...The United States government has laws intended to further fair, balanced, anticompetitive business practices called the antitrust laws. These laws are meant to “correct” the inherent contradiction of market economies, which in many key markets, one firm or a few major firms often come to dominate the entire market. Once this happens competition is none. If competition makes people act on their best behavior, then the antitrust laws gives incentives to competitors to do the same rather than abuse their dominance in order to take advantage of their customers. The antitrust laws serve to check the improper acquisition and abuse of market dominance, so I feel that to a certain extent these laws are effective. The United States would have more monopolies then it currently has, if these types of laws were not in place. However, I always thought that these laws were in place to also ensure competition in our economy. The anti-monopoly law, which is really a better way to understand what antitrust is, is a set of political laws to help prevent concentrations of political power. These laws were put in place a while back; I would say from the tea party, in the late 1700’s, all the way up until the Civil War, the U.S. Government did a pretty good job of preventing monopolies in the United States. The Sherman act of 1890 was aimed at collusion among companies to constrain freedom of trade, while the Clayton act of 1914 went further and specifying anti-competitive practices such as bundling...
Words: 619 - Pages: 3
...Laws were created in the United States for a variance of different reasons. The laws confirm and set regulations for later legislatures to follow. The laws guide citizens and other figures from wrongdoing. Most laws, however, are directed at protecting the citizens under the law. The amendments in the Constitution, however, significantly play a role in protecting the citizens under the United States Constitution. Of the amendments, the 4th amendment grants citizens the rights against “unreasonable searches and seizures” (Schmalleger 2013). However, if this amendment is breached, the exclusionary rule applies, regarding any evidence obtained illegally unusable in trial. The evidence that is obtained illegally may not be used on the accused. The exclusionary rule protects citizens from unlawful searches. For example, if an officer pulled over a citizen for speeding, the police officer has the right to question the driver. The police officer also reserves the right to check for a valid driver’s license and insurance. However, for a routine traffic stop, the officer does not have the right to search through the trunk of the accused without a warrant. The law grants reasonable searches, as opposed to unreasonable searches – searches without a warrant. The exclusionary rule applies to all evidence obtained and related to a case. The Fruit of Poisonous Tree Doctrine denotes that “later evidence that derived from the illegal seizure” may also not be permissible in court (Schmalleger...
Words: 769 - Pages: 4
...The legal history of marital rape laws in the United States is a long and complex one that evolves through several decades. Traditional rape laws in the US defined rape as forced sexual intercourse by a male with a "female not his wife", making it clear that the statutes did not apply to married couples. The criminalization of marital rape in the United States started in the mid-1970’s and by 1993 marital rape was a crime in all 50 states, under at least one section of the sexual offense codes. In 1992, a survey by the National Victim Centre in Arlington, Virginia states that 10% of all sexual assault cases reported by women involved a husband or ex-husband. During the 1990’s, most states differentiated between the way marital rape and non-marital...
Words: 1505 - Pages: 7
...legal leaders. The first issue is the consumers right to know. In the United States, laws have passed that state the consumer doesn't have the right to know if the food they eat, or the product they use has been modified. The reason for such laws, as stated by the people who support it, is, that when a product is labeled a GMO it will sell less. That seems to be fair, because that is the case in other countries were such a label is mandated. While a products selling potential, and a companies right to make a profit seems to be a good enough reason to pass such a law, a part of me feels, as a consumer that I have the right to know if the medium rare hamburger that I'm biting into was born and raised naturally or in a lab. This science is in its infancy however, and as GMO's become more prevalent, and their technology becomes readily available its legality will continue to be questioned and thus politicians will be forced to bring this issue to the forefront. The consumers right to know, this is pretty straight forward. What do we as consumers have the right to know. The most troubling, or another way to put it is, the area where the most questions are ask is with in the food industry. Much of the food we eat has some form of modified organisms in them. But, as a consumer we, with in this country do not have the right know about them. With health consciences become more prevalent with the the United States of America, people want to know what they are eating. The reason for this...
