Government of Hong Kong v. Judge Olalia Facts: Juan Muñoz was charged before a Hong Kong Court with several counts of offenses in violation of Hong Kong laws. If convicted, he faces a jail term of 7 to 14 years for each charge. After Juan Muñoz was arrested in the Philippines, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region filed with the RTC of Manila a petition for the extradition of Juan Muñoz. On December 20, 2001, Judge Olalia of RTC-Manila allowed Juan Muñoz to post bail. However, the government of Hong Kong alleged that the trial court committed grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction in admitting him to bail because “there is nothing in the Constitution or statutory law providing that a potential extraditee a right to bail, the right being limited solely to criminal proceedings.” Issue: Whether Juan Muñoz, a potential extradite, be granted bail on the basis of clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk and will abide with all the orders and processes of the extradition court

Held: Yes. In a unanimous decision, the SC remanded to the Manila RTC, to determine whether Juan Muñoz is entitled to bail on the basis of “clear and convincing evidence.” If Muñoz is not entitled to such, the trial court should order the cancellation of his bail bond and his immediate detention; and thereafter, conduct the extradition proceedings with dispatch. “If bail can be granted in deportation cases, we see no justification why it should not also be allowed in extradition cases. Likewise, considering that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to deportation cases, there is no reason why it cannot be invoked in extradition cases. After all, both are administrative proceeding where the innocence or guilt of the person detained is not in issue,” the Court said.

Citing the various international treaties