a) This is a case filed at the Court of Appeal and follows a judgment passed by the trial judge that the appellant should compensate the respondent $318,288 in damages[1]. The respondent had brought a claim in negligence following an incident at the State High School on 5 December 2008 whereby he was assaulted by a student and sustained injuries leading to brain damage[2]. The allegations presented forward were that the school has failed to provide the teachers and the staff with the right information regarding T’s tendency towards violence even with minor provocation[3]. This was based on an earlier event 6 weeks ago whereby T was involved in another similar altercation with another student[4]. Following this judgment by the trial judge, the appellant then appealed against the decision on two key issues: the first one was that the judge had erred in the findings that the appellant might have breached the duty to care for the respondent, and secondly, the trial judge had failed to offer the relevant findings related to causation[5]. After a notice of contention was offered, it was indicated that the respondent agreed that the classroom teacher ought to have held various roles and steps towards the safety and welfare of the respondent, and the students as a whole[6]. b) First key issue is that the trial judge had erred in the findings that the appellant might have breached the duty to care for the respondent and Second key issue is that the trial judge had failed to establish relevant findings related to causation[7]. From the case, it was argued that the appellant had taken the relevant measures and precautions to ensure there was no harm on the side of the respondent[8]. There was the presentation that the institution has failed to take the necessary measures and precautions to inform the class teacher about the possible precautions and measures against any kind