...Business Entities, Laws, and Regulations Paper BUS/415 Professional practice Tara and Akiva have just got their licenses in obstetrics and are looking to open a professional practice. They will be a new company and will have to be a member managed LLC. This will protect them from being liable if there are any accidents in the future. Since their business has to do with medicine, they are going to need particular protection from liability issues that might come up. For example, one consequence of any problems could be a threat to the health of mother and child, and not following correct procedures could cause accidents, and then lawsuits. They have licenses which are based on their knowledge of the legal and illegal practices. They are going to have to train all of their employees to make sure they know the proper practices as to not injure any of their patients. If the business is ethical and morally sound, and also follows all of the medical laws, they will get a lot of mothers as patients. Restaurant/Bar Miriam, an investor with a lot of money, but very little time on her hands, will finance a restaurant/bar that Lou and Jose will open. The owners of this company are Lou, Jose, and Miriam. The bar should be run in a limited partnership. According to Cheeseman, H.R. “A partnership has to file an information return with the government, telling the government the amount of income earned or losses incurred by the partnership...
Words: 1041 - Pages: 5
...State of Confusion BUS/415 State of Confusion Tanya Trucker intends to file a lawsuit against the state of Confusion regarding the validity of a statute requiring the use of specific B-type hitches on trucks and towing trailers passing through the state of Confusion. The sole manufacturer of these hitches resides within the state of Confusion. Currently the federal government does not regulate the type of hitches trucks must use on its highways. Tanya Trucker owns a trucking company in the state of Denial and must either purchase these hitches for her trucks or drive around the state of Confusion. Tanya Tuck aims to prove this statute imposes an unwarranted additional expense on her trucking company, is unconstitutional, and the state of Confusion should overturn the statute (University of Phoenix, 2012). Although the state of Confusion owns the statute, Tanya Trucker and her legal team must decide which court has jurisdiction over this case. Jurisdiction This case has two interesting factors, which will help Tanya Trucker and her legal team determine the jurisdiction to file the lawsuit. These factors involve diversity of citizenship and the U.S. Constitution. The diversity of citizenship becomes a factor because issue is between citizens of different states. In this case the statute resides in the state of Confusion; however, the statute affects Tanya Trucker who resides another state. To file the case in federal court using the diversity of citizenship issue, the plaintiff—Tanya...
Words: 314 - Pages: 2
...In relation to estate law joint tenancy is a form of ownership of the same property by two or more people. The owners of the property are called tenants, and share equal ownership, and have full equal rights to property. The individuals, who are called joint tenants, share equal ownership of the property and have the equal, undivided right to keep or do away with the property. Joint tenancy generates rights of survivorship, providing that if a joint tenant should die then the remaining property will be transferred to survivors. Joint tenancy should not be used if the owners do not want the property title pass on to the survivor. According to the Free Legal Dictionary, joint tenancy is “adopted from common-law tradition, joint tenancy is comparative to another form of concurrent property ownership: Tenancy in Common, a less restrictive form of ownership that sometimes results when joint tenancies do not exist” (Free Legal Dictionary 2010). Several key characteristics that distinguish joint ownership from tenancy in common include, joint tenants own an undivided interest of the entire property; each share is equal, and no one joint tenant can ever have a larger share. This differs from a tenant in common because tenant shares vary in proportions; one may have a larger share of property than the other tenants or only a fraction. Another distinction is that the estates of the joint tenants are fixed and unalterable by any condition for exactly the same period of time such as, the...
Words: 422 - Pages: 2
...Since 1996, it has been a federal requirement for sex offenders to register. With the introduction of the Wetterling Act, Megan’s Law, the Campus Sex Crimes Prevention Act, and the Walsh Act this registration has been expanded and now requires community notification. This information must be given frequently until a statutorily required limit has passed depending on the severity of the crime. The Walsh Act established a three-tier system for offenders, offenders must register home and work addresses, failure to register results in a felony, internet restrictions, and length of registration variations from fifteen years to life (Bonnar-Kidd, 412). They all have aimed at reducing recidivism and sexual assault, but limits reintegration for the...
