Free Essay

Judiciary System in Malaysia

In:

Submitted By virginiawoodford
Words 3969
Pages 16
MALAYSIAN JUDICIAL STRUCTURE

THE SUPERIOR COURTS 1. The Federal Court
The Apex Court

The Federal Court is the highest judicial authority in the country. It was established pursuant to Article 121(2) of the
Federal Constitution. Its decision binds all the courts below. Prior to 1st January 1985, the superior courts system in
Malaysia was three-tiered, namely,

The Privy Council
The Supreme Court
The High Court Malaya and the High Court Borneo.

The Privy Council was the highest court of appeal for Malaysia until 31st December 1984. On 1st January 1985, all appeals from Malaysia to the Privy Council were abolished. In its place, the Supreme Court was established making it the final court of appeal in the country. The abolishment of appeals to the Privy Council resulted in a change from the three-tiered system of superior courts to a two-tiered system, which was the Supreme Court and the two (2) High Courts.
In 1994, a significant change took place in the Judiciaryw hen Parliament amended the Federal Constitution. With the amendment, the Court of Appeal was established. The Supreme Court was renamed the Federal Court. As a consequence, the three-tiered system of the superior courts was restored.

The Federal Court is headed by the Chief Justice. Prior to the amendment the post was known as the Lord President.

Members

According to Article 122(1) of the Federal Constitution, the Federal Court shall consist of the Chief Justice, the President of the Court of Appeal, the two Chief Judges of the two High Courts and seven other judges.

Appointment of Judges

Article 122B of the Federal Constitution provides for the appointment of the Chief Justice, the President of the Court of Appeal, the Chief Judges of the High Courts and the other judges of the Federal Court by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister, after consulting the Conference of Rulers. Before tendering his advice, the Prime Minister shall, except for the appointment of the Chief Justice, consult the Chief Justice.

Appointment of Additional Judges Article 122(1A) of the Federal Constitution, allows the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the Chief Justice, to appoint any person who has held high judicial office in Malaysia to be an additional judge of the Federal Court. This appointment may be for such purposes or for such period as may be determined by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

Composition

Every proceeding in the Federal Court is according to section 74 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, heard and disposed off by three judges or such greater uneven number of judges as the Chief Justice may in any particular case determine. In the absence of the Chief Justice the most senior member of the Court shall preside.

Article 122(2) of the Federal Constitution provides that the Chief Justice, if he considers that the interests of justice so require, may nominate a judge of the Court of Appeal other than the President of the Court of Appeal to sit as a judge in the Federal Court.

Sittings

The Court sits on such dates and at such places as the Chief Justice may from time to time direct. Normally the Federal Court sits at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya. However the Federal Court also goes on circuit to the major towns of Penang, Ipoh, Kota Bharu, Johor Bahru, Alor Setar, Kuantan, Malacca, Kuching and Kota Kinabalu (section 75 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Jurisdiction

Article 121(2) of the Federal Constitution confers the Federal Court with the following jurisdiction–

(a) to determine appeals from decisions of the Court of Appeal, of the High Court or a judge thereof;

(b) such original or consultative jurisdiction as is specified in Articles 128 and 130; and

(c) such other jurisdiction as may be conferred by or under federal law.

Criminal Appeals

The Federal Court may subject to section 87 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 hears and determines appeals against decisions of the Court of Appeal relating to any criminal matter decided by the High Court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction.

Civil Appeals

Section 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 provides that an appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal may be made to the Federal Court with with the leave of the Federal Court. Leave is only granted if–

(a) the decision of the Court of Appeal is in respect of any civil cause or matter decided by the High Court in exercise of its original jurisdiction where it involves a question of general principle of law decided for the first time or a question of importance upon which further argument and a decision of the Federal Court would be to public advantage; or

(b) the decision of the Court of Appeal is as to the effect of any provision of the Federal Constitution including the validity of any written law relating to any such provision.

(section 96(a) and (b) Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Original

The Federal Court has the exclusive jurisdiction to determine–

(a) any question whether a law made by Parliament or by the Legislature of a State is invalid on the ground that it makes provision with respect to a matter with respect to which Parliament or, the Legislature of the
State has no power to make laws; and

(b) disputes on any other question between States or between the Federation and any State.

(Article 128(1) of the Federal Constitution).

Referral

The referral jurisdiction of the Federal Court is provided for in Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution which reads—

“Without prejudice to any appellate jurisdiction of the Federal Court, where in any proceedings before another court a question arises as to the effect of any provision of this Constitution, the Federal Court shall have jurisdiction (subject to any rules of court regulating the exercise of that jurisdiction) to determine the question and remit the case to the other court to be disposed of in accordance with the determination.”

