Free Essay

Keynes

In:

Submitted By reenarena
Words 3095
Pages 13
Table of Contents Why were Keynesian ideas revolutionary? 2 How does Keynes theory work? 4 What economic conditions in your news article that require government intervention? Do you have faith that this intervention will be effective? 7 How have the economists’ views on Keynesian economics changed over time? 9 Is Keynesian economics dead today? 12 Works Cited 14 Appendix A 15 Why you should be wary of the Japanese “revival” 15

Why were Keynesian ideas revolutionary?
Keynesian economics is a macroeconomic theory developed by John Maynard Keynes, who is a British economist. According to Keynesian theory, government intervention plays an important role in the economy, and focuses on short-term goals. It is used mostly in times of recession, inflation, unemployment to stabilize the business cycle, therefore active government policy is required and government spending is a good way to put money back into the GDP. (hupii.com) Keynes is famous for his simple explanation for the cause of the Great Depression during the 1930s. His idea was based on a circular flow of money, which states that when spending increases in an economy, earnings will also increase, and the outcome it will lead to even more spending and earnings (economic growth). His ideas had led to a revolution in economic thought. (martinfrost.ws) During the period of World War 2, United States president has spent enormously huge on defence which has that helped revive the U.S economy. Besides that, Paul Volcker has overcome the recession on 1980 – 1982 with Keynesian method. He had applied the technique of increasing interest rates and constricting the money supply, as the results the economic is recover. On the other hand, Keynes claimed that depending on markets to obtain full employment was not a good concept. Therefore, Keynes has removed the classical economic theory and introduced more general theory to ensure the full employment. According to Keynes, if the incomes were inflexible, those employees would be turn down to consider taking the lower nominal income, even though the price has lower by larger amount. This also will cause surplus of income to occur when the income level cannot be lower. Therefore, to overcome this, the solution is to increase the money supply by Federal Reserve. This is to ensure the increase in spending which will lead to more job opportunity. However, there is different when it comes to inflation, which the money supply needs to be constricted while during recession the money supply needs to be increase. Keynes is also well known as “the father of modern economics” and even the Keynes’ criticizers had named him as the greatest and most influential economist of 20th century. The Keynesian Revolution was introduced and it was known as neo-Keynesianism. The Keynes’s Revolution is related to issue of determining the level of employment and to the point that employment is a function of demand, but not supply.

How does Keynes theory work?
During recession, the government should adopt expansionary fiscal policy. Expansionary fiscal policy involves increasing government spending or reducing taxes. When there is recessionary gap, expansionary fiscal policy can be used. Recessionary gap exists when equilibrium GDP is below full-employment GDP. There is insufficient total spending which contracts or depresses the economy. This is where expansionary fiscal policy works by increasing government spending or reducing tax.

Figure 2.1 Recessionary Gap Figure 2.2 Inflationary Gap

In Figure 2.1, when it is assumed that yf is $100 billion and ye is $50 billion, the GDP gap would be $50 billion. However, the government does not need to increase its spending by $50 billion to remove recessionary gap. It is because of multiplier effect. Small increase in government spending would generate larger increase in real GDP.
Multiplier= 11-MPC = 1MPS
Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) determines the magnitude of the multiplier. MPC is the fraction of any change in disposable income spent on consumption. The size of the MPC and the multiplier are directly related. Therefore, the larger the MPC, the greater the multiplier will be. Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) is inversely related to the multiplier. Smaller MPS would give larger multiplier. Therefore, assuming MPC is 0.8, the following is the calculation related to multiplier.

Multiplier= 11-MPC= 11-0.8=5
∆ real GDP= Multiplier × ∆ in initial spending
$100-50billions =5 × ∆ in intial spending
∆ in initial spending=$10 billions

