Premium Essay

Lulumon Athletica Vs. Calvin Klein Case Summary

Submitted By
Words 403
Pages 2
The two companies have a valid case that requires a court injunction. Lulumon Athletica has a single waist yoga pant design while Calvin Klein has a yoga pant with two waists bands. The two companies have fashion design patents. However, Lulumon athletica patented the design before Calvin Klein. In this case, Calvin Klein has infringed on the rights of Athletica due to the fact that Klein has an almost similar design, with over 80% similarity to athletica’s. Since the two companies belong to two deferent nations. Both national and international laws are relevant to the case. The two laws provide for an almost precise definition of infringement of fashion design rights. Calvin Klein is guilty of the offence of copying another company's design

Similar Documents