Advisory

The advisory jurisdiction of the Federal Court is provided for in Article 130 of the Federal Constitution which reads—

“The Yang di-Pertuan Agong may refer to the Federal Court for its opinion any question as to the effect of any provision of this Constitution which has arisen or appears likely to arise, and the Federal Court shall pronounce in open court its opinion on any question so referred to it.”

2. THE SPECIAL COURT
Constitution

The Special Court was established pursuant to Article 182 of the Federal Constitution to hear any action civil or criminal instituted by or against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or any of the nine Malay Rulers.

However, by Article 183 of Federal Constitution no action, civil or criminal, shall be instituted against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or any of the Rulers of States in respect of anything done or omitted to be done by him in his personal capacity except with the consent of the Attorney General personally.

Members

Article 182(1) of the Federal Constitution provides that the Special Court shall consist of the Chief Justice of the Federal Court, who shall be the Chairman, the Chief Judges of the two High Courts and two other persons who hold or have held office as judges of the Federal Court or the High Court appointed by the Conference of Rulers.

Jurisdiction

Article 182(3) of the Federal Constitution stipulates that the Special Court has an exclusive jurisdiction to try all offences committed in the Federation by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or any of the Rulers of the States and all civil cases by or against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or any of the Rulers of the States notwithstanding where the cause of action arose.

In addition to its exclusive jurisdiction, the Special Court also has the same jurisdiction and powers as are vested in the subordinate courts, the High Court and the Federal Court by the Federal Constitution.

Proceedings

The procedure (including the hearing of proceedings in camera) in civil or criminal cases and the law regulating evidence and proof in civil and criminal proceedings, the practice and procedure applicable in any proceedings in any subordinate court, the High Court and the Federal Court shall apply in any proceedings before the Special Court. The proceedings of the Special Court is decided by the opinion of the majority of the members.

Finality of decision

The decision of the Special Court is final and conclusive and cannot be challenged or called into question in any court on any ground.

Sittings

The Special Court may sit at the premises of the Federal Court located at the Palace of Justice, Putrajaya Wilayah Persekutuan on such dates and at such times as the Chief Justice may from time to time appoint.

3. THE COURT OF APPEAL
The Court of Appeal was established in 1994. It has–

(a) the jurisdiction to determine appeals from decisions of a High Court or a judge thereof; and

(b) such other jurisdiction as may be provided for under any federal law.

(Article 121(1B) of the Federal Constitution).

As from 1st January 2002 the number of judges was increased to fifteen by order of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (Article 122A(1) Federal Constitution).

Members

Article 122A(1) of the Federal Constitution provides that the Court of Appeal shall consist of the President of the Court of Appeal and fifteen Court of Appeal judges.

Appointment of Judges

Article 122B (2) and (4) of the Federal Constitution provides that the President of the Court of Appeal and the Court of Appeal judges shall be appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong acting on the advice of the Prime Minister, after consulting the Conference of Rulers. Before tendering his advice the Prime Minister shall consult the Chief Justice and the President of Court of Appeal.

Composition

Proceedings in the Court of Appeal are heard and disposed of by a panel of three judges or such greater uneven number of judges as the President of the Court of Appeal may determine (section 38 Courts of Judicature Act 1964). In accordance with Article 122A(2) of the Federal Constitution a judge of a High Court may sit as a judge of the Court of Appeal where the President of the Court of Appeal considers that the interests of justice so require. The judge shall be nominated for the purpose by the President after consulting the Chief Judge of that High Court.

Sittings

The Court of Appeal sits at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan. However, the President may, when he deems expedient, direct that any appeal proceeding be heard at any time and in any place in Malaysia (section 39 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Final Court

The Court of Appeal is the final court of appeal on matters decided by the High Court in its appellate or revisionary jurisdiction (sections 87 and 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Jurisdiction

Criminal

The Court of Appeal has the jurisdiction to hear and determine any criminal appeal against any decision by the High Court—

(a) made in the exercise of its original jurisdiction; and

(b) in the exercise of its appellate or revisionary jurisdiction on any criminal matter decided by the Sessions Court.

