Free Essay

Manager

In:

Submitted By pg586
Words 15130
Pages 61
World Tariff Profiles 2013
Applied
MF
Nt
ar iff s

0 1000

> 1000

40

29

412

849

7,594

Egypt

0.2

2.2

0

164

164

15

13

35

143

6,958

El Salvador

68

5,476

Ethiopia

4.4

4.6

0

605

605

1167

1141

202

177

10,453

European Union

0.1

1.1

0

> 1000

> 1000

33

82

74

434

5,951

Fiji

4.1

4.2

0

73

65

346

196

122

125

9,636

FYR of Macedonia

0

35

6

0

0

0

60

30

2

6

74

53

5,491

Gabon

0

0

0

110

20

9

4

21

53

5,089

The Gambia

0.7

12.5

387

38

41

125

297

10,256

Georgia

36

91

6,402

Grenada

0

418

0

0

99

6
11

Ghana

0.7

6.2

0

200

40

0.6

0.9

0

257

151

26

9

47

114

7,115

Guatemala

0.1

0.1

0

75

55

15

6

77

59

5,760

Guinea

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

8

21

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 7

All products
Summary Tables
All products

Year of
MFN
applied tariff Country/Territory
1

2

Binding coverage Simple average

Duty-free

Bound

Bound

MFN applied 4

5

6

7

in %
3

Non ad valorem duties

MFN applied MFN applied Bound

Duties > 15 %
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subheadings in per cent
8

9

10

11

Guinea-Bissau

2012

97.7

48.7

11.9

0

1.6

0

0

97.7

40.0

Guyana

2012

100

56.6

10.9

0

9.5

0

0.0

100.0

25.0

Haiti

2012

89.3

18.7

2.8

5.1

68.4

9.1

0.0

53.1

0.0

Honduras

2012

100

31.8

5.8

2.5

50.0

0

0

89.5

0.6

Hong Kong, China

2012

45.6

0

0

45.6

100.0

0

0

0

0

Iceland

2012

95.0

23.5

5.5

43.6

75.0

3.1

2.5

32.3

4.4

India

2012

73.8

48.6

13.7

2.7

3.0

5.3

4.9

70.5

19.6

Indonesia

2012

96.6

37.1

7.0

2.5

10.7

0.0

0.5

90.7

Iran

2011

Israel

2012

75.1

22.1

5.7

8.5

61.9

5.9

5.5

21.4

4.9

Jamaica

2011

100

49.6

7.6

0.6

65.9

0.0

0

83.8

24.7

Japan

2012

99.7

5.2

4.6

53.0

52.9

3.5

3.6

3.8

3.8

Jordan

2012

100

16.3

10.9

6.5

50.9

0.2

0.1

47.4

35.5

Kazakhstan

2012

Kenya

2012

14.8

95.4

12.9

0

36.9

0

0.2

14.8

41.9

Korea, Republic of

2012

94.6

16.6

13.3

14.1

15.2

0.7

0.5

20.5

10.4

26.6

0

9.5

0.2

15.0

1.6
45.7

12.7

10.4

Kuwait, the State of

2012

99.9

97.2

4.7

2.8

10.3

0

1.4

97.1

0.2

Kyrgyz Republic

2012

99.9

7.5

4.6

20.0

48.8

0.5

0.3

3.0

0.4

100

18.8

100

78.4

2.6

100.0

Lao People's Democratic Republic

0.9
7.6

0

0

2012

Liberia

2012

Macao, China

2012

27.9

0

0

27.9

100.0

0

0

0

0

Madagascar

2012

29.7

27.4

11.8

0.0

4.9

0

0

27.4

39.0

10.2

61.5

0

56.5

Lesotho

0.0

1.6

20.8
16.8

Malawi

2012

31.6

75.4

12.7

0

31.9

0

0.0

31.6

39.3

Malaysia

2012

84.3

23.0

6.5

6.0

64.7

2.9

0.7

36.7

16.0

Maldives

2011

97.1

36.9

20.5

0

0.1

0

0.0

97.1

59.4

Mali

2012

40.2

29.0

11.9

0.6

1.6

0

0

19.0

40.0

39.1

19.9

Mauritius

2012

17.9

94.0

1.1

3.2

92.7

0

2.1

14.8

1.1

Mexico

2012

100

36.1

7.8

0.2

50.4

0.9

0.7

98.7

13.8

Moldova, Republic of

2012

100

7.0

4.6

25.2

48.0

1.1

1.3

2.6

1.7

Mongolia

2012

100

17.5

5.0

1.5

0.9

0

0.1

77.7

0.0

Montenegro

2012

100

5.1

4.3

30.7

28.9

0

1.0

3.3

4.6

Morocco

2012

100

41.3

12.9

0.0

0.0

0

0

99.5

32.2

Mozambique

2012

13.6

97.5

10.1

0

3.5

0

0

13.3

33.4

Myanmar

2012

17.6

83.4

5.6

0.9

3.9

0.1

0

14.4

5.0

Namibia

2012

96.4

19.0

7.6

14.6

61.5

0

2.6

39.9

20.8

Mauritania

0.6

0

17.9

Nepal

2012

99.4

26.0

12.3

2.7

2.6

0

0.5

88.2

14.6

New Zealand

2012

100.0

10.2

2.0

47.5

63.9

3.3

0.4

31.1

0.0

Nicaragua

2012

100

40.7

5.7

2.5

50.8

0

0

97.4

0.8

Niger

2012

96.7

44.6

11.9

0.6

1.6

0

0

75.8

40.0
39.0

Nigeria

2011

19.1

119.1

11.7

0

2.1

0

0

19.1

Norway

2012

100

20.2

8.0

46.3

88.2

10.6

7.3

6.3

6.0

Oman

2012

100

13.7

4.7

6.7

10.3

0

1.4

3.5

0.2

98.7

59.9

13.5

0

6.3

0.0

0.7

95.0

36.1

Pakistan

2012

Palau

2012

Panama

2012

4.1
22.8

100

Papua New Guinea

100

7.0

32.1

11.1
4.6

35.7

0

2.1
0.2

0

0.8

1.0
68.7

1.0

71.5

Paraguay

2012

100

33.5

10.1

0

13.9

0

0

94.9

Peru

2011

100

29.3

3.7

2.6

53.2

0

0

97.4

30.3
0

Philippines

2012

67.0

25.7

6.2

2.5

3.4

0.1

0

56.0

3.1

Qatar

2012

100

15.9

4.7

0.9

10.3

0

1.4

18.8

0.2

Russian Federation

2012

100

7.8

10.0

3.3

13.4

9.1

12.7

2.1

11.7

Rwanda

100

89.4

12.8

0.9

36.9

0

0.2

97.1

41.9

2011

97.8

75.9

10.3

0

4.8

0

0.3

97.8

24.5

Saint Lucia

8

2012

Saint Kitts and Nevis

2011

99.6

62.0

10.2

0

5.5

0

0.2

99.6

24.6

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Concessions not yet implemented in 2012

Duties > 3 * AVG
MFN
applied

Bound

Number of distinct duty rates MFN
MFN applied
Bound
applied

Maximum duty
Bound

Summary Tables
All products
Coefficient of variation
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subhdgs in per cent
12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Number of
MFN
applied tariff lines
21

