...Week One Assignment Testing a Theory PSY/211 April 8, 2011 In my profession, theories are constantly brainstormed and are key ingredients of Quality and Efficiency design. Along with the chosen theory must come a vast majority of collection of data in order to measure, analyze, conduct experiments, and prove whether your theory was correct or not and why? One example I choose to explain when I tested a theory was 4 years ago on assignment with Panasonic Corporation. Their manufacturing, supply-chain and quality processes although well designed still had variation the previous quarters as their KPI’s (Key Performance Indicators) and KBM’s (Key Business Metrics) reflected. The first three to four weeks were spent observing the processes visually, gathering data and measuring them in order to see if possibly the KPI’s and KBM’s that Panasonic had currently were accurate or not. Our metrics and charts matched theirs so it was not a measurement failure. Next areas to look for are if resources were being utilized appropriately and this is where my theory came about. Based on previous experiences and projects I noticed that personnel many times apply techniques and tools based mainly on repetition and habit without really comprehending the beneficial impacts. I specialize on Lean and Six-Sigma methodologies and tools. Even though top global companies use and promote these tools to implement in their culture, they do not always sustain. One reason they may not sustain in...
Words: 725 - Pages: 3
...Company Project Scoring Guidelines | | Fill in each block below. Student’s Name: Kumar Sunny Mehrotra | Date Paper E-mailed 02/24/20161st Revision Date: ______________________2nd Revision Date: ______________________ | Explain the purposes/uses of the Discrepancy-Based model (3 points) * To understand the current situation or problem. * To determine a desired goal and analyse the GAP between the current and desired position. * To find the Root Cause of the Gap thus, providing solutions to eliminate/solve the problem and reach the desired goal. | Explain the purposes/uses of the Systems model (3 points) * Understands the parts of the system and how they are connected related to each other. * Identifies the problems occurring in the systems , their causes and provides for a solution for them * Then, identifies what to measure (feedback & monitoring) to determine whether the problem has been solved or measure the current performance in regards to the desired performance. | Check (✓ ) the performance improvement approach you are using: ✓ Discrepancy-Based Model ☐ Systems Model Company Project Paper: Discrepancy-Based Model Note: the points are based on correctly identifying the steps and providing explanation for each of those steps. Fill in any missing information. Points | Identification | Explanations | 2 | Appropriate sequence | Discussion of reason(s) for this sequence. Why these steps in this order...
Words: 1550 - Pages: 7
...to our deepest values. We have an independent will that does not allow genetic influences or the environment to dictate our actions. We have an infinite creative imagination that allows us to create beyond our reality but perhaps the most uniquely human endowment we all possess is self-awareness. Self-awareness is the recognition of how we feel and how we behave. It also allows us to examine why we exist and ultimately, that we are going to die. While self-preservation is a characteristic to both humans and animals, the understanding of one’s own mortality is uniquely human. How do we, as humans, deal with the terror that is associated with this knowledge? According to Terror Management Theory (TMT), developed by Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon, and Tom Pyszczynski (1989), the need for “terror management” is a fundamental function possessed by humans and cultural systems. Based on the writings of anthropologist Ernest Becker and inspired by Freud’s work on how death provokes belief in mystical transcendence, TMT can provide explanations for a variety of human behaviors and relate them to the basic reason of why humans protect themselves from mortality awareness (Magdalena Smieja et al., 2006). The actuality that we are all going to die, one of the only certainties in life, is an on-going source of existential anguish for humans. This anguish stems from our desire to preserve life and the awareness of this impossibility. Since we cannot resolve this paradox, we use culture...
Words: 1289 - Pages: 6
...Traditional/Conventional Models University of Phoenix PHL717 Constructing Meaning 11-25-2006 This paper will compare and contrast a selected foundational philosophy of management theory to that of a more modern one. The comparison will entail a personal understanding of the evolution of management thought as it is represented in the philosophies under analysis. Personal view would indicate or relate the thought that “I believe that the task of any theory of managing is to produce generalizations that are actionable by managers in everyday life and that as managers use such generalizations, they create opportunities for robust tests of their validity. The business of science and the business of managing are not separable” (Argyrols, 1996, p. ?). While personal reflection shows that each chosen theory can correlate into the business world of today, as commonalities can be examined, each hold a number of differences that illuminates the individuality of the theory and the times in which the theory originated or was prominent. For this paper there will be a look into organization theory in part as portrayed by Peter Drucker from a modern perspective and a science management theory as devised by Frederick Taylor. In today’s organizational society there is a push for organizations to become more in line with a true learning organization, which essentially separates from the more mainstream or traditional authoritarian and controlling philosophy to that of a behavioral...