However, if it is an appeal from a decision of the High Court exercising its appellate or revisionary jurisdiction on any criminal matter that originated from a Magistrates’ Court then no further appeal to the Court of Appeal is permissible without leave of the Court of Appeal and such appeal must be confined only to questions of law which may have arisen in the course of the appeal or revision and the determination of which by the High Court has affected the event of the appeal or revision (section 50(1) & (2) Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Civil

The Court of Appeal has the jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from any judgment or order of any High Court in any civil cause or matter, whether made in the exercise of its original or of its appellate jurisdiction, subject to any written law regulating the terms and conditions upon which such appeals are brought (section 67 of the Courts of the Judicature Act 1964). However, no appeal shall be brought to the Court of Appeal in the following cases—

(a) if the amount or value of the subject matter of the claim is less than RM250,000/- except with the leave of the Court;

(b) the judgment or order is made by consent of parties;

(c) the judgment or order relates to costs only; and

(d) where by virtue of any written law the judgment or order of the High Court is final.

No appeal shall lie from a decision of a Judge in Chambers in a summary way on an interpleader summons, where the facts are not in dispute, except with leave of the Court (section 68 Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Specialized Panels

As appeals to the Court of Appeal are on the upsurge each year, sittings of the Court have also been increased. In order to expedite the disposal of appeals specialized panels have been constituted. The panels are as follows–

• Criminal Panel
• Commercial Panel
• Civil Panel
• Interlocutory Panel
• Leave to Appeal Panel
• Prerogative Writs Panel

Registry

The principal registry of the Court of Appeal is located at the Palace of Justice, Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan. It is headed by a Registrar and assisted by Deputy and Senior Assistant Registrars. Although all appeals from the High Courts are filed in the respective High Courts they are registered in the Court of Appeal Registry at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya.

4. THE HIGH COURTS
In Malaysia there are two High Courts having coordinate jurisdiction and status, that is the High Court in Malaya and the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak. The High Court in Malaya consists of a Chief Judge and forty-seven judges whilst High Court in Sabah and Sarawak consists of a Chief Judge and ten judges. (Articles 121(1) and 122AA(1) of the Federal Constitution).

Appointment of Judges

The judges are appointed under Article 122B (2) and (4) of the Federal Constitution by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister after consulting the Conference of Rulers. Before the Prime Minister tenders his advice to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, the Prime Minister shall consult the Chief Justice and the Chief Judge of that Court. A person is qualified for appointment as a judge of any High
Courts if he is a citizen and for the 10 years preceding his appointment he has been an advocate of those courts or has been a member of the judicial and legal service of the Federation or of the legal service of a State. The appointment of a judicial commissioner is provided for under Article 122AB of the Federal Constitution. A judicial commissioner who is appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the Prime Minister after consulting the Chief Justice shall have the same powers and enjoy the same immunities as if he had been a judge of the High Court.

Sittings

The High Courts sit at such times and at such places as the Chief Judges shall from time to time appoint (section 19 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Jurisdiction

Criminal

The High Court has jurisdiction to try all offences committed–

(a) within local jurisdiction;

(b) on the high seas on board any ship or on any aircraft registered in Malaysia;

(c) by any citizen or any permanent resident on the high seas on board any ship or on any aircraft;

(d) by any person on high seas where the offence is piracy by the law of nations; and

(e) offences under Chapter VI of the Penal Code and those offences of extra-territorial in nature.

(Section 22 of the Courts Judicature Act 1964).

The High Court may pass any sentence allowed by law (section 22(2) of the Courts of Judicature Act). Cases involving capital punishment are tried in the High Court. However, under special circumstances cases not involving capital punishment may be heard in the High Court on the application by the Public Prosecutor (section 418A Criminal Procedure Code).

Civil

The High Court has jurisdiction to try all proceedings where –

(a) the cause of action arose;

(b) the defendant or one of several defendants resides or has his place of business;

(c) the facts on which the proceedings are based exist or are alleged to have occurred; or

(d) any land the ownership of which is disputed is situated,

within the local jurisdiction of the Court and notwithstanding anything contained in section 23 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, in any case where all parties consent in writing within the local jurisdiction of the other High Court.

The High Courts also have specific jurisdiction including–

(a) jurisdiction under any written law relating to divorce, matrimonial causes, bankruptcy or companies;

(b) the same jurisdiction and authority in relation to matters of admiralty as is had by the High Court of Justice in England under the United Kingdom Supreme Court Act
1981;

(c) jurisdiction to appoint and control guardians of infant and generally over the person and property of infants;

(d) jurisdiction to appoint and control guardians and keepers of the person and estates of idiots, mentally disordered persons and persons of unsound mind; and

(e) jurisdiction to grant probates of will and testaments and letters of administration of estates of deceased persons leaving property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court and to alter or revoke such grants.