Due to multiplier effect, the government just needs to spend $10 billion to close the recessionary gap.
During inflation, the government should adopt contractionary fiscal policy. Contrary to expansionary fiscal policy, it involves decreasing government spending or increasing taxes. When there is inflationary gap, contractionary fiscal policy can be used. Inflationary gap exists when equilibrium GDP is above full-employment GDP. There is excessive total spending which inflates the economy. This is where contractionary fiscal policy works.
However, there are some criticisms on Keynes’ multiplier effect. Keynes assumed that the price be fixed in his AE Model. However, in reality, price is not fixed; therefore, it is not a realistic model. In addition, using AD-AS Model, which allows the price levels to change, the multiplier effect is less potential; the effect is smaller than it would be if the price level were fixed. As shown in the Figure 2.3 below, an increase in investment will increase aggregate planned expenditure, but as price level rises, it will somewhat dampen aggregate planned expenditure. (McConnell & Brue)

Figure 2.3 Multiplier effect on AD-AS Model

What economic conditions in your news article that require government intervention? Do you have faith that this intervention will be effective?
Through the article, ‘Why you should be wary of Japanese revival’ that we read are regarding to the economy deflation in Japan. Deflation is a general prices decline which is caused by reduction in the supply of money.
Due to economy deflation, this condition which can lead to Japan nation does not enough using of money. The government has to spending money on their other projects as well as payment income for the public works. Besides that, Bank of Japan has to spend amount of money to purchase of financial assets. This situation actually can affect to the economy become worst. Japan nation also has to perform trading activities with other countries where the country currency is too strong than Japan. This condition is more burdens to government as they should spent more money on the import trading which the cost of import is higher.
Based on that situation above, the government spending is too high can bring the effects to their own country which is called budget deficit. Japan nation has to faces the problem such as high debt where Japan borrowed money from other country, poor corporate profitability, loss competitiveness because Japan currency excessive strongly and increase unemployment. (McConnell & Brue)
The articles suggest that this intervention will be effective. As we see, Japanese are afraid that banks will collapse so they prefer to buy (Japanese) Treasury bonds instead of saving their money in a bank account. So it means the money is not available for lending and therefore economic growth. The rate depresses consumption, but does not appear in the economy in an efficient form to spur new investment. (White, 2012)
Japan imports Chinese and other countries' inexpensive consumable goods, when the good product due to lower wages and inexpensive raw materials, many of which reached all time real price minimums in the world. Thus, prices of imported products are decreasing. So the local producers must match these prices in order to remain competitive. However the central bank needs to ease monetary policy more aggressively to help end deflation. (international economics)

How have the economists’ views on Keynesian economics changed over time?
The person who critics Keynesianism is Robert Lucas. Firstly, recession is self-correcting as when everyone is hoarding money, soon recession will happen. Recession will cause a cut in prices and labour wage. This means that the purchasing power had strengthen, which is the same as increase in monetary policy.
Secondly, economic indicators are both available at the same time to government and private businesses. Government will increase the money supply and private business as well will just reduce their prices. This will offset the effect. Therefore, Robert Lucas claims that government intervention will just interrupt the economy and therefore should not intervene. However, it is proven to be wrong. First, business owner are irrational and does not follow all the economic indicators to set price. Only economist will track the economic indicator and try to make the market efficient by changing the price. Secondly, recessions last for years, which is far longer than people's ignorance of their onset. Lucas and his followers searched for every model that would keep businessmen aware of the leading economic indicators and yet ignorant of the fact that they were in a recession.
Over times, the major critic for Keynes economic is from Milton Friedman also known as Monetarist. Monetarist accepts the definition of Keynes’ recession definition, but disagrees with the cure. He argued that government should butt out of the business of expanding and contracting the money supply as the money supply should keep it steady and only expand slightly each year to allow for healthy economic growth. This policy is named monetarism. During the 70s, Monetarism reached the peak. However, in the Great Britain during 1980s, monetarism is proved to be a disaster. The Bank of England tried its best to make it work. According to monetarism theory, it should enjoy low inflation and high stability, but it was totally opposite. Although at that time the inflation had come down, but this is because of the rising of unemployment. This is not healthy for the economic. At last, Bank of England had abolished the idea of Monetarism. Keynes economics do have some supporter as well, such as Alban William Housego `Bill' Phillips. He developed the Phillip Curve which illustrate the relationship between unemployment and inflation rate. He was influenced by Keynes that full employment and stability of price have no conflict. When an economy is below full employment, aggregate demand will not affect inflation. The Phillips Curve shows an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment in an economy, which revised the classic Keynesian model.