Words: 1157 - Pages: 5
...resources efficiently and effectively, that's called management. Modern management was based on The Principles of Scientific Management (F.W. Taylor by 1911) and Administration Industrielle Et Générale（H. Fayol by 1916). Nowadays, the subject of management have more development and more theories than the past, meanwhile many theories' disadvantage was discovered. Main theories of management 1. Classical theory There are a lot of theories of management in the world; one of the parts is called classical theory. Basically, this theory is emphasis on purpose, formal structure, hierarchy of management, technical requirements, and common principles of organization. It’s also emphasis placed on planning of work, technical requirements of organizations, systematic methods of management, and assumption of rational and logical behavior. Meanwhile propose that associated with division of work tasks, clearly defined duties, control and co-ordination of work, hierarchy, formal rules. There are two major classical sub-groups: i. Scientific Management (F.W. Taylor, 1911) Scientific management also called Taylorism. In the beginning of The Principles of Scientific Management (F.W. Taylor by 1911), Taylor thought that to prove the best way of management is a real scientific subject. This subject are based on clearly defined discipline, rules and principles, and further show that the fundamental principles of scientific management applied to human behavior - from the easiest personal...
Words: 1887 - Pages: 8
...Running Head: MANAGEMENT THEORY 1 Management Theory Management Theory: Great Leaders of made of Machiavelli, Nietzsche, and McGregor Tyng Wu Benedictine University Humanities 250 Professor Amy Hanridge June 1, 2014 Management Theory: Great Leaders of made of Machiavelli, Nietzsche, and McGregor Theories of leadership in any period are driven by a set of principles and hopes on the part of the philosopher. A core assumption about leadership is that leaders who succeed have a “vision,” a tangible goal toward which they and their followers can strive towards. While this is true on one spectrum, there are others that believe in the philosophy of Lao Tzu who said, “A good traveler has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving” (Tzu, 2014). Participative management and leadership style of the modern times was influenced by the philosophers of the past. In modern leadership and management we see Machiavelli’s active rule, not by fortune, but by virtue and prudence. We also see Nietzsche’s will to power, which is more internally driven first and foremost, but the internal becomes outward actions. Finally we see McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y in management styles, with micromanagers or enlightened leaders. McGregor’s Theory X and Machiavelli viewed human beings in a negative light, where they must be controlled by any possible means. However, McGregor’s Theory Y falls more in line with Nietzsche’s philosophy of the will to power, where it...
Words: 1578 - Pages: 7
...Critically evaluate the classical and human relations approaches of management theory. A central part of the study of organisation and management is the development of management thinking and management theory, applying theory can cause change in actual behaviour and managers reading the work of leading writers may see their ideas, attitudes and conclusions being influenced by management practise. The classical approach towards management theory was developed shortly after scientific management came into widespread use as a complementary set of ideas, as while scientific management initially focused on the micro level issue of job design, classical theory attempted to lay down guiding principles for the design and functioning of the whole organisation. The classical writers thought of the organisation in terms of its purpose and formal structure so emphasis was placed on the planning of work, the technical requirements of the organisation, principles of management and the assumption of rational and logical behaviour. This analysis is associated with the work by writers such as Taylor, Fayol, Mooney and Reiley, which will later be discussed in greater detail. The alternative approach known as human relations was developed during the 1920’s, the years of the great depression when greater attention began to be paid to the social factors at work and to the behaviour of employees within an organisation. The turning point in the development of the human relations movement came with...