(Section 24 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Appellate

The High Court has the power to hear appeals from the subordinate courts. However not all decisions of the subordinate courts are appealable to the High Court. No appeal shall lie to the High Court from a decision of a subordinate court in any civil cause or matter where the amount in dispute or the value of the subject matter is ten thousand ringgit or less except where it involves a question of law (sections 26-29 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Revisionary Power

The High Court may exercise powers of revision in respect of criminal proceedings and matters in the subordinate courts in accordance with any law for the time being in force relating to criminal procedure. The High Court may call for and examine the record of any civil proceedings before any subordinate court for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any decision recorded or passed, and as to the regularity of any proceedings of any such subordinate court (sections 31 and 32 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964).

Specialization

The courts in Malaysia are heading towards specialization. This move is fuelled by the desire to provide the best service to the public, in the form of dispensing justice fairly, speedily and effectively. In the major towns where there are two or more High Court judges, specialization had already taken place.

Specialization in the Kuala Lumpur High Courts

In the High Court in Malaya at Kuala Lumpur, specialization is done by categorising the High Court into Criminal, Civil, Commercial, Appellate and Special Powers and Family Divisions.

(i) Criminal Division

The Criminal Division hears cases in the exercise of its original, appellate or revisionary jurisdiction on any criminal matter from the subordinate courts.

(ii) Civil Division

The Civil Division hears among others, actions on foreclosure, tort and contracts for services.

(iii) Commercial Division

The Commercial Division hears among others, admiralty, insurance, companies winding-up, agency, banking, intellectual property and Specific Relief Act cases. There is further specialization in the Commercial Division, in that, all Islamic Banking (Muamalat) cases are heard by a judge in this Division, who in addition, also hears other commercial cases.

(iv) The Appellate and Special Powers Division

The Appellate and Special Powers Division hears appeals from the subordinate courts, cases under the Legal Profession Act 1976 and judicial review of administrative actions and under specific Acts.

(v) Family Division

Formerly, the Family Court was part of the Civil Division. Now, it is a Division by itself and hearing matrimonial cases under the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976.

Deputy Registrars and Senior Assistant Registrars

High Court judges are assisted by Deputy Registrars and Senior Assistant Registrars who are appointed under section 10 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, on the recommendation of the Chief Justice. The Deputy Registrars and Senior Assistant Registrars hear interlocutory matters in Chambers, do research for the judges, and also perform administrative duties, such as overseeing the running of their respective courts’ registries.

THE SUBORDINATE COURTS

Subordinate courts consist of the Sessions Court, the Magistrate’s Court and the Court for Children. A Sessions Court is presided by a Sessions Court judge while a Magistrate’s Court and a Court for Children are presided by magistrates.

1. Sessions Court
A Sessions Court has the jurisdiction to hear both criminal and civil cases. At present there are eighty seven Sessions Court judges throughout Malaysia.

Appointment

A Sessions Court judge is appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the recommendation of the respective Chief Judges
(section 59 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948).

Sittings

The court sits everyday except on public holidays.

Jurisdiction

Criminal

A Sessions Court has the jurisdiction to try all offences other than offences punishable with death. Except for the sentence of death, a Sessions Court may pass any sentence including natural life sentence (sections 63 and 64 of the Subordinate
Courts Act 1948).

2. Magistrates' Court
The Magistrates’ Courts have jurisdiction to hear both criminal and civil cases. At present there are one hundred and fifty one Magistrates throughout Malaysia.

Appointment

For the Federal Territory, magistrates are appointed by Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the recommendation of the Chief Judge. In each of the States, magistrates are appointed by the State Authority on the recommendation of the respective Chief
Judges (section 78 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948). Sittings The court sits everyday except on public holidays.

Jurisdiction

Criminal

A First Class Magistrate has jurisdiction to try all offences for which the maximum sentence does not exceed ten years imprisonment or with fine only (section 85 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948).

Civil

A First Class Magistrate has the jurisdiction to hear all actions and suits of a civil nature where the amount in dispute or value of the subject matter does not exceed RM25,000.00 (section 90 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948).

3. Court For Children
A Court for Children was established under the Child Act 2001. Section 2 of the Act defines “Child” as a person under the age of eighteen years, and for the purposes of criminal proceedings, means a person who has attained the age of ten.

Composition

The Court shall consist of a magistrate and shall, as the case may require, be assisted by two advisors (section 11(2) Child Act 2001).

Sittings

No person shall be present in any sitting of this court except among others members and officers of the court and the children who are parties to the case including their parents or guardians (section 12 of the Child Act 2001).

