Law Suit Recommendation Paper

Tomekia Trimble
Grand Canyon University: HLT 520-0101
February 26, 2014

When exploring the options of letting the physician go, I do not think it is wise for the physician to act irrational. As the hospital administrator it is in the best interest for the hospital as well as the physician to negotiate a good outcome. My facility is integral to success. It is our goal to end the relationship on the best terms. However, if this resolve does not come then other options should be explored upon.
As a hospital administrator to ensure that the hospital is fully defended in the stance of the hospital opting out of renewing the physician’s contract I would explore several viable options to come to a resolution. Those considerable options would include, but not be limited to one or the other paths as follows: negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or litigation.
Negotiation of the matter would involve employing a lawyer to negotiate. This would give insight to the goals of the company and the decision to go in another direction with the hospital. In the negotiation this will allow the current views of the hospital to be explored as well as a view of what direction the company saw the doctor to be leaning towards. Most hospitals have mission statements and goals visible to let patrons and employees know where their focus lies. It is almost certain the physician knew of these mission statements and goals.
Mediation is another option to assist with a dispute between the physician and the hospital which allows a neutral third party to assist in the two parties arriving at a common decision. The mediator only assists the parties involved to reach a negotiated settlement. The end result cannot be imposed or decided upon by the mediator, but by the parties involved.
Arbitration, which is similar to mediation also entrust the services of