Country/Territory
22

0

0

0

50

20

2

4

7

57

5,549

Guinea-Bissau

0

7.7

0

100

100

3

15

30

112

6,305

Guyana

0.0

17.0

0

70

58

919

7

59

165

5,277

Haiti

0.0

0.6

0

164

164

22

12

31

131

6,939

I SUMMARY TABLES

All products

Honduras

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

7,281

Hong Kong, China

5.3

4.3

0

574

470

417

294

250

391

8,509

Iceland

4.8

2.6

0

300

150

358

356

82

124

11,477

India

0.4

1.1

0

210

150

20

43

35

147

8,733

Indonesia

106

6,847

Iran

739

224

711

374

224

8,505

Israel
Jamaica

7.2

400

7.0

4.6

0

24
194

0

8.5

0

100

100

12

12

50

142

6,855

3.8

4.2

0

933

692

607

480

432

395

9,446

Japan

0.5

0.5

0

200

180

25

31

92

136

6,212

Jordan
Kazakhstan

118

11,122

0

1.7
0.6

0

100

100

5

12

15

93

5,440

Kenya

2.4

2.7

0

887

887

221

113

320

402

12,245

Korea, Republic of

0

0.2

0

100

100

2

4

23

112

7,234

Kuwait, the State of

0.1

2.0

0

148

142

50

23

72

109

10,990

100

90

0

200

0.6
0

9.4
0.5

0

0

439

292

17
122

2

0

166

60

Kyrgyz Republic
Lao People's Democratic Republic

146

7,231

75

93

113
0

61
5,907

Lesotho
Liberia

0

1

1

0

0

6,756

Macao, China
Madagascar

0

0

0

30

20

13

5

20

58

6,491

0

0.0

0

125

200

10

9

54

87

5,497

Malawi

1.7

15.9

0

> 1000

> 1000

335

70

330

296

10,388

Malaysia

2.5

1.0

0

300

200

2

13

116

64

8,320

Maldives

0

0

0

75

20

12

4

88

57

5,549

0

75

1.5

13

87

Mali
Mauritania

0

6.7

0

122

117

5

216

56

348

6,250

0.8

3.5

0

254

254

100

85

45

237

12,106

Mauritius
Mexico

0.8

7.4

0

75

70

81

104

88

125

9,870

Moldova, Republic of

0.0

0.2

0

75

25

12

4

36

14

5,436

Mongolia

3.3

6.2

8.5

50

60

78

87

124

139

9,382

Montenegro

1.3

6.6

0

289

304

48

38

56

158

17,482

Morocco

0

0

0

100

20

3

6

15

73

5,197

Mozambique

0.5

5.0

0

550

40

25

15

108

120

9,820

Myanmar

3.1

9.4

0

597

316

57

166

129

158

7,231

Namibia

0.5

0.9

0.2

200

190

13

42

49

84

5,167

Nepal

5.7

4.9

0

196

45

318

10

115

130

7,510

New Zealand
Nicaragua

0.1

0.8

0

200

164

8

12

27

130

7,356

3.1

0

0

200

20

13

4

75

57

5,549

Niger

0

0

0

150

35

7

6

40

67

5,672

Nigeria

5.9

5.4

0

> 1000

> 1000

939

756

331

412

7,206

Norway

1.2

0.2

0

200

200

14

12

138

152

7,233

Oman

0.0

0.7

0

200

100

17

62

37

82

6,998

Pakistan

638

5,357

Palau

1.0

0

260

142

8,739

Panama

0

235

0

0

0

35

30

6

24

22

81

10,075

0

12.4

2.6

68

13

3

3

24

126

7,369

Peru

0.0

3.1

0

80

65

24

15

49

110

8,979

Philippines

1.0
0.5
0.7

93

> 1000
260

68

28

59

64
59

Papua New Guinea
Paraguay

0.7

0.2

0

200

200

15

11

103

139

7,284

Qatar

0.7

2.0

57.3

292

292

1428

492

108

114

11,122

Russian Federation

0

0.6

0

100

83

14

12

32

93

5,440

Rwanda

0.1

5.0

0

250

177

22

29

25

95

6,439

Saint Kitts and Nevis

0.2

5.2

0

250

89

36

17

45

94

6,438

Saint Lucia

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 9

All products
Summary Tables
All products

Year of
MFN
applied tariff Country/Territory
1

2

Binding coverage Simple average

Duty-free

Bound

Bound

MFN applied 4

5

6

7

in %
3

Non ad valorem duties

MFN applied MFN applied Bound

Duties > 15 %
Bound

MFN applied Share of HS 6 digit subheadings in per cent
8

9

10

11

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

2011

99.7

62.6

10.1

0

4.8

0

0.2

99.7

24.1

Samoa

2012

100

21.2

11.4

0

2.6

0.4

0.5

54.2

28.8

Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of

2012

100

11.3

5.1

7.1

10.3

1.2

1.4

1.0

0.4

Senegal

2012

100

30.0

11.9

0

1.6

0

0

99.8

40.0

Serbia

2011

7.3

1.4

0.0

Seychelles

2012

6.4

87.8

0.4

Sierra Leone

2012

100

47.4

Singapore

2012

69.7

Solomon Islands

2012

100

South Africa

2012

Sri Lanka

2012

Sudan

2012

Suriname

2011

26.7

18.2

10.3

1.2

4.5

0.0

0.1

21.0

24.7

Swaziland

2012

96.4

19.0

7.6

14.6

61.5

0

2.6

39.9

20.8

Switzerland

2012

99.7

9.1

6.5

18.5

24.1

81.3

78.6

7.1

4.5

Chinese Taipei

2012

100

6.3

6.1

30.5

30.9

1.1

1.1

6.3

6.5

Tajikistan

2012

100

8.1

7.8

11.9

1.5

0.4

0.5

7.6

0.3

Tanzania

2012

13.4

120.0

12.9

0

36.9

0

0.2

13.4

41.9

Thailand

2011

75.0

27.8

9.8

2.8

21.7

19.1

10.0

66.0

22.6

East Timor

2012

Togo

2012

14.0

14.0

40.0

Tonga

2012

Trinidad and Tobago

2011

0

0.2

10.2

0.2

15.7

100.0

0.5

0.0

0.5

0.0

78.6

10.0

0

0.2

1.5

0.8

96.4

0.5

96.4

19.0

7.6

14.6

61.5

0

2.6

39.9

20.6

38.1

30.2

9.9

0.2

51.3

0.5

3.0

24.9

7.0

2.5
80.0

11.9

100.0

17.6

12.0

100

55.8

7.5

100.0

0

0
0

0

9.8

11.9

21.2

0

13.7

18.8
52.5

0
0

41.3

0

1.6

0

0

13.4

0.0

0.0

51.3

11.2

1.4

67.3

0

0.3

95.2

24.7

Tunisia

2012

58.0

57.9

15.5

0

32.6

0

0

58.0

36.9

Turkey

2011

50.3

28.6

9.6

3.5

24.0

0.1

0.5

28.9

10.8

Uganda

2012

15.7

73.4

12.8

0

37.0

0

0.2

15.7

41.8

Ukraine

2012

100

5.8

4.5

31.0

40.2

0.1

0

4.0

2.7

United Arab Emirates

2012

100

14.3

4.7

3.8

10.3

0

1.4

0.7

0.2

United States of America

2012

100.0

3.5

3.4

45.7

46.1

8.2

8.6

2.8

2.7

Uruguay

2012

100

31.6

10.5

0

15.0

0

0

98.2

Uzbekistan

2012

15.4

3.2

5.8

35.2
33.8

Vanuatu

2012

100.0

39.7

9.1

3.4

25.9

0

0.3

96.2

10.8

Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of

2012

100.0

36.5

13.3

0

0.6

0

0

99.0

28.3

100

11.4

9.5

14.3

37.1

0.0

0.1

27.4

24.7

Viet Nam

2012

Zambia

2012

16.8

106.5

13.6

0

21.7

0

0

16.8

34.4

Zimbabwe

10

2012

Yemen

2012

21.9

89.2

17.8

1.8

9.7

0.6

6.4

15.1

29.5

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 7.5

1.3

2.5

6.9

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Concessions not yet implemented in 2012

Duties > 3 * AVG
MFN
applied

Bound

Number of distinct duty rates MFN
MFN applied
Bound
applied

Maximum duty
Bound

Summary Tables
All products
Coefficient of variation
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subhdgs in per cent
12

13

14

15

0.3

5.2

0

0.1

0.3

0.2

0.4
0

0

16

17

250

182

0.5

109

0.0

> 1000

0

30

18

19

20

37

16

45

109

70

24

427

109

20

20

2

4

2

Number of
MFN
applied tariff lines
21

Country/Territory
22

94

6,438

37

59

5,481

Samoa

191

182

7,310

I SUMMARY TABLES

All products

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of
Senegal

57

5,549

3.6

30

16

96

10,026

Serbia

9.8

200

10

414

5,670

Seychelles
Sierra Leone

0

0

0

80

30

6

7

13

60

5,461

0.5

0.0

0

> 1000

> 1000

56

7

472

5,864

9,557

Singapore

0.1

0.4

0

557

557

88

59

22

209

5,442

Solomon Islands

3.1

9.3

0

597

> 1000

57

192

129

209

7,231

South Africa

0.0

18.6

0

175

406

51

105

67

152

6,521

Sri Lanka

75

5,454

Sudan
Suriname

0
0

5.8

40
0

40

50

6
20

10

51

93

6,438

3.1

9.4

0

597

316

57

166

129

158

7,231

Swaziland

5.0

3.6

0

> 1000

> 1000

6861

6308

340

471

8,305

Switzerland

5.4

5.6

0

500

500

249

175

235

215

8,725

Chinese Taipei

0.8

0.3

100

292

292

184

30

85

72

13,802

Tajikistan

0

0.6

0

120

120

1

13

0

94

5,440

Tanzania

0.9

15.8

0

> 1000

142

1234

399

78

131

9,082

Thailand

0

5,050

East Timor

0

3

1

0

0

0

80

20

1

4

0

57

5,549

Togo

0

0

0

20

20

3

6

14

56

5,304

Tonga

0

8.2

0

156

100

16

19

36

152

6,295

Trinidad and Tobago

1.1

0

0

200

36

42

8

70

78

11,470

Tunisia

2.9

8.1

0

225

225

320

225

119

221

12,105

Turkey

0

0.6

0

80

80

5

12

18

93

5,440

Uganda

3.9

4.0

0.1

64

424

59

118

92

143

10,722

Ukraine

0.7

0.2

0

200

200

10

10

117

139

7,285

United Arab Emirates

7.4

7.4

0

350

350

1330

1119

294

261

11,262

United States of America

0

0.5

0

55

35

18

18

23

76

11,576

Uruguay

80

10,984

Uzbekistan

0.5

102

230

0.0

5.8

0.9

210

75

16

13

29

97

5,085

Vanuatu

2.0

0.9

0

135

40

44

8

41

60

7,441

Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of

6.7

2.8

200

135

63

36

116

121

9,546

Viet Nam

70

6,169

Yemen

3.8

6.9

25

4

0

0

0

125

25

7

5

32

76

6,179

Zambia

0

6.2

0

150

356

63

354

80

136

5,932

Zimbabwe

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 11

Agricultural products
Summary Tables
Agricultural products

Year of
MFN
applied tariff Country/Territory
1

Simple average

Duty-free

Non ad valorem duties

MFN applied Bound

MFN applied 4

2

Bound

5

6

7

MFN applied Bound

Duties > 15 %
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subheadings in per cent