Illustration of Phillips Curve.

Is Keynesian economics dead today? Keynesian economics is still used today. The global financial crisis in 2008-2009 showed that many economists and policymakers have abandoned the concept of free market and moved towards Keynesian economics. Some countries such as United States are using Keynesian economics through government stimulus programs. The stimulus programs are about the massive infusions of cash from government for infrastructure programs, green energy and education. It is to prevent the unemployment and get the economy working again. The largest fiscal stimulus is Barrack Obama’s stimulus package of $878 billion in 2009. (Farrell & Quiggin, 2012) In 2009, some of the Europe countries were seeing signs of recovery when they had implemented the fiscal stimulus package. There was also a rise in consumer confidence and business, especially in the emerging economics such as Brazil. The economy of Europe can get working again because the government responses according to Keynesian theory that markets do not self-correct automatically and the management policies are needed to revive the economy.
Besides, China is one of the countries that launch the fiscal stimulus package according to the Keynesian economics. It focuses on the compensation for the decline in aggregate demand due to the reduction in global demand. In 2009, there were signs of recovery in government and private investors of China such as increasing in commodity prices. It proved that the government had succeeded in using state-owned banks to inject liquidity into the real economy.
President Barack Obama has appointed self‐described Keynesians as some of his chief economic advisers, such as Christina Romer. Another Obama economic adviser, Larry Summers, “grew up in a Keynesian household” though he later came to believe that “Keynesian theory was not so much wrong as incomplete.” (Pearlstein) Keynesian economics has existed for many years and it has a great impact not only to economists but also the policymakers. Many economists nowadays have shift to Keynesian economics. Some governments also make the policies regarding to Keynesian view. This is because they believe that the Keynesian economics is more accurate. (Blinder)

Works Cited hupii.com. (n.d.). A REVIEW OF KEYNESIAN THEORY . Retrieved February 2013, from http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/Keynesianism.htm martinfrost.ws. (n.d.). Keynesian economics . Retrieved February 2013, from martinfrost.ws: http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/keynesian_economics.html
McConnell, C., & Brue, S. economics: Principles, Problems and Policies. Irwin McGeaw-Hill.
White, S. (2012, December 17). Deflation a Determined Foe in Japan . Retrieved February 2013, from new york times: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/business/global/deflation-a-determined-foe-in-japan.html?_r=2& international economics. (n.d.). Foreign Exchange Intervention . Retrieved February 2013, from international economics: http://intl.econ.cuhk.edu.hk/topic/index.php?did=9
Farrell, H., & Quiggin, J. (2012). Consensus, Dissensus and Economic Ideas: The Rise and Fall of Keynesianism During the Economic Crisis.
Pearlstein, S. Friedman Debunked the Gospel of Keynes. The Washington Post.
Blinder, A. S. Keynesian Economics