Words: 1390 - Pages: 6
...department of business & management studies Group Assignment Names: Alexis Parris-14/0312/1864 Narotam Bisnauth- Sherry Wilson-Fraser- Willana Cameron- Jenelle Richards- Kester Bowen- Course: ACT 2101 Semester 1 for the Academic Year: 2015-2016 Presented to: Ms. Elizabeth Persaud 2015 lucky 10/1/2015 Table of Content Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..2-3 Description………………………………………………………………………………..4-16 Analysis………………………………………………………………………………………17- Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………… Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………. Introduction Management theories have evolved over a number of centuries. According to (Koontz and Weihrich 1990, p 4), management is the process of designing and maintaining an environment in which individuals, working together in groups, efficiently accomplish selected aims. Theories are perspectives with which people make sense of their world experiences (Stoner et.al 1995, p 31-32). Theory is a systematic grouping of interdependent concepts and principles that give a significant area of knowledge. Theory is in its lowest form a classification, a set of pigeon holes, a filing cabinet in which fact can accumulate. Nothing is more lost than a loose fact, (Homans 1958, p 5). Management theories are the set of general rules that guide the managers to manage an organization. Management theories are implemented to help increase...
Words: 7187 - Pages: 29
...about the four major management theories: 1. Scientific theory 2. Behavioral theory 3. Systems theory 4. Contingency theory Scientist have followed the study of management for years. The four management studies are different in many ways. The Scientific theory in the 1911s focuses on the position and duties of the manager tasks, machines, and materials needed to get the job done. Which changes with The Behavioral? Behavioral theory, in the 1920s which studies the psychological and social process of human behavior which motivates its employees to succeed. Another theory was the Systems theory in the 1940s looks as the business as separate parts arranged to produce a whole. In the end returns a finished product. Philosophy of management continuous improvement responding to customers’ needs and wants. Unlike the first two theories the central purpose is “its every ones job”. The Contingency theory, this approach sees the differences the organization itself different from The other theories because management learns to be flexible and change with the times as well Responding to all situations and determining the most effective way to manage. I believe the Contingency theory is more important. As times change the type of managing needs to change also. These managers learn to treat each situation that may arise in a unique way and by recognizing the facts and determining the solution as they show true management and leadership skills...
Words: 272 - Pages: 2
...Management Theory Introduction and Main Points Civilization is the product of those who came before us. The evolution of modern management thinking begins in the nineteenth century and flourished during the twentieth. The twentieth century has witnessed a revolution in management theory ranging from classical theory to the Japanese management approach. Today's management theory is the result of the interdisciplinary efforts of many people. The Founders The beginning of the modern organization occurred primarily during the middle of the nineteenth century with the rise of the factory system, principally in the textile industry, where automation and mass production became the cornerstone of productivity. Management thinking, however, was slow to evolve during the century. The need existed to define what management was in the first instance as well as to operationalize it in meaningful terms for an organization. During this period two principal management theorists took up this challenge and emerged as the so-called Pre-Classicists of management thought. Pre-Classicists In the nineteenth century, Robert Owen and Charles Babbage seriously addressed the quest for the development of management theory. Owen was an entrepreneur and social reformer while Babbage was a noted mathematician with a strong managerial interest. Robert Owen (1771-1858) Robert Owen's ideas stemmed from his ownership of a cotton mill in New Lanark, Scotland where he developed a strong interest in the welfare...
Words: 7041 - Pages: 29
...and Management Theories Heather Lunn-Howard HCS/514 11/3/2014 Jeani Thomas In this paper I will give an overview of four areas of management theory: Scientific Management, Human relations Theory, Bureaucracy, and administrative science. Along with some background on where each theory came from. Scientific Management Frederick Taylor, with his theories of Scientific Management, helped mold our modern management styles. In the early 1900s, Frederick Taylor pushed for change from the personal management to a new idea of scientific management. Under personal management, a person in charge was chosen simply because they were smart and knew more and possible had more experience than the other guys. Taylor claimed that a group of ordinary men (cause at the time women were not allowed to be management), following a scientific method would outperform the personal management style. Taylor consistently sought to push the scope of current management and replace it with observations leading to the best practice. Following this philosophy he also introduced the efficient training of workers in the best process rather than allowing them to direct themselves through their daily tasks. He believed that a relationship between workers and management could develop and create the best possible working environment. Under these ideas Taylor further believed that the workload would be shared between the workers and management because management could...