7.1

8

9

1.3

10

11

Afghanistan

2012

5.4

Albania

2012

9.5

7.7

10.9

10.7

0

0

16.2

15.6
0

Angola

2011

52.9

9.8

0

0

0

0

94.8

8.6

Antigua and Barbuda

2012

104.7

16.0

0

23.0

0

0

99.9

43.7

Argentina

2012

32.6

10.5

0.1

5.6

0

0

95.8

16.1

Armenia

2012

14.7

7.0

1.3

29.6

0

2.6

0

0

Australia

2012

3.5

1.2

30.8

77.0

1.6

0.9

3.6

0.5

Azerbaijan

2012

13.4

2.1

5.7

2.7

Bahamas

2011

23.2

25.4

0.1

56.6

Bahrain, Kingdom of

2012

38.9

7.5

0

23.5

0

2.2

99.9

3.3

Bangladesh

2011

192.0

17.2

0

10.0

0

0

99.3

56.5

110.8

30.0

0

12.8

0

3.5

99.9

47.7

99.9

44.5

Barbados

2012

Belarus

2012

Belize

2012

13.4
101.1

20.5

8.2
0

17.1

28.2
0

3.5

16.6

Benin

2012

61.8

14.6

0

0

0

0

98.1

58.6

Bolivia, Plurinational State of

2012

40.0

12.4

0

0.3

0

0

100.0

19.5

Bosnia and Herzegovina

2012

Botswana

2012

37.2

8.5

21.2

47.2

0

12.8

72.8

22.6
14.7

11.0

37.0

21.4

18.3

Brazil

2012

35.4

10.1

2.7

7.8

0

0

95.7

Brunei Darussalam

2011

31.4

0.1

0

98.3

2.2

1.2

96.5

0.0

Burkina Faso

2012

98.2

14.6

0

0

0

0

98.2

58.6
68.0

Burundi

2012

94.7

19.8

3.0

15.5

0

0.9

96.0

Cambodia

2012

28.1

15.2

0

13.5

0

0

72.1

26.5

Cameroon

2012

80.0

22.3

0

1.2

0

0

99.9

69.2

Canada

2012

17.5

16.2

47.8

59.8

19.4

12.0

10.0

8.7

Cape Verde

2012

19.3

12.2

0

30.6

0

0

61.9

39.4

Central African Republic

2011

30.0

21.9

0

0

0

0

99.9

66.2

Chad

2011

80.0

21.9

0

0

0

0

99.9

66.2

Chile

2012

26.0

6.0

0

0

0

0

100.0

0

China

2011

15.8

15.6

5.8

5.9

0

0.5

35.9

34.6

91.5

14.9

0

0

0

0

99.9

12.9

99.9

66.2

89.8

8.6

Colombia

2012

Comoros

2012

Congo

2011

9.8
30.0

21.9

Cook Islands

2012

Costa Rica

2012

42.7

11.3

5.9
0

0

0

30.1

18.8

0
0

92.1

0

15.2

3.6
0

0

7.7

Côte d'Ivoire

2012

14.9

14.6

0.1

0

0

0

1.0

58.6

Croatia

2012

11.0

10.3

16.1

26.3

13.8

13.4

26.2

25.1

Cuba

2012

37.3

10.7

3.9

8.9

0

0

93.2

17.4

Democratic Republic of the Congo

98.2

0

0

99.7

Djibouti

2012

49.9

14.2

0

1.3

0

0

99.7

Dominica

2012

112.2

21.2

0

24.5

0

0

99.9

34.0
46.7

Dominican Republic

2012

39.3

12.7

0

32.8

0

0

98.9

52.5
60.3

Ecuador

2012

25.6

18.5

0

22.7

0

0

85.4

Egypt

2012

96.1

66.7

0

16.0

1.5

1.3

68.5

26.5

El Salvador

2012

42.5

11.8

0

27.9

0

0

100.0

11.6

32.3

31.2

32.0

31.4

27.5

26.2

Ethiopia

2012

European Union

2012

13.7

13.2

22.4

1.4

0

70.9

Fiji

2012

45.4

20.6

0

5.1

2.2

3.2

99.8

18.4

FYR of Macedonia

2012

13.0

13.0

34.9

36.8

9.2

9.1

31.3

31.0

Gabon

2011

59.6

21.9

0

0

0

0

99.2

66.2

The Gambia

2012

104.2

16.9

0

8.4

0

0

99.9

78.5

Georgia

2012

13.1

6.7

8.4

49.8

2.5

2.2

13.7

1.9

Ghana

97.2

0

0

99.9

Grenada

100.7

18.2

2.0

11.3

0

0.1

98.0

2012

51.0

9.6

0

27.7

0

0

97.9

4.1

Guinea

12

2012

Guatemala

2012

39.7

14.3

0

3.2

0

0

98.2

57.2

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 48.2

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Concessions not yet implemented in 2012

Duties > 3 * AVG
MFN
applied

Bound

Number of distinct duty rates MFN
MFN applied
Bound
applied

Maximum duty
Bound

Summary Tables
Agricultural products
Coefficient of variation
Bound

MFN applied 19

20

Share of HS 6 digit subhdgs in per cent
12

13

14

15

16

3.1

17

18

25

9

Number of
MFN
applied tariff lines
21

Country/Territory
22

81

760

I SUMMARY TABLES

Agricultural products

Afghanistan
Albania

0

0

0

20

15

6

9

58

58

2,069

0

5.0

0

60

30

4

7

17

72

719

Angola

0

0

0

220

45

10

14

17

78

1,046

Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina

0

0.4

0

35

35

13

17

22

53

1,129

0

0

0

15

15

5

39

13

55

2,055

Armenia

7.4

23.0

0

29

28

37

8

144

186

838

Australia
Azerbaijan

1.1
2.2

111

57

77

2,178

0

61

12

78

971

Bahamas

267

1,183

Bahrain, Kingdom of

3.3

0

200

125

3

5

62

0

0

0

200

25

7

4

19

53

946

Bangladesh

0

9.3

0

223

216

15

54

23

132

1,116

Barbados

109

2,579

Belarus
Belize

3.1

134

400

0

3.6

0

110

110

4

21

7

106

1,041

0

0

0

100

20

7

3

20

46

785

Benin

0

0

0

40

20

2

5

1

38

948

Bolivia, Plurinational State of

165

2,171

Bosnia and Herzegovina

2.5

8.6
6.7

0

597

118

51

115

183
136

134

1,089

Botswana

0

0.4

0

55

55

21

18

31

58

1,031

Brazil

1.1

1.7

0

> 1000

50

23

14

285

1,157

1,139

Brunei Darussalam
Burkina Faso

595

0

0

0

100

20

6

3

13

46

785

0

2.4

0

100

100

5

8

24

67

782

Burundi

0

0

0

60

35

13

4

44

84

1,139

Cambodia
Cameroon

0

0

0

80

30

1

5

0

43

876

6.4

6.3

0

615

551

449

205

290

298

1,322

Canada

0

4.9

65.5

55

50

11

8

60

108

762

Cape Verde

0

0

0

30

30

1

5

0

45

813

Central African Republic

0

0

0

80

30

1

5

0

45

813

Chad

0.6

0

0

98

6

3

1

22

0

1,413

Chile

3.1

3.2

0

65

65

36

46

73

75

1,094

China

0

3.4

0

227

98

47

10

38

99

1,039

Colombia

68

715

Comoros

45

813

Congo

288

1,256

Cook Islands

0
0

0

25
0

30

4.7

30

5
1

5

0

34

> 1000

1.0

8.3

0

233

150

14

17

64

131

1,832

Costa Rica

0.9

0

0

64

20

8

3

36

46

785

Côte d'Ivoire

4.9

6.9

0

55

55

262

292

83

78

2,799

Croatia

0

0

0

40

30

8

11

27

83

750

0

100

0

4

12

Cuba
Democratic Republic of the Congo

4.6

0

0

450

26

10

8

98

67

864

Djibouti

0

4.2

0

150

150

3

18

21

127

1,027

Dominica

0

3.2

0

99

40

12

7

25

80

1,101

Dominican Republic

0.7

1.2

0

86

86

16

13

42

74

1,010

Ecuador

2.3

2.3

0

> 1000

> 1000

32

27

445

673

1,210

Egypt

1.4

6.9

0

164

164

13

9

49

127

1,028

El Salvador

47

726

Ethiopia

9.0

8.4

0

605

605

1088

1079

146

127

3,128

European Union

1.0

1.9

0

> 1000

> 1000

33

48

127

360

828

9.9

9.8

0

73

65

327

179

93

94

2,160

0

35

6

Fiji
FYR of Macedonia

0

0

0

60

30

2

5

9

45

812

Gabon

0

0

0

110

20

6

4

19

38

667

The Gambia

0.4

1.5

0

418

387

34

41

154

144

2,087

Georgia

0

99

0

200

0
0

0

3

10

Ghana

40

8

11

30

79

1,041

Grenada

3.9

1.3

0

257

40

22

8

81

71

1,125

Guatemala

0

0.3

0

75

55

6

6

14

51

807

Guinea

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 13

Agricultural products
Summary Tables
Agricultural products

Year of
MFN
applied tariff Country/Territory
1

Simple average

Duty-free

Non ad valorem duties

MFN applied Bound

MFN applied 4

2

Bound

5

6

7

MFN applied Bound

Duties > 15 %
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subheadings in per cent
8