Appendix A
Why you should be wary of the Japanese “revival”
FE Alpha Manager David Coombs, who heads up the Rathbone Multi-Asset range, explains why he is unconvinced by the recent optimism surrounding Japanese equities.
By David Coombs, Rathbones 
Wednesday February 27, 2013 Since Japan’s bubble burst in 1990, investors have been repeatedly drawn to the prospect of a fundamental turnaround in its economy, only to be disappointed as it sputters and returns to deflation.
If Abeonomics is successful, then it may well represent the catalyst Japan has been waiting for to regain some competitive stature. But even then, and accounting for very long-term economic drivers such as population and productivity growth, Japan’s potential remains precarious without fundamental reforms.
Over the last few months, expectations for the Japanese economy have been raised following prime minister Shinzo Abe’s move towards aggressive monetary easing and big fiscal spending.
Abe's cabinet has approved a ¥20trn – or £140bn – fiscal stimulus package, to be spent on public works and other government projects.
The package is expected to create 600,000 jobs and spur a 2 per cent increase in real economic growth. As a result, investors have expressed renewed interest in Japanese equities.
The Bank of Japan has also switched to an open-ended commitment to purchase financial assets, starting in 2014, and bowed to government pressure to change the inflation target from 1 to 2 per cent.
It is hoped these measures will help Japan emerge from a prolonged bout of deflation and tackle the excessively strong Yen which has plagued the economy.
The sheer mention of these policies has seen the Yen fall against the US dollar, approaching ¥90 to $1 for the first time since 2010.
Since the Japanese bubble burst in the early 1990s, policymakers and politicians have been branded the main culprits behind the economy’s malaise, owing to their slow response to the crisis.
For this reason, the latest move by the central bank is seen as its most determined effort yet to end years of economic stagnation.
Several economists argue that a weaker Yen is necessary for Japan to compete globally for market share, and to boost Japanese equity prices.
With the incumbent Bank of Japan governor, Masaaki Shirakawa, due to step down in March, however, there remains uncertainty around whether the central bank will fulfil its new policy commitments.
If a suitable successor is found who, in the words of Abe, “fully understands that the Bank of Japan has a big role and a clear role in maximising jobs", the BoJ may well pursue its new mandate with vigour.
While a weak Yen is beneficial to Japanese exporters, it comes at a price – higher import costs that hurt both households and manufacturers.
Already, Japanese households are beginning to feel the pinch of the weaker currency, which has resulted in higher costs for petrol and some consumer goods.
Furthermore, exiting deflation remains a steep challenge for Japanese policymakers.
While the BoJ has agreed to uphold Abe’s 2 per cent inflation target – clearly through "good" demand-pull inflation – the central bank has warned that the target may be difficult to achieve and may risk spikes in government bond yields.
If history is any guide, then the economy needs to be in a rip-roaring state in order to exit deflation.
In the short-term, the cyclical outlook for the Japanese economy is improving, highlighted by a rise in Japanese exports, improving business surveys and a bottoming-out of private consumption.
This supports increased odds of a pick-up in the relative performance of Japanese equities versus global equities.
Performance of indices over 3 months

Source: FE Analytics
Despite this, the Japanese economy still faces major structural challenges including sky-high debt, a rapidly aging population, loss in competitiveness and, related to this, consistently poor corporate profitability.
So while recent policy shifts are encouraging, we believe that broad-based reforms are still necessary to defeat deflation and improve long-term economic growth potential.
And with regard to the nature of those much-needed reforms, your guess is as good as ours.
Assuming the BoJ honours its policy commitments, the cyclical outlook for the Japanese economy appears improved; however, it is premature to make a similar claim for the structural outlook and, therefore, the long-term investment case. Japanese equities continue to trade on a significant valuation discount to history, but without a structural improvement, investors have every reason to be sceptical about a longer-term and meaningful re-rating of the market.
We continue to monitor the situation.
FE Alpha Manager David Coombs heads up the Rathbone Multi Asset Strategic Growth, Total Return and Enhanced Growth portfolios. Only the last has any meaningful exposure to Japan, at 2 per cent.
The three funds of funds sit in the IMA Unclassified sector and do not have a benchmark. However, FE data shows that Coombs has beaten his peer group composite since he started running portfolios in June 2009.
Performance of manager vs peers since June 2009

Source: FE Analytics
The three funds require a minimum investment of £1,000 and have total expense ratios (TERs) ranging from between 2.33 and 3.03 per cent.
Reference:
http://www.trustnet.com/News/404993/why-you-should-be-wary-of-the-japanese-revival/1/