Sentence or Orders

If a child is found guilty of an offence, he shall not be imprisoned, but among others, may either be sent to an approved school or released on bail. For capital offences, the child shall be detained in prison at the pleasure of the Ruler (sections 91-97 of the Child Act 2001).

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Body of Government in Malaysia

...INTRODUCTION After Malaysia achieved its independence on 31st August 1957, it adopted federal system of government. A federal government is formed by a combination of states or provinces in a federation, give some of their powers to the federal government and some of them are remained. Thus, this lead to the existence of more than one level of government; federal level, state level and local level have formed the federal system of government. Malaysia has 13 states and three federal territories. As Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy, Federal Constitution (FC) becomes the most supreme law of Malaysia and everyone must adhere to it. The concept of separation of power divided the power of government into three branches as stated in the FC; Executive (Part IV Chapter 3, Articles 39-43), Legislature (Part IV, Chapter 4, Articles 44-65) and Judiciary (Part IX Articles 121-131). Basically, the Executive body will formulate policy and ensures it is properly implemented, the Legislative will make law and the Judiciary will apply the law and settle dispute. In order of superiority, executive body is being the first, followed by legislature and lastly the judiciary. Here, the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary will be discussed and elaborated further to gain more understanding about the body of government respectively. THE EXECUTIVE. Executive generally defined as a body of government that is responsible for executing the laws, determine the general rules, appoint...

Words: 2121 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Param

...(Dewan Rakyat, Wednesday): The second major disconnect between the reality and rhetoric of reform in the past 17 months concerns the system of justice. The administration is suffering from a new denial syndrome, pretending that the over-a-decade-long crisis of the judiciary which plunged the credibility, reputation and legitimacy of the system of justice in Malaysia to an all-time low when the international judicial and legal community issued its terrible indictment in a report entitled “Justice in Jeopardy: Malaysia 2000” had not happened or was history and could never recur in the future. At the 12th Malaysian Law Conference in December 2003, former Finance Minister, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah quoted an anecdote in the nineties to illustrate his lack confidence in the Malaysian system of justice, how he was advised by his lawyer and a former Supreme Court judge “that it would be very difficult to get justice in my own country, especially when my adversaries were closely connected to the powers that be” and not to resort to the Malaysian courts when his political enemies alleged that he was responsible for the BMF scandal. But “the opportunity came when the same allegation was published in a number of foreign newspapers” and he hesitated no longer and filed actions in the appropriate foreign courts against those newspapers and cleared his name. Let me add my anecdote. In January 2000, I consulted two jurists who had held the highest judicial office in the land...

Words: 794 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Sources of Law

...enforced by law through sanctioned. Public law Public law is a law which governs the relationship between individual and the state. Public law can be further divided into constitutional law and criminal law. - Constitutional law Body of law which defines the relationship of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. - Criminal Law It is a body of rules and statute that defines the conduct prohibited by the government. In Malaysia, the penal code is a main source of criminal law. It covers most criminal offenses and provides relevant penalties where relevant acts are breached .It actually codifies various acts committed by individual against the state such as murder, cheating, forgery , rape, and other criminal offenses. Common law A law that derive from case law (precedent) and statute. It is accusatorial with an emphasize remedies. It form a basic right of English law and it can be found in the U.S , other commonwealth nation including Australia, Canada, Singapore, New Zealand, parts of Africa , India and Pakistan. Malaysia derives their legal system from the common law as a result of the British colonization where their legal principles are develops by judges through case law. Common law is a judge-made law which is different in manner from the way the Parliament enacts the legislations. When a Parliament enacts legislations in most cases, it creates a comprehensive and complete frame-work of rules that governs...

Words: 1838 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Moral

...Malaysian Studies – Revision Notes The Japanese Occupation The Japanese occupied Malaya for only 3 ½ years (from 15 Feb 1942 to 15 August 1945) Had a great impact on the country – the conquest of the whole of Malaya was fast and effective The attack started from two directions, from the East and the West After landing in Kota Bharu, the Japanese soldiers rushed to Kuantan and then to Mersing. On 12 Dec 1941, Jitra was captured, followed by Penang Island and Slim River. In Jan 1942, the Japanese soldiers entered Kuala Lumpur, and both the Japanese military troops met in Johore Bahru On 15 Feb 1942, Singapore fell to the Japanese army. The main aim of the Japanese was to establish a New Great East Asia government. The Japanese promised to declare independence in certain South East Asian countries. The Japanese Victory The Japanese military conquered Malaya quite easily although the British military was equipped with better firearms and were greater in number than the Japanese There are a few lessons to be learnt from this. 1. The British were not prepared for the war. They did not anticipate the Japanese attack from the north. 2. The fact was the Japanese had a comprehensive plan in which they had a network of spies in Malaya. 3. In addition to that, the Japanese soldiers were in excellent form because of intensive training and were led by capable and experience leaders (such as Yamashita and Tsuji). 4. The Japanese were enthusiastic and inspired to fight...