Words: 1416 - Pages: 6
...When determining whether the conduct is extreme and outrageous to bring action depends on whether an average member of the community where the conduct occurred would exclaim “outrageous”; upon showing this, the jury must find the facts and make its own characterization. Ashman, 535 S.E.2d 265; Gordon, 388 S.E.2d 362. Coach Crump knew of Shelley’s vulnerability to injury, yet continued to degrade her performance. Similarly in Williams and Gordon; where a physician battered a patient and where an employee on psychiatric leave had a harsh evaluation upon returning to work, respectively. The person asserting conduct knew of the plaintiff’s vulnerability, which means there is a chance that the conduct is extreme and outrageous. 415 S.E.2d 31; 388 S.E.2d 362,...
Words: 849 - Pages: 4
...Heather Norton State of Confusion University of Phoenix BUS/415 Leah M. Peer May 17, 2011 When a state enacts a law it is enforceable and any person who enters that state is responsible to abide by that law. If all transportation departments had fair, clear, and consistent rules and procedures for how out-of-state violations should impact home-state license privileges – and those agencies took responsibility for treating motorists fairly when problems arise (National Motorists Association, 2011). The State of Confusion requires Tanya Trucker and any other trucker to use a specific trailer hitch, when they drive through the state. Tanya Trucker is the owner of a trucking company, and she is upset that the Federal Government has not made any attempts to regulate the truck hitches used in the nation’s highways. In this paper the subject to analyze and determine what court has jurisdiction over Tanya’s suit, is the Confusion statue constitutional, the provisions of the U.S. Constitution that will be applied by a court to determine validity of the statue, is Tanya likely to prevail on her suit, and stages of a civil suit. The State of Confusion enacted a ruling requiring all truck and towing trailers that use Highways in confusion are required to use a B-type trailer hitch. This specific hitch is only produced by one manufacturer based in Confusion. This regulation states truck drivers need to attach the B-type hitch on their truck or they will be forced to...
Words: 1314 - Pages: 6
...ACCTG 351B: Business Law (San Francisco, Fall 2013) INSTRUCTOR: KRISTIN L. ROSI Work: (415) 538-4387 FAX: (415) 904-5854 E-mail: krosi@ggu.edu In addition to working as an Adjunct Professor at Golden Gate University, I am employed as an Administrative Law Judge with the California Department of Insurance and as a Pro Tem Judge with the Alameda County Superior Court. Prior to becoming an ALJ, I was the Senior Regional Attorney at the California Public Employment Relations Board, where I authored a treatise on public sector employment. I was awarded an A.B. in Psychology and Women’s Studies by Smith College in 1992; a J.D. (Public Interest Scholar) by University of California, Hastings College of the Law, 1995; and am currently working on my PhD in Judicial Studies from the National Judicial College at the University of Nevada, Reno. OFFICE HOURS: My office is located 1.5 blocks from 536 Mission St., so I can meet there by appointment. Please telephone or email me as early as possible for an appointment. COURSE DESCRIPTION: Focuses on the legal, regulatory and ethical context of professional accounting practice. This course will consider the law and the legal environment within which certified public accountants practice and the most important areas of the law affecting clients. Topics covered in this course are the law of administrative agencies; the regulation of professions generally and of accounting specifically; ethics and professional responsibility, the AICPA's...
Words: 1642 - Pages: 7
...A State of Confusion Wendy Haugen BUS 415 Douglas Edmunds Tanya Trucker’s lawsuit versus the State of Confusion conveys a paradigm concurrent with the course book regarding Interstate Commerce. Commercial traffic within the states, considered Interstate commerce, will affect commerce between states. The Commerce Clause allows the federal government to regulate the interstate commerce. The statute enacted by the state of Confusion requires all towing trailers and trucks that drive through the state of Confusion to use a B-type truck hitch. Tanya Trucker, a resident of the state of Denial is livid, incandescent with fury, yet she controls herself as she contacts a known law firm, which specializes in this field of commercial law. In a genteel fashion, she has expressed her extreme displeasure in the situation with her attorney, pointing out the additional expense this statute imposes on her business. She intends to file suit against Confusion to overturn the statute. Tanya Truckers lawsuit will occur in the jurisdiction of the Federal District court. Her Attorney and his colleagues research their sources, discovering the statute is void as it violates the supremacy clause; No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay duties in another. “Federal jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship requires...