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Keynes

...Реферат на тему "Джон Мейнард Кейнс и его общая теория" СОДЕРЖАНИЕ ВВЕДЕНИЕ 3 ЛИЧНАЯ И СЕМЕЙНАЯ ЖИЗНЬ 5 КЕЙНС И ЕГО РАБОТА 6 "ОБЩАЯ ТЕОРИЯ ЗАНЯТОСТИ, ПРОЦЕНТА И ДЕНЕГ" 9 НОВИЗНА ГЛАВНОЙ ИДЕИ "ОБЩЕЙ ТЕОРИИ" 10 Методологическая связь с концепцией меркантилизма 11 Методологические расхождения с классиками и неоклассиками 11 КОНЦЕПЦИЯ МУЛЬТИПЛИКАТОРА ИНВЕСТИЦИЙ 12 ХВАЛЕБНЫЕ МНЕНИЯ 19 ЛИЧНАЯ ЖИЗНЬ И СМЕРТЬ 20 КЕЙНСИАНСТВО В СОВРЕМЕННОМ МИРЕ 21 СПИСОК ИСПОЛЬЗУЕМОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ 23 ВВЕДЕНИЕ Джон Мейнард Кейнс, 1-ый барон Кейнский, графство Суссекс (5 июня 1883 – 21 апреля 1946) был британским экономистом, чьи идеи во многом повлияли на современную макроэкономику, как в теории, так и на практике. В начале Кейнс был простым экономистом, пытающимся решить некоторые вопросы, ясные ответы на которые еще не были предложены обычными экономистами. В конце концов, он опрокинул основной постулат о том, который он назвал "классической экономикой", что экономия является ключом к экономическому росту и что экономия всегда приведет к инвестициям. Кейнс пришел к выводу, что аппетит к инвестициям, как правило, подкармливает аппетит на экономию, в результате чего экономический рост и занятость ниже опускаются ниже возможного уровня до тех пор, пока не вмешивается правительство. В 1930-х годах Кейнс возглавил революцию в экономическом мышлении, переворачивая старые идеи неоклассической экономической теории, в соответствие с которой свободный рынок будет автоматически...

Words: 4891 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Keynes

...discuss their vision for rebuilding the world economy after the ravaging war. John Maynard Keynes, perhaps the biggest economist celebrity of his time, attended the conference with his own idea of how the post-war economy should shape up. Unfortunately for him, and perhaps for us all, his ideas were overruled in favor of American treasury secretary, Harry Dexter White’s plan, and was lost in the annals of history, before seeing renewed resurgence in the context of contemporary instabilities in the international monetary system, forcing a rethink of what was lost in the conference years ago. The Bretton Woods Conference was a defining event in world history, as it established the monetary system that we see today. Dollar hegemony and its status as a reserve currency has been called an ‘exorbitant privilege’, against which there have been voices time and again, but never has the wave been as strong as today. From a concern by economists, such as Triffin, Monbiot, Skidelsky, the overreaching impact of the economic recession of the late 2000s has led to significant doubts about the current system for policymakers and national leaders. In 2008, Monbiot recalled Keynes while analysing the financial instability of 2008, “John Maynard Keynes had the answer to the crisis we’re now facing; but it was blocked and then forgotten”. Skidelsky talks about reforming the ‘non-system’ by focusing on Keynes’ Clearing Union proposals and suggests that it is desirable to shift towards SDRs or a similar...

Words: 2548 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Hayek vs Keynes

...Friedrich August von Hayek and John Maynard Keynes have been the focus of a near 100 year long battle regarding how . Time and again, the ideas and theories of Keynes and Hayek have been used to argue for and against the involvement that government has in the fiscal policy making process in the US. Both of them have played roles in the development of American economic policy. Only one of these two men, though, has been accepted as knowledgeable in the halls of government power. And that man is Keynes. As shown in history the theory of the role that government should play in the marketplace from Hayek has been long overlooked. Beginning in the Great Depression era, policy makers in Washington latched on to Keynes’ new theories of stimulating the economy through high levels of government spending. Keynes believed that the government should increase public works projects and stimulus spending which would increase the nation’s aggregate demand, meaning an increase of the total demand for final goods and services. The Great Depression continued on as project after project and program after program failed to yield the results that Keynesians had hoped for. Even when faced with the data that proved the Keynesian theory incorrect, the policy makers argued that spending was just not high enough. On the other side of the argument was Friedrich Hayek, who argued that government planning the economy would never work. As Hayek argued in his book The Fatal Conceit, “the curious task of...