Words: 8065 - Pages: 33

Premium Essay

Rule of Law

...equity upon every person in respect to the law. Lastly which is a general principle that courts are the determine factor of right of private person. This prove that common law courts represents the greatest protection for any individual rights.” According to Hilare Barnett, “the organs of the currently do not exercise the primary function of the others (minister do not have legislative power). It however the interrelation between the organs serves as a check and balance mechanism, where it allows the organs to scrutinize the function of the other.”This in turn uphold the first conception of Dicey, which is to prevent arbitrary use of power. As one of the check and balance mechanism stated by Hilare Barnett. One essential function of the judiciary is to protect citizen against unlawful acts of the executive. This is also in respect to Dicey third conception where courts protects the rights of an individual. The case of such protection was shown in the case of Entick v Carrington where the state could not claim...

Words: 2939 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Stuff

...Introduction Malaysia consists of a federation of fourteen states. Article 4(1) of the Malaysian Constitution states that the supreme law of the federation is the Constitution. Malaysia follows the Westminster model of government. The Cabinet headed by the Prime Minister exercises executive power. Both the prime minister and Cabinet answers to the parliament. The Monarch appoints the Prime Minister. He is the leader of the ruling party in the lower house (House of Representative) of the Parliament. Members of the lower house are elected for fiveyear terms. Members of the upper house (Senate) consist of two senators elected by each state legislative assembly and the Monarch appoints the rest. Senators serve for six years. The House of Representatives is the main legislative body. The Senate only has delaying powers over legislation. Members of the executive are also members of the legislature. The executive practically makes law. The executive and legislative branch in Malaysia could be conveniently be categorised together. The term executive and legislature in the Malaysian context actually refers to the same entity exercising different functions. This is coupled by the fact that the ruling government has been able to maintain a two-third majority in Parliament ever since independence. Several significant legislations such as the regular use of Emergency powers under Article 150 of the Constitution and the Internal Security Act 1960 has led to the erosion of civil liberties...

Words: 2993 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Justice System

...deprived section of the community, and does not possess adequate social and material resources, is bound to be at a disadvantage as against a strong and powerful opponent under the century-oldjustice system. The laws of most nations recognise the equal status of all people before the law, the presumption of their innocence (until proven guilty) and their right to legal representation. The Mobile Court, created to save time, reduce legal and other expenses, goes to the place of offence and provides justice speedily. Mobile Court is the best option today to get the lowest cost law services and fastest court judgment. Developed countries are even considering introducing mobile phone SMS Law and Order coordination between lawyers, judge and common masses, web page and technical solution systems. Mobile Internet Devices of proposed SMS law and Order programming through e-court will be a most advanced justice delivery system at very low cost. In 2007, Chief Justice of India inaugurated the mobile court as an endeavour to make the judicial system accessible to remote and backward areas and said, "People generally go to courts to getjustice but today with mobile courts, the courts will come to the people." 6 Pages Independence of Judiciar ...Independence of Judiciary in Australia a) How is the... 3 Pages Independence of Judiciar ...Kingdom and its predecessor states, judicial...

Words: 377 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

International Marketing

...2.0 CULTURE OF MALAYSIA The culture of Malaysia draws on the varied cultures of the different people of Malaysia. The first people to live in the area were indigenous tribes that still remain; they were followed by the Malays, who moved there from mainland Asia in ancient times. Chinese and Indian cultural influences made their mark when trade began with those countries, and increased with immigration to Malaysia. Other cultures that heavily influenced that of Malaysia include Persian, Arabic, and British. The many different ethnicities that currently exist in Malaysia have their own unique and distinctive cultural identities, with some crossover. Arts and music have a long tradition in Malaysia, with Malay art dating back to the Malay sultanates. Traditional art was centred around fields such as carving, silversmithing, and weaving. Islamic taboos restricted artwork depicting humans until the mid-20th century. Performing arts and shadow puppet shows are popular, and often show Indian influences. Various influences can be seen in architecture, from individual cultures in Malaysia and from other countries. Large modern structures have been built, including the tallest twin buildings in the world, the Petronas Twin Towers. Malaysian music has a variety of origins, and is largely based around percussion instruments. Much early Malaysian literature was based on Indian epics, which remained unchanged even as Malays converted to Islam; this has expanded in recent decades. English...