9

10

11

Guinea-Bissau

2012

40.1

14.6

0

0

0

0

100.0

58.6

Guyana

2012

99.6

21.8

0

10.5

0

0

100.0

49.3

Haiti

2012

21.1

6.0

17.2

34.2

8.9

0.4

65.7

0

Honduras

2012

32.4

10.5

0

25.2

0

0

94.3

4.4

Hong Kong, China

2012

0

0

100.0

100.0

0

0

0

0

Iceland

2012

109.4

24.4

25.9

63.9

23.2

17.9

61.9

30.4
84.2

India

2012

113.1

33.5

0

5.3

0.3

0.3

98.6

Indonesia

2012

47.0

7.9

0

9.6

0.2

3.5

99.4

Iran

2011

Israel

2012

73.4

17.0

3.1

38.7

0.2

21.7

75.5

Jamaica

2011

96.9

17.9

1.7

41.6

0.3

0

97.3

48.1

Japan

2012

22.1

16.6

34.1

36.0

15.1

13.7

24.0

22.4

Jordan

2012

23.6

17.8

1.1

32.1

0.8

0.8

55.4

48.2

Kazakhstan

2012

Kenya

2012

99.9

68.3

30.4

0

13.4

0.4

8.2

100.0

19.9

0

28.2

15.3

0

0.9

4.6
56.5
26.8

17.4

Korea, Republic of

2012

56.1

52.7

2.2

5.6

5.2

3.2

73.3

52.6

Kuwait, the State of

2012

100.0

5.1

0

23.4

0

7.9

100.0

1.3

Kyrgyz Republic

2012

12.6

7.4

1.2

30.2

2.2

2.1

22.3

3.0

Lao People's Democratic Republic

6.0

19.3
8.6

0

Lesotho

2012
2012

Macao, China

2012

0

0

99.9

100.0

0

0

0

0

Madagascar

2012

30.0

14.6

0

5.3

0

0

99.9

60.6

Malawi

2012

121.1

18.0

0

11.7

0

0

99.9

57.3

Malaysia

2012

66.9

11.2

12.9

74.7

21.1

5.0

27.3

8.4

Maldives

2011

48.1

18.3

0

0.5

0

0.2

99.9

27.9

Mali

2012

59.2

14.6

0

0

0

0

98.2

58.6

10.7

37.8

47.2

0

40.6

Liberia

Mauritania

198.9

0
0

0

12.8

100.0

4.2

0

23.0
15.3

98.3

Mauritius

2012

119.7

0.9

0

93.0

0

0.3

99.9

0.3

Mexico

2012

44.5

21.2

0.4

17.9

7.0

5.1

95.5

43.2
12.3

Moldova, Republic of

2012

13.9

10.5

3.1

19.4

8.7

8.4

18.6

Mongolia

2012

18.9

5.1

0.7

0.8

0

0.5

73.9

0.2

Montenegro

2012

10.8

10.4

23.0

27.4

0

7.0

24.1

28.6

Morocco

2012

54.4

40.7

0

0

0

0

99.9

73.2

Mozambique

2012

100.0

13.8

0

0.7

0

0

99.9

60.1

Myanmar

2012

103.7

8.6

0.6

10.4

0.6

0

85.0

3.8

Namibia

2012

39.6

8.6

21.8

47.2

0

12.8

72.3

23.0
12.7

Nepal

2012

41.5

13.9

0

0

0

2.6

96.4

New Zealand

2012

6.0

1.4

54.8

72.4

0.2

0.1

13.2

0

Nicaragua

2012

43.4

10.6

0

27.1

0

0

100.0

5.6

Niger

2012

84.3

14.6

0

0

0

0

98.3

58.6

Nigeria

2011

150.0

15.5

0

0

0

0

99.9

59.4

Norway

2012

132.0

53.2

28.9

45.3

65.6

50.8

47.3

41.8

Oman

2012

27.7

5.7

0

23.4

0

7.9

10.9

1.3

Pakistan

2012

95.6

15.5

0

14.3

0.1

4.5

92.8

35.8

27.6

12.4

0.4

25.2

79.4

7.2

Palau

2012

Panama

2012

Papua New Guinea

10.1
45.6

62.6
0

2.9
0.2

0

5.9

4.2
79.8

Paraguay

2012

33.1

10.0

0

7.4

0

0

93.3

Peru

2011

30.8

4.1

0

37.7

0

0

100.0

14.1
0

Philippines

2012

35.1

9.8

0

0.3

0.6

0

90.5

13.1

Qatar

2012

25.7

5.5

0

23.4

0

7.9

23.5

1.3

Russian Federation

2012

11.2

13.3

3.0

8.2

22.9

28.2

7.7

16.9
68.3

Rwanda

74.2

19.9

3.0

15.3

0

0.9

95.0

2011

108.7

16.5

0

10.8

0

2.1

99.3

40.6

Saint Lucia

14

2012

Saint Kitts and Nevis

2011

114.6

16.5

0

16.2

0

0.5

100.0

41.8

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Concessions not yet implemented in 2012

Duties > 3 * AVG
MFN
applied

Bound

Number of distinct duty rates MFN
MFN applied
Bound
applied

Maximum duty
Bound

Summary Tables
Agricultural products
Coefficient of variation
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subhdgs in per cent
12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Number of
MFN
applied tariff lines
21