Words: 1013 - Pages: 5
...globalization. Arguably, the first multinational business organization was the Knights Templar, founded in 1120.[4][5][6] After that came the British East India Company in 1600[7] and then the Dutch East India Company, founded March 20, 1602, which would become the largest company in the world for nearly 200 years.[8] Contents [hide] 1 Conflict of laws 2 Transnational corporations 3 Criticism of multinationals 4 See also 5 References 6 External links Conflict of laws[edit] Main article: Conflict of laws Conflict of laws is a set of procedural rules that determines which legal system and which jurisdiction applies to a given dispute. The term conflict of laws itself originates from situations where the ultimate outcome of a legal dispute depended upon which law applied, and the common law court's manner of resolving the conflict between those laws. In civil law, lawyers and legal scholars refer to conflict of laws as private international law. Private international law has no real connection with public international law and is instead a feature of local law which varies from country to country. The three branches of conflict of laws are: Jurisdiction – whether the forum court has the power to resolve the...
Words: 880 - Pages: 4
...Hangzhou, China, Riordan’s e-business plays a vital role in continued growth. “E-business involves business processes spanning the entire value chain: electronic purchasing and supply chain management, processing orders electronically, handling customer service, and cooperation with business partners” (Wikipedia, n.d.). E-Business is taking new forms and enabling new business practices that may bring numerous risks. Protection of intellectual property is a major concern, but so are the value of contracts, domain names, and handling legal issues in a multinational environment. “Intellectual property rights, such as patents, copyright, trademarks, trade secrets, trade names, and domain names are very valuable business assets. Federal and state laws protect intellectual property rights from misappropriation and infringement” (Cheeseman, 2004). Riordan’s Internet site states, “Riordan Manufacturing, Inc. is an industry leader in the field of plastic injection molding. With state-of-the art design capabilities, we create innovative plastic designs that have earned international acclaim” (Apollo Group, Inc., 2005). With this claim comes the responsibility to protect the company’s trade secretes and register trademarks associated...
Words: 1071 - Pages: 5
...Phoenix Bus. - 415 Business Law SB09BSB10 Mr. Mark Oertel October 13, 2010 State of Confusion Paper This paper will attempt to analyze the case which has been brought upon the State of Confusion by Tanya Trucker, who has a trucking company that she owns in the State of Denial. According to the scenario, “The state of Confusion has enacted a statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers that uses its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. This hitch is manufactured by only one manufacturer in Confusion” (University of Phoenix, 2010). In order for Tanya Trucker to operate her trucking businesses, she would have to buy the hitches in Confusion were they are manufactured by only one manufacturer; in order to go through this one state, or go around the State of Confusion. Even though Tanya Trucker knows that interstate trucking is a huge and profitable business, and could possibly inflict an economic hardship not just on her company in Denial, but on many others trucking companies that want to go though the State of Confusion, but can’t because the manufacture of the (B-Type) truck hitch is only located in the state of Confusion. Therefore, Tanya Trucker has decided to file a lawsuit against the State of Confusion. She feels that the statue is unconstitutional, and may cause problems not just for her living in Denial, but for other out of state truck drivers as well. With Tanya Trucker living in the State of Denial, she could file her law-suit in Federal...
Words: 1012 - Pages: 5
...State of Confusion Geoffrey Goebel BUS/415 March 21, 2012 Tracy Bomar-Howze, JD, Esq. State of Confusion The state of Confusion endorsed a statute that requires trucks and tractor trailers that use its freeways to attach a B-type truck hitch. The hitch in question is produced by one particular company in Confusion. This statute mandates that any trucker who proceeds to drive through Confusion is ordered to stop and have this hitch mounted on his or her truck, or drive around the state. The federal government has not anticipated the need to standardize the truck hitches used on state traveled highways and therefore no action has been taken. Tanya Trucker, who is the owner of a trucking business in the state of Denial, is unhappy about the supplementary expense this statute imposes on her business. Tanya plans to file suit against Confusion to upend the law. Jurisdiction, determining if the Confusion statute is constitutional, provisions of the U.S. Constitution applied to determine validity, the outcome, and the stages of the civil suit are considered in this case. Court Jurisdiction and Confusion Statute * The first order of operations is to determine what court will have jurisdiction over Tanya’s suit and why. Jurisdiction refers to which state or court system has the power to oversee litigations with regard to a court case (Butera, 2012). When determining...