Words: 1687 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Blaaaa

...INTRODUCTION State government is a form of government that rules a state in each of 13 states in the federation of Malaysia. It is also the second level of government in Malaysian government hierarchy. Just like federal government, state government too, does adopt the Westminster Parliamentary system from the United Kingdom. It is also further divided into three branches of government bodies or machineries. Namely executive, legislative, and judiciary. These components are the ones that are responsible in governing and administrating the state. As been stated in the Federal Constitution, the state government has certain powers over some matters related to the state that the federal government has no authority over those matters at all. 1 THE ROLES OF STATE GOVERNMENT State government practices the similar system to the federal government. Consists of three bodies, each of them carries different functions and roles towards implementing the state’s policies and serving the people. For example, the executive components of state of Sarawak consists of TYT (Tuan Yang Terutama) or also known as the Governor of Sarawak as the head of state. The role of the Governor is similar to the states that have Sultans. It is mainly ceremonial. The governor has the power to appoint the chief minister and to give consent to dissolve...

Words: 1340 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Al Barakah

...About Al Baraka |   | Al Baraka Islamic Bank B.S.C. (c) - Bahrain (AIB - Bahrain) established 1984 in Bahrain and up the years has pioneered the development of Islamic banking and finance. The Bank is registered with the Bahrain Ministry of Industry &, Commerce CR no. 14400 and is licensed by Central Bank of Bahrain (CBB) as an Islamic Retail Bank, with an authorized capital of US$ 600 Million, of which US$ 122 Million has been issued and fully paid.AIB - Bahrain is one of the Banking Units of Al Baraka Banking Group's (ABG). ABG is a Bahraini Joint Stock Company listed on Bahrain and Dubai stock exchanges and one of the well-known leading international Islamic banks.  It has been rated by Standard & Poor's as BBB- with a short-term rating of A-3. ABG offers retail, corporate and investment banking and treasury services strictly in accordance with the principles of the Sharia'a. The authorized capital of ABG is US$1.5 billion, while the total equity amounts to about US$ 1.8 billion.  The Group has a wide geographical presence in the form of subsidiary banking Units in 14 countries, which in turn provide their services through more than 400 branches.  These banking Units are Jordan Islamic Bank/ Jordan, Al Baraka Islamic Bank - Bahrain, Al Baraka Bank Limited/ Pakistan, Banque Al Baraka D'Algerie/ Algeria, Al Baraka Bank Sudan/ Sudan, Al Baraka Bank Ltd/ South Africa, Al Baraka Bank Lebanon/ Lebanon, Al Baraka Bank Tunisia/ Tunisia, Al Baraka Bank Egypt/ Egypt, Al Baraka...

Words: 2512 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Law of Unwritten

...the written Federal and State Constitutions. Unwritten law is found in cases decided by the courts, local customs, etc. Unwritten law comprises of the following. * English law The common law of England does apply in Malaysia. However, not all of England’s common law forms part of Malaysian Law. Section 3 (1) of the Civil Law Act 1956 ( Revised 1972) provides that, in Peninsular Malaysia, the courts shall apply the common law of England as well as equity as administered in England on April 1956. In the states of Sabah and Sarawak, the common law of England and the rules of equity together with the statutes of general application shall be applied However, the application of the English law throughout Malaysia is subject to two limitations: a) It is applied only in the absence of local statutes on the particular subjects. Local law takes precedence over English law as the latter is meant to fill the gaps (lacuna) in the local system. b) Only that part of the English law is suited to local circumstances will be applied. The provision to Section 3(1) of the Civil Law Act, 1956 is authority for this. It states at the common law, rules of equity and statutes of general application shall be applied so far only as the circumstances of the States of Malaysia and their respective inhabitants permit, and subject to such qualifications as local circumstances render necessary. The reason for this provision is that, in a nation of diverse races...