Words: 782 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

John Maynard Keynes

...Running head: JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES Intellectual Biography: John Maynard Keynes Shawn Detamore Davenport University Abstract Known as one of the most influential economist of the 20th century, John Maynard Keynes changed the economy by his Keynesian Economics. Not only was it used during the Great Depression, it is continually used in our economy today. Introduction John Maynard Keynes (also known as “1st Baron Keynes) was a British economist that was born in Cambridge, England. His ideas and theories changed the practice of modern macroeconomics. He is well known for the Keynesian economics that made him one of the most influential economist of the 20th century (Keynes, 2014). Since he was so influential, there were many other economist that were influenced by John Maynard Keynes that supported the Keynesian theory. A few of those economists where: James K. Galbraith, James Tobin, Paul Samuelson and Paul Krugman. Keynes also wrote many books related to economics, one well-known one was the General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. He also wrote A Treatise on Money, The Economic Consequences of Mr. Churchill, and A Tract on Monetary Reform. Keynes was very influential. In 1999, Time Magazine listed John Maynard Keynes as one of the 100 most important and influential people of the 20th century (Time Magazine, 2014). The Economist also named Keynes as Britain’s most famous 20th-century economist. Keynesian Economics Keynesian Economics is the theory...

Words: 1030 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Keynes vs. Hayek

...Keynes VS. Hayek John Maynard Keynes developed an economic theory that argues, the government can borrow money. Then spends the means to create jobs and purchasing power. The concept is based on the circular flow of money and the government should step in and increase the money supply or start buying things themselves. Trying to balance the budget during a poor economy would make matters worse not better. The government Keynes beliefs were the government would spend more during a poor economy and cut back during better ones. Friedrich Von Hayek theory states that the problem is under central planning, and that there is no financial calculation that would help make the right resource to spend money. Under his theory, Central planner would make a decision based on accurate information, not economic ones. Less government intervention and more financial freedom are Hayek beliefs to turn around a poor economy. As I read into the two theories, I am finding out that the US economy is most like the Keynes. One point I believe this is because of the massive deficits that are government is occurring. Another example is because Keynes theories consider tariffs and bailout, which we have seen this over the last few years in the auto industries and the financial district. I believe in Hayek theory of the free trade and letting the economy do its part. In my opinion when the government plays a prominent role in the economy, then it is going to be the best decision for the...

Words: 362 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

John Maynard Keynes

...John Maynard Keynes He was a famous economist born on 5th June 1883. His father was an economics professor at Cambridge. son of a Cambridge economics professor If ever there was a rock star of economics, it would be John Maynard Keynes. Keynes shares his birthday, June 5th, with Adam Smith and he was born in 1883, the year communist founder Karl Marx died. With these auspicious signs, Keynes seemed to be destined to become a powerful free market force when the world was facing a serious choice between communism or capitalism. Instead, he offered a third way, which turned the world of economics upside down. In this article, we'll examine Keynes' doctrine and its impact. (To read about Adam Smith, be sure to check out Adam Smith: The Father Of Economics.) Keynes was ultimately a successful investor, building up a private fortune. His assets were nearly wiped out following the Stock Market Crash of 1929, which he failed to foresee, but he soon recouped. At Keynes's death, in 1946, his worth stood just short of £500,000 – equivalent to about £11 million ($16.5 million) in 2009. His first prediction was a critique of the reparation payments that were levied against the defeated Germany after WWI. Keynes rightly pointed out that having to pay out the cost of the entire war would force Germany into hyperinflation and have negative consequences all over Europe. He followed this up by predicting that a return to the prewar fixed exchange rate sought by the chancellor of the exchequer...

Words: 2145 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes

...The contribution to economics of Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes both have had a major effect on economic thought and many of their ideas are still influential today. This essay will look at the contribution that both men made to economic thought. According to Adam Smith Institute (2012), Adam Smith was born in 1723 in Scotland and is popularly known as the father of economics. His best known work is called “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” which is more commonly known as the Wealth of Nations. It was published in 1776 and in it; Adam Smith outlines his main economic ideas. Many ideas in the book were not ground breaking or original but Smith was the first to put them all together. In the Wealth of Nations (1776) Smith begins with an example of a factory that produces pins which he uses to explain the benefits of specialisation and division of labour. Smith explains how: “One man draws out the wire; another straights it; a third cuts it; a fourth points it; a fifth grinds it at the top for receiving the head” And so on until the pin is finished. Splitting the production of the pins into different operations, would result in more pins being created. Smith believed that 10 workers could produce 48,000 pins a day using specialisation and division of labour. If the workers were to produce pins individually then Smith believed that they would only produce 20 or less pins a day. It was Smiths...