Words: 1649 - Pages: 7
...December 10, 2014 Introduction Management effectiveness in leadership styles is essential to many industries; it has been of very significant importance. Management is essential and crucial to an enterprise and the primary source of long-term differentiation between firms. According to Steven Covey’s, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People it is based upon a set of principles that directs individual effectiveness through inside-out management, one that begins with a focus on one’s self. I will summarize the management theories, how they apply to my organization, compare and contrast two articles that relate to my organization and evaluate my organization in relation to my analysis. Theory X and Theory Y developed by Douglas McGregor in the 1950’s are to be considered theoretical assumptions of management. The focus of theories was on the cosomolgy of managers to elucidate the effects of managerial assumptions on employee work behavior. The central task of management is the control, where they cannot be any prediction without underling the theory. All management decisions and actions rest on a personally held theory (McGregor, Douglas, 1960). McGregor’s ideas of the theories reflect the six ideas, (1) managers make assumptions about employees in work organizations, even if they are unaware of doing so. (2) Two broad categories of managerial assumptions can be identified: an unenthusiastic view (Theory X), and a more enthusiastic view (Theory Y), (3) there are three element...
Words: 1772 - Pages: 8
...Management Theories Management is the discovering of ways to productively and efficiently manage an organization to get tasks accomplished, continue improvements and increase economic prosperity. Throughout time, different theories have been developed and labeled, and all have evolved out of a trial and usage process in an attempt to find the most effective ways to manage employees within an establishment, company, or organization. Listed are the three major divisions in the Theories of Management - Scientific Management Theory, Bureaucratic Management Theory, and the Human Relations Movement (McNamara). Scientific Management Theory (1890-1940) Industrialized organizations were the mainstream means by which products were manufactured. Routine tasks were methodical, following a systematic approach that lead to the manufacturing of many goods. Worker and workplace efficiency was emphasized as well as the standardization of tasks and assignments. The father of the “Scientific Management Theory” is Frederick Winslow Taylor. It is also referred to as “Taylorism.” Frederick Taylor sought to expand productivity by increasing the efficiency of the worker. He believed that the worker and management shared a common interest to increase productivity, therefore improving profits. As an engineer of a US steel company, Taylor conducted studies and observed various tasks, finding the most effective way for each task to be accomplished. These were known as his Time and Motion Studies...
Words: 1473 - Pages: 6
...Danial (2003) the approaches to management takes different forms with many organization adopting an approach suitable to its structure, culture and objectives. Considering this, Stoner, Freeman and Danial (2003) defines management as the process through which the goals and objectives of an organization are clearly ascertained at regular intervals, the design of the work system and the structure of the organization is identified, and as the process through which organizations maintain an environment in which employees, working as a group, accomplish their aims and objectives and those of the organization in an effective and efficient manner. Stoner, Freeman and Danial (2003) further posits that management is best analysed by dissecting the processes into five managerial functions namely; planning, organizing, leading and controlling. As such, management is crucial to the continued functioning of any organization. According to Mullins, in trying to identify main trends in the development of organisational behaviour and management theory, numerous works of theorists have been categorised into different approaches based on their views of organisations, their structure and management. Stating further that it is possible to identify a number of other approaches, or at least subdivisions of the approaches, and also cross grouping amongst the approaches. This essay will be looking closely at the classical and human relations approaches to management theory .and also critically discuss...
Words: 2997 - Pages: 12
...Management Concept Douglas McGregor (Theory X & Y) William Ouchi (Theory Z) Motivation Tends to categorize people as one type or another: either being unwilling or unmotivated to work, or being self motivated towards work. Threats and disciplinary action are thought to be used more effectively in this situation, although monetary rewards can also be a prime motivator to make Theory X workers produce more. Believes that people are innately self motivated to not only do their work, but also are loyal towards the company, and want to make the company succeed. Leadership Theory X leaders would be more authoritarian, while Theory Y leaders would be more participative. But in both cases it seems that the managers would still retain a great deal of control. Theory Z managers would have to have a great deal of trust that their workers could make sound decisions. Therefore, this type of leader is more likely to act as "coach", and let the workers make most of the decisions. Power & Authority As mentioned above, McGregor's managers, in both cases, would seem to keep most of the power and authority. In the case of Theory Y, the manager would take suggestions from workers, but would keep the power to implement the decision. The manager's ability to exercise power and authority comes from the worker's trusting management to take care of them, and allow them to do their jobs. The workers have a great deal of input and weight in the decision making process. Conflict This type of manager...
Words: 1045 - Pages: 5