Words: 1120 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Political Leaders Are Only Responsible for the Political Oppression in Bangladesh

... Rana Plaza, seven murder in Narayangong, Sagor-Runy killing? Surely you have heard it, but question is can law enforce agency do anything to ensure the justice? The answer will be no and now the question is why does it happen? The answer will be for the political leaders but the law enforces agency cannot do anything to stop it and they have no power on the politician to lessen it. For that reason mass people of Bangladesh and the opposition leaders also face political oppression and they have no way to overcome it. That is why, I strongly believe that, political leaders are only responsible for political oppression in Bangladesh as they are control over law enforces agencies, they have extra privilege and they also influence the judiciary system. First of all I want to say that politicizing of law enforce agency is the first reason for the political oppression of Bangladesh. According to Ahmad (2013), the political, democratic and basic constitutional rights of the political parties and mass people are denied and the senior political leaders are routinely arrested by police, but we know that the primary duty of the law enforces agency is to maintain and control law and order within the country and it is the constitutional mandate (Article 27 of the constitution) unfortunately the result of the politicizing law enforces agency the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), Police and Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) have been acting...

Words: 2107 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Mmu Buisness & Society

...thoroughly. 2. The Instructions are stated in detail in this booklet and must be observed. Late assignments will be penalized. The ‘water-marked’ date on the envelope of the assignment send in by students will be taken as the date of posting. 3. The course-schedule is included in here. You are to follow the course outline stated in this Coursework Booklet. DISTANCE EDUCATION TRIM 2, 2009/2010 (8 STUDY WEEKS) 1. About the instructor ➢ Name: Afizal @ Mohd Afizal B Mohd Aris ➢ Qualification: Master of Malaysia Studies (Government and Politics), University of Malaya ➢ Room No: R 3045, FCM Building ➢ Contact No.: 03-8312 5774 ➢ Email Address: afizal@mmu.edu.my ➢ Consultation Hours: via email 2. Course Overview 1. An introductory study of the earliest history until the formation of Federation of Malaysia. 2. A discussion on the system and structure on the country’s administration and constitution 3. A synopsis on the Malaysian Government premier policies in terms of development, social, and politics and its commitment towards the region and international level. 3. Course Objective The objective of this subject is to develop Malaysians who are loyal, patriotic and visionary. The aim of this class is also to produce Malaysians who are proud of their country and able to meet daily challenges so that they can live harmoniously as well as able to appreciate and understand Malaysia’s...

Words: 1079 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Rukun Negara

...MESSAGE RT. HON. DATO' SERI ABDULLAH HAJI AHMAD BADAWI PRIME MINISTER OF MALAYSIA Malaysia has been a successful developing country and is forging ahead to become a developed nation in its own mould. In order to be more successful, our nation has to be managed effectively and its weaknesses and shortcomings have to be overcome. A major challenge it has to address in this endeavor is the strengthening of ethics and integrity. The government has implemented the Prime Minister's Directive No. I of 1998 which aims to enhance the integrity of the management in government administration. This has been done namely through the setting up of the Integrity Management Committee in all ministries, departments and agencies of the Federal Government as well as the State Governments. However, there is no mechanism thus far to involve other sectors, such as the private sector, political parties, non-government organizations, religious groups, the media, women, youth and students in an integrated and coordinated movement to enhance integrity. It is in this regard that the government has formulated the National Integrity Plan (NIP) which will act as a master plan to guide all of the above sectors. The formulation of the NIP is predicated upon the spirit and principles of the Federal Constitution, the philosophy and principles of the Rukun Negara as well as the aspirations of Vision 2020. The overall objective of the NIP is to fulfill the fourth challenge of Vision 2020, namely, "to establish...

Words: 6682 - Pages: 27

Premium Essay

Accountability from the Perspective of Governence

...Teknologi MARA Terengganu, 23000 Dungun, Terengganu Tel: 60-12-222-7659 E-mail: faiziiu@yahoo.com Nadhrah A. Kadir Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies Universiti Teknologi MARA Terengganu, 23000 Dungun, Terengganu Tel: 60-12-250-4302 E-mail: nadhr292@tganu.uitm.edu.my Kamaruzaman Jusoff (Corresponding author) TropAIR, Faculty of Forestry, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia Tel: 60-3-8946-7176 E-mail: kjusoff@yahoo.com Abstract Generally, accountability is often associated with a concept of answerability, responsibility, blameworthiness, liability etc. Commonly, the concept of accountability from the perspective of governance is the means to control the public administration in democratic countries. The classification of public accountability is normally seen in terms of external and internal mechanisms. Hence, this paper shall discuss both mechanisms with special reference to Malaysia. The discussion also focuses on the limitation of each mechanism which rendered some problems to the concept of accountability in Malaysia. Keywords: Accountability, Governance, Public administration, 1. Introduction Accountability is often associated with such concepts as answerability, responsibility, blameworthiness, liability and other terms associated with the expectation of accounting (Note 1). An individual who is accountable will be on his own commit to do or implement something if he feels that an occurrence or...

Words: 10290 - Pages: 42