Country/Territory
22

0

0

0

50

20

2

3

3

46

785

Guinea-Bissau

0

4.1

0

100

100

2

10

6

97

1,027

Guyana

0.3

0

0

70

15

107

6

73

95

736

Haiti

0.2

3.1

0

164

164

15

12

37

122

1,019

I SUMMARY TABLES

Agricultural products

Honduras

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

1,023

Hong Kong, China

12.0

11.1

0

574

470

406

291

129

230

1,903

Iceland

0

2.2

0

300

150

19

21

46

88

1,497

India

3.3

3.1

0

210

150

16

35

51

247

1,156

Indonesia

105

883

Iran

2.8

8.3

0

560

224

121

258

91

169

1,231

Israel
Jamaica

1.9

400

22

0

1.5

0

100

100

7

12

17

98

1,219

6.3

5.8

0

933

692

352

323

262

260

1,843

Japan

3.4

2.9

0

200

180

22

26

132

147

845

Jordan

105

2,579

Kazakhstan

0

2.5

0

100

100

1

9

0

66

782

Kenya

7.0

8.3

0

887

887

182

92

217

249

1,714

Korea, Republic of

0

1.3

0

100

100

1

4

0

237

1,149

Kuwait, the State of

0.3

0.6

0

148

142

37

22

68

77

2,470

100

90

0

200

3.3

3.8
0

6.7
1.1

0

15
122

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.3

0

8.9

5.5

0

6.7

0.2

0

0

0

75

88
112

8

Kyrgyz Republic
Lao People's Democratic Republic

1,089
918

Lesotho
Liberia

0

970

Macao, China
Madagascar

0

1

1

30

20

1

4

0

49

962

125

200

6

7

15

72

743

Malawi

> 1000

> 1000

323

64

273

488

1,192

Malaysia

0

300

105

2

8

141

43

1,119

Maldives

0

75

20

6

3

12

46

785

7

0

135
83

40

113

0

0

184

292

44

Mali
Mauritania

0

6.9

0

122

30

3

6

11

276

860

4.4

5.1

0

254

254

96

77

89

187

1,194

Mauritius
Mexico

2.0

1.0

0

75

70

77

99

71

76

2,120

Moldova, Republic of

0.3

0.2

0

75

25

10

4

26

29

756

Mongolia

3.9

4.8

39.0

50

60

51

68

85

84

2,069

Montenegro

8.4

3.5

0

289

304

41

37

96

106

2,495

Morocco

0

0

0

100

20

1

5

0

59

722

Mozambique

3.4

3.1

0

550

40

24

12

92

94

1,436

Myanmar

2.5

6.7

0

597

122

52

112

131

134

1,089

Namibia

0.9

2.0

0

200

190

12

30

53

116

687

Nepal

10.1

27.5

0

44

6

65

6

112

136

1,073

New Zealand

0.6

4.4

0

200

164

6

12

33

117

1,155

Nicaragua

0

0

0

200

20

7

3

76

46

785

Niger

0

0

0

150

35

1

5

0

52

794

Nigeria
Norway

7.9

10.6

0

> 1000

> 1000

776

739

124

169

1,441

7.1

1.3

0

200

200

10

12

155

299

1,148

Oman

0

2.3

0

200

90

13

47

22

98

878

Pakistan

585

709

Palau

1.5

3.7

0

260

35

24

79

160

1,427

Panama

0

235

0

0.7

0

35

30

6

15

20

55

1,029

0

4.5

0

68

13

2

3

21

88

970

Peru

0

9.8

0

80

65

22

14

35

113

1,184

Philippines

3.8
1.5

27

> 1000
260

52

61

Papua New Guinea
Paraguay

5.4

1.3

0

200

200

10

10

163

278

1,183

Qatar

3.1

3.2

53.2

292

292

803

169

125

105

2,579

Russian Federation

0

2.5

0

100

80

8

9

28

64

782

Rwanda

0

0.4

0

250

177

17

26

28

90

1,053

Saint Kitts and Nevis

0

0.0

0

250

89

15

16

24

88

1,053

Saint Lucia

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 15

Agricultural products
Summary Tables
Agricultural products

Year of
MFN
applied tariff Country/Territory
1

Simple average

Duty-free

Non ad valorem duties

MFN applied Bound

MFN applied 4

2

Bound

5

6

7

MFN applied Bound

Duties > 15 %
Bound

MFN applied Share of HS 6 digit subheadings in per cent
8

9

10

11

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

2011

114.6

16.7

0

11.7

0

0.5

99.9

41.7

Samoa

2012

26.4

14.5

0

6.0

3.4

3.1

77.1

51.7

Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of

2012

17.1

6.2

0.1

23.4

8.8

7.7

5.1

1.5

Senegal

2012

29.8

14.6

0

0

0

0

99.0

58.6

Serbia

2011

14.2

3.3

0.1

Seychelles

2012

7.8

87.8

3.1

Sierra Leone

2012

40.4

15.4

0

0.2

0

0

44.9
8.7
100.0

65.5
0.2

Singapore

2012

26.5

1.4

3.9

99.8

3.6

0.2

3.6

Solomon Islands

2012

73.3

15.9

0

0.6

3.3

3.3

86.4

3.0

South Africa

2012

39.6

8.4

21.8

47.2

0

12.8

72.3

21.8

Sri Lanka

2012

50.0

25.8

0

13.5

2.5

12.0

99.5

68.1

Sudan

2012

Suriname

2011

99.2

45.6

30.3
19.8

17.8

3.7
0.3

10.4

0
0

0.0

84.5

Swaziland

2012

39.6

8.6

21.8

47.2

0

12.8

72.3

23.0

Switzerland

2012

53.4

33.5

22.7

39.7

77.3

71.3

43.2

25.4

Chinese Taipei

2012

17.3

16.4

26.2

25.4

6.6

6.8

36.3

36.6

Tajikistan

2012

11.4

10.8

0.5

1.0

3.1

3.6

7.8

2.6

Tanzania

2012

120.0

20.0

0

15.3

0

0.9

99.9

68.3

Thailand

2011

39.0

21.8

2.0

5.0

44.2

30.5

91.0

57.3

East Timor

2012

Togo

2012

99.9

58.6

2.5
80.0

14.6

0
0

0

0
0

0

0

Tonga

2012

19.2

11.5

0

28.2

0

0

83.0

15.2

Trinidad and Tobago

2011

89.9

18.2

5.5

42.2

0

2.3

89.6

45.9

Tunisia

2012

116.0

33.0

0

3.8

0

0

100.0

89.7

Turkey

2011

61.0

41.2

0.0

16.3

0

0.6

87.3

62.2

Uganda

2012

77.6

19.9

0

15.3

0

0.9

99.9

68.3

Ukraine

2012

11.0

9.5

12.6

21.1

1.0

0

26.5

18.6

United Arab Emirates

2012

25.2

5.5

0

23.4

0

7.9

5.5

1.3

United States of America

2012

4.7

4.7

32.7

30.7

40.2

41.9

5.3

5.3

Uruguay

2012

33.9

9.8

0

8.9

0

0

96.3

Uzbekistan

2012

19.2

0

11.6

14.4
46.2

Vanuatu

43.6

17.5

0.1

8.8

0

0.5

99.3

49.7

2012

55.8

16.8

0

0

0

0

99.0

43.0

Viet Nam

2012

18.5

16.1

8.8

15.6

0

0

45.2

40.2

Yemen

2012

Zambia

2012

123.3

19.0

0

1.7

0

0

99.9

59.2

Zimbabwe

16

2012

Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of

2012

140.1

23.4

1.2

5.0

2.4

3.0

95.6

48.7

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 10.4

1.1

7.6

17.9

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Concessions not yet implemented in 2012

Duties > 3 * AVG
MFN
applied

Bound

Number of distinct duty rates MFN
MFN applied
Bound
applied

Maximum duty
Bound

Summary Tables
Agricultural products
Coefficient of variation
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subhdgs in per cent
12

13

0

14

15

0.1

0

16

250

17

182

18

16

19

16

20

24

Number of
MFN
applied tariff lines
21

90

Country/Territory
22

1,053

I SUMMARY TABLES

Agricultural products

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

0.6

1.0

1.4

109

109

65

22

40

71

864

Samoa

1.3

1.5

0

> 1000

427

105

18

303

357

1,183

Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of

0

0

0

30

20

2

3

6

Senegal

46

785

0

30

10

59

2,109

Serbia

8.7

200

7

387

861

Seychelles
Sierra Leone

0

0

0

80

30

4

7

12

45

787

3.6

0.2

0

> 1000

> 1000

55

7

335

2,160

1,298

Singapore

0.6

2.5

0

557

557

34

28

48

3 03

761

Solomon Islands

2.5

6.2

0

597

124

52

13 0

1 31

13 5

1, 089

South Africa

0.0

2.0

0

175

175

32

74

13

82

962

Sri Lanka

44

800

Sudan

83

1,053

Suriname

0

40
20

0

0

0

2.5

6.7

0

597

122

52

112

131

134

1,089

Swaziland

8.9

8.6

0

> 1000

> 1000

1716

1389

164

269

2,134

Switzerland

3.8

3.5

0

500

500

163

130

209

190

1,407

Chinese Taipei

1.1

1.5

100

292

292

177

28

89

83

3,115

Tajikistan

0

2.5

0

120

120

1

10

0

68

782

Tanzania

2.9

0.2

0

> 1000

124

388

233

114

80

1,236

Thailand

0

663

East Timor

0

50

5
6

3

9

9

1

0

0

0

80

20

1

3

0

46

785

Togo

0

0

0

20

20

2

4

10

68

712

Tonga

0

2.1

0

156

100

11

15

38

106

1,026

Trinidad and Tobago

0

0

0

200

36

27

8

33

20

2,299

Tunisia

4.5

9.8

0

225

225

135

150

79

113

2,335

Turkey

0

2.5

0

80

80

5

9

10

64

782

Uganda

0.7

1.0

0.1

64

424

32

91

65

120

2,149

Ukraine

5.5

1.3

0

200

200

2

10

168

278

1,183

United Arab Emirates
United States of America

6.0

7.0

0

350

350

818

770

336

313

1,691

0

0.4

0

55

35

14

16

23

57

1,478

Uruguay

65

2,331

Uzbekistan

1.1

43

230

0.2

1.4

3.5

210

75

12

11

27

72

680

Vanuatu

0

0

0

135

40

38

7

60

51

1,026

Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of

2.0

1.6

1.3

135

135

31

25

91

90

1,298

Viet Nam

71

934

Yemen

0

25

4

0

0

0

125

25

4

5

9

43

869

Zambia

0

1.6

0

150

160

32

39

30

92

828

Zimbabwe

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 17

Non-agricultural products
Summary Tables
Non-agricultural products

Year of
MFN
applied tariff Country/Territory
1

2

Binding coverage Simple average

Duty-free

Bound

Bound

MFN applied 4

5

6

7

in %
3

Non ad valorem duties

MFN applied MFN applied Bound

Duties > 15 %
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subheadings in per cent

5.7

8

9

0.4

10

11

Afghanistan

2012

0.2

Albania

2012

100

6.6

3.2

31.6

57.4

0

0

15.8

2.8
0

Angola

2011

100

60.1

6.9

0

.