Words: 747 - Pages: 3
...Assignment 1: Contrast and compare the cyber hacking laws between the United States, Russian Federation, and the Peoples Republic of China Though, the fact that cyber security hacking is a widely used term, the law, punishment, rules and law are not fully developed yet. First, the cyber hacking laws in three countries are going to be reviewed. The cyber hacking laws of US is also known as “Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) ” was released by the congress in 1986. In the documentation, it provides the laws to protect personal intellectual property on computer. Basically, it says that people should get punishment by accessing an authorized computer. Here, accessing means stealing code, command, and documents; damaging information from a...
Words: 1530 - Pages: 7
...The United States of America in a sense is a fairly new and young country compared to many others in the world. Being founded on July 4th, 1776 makes America only 240 years old. After a bumpy start and many conflicts the civil war which end in 1865 things economically started to look way up in America. After the civil war the United States’ economy exploded and kept rising for many years. By 1900 the United States of America had the largest economy in the world, and has continued to be the largest in world till this present day. With this dominance on a global market came this hope and belief for a much brighter future to come, the American Dream. The hope in this country is to leave your children or family with more than you had when you were...
Words: 2265 - Pages: 10
...Commom Common Law Tradition in The United States John Carrillo BUSN 420 – Business Law DeVry University Our legal system in the United States is based on the common law tradition that we inherited from England. A common law system or case law is based on precedent or previous decisions made by the court in similar cases. The idea is that it’s only fair to reach the same decision under similar circumstances. The first effort on creating any type of uniformity in the English Law was about 1100 A.D. In an attempt to solve disputes in remote areas, the king sent judges to different areas of the countryside. The judges kept a journal of all the decisions made. When they came back, the judgments of all cases were compared and a uniform set of laws started to take shape. Deciding cases based on previous judgments is a practice named stare decisis which means “to stand on decided cases”. This precedent system continue to be the root of our legal system. With a rapid and progressive advancement in technology, published precedents are more accessible; which facilitate attorneys to support their cases. There are several interesting aspects of our legal system. Among them, there are the concepts of equitable and legal remedies. A remedy is the relief given to a party to enforce a right or to compensate the violation of a right. A legal remedy consist primarily of monetary compensation. Equitable remedies...
Words: 396 - Pages: 2
...Have you ever wonder why criminal are able to get their hands on gun even with so many charges and felony? Even though there is a background check in most gun store people are still able to obtain gun legally as long as they have money. Guns can easily be purchased in united state because united state does not have very strict law on gun. Anyone can get their hands on a gun even if they committed a felony or have a mental health problem due to the lack of government involvement, and background check. Guns are easily being purchased causing many shooting over the year. Research found that “Out of 50 states, 35 do not require that gun owners hold a license, obtain a purchase permit, or register their weapons.” This is a causes a massive problem...
Words: 579 - Pages: 3
...Massachusetts Immigration Laws Currently, immigration is a huge concern in the United States. Because of this, state and federal laws have been put in place to help deal with these issues. Unfortunately, these laws have a tendency to negatively affect those who live in this country. Here is some information to help you learn more about the concerns you may be facing when it comes to immigration. General Immigration Laws Some of the most general immigration laws in Massachusetts revolve around law enforcement and employment. When a person is arrested, their fingerprints are automatically run through a federal database in order to determine their immigration status. When you renew your driver's license, you are also required to prove your citizenship...
Words: 263 - Pages: 2
...a survey in which we questioned high school students on their opinions about gun control laws in the United States. Our population of interest was high school students at James E. Taylor High School, since we conducted our survey in hope of learning the opinion of these students. Our survey first began when thirty high school students, selected based on grade level (stratum sampling), were asked the unbiased question: “Do you agree or disagree with gun control laws?” In order to include a bias in our survey, we included a wording bias in our survey by changing the question to obtain a desired response. Therefore, we conducted the survey again by selecting thirty different high school students based on grade level (stratum sampling), and asking them a biased question: “Considering there have been 247 mass shootings from January 2015 to August 2015 cause by gun usage, do you believe that the United States should implement gun laws?”...