Words: 1913 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

John Maynard Keynes Economics Paper

...Running head: JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES   1 The Most Influential Economist of the 20th Century Lucas Strader Post University JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES   2 The Most Influential Economist of the 20th Century In the history of economics, John Maynard Keynes is of the most influential people. He strongly influenced the economy and became widely recognized while he was still alive. The man who 75 years ago wrote an essay “The Economic Possibilities for our Grand Children” brought very important issues to our attention. Keynes wondered what kind of world our children would live in, and what sort of tools would they need to succeed and be happy. So what do we know about this extraordinary man, and how did his economic views change our lives? In order to know why Keynes was a successful economist, it is important to know where he came from. John Maynard Keynes was born June 5, 1883 in Cambridge England. His father was an economist and a lecturer at the University of Cambridge, and his mother was a local social reformer. With the assistance and coaching of his parents, Keynes was successful throughout his time in school. Many people were not surprised that Keynes became an economist since his father was a professor of economics. He was good at managing his own finances. His investments with foreign money made him a wealthy man. This allowed him to sponsor the classic ballet along with his Russian...

Words: 1675 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Critical Review of Keynes' General Theory

...A Critical Review of Keynes’ General Theory of Employment, Interest & Money By:- Deepika Rana Priyanka Gupta Biographical Account John Maynard Keynes is doubtlessly one of the most important figures in the entire history of economics. He revolutionized economics with his classic book, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936), regarded as probably the most influential social science treatise of the 20th Century. The son of the Cambridge economist and logician John Neville Keynes, John Maynard Keynes, born in 1883, was bred in British elite institutions - Eton and then King's College Cambridge. During his freshman year at Cambridge, Keynes was invited to join an intellectual group called "The Apostles" that met periodically to discuss literary, philosophical, political, and aesthetic questions. Through his association with the Apostles, Keynes became introduced to the philosophy of G. E. Moore; critics note the pervasive influence of Moore's Principia Ethica on Keynes's A Treatise on Probability, his only philosophical work, as well as on his economic methodology. His first book on Indian currency (1913) was directly related to his experience at the India office. From 1914 to 1918, J.M.K. was called to the UK Treasury to assist with the financing of the British war economy. He excelled at his job and the influence he gained earned him a position with the British delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference in 1918. J.M.K was appalled at the vindictive...

Words: 4492 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Keynes Model

...of economic thought with its origins in The General Theory of John Maynard Keynes, although its subsequent development was influenced to a large degree by Michał Kalecki, Joan Robinson, Nicholas Kaldor and Paul Davidson. Keynes' biographer Lord Skidelsky writes that the post-Keynesian school has remained closest to the spirit of Keynes' work, particularly in his monetary theory and in rejecting the neutrality of money. Introduction Post-Keynesian economists maintain that Keynes' theory was seriously misrepresented by the two other principle Keynesian schools: neo-Keynesian economics which was orthodox in the 1950s and 60s - and by New Keynesian economics, which together with various strands of neoclassical economics has been dominant in mainstream macroeconomics since the 1980s. Post-Keynesian economics can be seen as an attempt to rebuild economic theory in the light of Keynes's ideas and insights. However even in the early years in the late 1940s post-Keynesians such as Joan Robinson sought to distance themselves from Keynes himself, as well as from the then emergent neo-Keynesianism. Some post-Keynesians took an even more progressive view than Keynes with greater emphases on worker friendly policies and re-distribution. Robinson, Paul Davidson and Hyman Minsky were notable for emphasising the effects on the economy of the practical differences between different types of investments in contrast to Keynes more abstract treatment. A feature of post-Keynesian economics is the principle...