0

0

100.0

10.1

Antigua and Barbuda

2012

97.5

51.5

9.1

0

6.9

0

0

97.5

22.2

Argentina

2012

100

31.8

12.8

0

14.1

0

0

98.1

39.0

Armenia

2012

100

7.6

3.0

41.6

69.7

0

0

0

0

Australia

2012

96.7

11.0

2.9

19.2

45.9

0.1

0.0

15.2

Azerbaijan

2012

8.3

3.2

37.8

0.4

7.3

0
0.2

Bahamas

2011

Bahrain, Kingdom of

2012

69.3

33.5

4.6

3.2

8.2

0

0.2

66.1

0

Bangladesh

2011

2.7

37.3

14.0

0.0

3.1

0

0.4

2.3

37.6

Barbados

2012

97.5

73.0

9.7

0

3.9

0

0.1

97.5

21.0

Belarus

2012

Belize

2012

97.6

51.5

9.3

0

9.6

0

0.0

97.6

21.3

Benin

2012

29.7

11.5

11.5

0.7

1.9

0

0

5.5

37.2

Bolivia, Plurinational State of

2012

100

40.0

11.0

0

7.4

0

0

100.0

19.5

Bosnia and Herzegovina

2012

Botswana

2012

35.0

20.4

9.1

14.2

5.9
95.8

0

10.1

30.1

15.8

7.4

13.5

63.9

87.6

9.1

0.2
0

0.9

0.0

Brazil

2012

100

30.8

14.1

0.7

5.6

0

0

96.5

39.7

Brunei Darussalam

2011

95.0

24.5

2.9

0

78.7

0

0.1

95.0

11.0

Burkina Faso

2012

29.6

13.3

11.5

0.7

1.9

0

0

5.3

37.2

Burundi

2012

10.2

27.0

11.7

0.4

40.5

0

0.0

7.2

37.5

Cambodia

2012

100

17.7

10.3

1.1

16.0

0

0

40.3

6.4

Cameroon

2012

0.2

65.0

17.2

0

2.6

0

0

0.1

44.2

Canada

2012

99.7

5.3

2.4

36.1

73.9

0.3

0

7.1

6.5

Cape Verde

2012

100.0

15.2

9.8

5.5

47.1

0

0

41.4

29.1

Central African Republic

2011

56.4

37.9

17.2

0

0.6

0

0

56.4

43.9

Chad

2011

0.3

76.1

17.2

0

0.6

0

0

0.3

43.9

Chile

2012

100

25.0

6.0

0.0

0.3

0

0

100.0

0

China

2011

100

9.1

8.7

6.7

7.7

0

0.5

13.4

11.6

100

34.4

7.8

2.9

2.6

0

0

97.1

0.3

1.0

43.9

Colombia

2012

Comoros

2012

Congo

2011

8.6
3.4

15.0

17.2

1.8

0

0.6

2.8

54.8

0

0

96.5

0.0
37.2

Cook Islands

2012
2012

100

42.9

4.6

Côte d'Ivoire

2012

22.7

8.6

11.5

0.7

1.9

0

0

2.8

Croatia

2012

100

5.5

4.1

28.5

51.4

0

0

0.3

0.4

Cuba

2012

20.4

9.4

10.7

1.7

5.5

0

0

2.0

8.4

100

95.9

Djibouti

2012

100

40.0

22.0

0.0

0.0

0

0

99.6

76.7

Dominica

2012

93.9

50.0

8.3

0

23.5

0

0

93.9

20.3

Dominican Republic

2012

100

33.2

6.4

2.8

59.1

0

0

87.9

25.2

Ecuador

2012

100.0

21.2

8.8

0

47.6

0

0

69.6

22.3

Egypt

2012

99.3

27.7

9.3

2.8

10.2

0

0

71.7

18.1

El Salvador

2012

100

35.7

5.1

3.1

53.8

0

0

96.9

Ethiopia

2012

European Union

2012

100

3.9

4.2

28.4

26.1

0.6

0.6

0.9

1.6

Fiji

2012

44.0

40.0

16.3

0

4.8

0.0

1.6

44.0

14.7

FYR of Macedonia

2012

100

6.3

5.9

38.6

42.4

0.1

0.2

8.7

8.3

Gabon

2011

100

15.5

17.2

0

0.6

0

0

1.2

43.9

The Gambia

2012

0.6

61.5

13.7

0

16.0

0

0

0.6

54.3

Georgia

2012

100

6.5

0.6

24.6

93.7

0.0

0

0.3

0

1.3

38.2

Ghana

99.2

0

Costa Rica

Democratic Republic of the Congo

0.4

0

2.2

0

0

16.5

0.1

0

5.1

0

0.3

98.8

0

0

0.6
47.8

1.3

Grenada

100

50.0

9.2

0

3.9

0

0

100.0

2012

100

39.7

5.1

2.8

54.3

0

0

93.1

0.4

Guinea

18

2012

Guatemala

2012

29.2

10.2

11.5

0.7

3.3

0

0

5.0

37.2

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

21.3

Concessions not yet implemented in 2012

Duties > 3 * AVG
MFN
applied

Bound

Number of distinct duty rates MFN
MFN applied
Bound
applied

Maximum duty
Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subhdgs in per cent
12

13

14

15

16

0.6

17

18

50

Summary Tables
Non-agricultural products
Coefficient of variation Number of
MFN
MFN
Bound
applied applied tariff lines
19

20

13

21

Country/Territory
22

65

4,571

I SUMMARY TABLES

Non-agricultural products

Afghanistan
Albania

10.6

21.0

0

20

15

7

6

105

164

7,313

0

2.1

0

80

30

3

7

3

95

4,658

Angola

0.2

3.2

0

206

70

25

19

23

85

5,477

Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina

0

0

0

35

35

10

15

23

84

9,208

0

30.3

0

15

10

7

2

92

141

7,909

Armenia

6.8

4.5

0

55

10

55

12

105

94

5,362

Australia
Azerbaijan

0.1
0

250

19

89

7,778

0

85

15

42

4,927

Bahamas

31

6,102

Bahrain, Kingdom of

0

0

100

5

3

3

29

0.1

0

0

200

25

13

26

79

65

5,159

Bangladesh

0.4

4.1

0

247

145

18

15

23

119

5,549

Barbados

101

8,543

Belarus
Belize

0.8

231

190

0

4.8

0

110

70

4

18

12

101

5,282

1.3

0

0

60

20

12

4

91

58

4,764

Benin

0

6.3

0

40

35

2

6

1

77

6,226

Bolivia, Plurinational State of

84

7,996

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0.4

9.2

0

50

60

13

70

70

148

6,142

Botswana

0

0

0

35

35

19

19

27

74

9,001

Brazil

0

13.1

0

50

155

5

19

30

199

7,396

Brunei Darussalam
Burkina Faso

0.0

19

46

1.2

0

0

100

20

11

4

141

58

4,764

1.4

0.3

0

100

83

10

8

113

97

4,658

Burundi

0

6.4

0.4

43

35

19

4

55

76

7,158

Cambodia
Cameroon

0

0

0

80

30

2

5

25

54

5,248

6.5

10.4

0

20

25

129

36

98

185

5,943

Canada

1.9

15.0

57.3

55

50

12

16

85

131

5,005

Cape Verde

0

0

0

70

30

7

6

25

54

4,679

Central African Republic

0

0

0

80

30

2

6

3

54

4,679

Chad

0

0

0

25

6

5

2

2

7

6,371

Chile

1.4

1.2

0

50

50

52

83

70

74

6,887

China

0.1

0.3

2.9

104

35

6

6

24

63

6,414

Colombia

37

4,667

Comoros

54

4,679

Congo

3,680

6,470

Cook Islands

0
0

0

25
0

30

0.8

30

8
3

6

68

17

> 1000

0

19.6

0

100

45

15

5

31

123

8,439

Costa Rica

0

0

0

25

20

12

4

65

58

4,764

Côte d'Ivoire

0.3

7.5

0

25

25

21

27

85

115

7,855

Croatia

0.7

0

0

62

30

27

13

80

65

4,870

0

100

0

7

22

Cuba
Democratic Republic of the Congo

0.0

0

0

230

33

9

13

19

36

6,023

Djibouti

0

3.7

0

100

165

2

15

3

145

5,266

Dominica

0

25.2

0

40

20

7

5

36

132

5,902

Dominican Republic

0

9.2

0

40

40

10

13

35

124

6,349

Ecuador

0.1

15.0

0

160

> 1000

18

9

71

384

6,384

Egypt

0

0.6

0

80

101

9

10

30

126

5,930

El Salvador

70

4,750

Ethiopia

7.4

2.8

0

26

26

125

112

105

100

7,325

European Union

0

35

6

0

0.9

0

40

> 1000

1

40

0

448

5,123

Fiji

2.5

2.7

0

33

33

33

32

107

111

7,476

FYR of Macedonia

1.2

0

0

60

30

2

6

32

54

4,679

Gabon

0

0

0

110

20

5

4

42

55

4,422

The Gambia

0.3

6.2

0

20

12

14

4

75

393

8,169

Georgia

0

99

0

100

40

3

86

5,361

Grenada

0
0

4.0

6
2

40
9

Ghana

0

0.4

0

75

151

12

6

32

125

5,990

Guatemala

0.2

0.1

0

40

55

14

6

69

60

4,953

Guinea

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 19

Non-agricultural products
Summary Tables
Non-agricultural products

Year of
MFN
applied tariff Country/Territory
1

2

Binding coverage Simple average

Duty-free

Bound

Bound

MFN applied 4

5

6

7

in %
3

Non ad valorem duties

MFN applied MFN applied Bound

Duties > 15 %
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subheadings in per cent
8