Words: 542 - Pages: 3
...I am very supportive of gun control laws, there are less deaths and less brutally crimes if there are less firearms in the hands of people. The founding father had no real idea that hundreds of years later people living in huge urban areas like New York, Los Angeles and Chicago would very furious to execute each other over money and medication consistently. Other nations and countries that have stronger firearms laws have less crimes and fewer deaths. In the event that life is the most vital thing, why aren't we accomplishing more in America to protect real life instead of guarding a lifestyle? More weapons mean more dead people. Ponders demonstrate that the more weapons a populace of a nation has, the more brutality and deaths happen from...
Words: 951 - Pages: 4
...In the United States many things influence voter turnout. For example, voting laws, they started adding more to increase the number of people voting. One way they accomplish this was by motor voter laws and this made it easier for people to register to vote. Another thing that has impact on voter attendance is demographics, like education and age. The statics show that people with a higher education and who are higher in age are more likely to vote than others. Also, constitutional requirements affect the voter turnout in America and examples of these are the fifteenth amendment, nineteenth amendment, and twenty-sixth amendment. These three amendments where put in place to have equal voting rights for all citizens. As a result, the voter turnout varies for...
Words: 1496 - Pages: 6
...United States v. WRW Corporation 986 F.2d 138 (1983) United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit PECK, Circuit Judge In 1985, civil penalties totaling $90,350 were assessed against WRW Corporation (WRW), a Kentucky corporation, for serious violations of safety standards under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act (the Act) which resulted in the deaths of two miners. Following the imposition of civil penalties, WRW liquidated its assets and went out of business. Three individual defendants, who were the sole shareholders, officers, and directors of WRW, were later indicted and convicted for willful violations of mandatory health and safety standards under the Act. Roger Richardson, Noah Woolum, and William Woolum each served prison sentences and paid criminal fines. After his release from prison, Roger Richardson filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The United States (the Government) brought this action in May of 1988 against WRW and Roger Richardson, Noah Woolum, and William Woolum to recover the civil penalties previously imposed against WRW. The district court denied the individual defendants' motion to dismiss and granted summary judgment to the Government piercing the corporate veil under state law and holding the individual defendants liable for the civil penalties assessed against WRW. For the reasons discussed herein, we affirm. The district court held that it was appropriate to pierce WRW's...
Words: 1010 - Pages: 5
...will be no racism and everyone will be equal. Prior to today, African Americans along with other races were discriminated and put to shame because of the color of their skin. Slavery started as early as 1619 where people of color were treated as animals. When the civil war came in 1861, in a population of twelve million, four million were slaves (Contributors, Wikipedia). According to Samantha Siddique, “discriminatory laws barred them from voting and owning property.” One of the laws was the John Crow law, this law “made it legally acceptable to force African Americans to use separate washrooms, entrances, water fountains, schools, and transportation” (Segregation Facts). After all African Americans were treated as non humans throughout history....
Words: 489 - Pages: 2
...The Jim Crow Laws were local and state laws enforcing racial segregation in the Southern States in the United States. Segregation was based on skin color, and based on the idea that “blacks were inferior and subordinate class of beings”. The Jim Crow laws were very strict and did not give freedom to blacks. They segregated whites away from black through all forms of contact with whites. Blacks were discriminated from whites and were only used as slaves. The laws originated from the Southern and border states. Many southern states passed laws to discriminate blacks from whites and made them slaves. The Jim Crow laws originated from a white actor named Thomas Dartmouth Rice. He was a struggling actor that would paint his face black and preform...
Words: 327 - Pages: 2