Words: 1167 - Pages: 5
...State of Confusion Paper Charlotte Long BUS/415 4/11/2012 Liliya Kades What Court Will Have Jurisdiction over Tanya’s Suit? Why? According to the tenth Amendment to the Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 (often referred to as the Commerce clause), “Congress has authority over trade activities among the various states and foreign countries.” The statute in Confusion appears to be in the breach of this clause, therefore Tanya Trucker should file suit that will challenge the constitutionality of the statute given by the State of Confusion. The matter of where jurisdiction lies in this case would be determined by the Federal court. Therefore this suit will be filed in the Federal District Court in the State of Denial. Is The Confusion Statute Constitutional? Discuss your legal reasoning. In a case regarding Pacific Co. v Arizona, 325 U.S. 761 (1945), a state law was passed regarding the prohibition of trains. The reason for this law was to help avoid any unnecessary accidents caused by cross state trains carrying more than 70 freight cars. It was later found in violation of the Commerce Clause, in spite of the fact that it treated both in and out of state commerce equally. Actually, when put into action, the law hindered interstate commerce which caused difficulty for the trains when following the state law. This similar statute has been endorsed by the state of...
Words: 898 - Pages: 4
...Case brief form Case Name | Curtis v. Loether | Citation(year) | 415 U.S. 189 (1974) | Court/J. | U.S. Supreme Court | Procedural History | District Court held that a jury trial was neither authorized by Title VIII nor required by the Seventh Amendment and denied the jury request. The Court of Appeals reversed on the jury trial issue. The Court concluded essentially that the Seventh Amendment gave respondents the right to a jury trial in this action, and therefore interpreted the statute to authorize jury trial so as to eliminate any question of its constitutionality. | Short Facts | Petitioner, an African American woman, brought a civil action suit against respondents for refusing to rent an apartment to petitioner based on her race. Petitioner contends that respondents’ action constituted a violation of§ 812 of Title VIII. The complaint sought only injunctive relief and punitive damages. A claim for compensatory damages was later added. Respondents filed a demand for a jury trial, which the district court denied. The court of appeals reversed the decision based on the jury trial issue. | Issues | Whether the Civil Rights Act of 1968 or the Seventh Amendment requires a jury trial upon demand of one of the parties in an action for damages and injunctive relief? | Holdings | Yes. The Seventh Amendment entitles either party to demand a jury trial in an action for damages in federal court under the Civil Rights Act of 1968. The right to a jury trial applies...
Words: 778 - Pages: 4
...LABR 251: “Know Your California Workplace Rights” (An Introduction to Labor and Employment Law – Online Class) This class provides students with an overview of labor and employment law in the State of California. These laws will include those applying to minimum wages, overtime wages, vacations, holidays, sick leave, as well as workplace injuries, disabilities, discrimination, sex harassment, and so on. There will also be an overview of important national workplace laws as they impact on the California employee; for example, the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This course seeks to demystify the law, and to provide students with an understanding of the most important laws regulating the workplace in California. The goal of this class is to introduce students to our State’s laws and our legal system– to become familiar with laws and how they are written and enforced – we will start by learning about our legal system, and then we will turn to particular laws and what they say and how they are enforced. This course may serve as an introduction not only to Labor Studies; it may also prove interesting and useful to anyone considering law, criminal justice, and related fields, as their major field of studies. It is also useful to any student who has a job in the State of California, since it will teach them their legal rights in their workplace. Required Text: David Rosenfeld, Miles Locker, and Nina Fendel, California Workers’...
Words: 1365 - Pages: 6