9

10

11

Guinea-Bissau

2012

97.4

50.0

11.5

0

1.9

0

0

97.4

37.2

Guyana

2012

100

50.1

9.3

0

9.4

0

0.0

100.0

21.3

Haiti

2012

87.7

18.2

2.3

3.3

73.6

9.2

0

51.2

0.0

Honduras

2012

100

31.7

5.0

2.9

54.1

0

0

88.7

0

Hong Kong, China

2012

37.3

0

0

37.3

100.0

0

0

0

0
0.0

Iceland

2012

94.2

9.6

2.3

46.3

76.9

0.0

0

27.8

India

2012

69.8

34.5

10.4

3.1

2.6

6.0

5.7

66.2

8.8

Indonesia

2012

96.1

35.6

6.9

2.9

10.9

0

0

89.4

1.2

Iran

2011

Israel

2012

71.5

11.3

26.1
3.9

9.4

65.8

.
6.7

2.8

0.2
13.1

44.1
1.2

Jamaica

2011

100

42.4

6.0

0.4

69.5

0

0

81.8

21.2

Japan

2012

99.6

2.6

2.6

55.9

55.7

1.7

1.9

0.8

0.7

Jordan

2012

100

15.2

9.8

7.3

53.8

0.1

0

46.2

33.6

1.8

37.5
3.3

Kazakhstan

2012

Kenya

2012

1.8

56.2

11.7

0

40.5

0

0.0

Korea, Republic of

2012

93.8

10.2

6.8

15.9

16.8

0.1

0.1

12.5

Kuwait, the State of

2012

99.9

96.7

4.6

3.3

8.2

0

0.3

96.6

0

Kyrgyz Republic

2012

99.9

6.7

4.2

22.9

51.7

0.2

0

0.1

0

100

18.7

100

60.1

63.9

0

0.9

100.0

Lao People's Democratic Republic

8.8

16.2

0.1
0

0

9.2

59.0

Lesotho

2012

Liberia

2012

Macao, China

2012

16.9

0

0

16.9

100.0

0

0

0

0

Madagascar

2012

19.0

25.4

11.3

0.0

4.9

0

0

16.3

35.4

Malawi

2012

21.2

42.5

12.0

0

35.0

0

0.0

21.2

36.6

Malaysia

2012

81.9

14.9

5.8

5.0

63.2

0.1

0.0

38.2

17.1

Maldives

2011

96.6

35.1

20.8

0

0.0

0

0

96.6

64.2

Mali

2012

31.1

14.1

11.5

0.7

1.9

0

0

6.9

37.2

29.9

10.7

Mauritania

7.4

10.1

10.1

0.0

0.7

1.2

0

20.4
17.1

5.6

Mauritius

2012

5.5

22.1

1.1

3.7

92.6

0

2.4

1.8

1.3

Mexico

2012

100

34.8

5.8

0.2

55.3

0.0

0.1

99.2

9.3

Moldova, Republic of

2012

100

5.9

3.7

28.6

52.3

0

0.2

0.1

0.1

Mongolia

2012

100

17.3

5.0

1.6

1.0

0

0

78.3

0

Montenegro

2012

100

4.3

3.3

31.9

29.1

0

0.0

0.2

0.6

Morocco

2012

100

39.3

8.7

0.0

0.0

0

0

99.4

26.0

Mozambique

2012

0.5

19.3

9.5

0

3.9

0

0

0.1

29.4

Myanmar

2012

5.1

21.8

5.1

1.0

2.9

0

0

3.7

5.2

Namibia

2012

95.8

15.8

7.4

13.5

63.9

0

0.9

35.0

20.4

Nepal

2012

99.3

23.7

12.0

3.1

3.0

0

0.2

86.9

14.9

New Zealand

2012

100.0

10.8

2.2

46.4

62.5

3.8

0.5

33.9

0.0

Nicaragua

2012

100

40.3

4.9

2.9

54.7

0

0

97.1

0

Niger

2012

96.2

38.3

11.5

0.6

1.9

0

0

72.4

37.2

Nigeria

2011

6.8

49.3

11.2

0

2.5

0

0

6.7

35.9

Norway

2012

100

3.2

0.5

48.9

95.3

2.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

Oman

2012

100

11.6

4.6

7.7

8.2

0

0.3

2.4

0

Pakistan

2012

99.1

54.6

13.2

0

5.0

0

0.1

95.4

36.2

22.1

6.1

5.2

37.4

0

67.0

0.0

Palau

2012

Panama

2012

100
100

30.0

Paraguay

2012

100

33.5

10.2

0

14.9

0

0

95.2

Peru

2011

100

29.1

3.6

3.0

55.6

0

0

97.0

0

Philippines

2012

61.9

23.4

5.7

2.9

3.9

0

0

50.8

1.6

Qatar

2012

100

14.5

4.6

1.1

8.2

0

0.3

18.1

0.0

Russian Federation

2012

100

7.2

9.4

3.4

14.2

7.0

10.1

1.3

10.8

Rwanda

2012

100

91.7

11.7

0.5

40.5

0

0.0

97.4

37.5

Saint Kitts and Nevis

2011

97.5

70.8

9.3

0

3.9

0

0

97.5

22.1

Saint Lucia

2011

99.5

54.0

9.3

0

3.8

0

0.1

99.5

22.0

Papua New Guinea

20

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 3.2

3.2
0

1.9
0.2
0.1

0.5
70.2

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

33.0

Concessions not yet implemented in 2012

Duties > 3 * AVG
MFN
applied

Bound

Number of distinct duty rates MFN
MFN applied
Bound
applied

Maximum duty
Bound

Summary Tables
Non-agricultural products
Coefficient of variation
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subhdgs in per cent
12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Number of
MFN
applied tariff lines
21

Country/Territory
22

0

0

0

50

20

2

4

1

58

4,764

Guinea-Bissau

0

4.1

0

100

70

3

13

3

100

5,278

Guyana

0

14.0

0

50

58

823

7

56

184

4,541

Haiti

0

19.4

0

55

15

18

4

30

116

5,920

I SUMMARY TABLES

Non-agricultural products

Honduras

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

6,258

Hong Kong, China

8.7

19.3

0

175

20

39

9

134

182

6,606

Iceland

0.2

1.3

0

161

143

346

344

38

94

9,980

India

0.0

0.7

0

150

150

10

15

26

87

7,577

Indonesia

105

5,964

Iran

4.4

20.0

0

739

110

623

129

210

170

7,274

Israel
Jamaica

7.1

120

21

0

21.2

0

100

50

10

10

38

149

5,636

8.9

8.0

0

813

463

312

213

481

309

7,603

Japan

0.0

17.7

0

59

66

12

16

66

123

5,367

Jordan

108

8,543

Kazakhstan

0

0.3

0

100

83

5

8

31

97

4,658

Kenya

3.4

0.1

0

313

334

57

39

88

91

10,531

Korea, Republic of
Kuwait, the State of

1.0

262

190

0

0

0

100

5

2

3

25

31

6,085

0

0.1

0

20

15

22

6

64

115

8,520

100

60

0

200

0.1
0.1

9.2
0.4

0

0

13
60

2

50
0

0

0

56
69

6

1

0

148

6,142

74

61
1

Kyrgyz Republic
Lao People's Democratic Republic

4,989

Lesotho
Liberia

0

5,786

Macao, China
Madagascar

0

0

0

30

20

13

5

27

59

5,529

0

0

0

125

25

10

8

19

88

4,754

Malawi

0.0

17.1

0

63

60

20

19

70

157

9,196

Malaysia

1.8

1.1

0

300

200

2

12

105

66

7,201

Maldives

2.8

0

0

60

20

11

4

110

58

4,764

0

50

0.1

12

72

Mali
Mauritania

0.1

6.7

0

122

117

3

214

161

359

5,390

0.0

9.3

0

156

50

12

15

15

153

10,912

Mauritius
Mexico

0.1

8.4

0

20

20

12

13

76

123

7,750

Moldova, Republic of

0

0

0

30

5

8

2

37

10

4,680

Mongolia

2.2

13.9

3.9

20

30

56

31

97

120

7,313

Montenegro

0

0.4

0

45

50

11

8

11

99

14,987

Morocco

0.1

0

0

100

20

3

6

171

74

4,475

Mozambique

0.0

5.2

0

165

40

11

15

76

124

8,384

Myanmar

0.4

9.2

0

50

316

14

69

70

163

6,142

Namibia

0

0.7

0.2

60

80

10

18

34

73

4,480

Nepal

6.5

5.7

0

196

45

281

6

114

129

6,437

New Zealand
Nicaragua

0

19.2

0

100

15

7

4

26

115

6,201

0

0

0

50

20

11

4

50

58

4,764

Niger

0.1

1.9

0

150

35

7

6

29

69

4,878

Nigeria

12.4

4.7

0

344

248

169

18

232

914

5,765

Norway

0

0

0

20

5

8

3

53

31

6,085

Oman

0

0.4

0

100

100

13

23

32

78

6,120

Pakistan

0.0

0.0

0

81

45

12

56

0

100

0

0

0

35

28

6

22

0

13.6

3.0

30

13

2

0

1.6

0

50

30

10

0.6
0.3

70

> 1000
81

454

4,648

Palau

90

7,312

Panama

22

84

9,046

3

24

132

6,399

Peru

9

49

101

7,795

Philippines

14

54

Papua New Guinea
Paraguay

0

0.0

0

30

20

13

4

34

33

6,101

Qatar

0.1

1.5

57.9

77

190

644

330

56

103

8,543

Russian Federation

0

0.3

0

100

83

13

8

31

97

4,658

Rwanda

0

3.2

0

170

70

9

12

11

89

5,386

Saint Kitts and Nevis

0.5

3.1

0

206

70

29

11

33

87

5,385

Saint Lucia

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 21

Non-agricultural products
Summary Tables
Non-agricultural products

Year of
MFN
applied tariff Country/Territory
1

2

Binding coverage Simple average

Duty-free

Bound

Bound

MFN applied 4

5

6

7

in %
3

Non ad valorem duties

MFN applied MFN applied Bound

Duties > 15 %
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subheadings in per cent
8

9

10

11

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

2011

99.7

54.7

9.1

0

3.8

0

0.1

99.7

21.4

Samoa

2012

100

20.4

10.8

0

2.0

0

0.0

50.7

25.0

Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of

2012

100

10.5

5.0

8.2

8.2

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.2

Senegal

2012

100

30.0

11.5

0

1.9

0

0

100.0

37.2

Serbia

2011

6.3

1.1

0

9.0

Seychelles

2012

6.2

87.8

0.0

10.0

Sierra Leone

2012

100

48.5

11.3

0

0.3

0

0

100.0

Singapore

2012

65.1

6.4

0

17.5

100.0

0

0

0

0

Solomon Islands

2012

100

79.4

9.1

0

0.1

1.2

0.4

97.9

0.1

South Africa

2012

95.8

15.8

7.4

13.5

63.9

0

0.9

35.0

20.4

Sri Lanka

2012

28.7

19.7

7.5

0.2

57.0

0.2

1.7

13.6

11.3

Sudan

2012

Suriname

2011

15.6

16.5

9.2

0.1

9.1

21.5

Swaziland

2012

95.8

15.8

7.4

13.5

63.9

0

0.9

35.0

20.4

Switzerland

2012

99.7

2.3

2.0

17.8

21.6

81.9

79.8

1.6

1.1

Chinese Taipei

2012

100

4.7

4.5

31.2

31.7

0.3

0.3

1.7

2.0

19.7

7.5
1.4

3.6

0
0.0

37.7

47.2

Tajikistan

2012

100

7.6

7.3

13.6

1.6

0

0

7.5

0

Tanzania

2012

0.2

120.0

11.7

0

40.5

0

0.0

0.2

37.5

Thailand

2011

71.3

25.4

8.0

3.0

24.2

15.2

6.9

62.2

17.4

East Timor

2012

Togo

2012

0.9

80.0

11.5

Tonga

2012

100.0

17.3

Trinidad and Tobago

2011

100

50.6

Tunisia

2012

51.6

40.8

Turkey

2011

42.7

Uganda

2012

2.9

2.5

.