Words: 1626 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Marx vs. Keynes

...Both Karl Marx and John Maynard Keynes greatly influenced the world with their respective economic theories. Born in 1818 in Germany, Marx grew up as the second son of a liberal, middle-class Jewish family. Throughout his life, Marx suffered poverty, and possibly because of his upbringing in life, he creates a disdain for capitalistic views. His most notable books Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital illustrated his well-known theories. Marx died in 1883, and in that same year, the birth of Keynes passed. Born in England, Keynes grew up in a comfortable English social class. Throughout his life, Keynes enjoyed success and great accomplishment. His books Economic Consequences of the Peace and The General Theory made his ideas and thoughts on economics and his view on protecting capitalism notorious. Marx and Keynes, two very different economists with distinctive proposals, share some similarities, but overall, the two possess totally different concepts on capitalism. Marx and Keynes differ in their broader economic views, but they still agree on some levels. Both economists attempt to devise an economic theory that will explain the problems of the real capitalist world in which they lived in during their respective times. Both predict an unstable capitalist system, since they both believe that a perfect capitalistic system rises and falls periodically. Marx supposes that by raising the national product over the long run will cause an ultimate collapse of the system and allow it...

Words: 1144 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Keynes General Theory

....................................................... 4 ð Employment and the essential properties of money: ............................................................... 4 ð Potential instability: ................................................................................................................ 5 ð Investments, saving and banking system:................................................................................. 5 conclusion: ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Page 1 of 5 Keynes’s “GENERAL THEORY” valid only for modern capitalism? This article focuses on the interpretation that restricts the applicability of Keynes General theory for modern capitalism. It makes his...

Words: 2005 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Keynes Versus Hayek

...Keynes versus Hayek There are differences between Keynes and Hayek on the role of savings in the economy. Keynes believed that it was a waste to save money, it only lead to destruction and prevent economic growth. He didn’t agree with private investment. He felt by keeping money in your pocket is senseless because soon we will all be dead. You can’t take the money with you. He also felt that the government should increase spending during times of recessions. In contrast, Hayek believed that you must save money so that you could later invest the money wisely. He felt time would multiply your interest. He felt that time did not matter. He believed the same principles of the economy that applied in the 1920 still applied in 2005. The solution was not to print more money, but to invest the money the money saved. These views are expressed in the lyrics below: {Keynes} So forget about saving, get it straight out of your head. Like I said, in the long run-we’re all dead. Savings is destruction, that’s the paradox of thrift. Don’t keep money in your pocket, or that growth will never lift. [Hayek] Real savings come first if you want to invest. The market coordinates time with interest. Your focus on spending is pushing on thread. In the long run, my friend, it your theory that dead. Whether it’s the late twenties or two thousand and five Booming bad investments, seems like they’d thrive. You must save to invest, don’t use the printing press Or a bust will surely follow...

Words: 950 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

A Report About the Key Concepts About Care Underpinning the Policy Proposals Presented in the Coalition Government’s Department of Health Consultation Document a Vision for Adult Social Care: Capable Communities and

...A report about the key concepts about care underpinning the policy proposals presented in the Coalition Government’s Department of Health Consultation Document A Vision for Adult Social Care: Capable Communities and Active Citizens, (2010) Department of Health website, http://dh.gov.uk/publications Dawn E. Paton Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Aims and objectives 3 1.2 Report structure 3 2 Dept of Health paper: A Vision for Adult Social Care 3 2.1 Background 3 3 Consultation document proposals 3 3.1 Table of proposals 4 3.2 Evidence to support the proposals 5 4 Constructions and locations...

Words: 2309 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Tma 02

...compare and contrast how content analysis and ethnographic research have been used to study children's understanding of friendship. Friendship is a difficult concept to define as it means different things to different people, it could be said that age and culture can change how one looks at friendship. The simplest way to define friendship would be as a relationship between two people who consider themselves “friends”. This essay will also consider the advantages, disadvantages, similarities and differences between two studies that used the content analysis approach and the ethnographic approach. When looking at both bigelow & la gaipa (1975) and william corsaro's (2006) studies I will also look at how there work as influenced future studies in this area of research and what criticism's have been made of there research. When looking firstly at the content analysis approach that bigelow & la gaipa took,to that of corsaro and the ethnographic method there is at first stark similarity,both bigelow & la gaipa and corsaro's studies were looking at what a child's understanding of friendship was. However after the inital comparison the aims are actually quite different,as bigelow & la gaipa's aim was to investigate children's understanding of friendship,in contrast to william corsaro who investigated children's individual understanding of the word “friend” he was interested in how children talked to each other. Basically the main difference is where corsaro explored the term “friend”...

Words: 1171 - Pages: 5