Premium Essay

Kimura K.K. Case

In:

Submitted By AndreiaNog
Words 1631
Pages 7
Value for a customer like Kimura KK

In B2B decisions there are normally many players involved, whereby each player has its own goals and therefore his own individual understanding of value. Kimura expected to be treated as a special customer and that Pramtex would understand the significance of their machines as an important part to satisfy their need. Trust, initially put into the service of Pramtex, started to diminish when Pramtex missed out on assisting them properly after the emergency breakdown. It seemed unexpected that Pramtex, a company striving to be the technology leader in their sector, acted in such an unprofessional way.

Key players at Kimura and their respective roles

Kimura has a decision making unit (DMU) that has the typical characteristics of a buying center: All those players have different motives and jobs to fulfill and therefore have different ideas of value.
Mr. Kimura is the President and final decision maker of the company (the decider). His goal was to minimize the start-up curve, so his production employees could adapt faster to the new machines. Mr Nomura, who is the top scientist of Kimura KK and Senior R&D Advisor was highly convinced by the performance and features of the Spartacus machines. He might have been influenced by emotional value and therefore thrilled Kimura on the buying decision (influencer). He therefore carries a large responsibility in the final buying decision. Dr. Komoda , the chief of production and therefore the user of the Spartacus machines had to deal with the problems that came up during the pilot run. He insists on a short delivery time (6 months) in order to be able to test-run the machines before dispatching the first order to Disney. He cares about functional value and intangible. He also looks for easy to use machines, high numbers of output (15.000 DVD/day) and the capability to handle

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Eee213

...NIKON CORPORATION NIKON REPORT 2014 Shin-Yurakucho Bldg., 12-1, Yurakucho 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8331 Japan (Scheduled to relocate to the following address on Nov. 25, 2014: Shinagawa Intercity Tower C, 2-15-3, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-6290 Japan) www.nikon.com This eco-friendly booklet was produced using FSC®-certified paper; non-VOC (volatile organic compound), vegetable-oil ink; and waterless printing technology. Printed in Japan NIKON REPORT 2014 Year Ended March 31, 2014 NIKON REPORT 2014 NIKON REPORT 2014 Independent Practitioner’s Assurance of Social and Environmental Performance Independent Practitioner’s Assurance of Social and Environmental Performance About NIKON REPORT 2014 Starting with reports published in the fiscal year ending March 2015, Nikon Corporation publishes its previously named ANNUAL REPORT as the NIKON REPORT. In addition to details regarding business performance and strategy, operational overviews, and other financial data previously published in the ANNUAL REPORT, this report comprises a broader range of non-financial data, including information on CSR activities and corporate governance. As a corporate group that continues to pursue steady growth and create new value prefaced on harmony with society, we hope that NIKON REPORT will promote further understanding of the Nikon Group among our shareholders, investors, and all other stakeholders. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 02 ‌Nikon’s Growth...

Words: 44823 - Pages: 180

Free Essay

Business Process Management

...Lecture Notes in Computer Science Commenced Publication in 1973 Founding and Former Series Editors: Gerhard Goos, Juris Hartmanis, and Jan van Leeuwen 6336 Editorial Board David Hutchison Lancaster University, UK Takeo Kanade Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Josef Kittler University of Surrey, Guildford, UK Jon M. Kleinberg Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine, CA, USA Friedemann Mattern ETH Zurich, Switzerland John C. Mitchell Stanford University, CA, USA Moni Naor Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Oscar Nierstrasz University of Bern, Switzerland C. Pandu Rangan Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India Bernhard Steffen TU Dortmund University, Germany Madhu Sudan Microsoft Research, Cambridge, MA, USA Demetri Terzopoulos University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Doug Tygar University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA Gerhard Weikum Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbruecken, Germany Richard Hull Jan Mendling Stefan Tai (Eds.) Business Process Management 8th International Conference, BPM 2010 Hoboken, NJ, USA, September 13-16, 2010 Proceedings 13 Volume Editors Richard Hull IBM Research, Thomas J. Watson Research Center 19 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532, USA E-mail: hull@us.ibm.com Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany E-mail: contact@mendling.com Stefan Tai Karlsruhe Institute of...

Words: 147474 - Pages: 590