In the case Krysa v. Payne, Mr. Payne the car dealer was completely untruthful when dealing with the Krysas. He knowingly committed fraud when he falsely misrepresented the facts concerning the truck he was to sell to them. Mr. Payne knew the history of the truck, but instead of relating to them the facts he chose to fabricate a story. The Krysas believed Mr. Payne’s depiction of the truck; they believed that it was in great working condition and purchased it.

Mr. Payne places their lives in jeopardy, instead of looking out for their lives he chose to look after his wallet. Mr. Payne engaged in fraudulent nondisclosure, fraudulent misrepresentation, and reckless disregard for the safety of his customer. Mr. Payne purposefully lied to an innocent