Do you think that Keith was justified in insisting that the job, not the person be evaluated? Explain your answer. I believe Keith was extremely justified in insisting that the job, not the person be evaluated. As the Chairperson of the company’s job reevaluation committee he was responsible for evaluating jobs in order to determine if the jobs are still viable and if they need to be increased to better achieve the company’s business strategy. When Keith sent out the jobs list to the committee members Bob and Rita both knew what jobs were going to be discussed during the meeting but because they had personal feelings toward the employee they felt though the person and not the job should be considered. After Keith was so rudely interrupted by Bob to talk about Geneva who worked as a receptionist for the company for more than 12 years, and was liked by all the executives for her performance and demeanor. Keith calmly reinstated to Bob that they were there to talk about the three receptionist’s jobs and not the person. The three new receptionist’s positions were all set up at the same pay band, which Bob and Rita thought Geneva should be paid more money for her time and service to the company. What Bob quickly forgot is that the purpose of the committee is to determine the value of the positions and not talk about the employees, which could be conducted through other company channels. Keith could have been brasher as the Chairperson and excused Bob from the meeting if he believed Bob’s personal feelings clouded his reasoning. Keith conducted himself like a true professional and quickly got the meeting on course, and kept the committee member’s focus on their job at hand which was to only evaluate the jobs and not the employee. Keith actions were justified and he clearly understood the importance of his role as Chairperson, which his actions were in the