0

0

0

1.9

0

0

0.9

37.2

12.1

0

11.2

0.0

0.0

46.5

10.6

5.9

0.8

71.1

0

0.0

96.1

21.5

12.6

0

37.4

0

0

51.6

28.1

17.0

4.8

4.0

25.2

0.1

0.5

20.0

3.1

51.2

11.6

0

40.6

0

0.0

2.9

37.4
0.3

Ukraine

100

5.0

3.7

33.8

43.1

0.0

0

0.5

2012

100

12.6

4.6

4.3

8.2

0

0.3

0

0

United States of America

2012

100.0

3.3

3.2

47.6

48.6

3.4

3.1

2.4

2.3

Uruguay

2012

100

31.2

10.6

0

16.0

0

0

98.5

38.7

Uzbekistan

2012

Vanuatu

2012

100.0

39.1

7.8

3.9

28.5

0

0.3

95.8

4.9

Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of

2012

100

33.6

12.8

0

0.7

0

0

99.0

26.1

Viet Nam

2012

100

10.4

8.4

15.1

40.7

0.0

0.1

24.7

22.1

Yemen

2012

Zambia

2012

4.1

43.5

12.8

0

25.0

0

0

4.1

30.3

Zimbabwe

22

2012

United Arab Emirates

2012

10.0

11.6

16.9

1.9

10.5

0.3

6.9

2.8

26.6

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 14.9

3.7

7.0

5.0

1.3

31.9

1.7

5.1

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Concessions not yet implemented in 2012

Duties > 3 * AVG
MFN
applied

Bound

Number of distinct duty rates MFN
MFN applied
Bound
applied

Maximum duty
Bound

Summary Tables
Non-agricultural products
Coefficient of variation
MFN
applied

Bound

Share of HS 6 digit subhdgs in per cent
12

13

0.5

14

2.9

15

0

16

206

17

40

18

30

19

10

20

34

Number of
MFN
applied tariff lines
21

84

5,385

Country/Territory
22

I SUMMARY TABLES

Non-agricultural products

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

0

0.0

0.3

55

50

16

7

33

51

4,617

Samoa

0

1.5

0.0

20

20

16

11

52

51

6,127

Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of

0

0

30

20

2

4

1

Senegal

0

58

4,764

6.0

30

15

93

7,917

Serbia

10.0

200

10

417

4,809

Seychelles
Sierra Leone

0

0

0

80

30

6

7

11

62

4,674

0

0

0

10

0

4

1

68

0

8,259

Singapore

0

0.1

0

231

46

59

35

16

26

4,681

Solomon Islands

0.4

9.2

0

50

> 1000

14

77

70

222

6,142

South Africa

0.7

11.3

0

100

406

27

36

87

170

5,559

Sri Lanka

80

4,654

Sudan

85

5,385

Suriname

0
0

2.4

40
0

40

40

6
17

9

73

0.4

9.2

0

50

316

14

69

70

163

6,142

Swaziland

8.8

8.6

0

142

58

5146

4922

184

168

6,171

Switzerland

2.6

3.0

0

209

186

128

86

120

120

7,318

Chinese Taipei

0.6

0

100

30

15

17

6

70

52

10,687

Tajikistan

0

0.3

0

120

83

1

8

0

97

4,658

Tanzania

0.4

11.3

0

130

142

853

175

40

140

7,846

Thailand

0

4,387

East Timor

0

3

1

0

0

0

80

20

1

4

0

58

4,764

Togo

0

0

0

20

20

3

6

14

55

4,592

Tonga

0

21.5

0

100

45

11

13

22

153

5,269

Trinidad and Tobago

0.1

0

0

180

36

28

7

39

89

9,171

Tunisia

0.8

3.5

0

161

82

249

117

79

150

9,770

Turkey

0

0.5

0

80

55

3

8

23

97

4,658

Uganda

0.5

5.6

0.1

25

65

42

43

90

115

8,573

Ukraine

0

0

0

15

5

9

3

38

31

6,102

United Arab Emirates

8.7

8.4

0

55

55

595

439

149

145

9,571

United States of America

0

0.5

0

35

35

11

15

23

78

10,098

Uruguay

83

8,653

Uzbekistan

0.3

62

228

0

1.8

0.5

85

55

15

11

29

93

4,405

Vanuatu

0

0.2

0

40

40

13

7

13

60

6,415

Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of

2.1

4.1

3.0

200

100

55

33

119

126

8,248

Viet Nam

66

5,235

Yemen

5.1

25

4

0

0

0

125

25

6

5

29

82

5,310

Zambia

0.3

6.9

0

150

356

37

323

127

145

5,104

Zimbabwe

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 23

II. Country tables
Index of country tables
Afghanistan30
Albania31
Angola32
Antigua and Barbuda
33
Argentina34
Armenia35
Australia36
Azerbaijan37
Bahamas38
Bahrain, Kingdom of
39
Bangladesh40
Barbados41
Belarus42
Belize43
Benin44
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
45
Bosnia and Herzegovina
46
Botswana47
Brazil48
Brunei Darussalam
49
Burkina Faso
50
Burundi51
Cambodia52
Cameroon53
Canada54
Cape Verde
55
Central African Republic
56
Chad57
Chile58
China59
Colombia60
Comoros61
Congo62
Cook Islands
63
Costa Rica
64
Côte d’Ivoire
65
Croatia66
Cuba67
Democratic Republic of the Congo
68
Djibouti69
Dominica70
Dominican Republic
71
Ecuador72
Egypt73
El Salvador
74
Ethiopia75
1
European Union 76
Fiji77
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 78
Gabon79

Gambia80
Georgia81
Ghana82
Grenada83
Guatemala84
Guinea85
Guinea-Bissau86
Guyana87
Haiti88
Honduras89
Hong Kong, China
90
Iceland91
India92
Indonesia93
Iran94
Israel95
Jamaica96
Japan97
Jordan98
Kazakhstan99
Kenya100
Korea, Republic of
101
Kuwait102
Kyrgyz Republic
103
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
104
Lesotho105
Liberia, Republic of
106
Macao, China
107
Madagascar108
Malawi109
Malaysia110
Maldives111
Mali112
Mauritania113
Mauritius114
Mexico115
Moldova, Republic of
116
Mongolia117
Montenegro118
Morocco119
Mozambique120
Myanmar121
Namibia122
Nepal123
New Zealand
124
Nicaragua125
Niger126
Nigeria127
Norway128
Oman129

Pakistan130
Palau131
Panama132
Papua New Guinea
133
Paraguay134
Peru135
Philippines136
Qatar137
Russian Federation
138
Rwanda139
Saint Kitts and Nevis
140
Saint Lucia
141
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
142
Samoa143
Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of
144
Senegal145
Serbia146
Seychelles147
Sierra Leone
148
Singapore149
Solomon Islands
150
South Africa
151
Sri Lanka
152
Sudan153
Suriname154
Swaziland155
Switzerland 2156
Chinese Taipei
157
Tajikistan158
Tanzania159
Thailand160
East Timor
161
Togo162
Tonga163
Trinidad and Tobago
164
Tunisia165
Turkey166
Uganda167
Ukraine168
United Arab Emirates
169
United States of America
170
Uruguay171
Uzbekistan172
Vanuatu173
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
174
Viet Nam
175
Yemen176
Zambia177
Zimbabwe178

1. The information provided by the European Union (formerly European Communities) covers its 27 members states before Croatia joined on July 1, 2013.
2. The information provided by Switzerland covers Liechtenstein.

24

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Part A.1
Tariffs and imports: Summary and duty ranges
Description or method of calculation

Technical notes

Simple average final bound Simple average of final bound duties excluding unbound tariff lines.

Simple average MFN applied Simple average of MFN applied duties.

Trade weighted average

HS six-digit MFN tariff averages weighted with HS six-digit import flows for traded national tariff lines.

Imports in billion US$

Imports in billion US$.

Binding coverage Share of HS six-digit subheadings containing at least one bound tariff line. The percentage share is also presented separately for non-agricultural (Non-AG) tariff lines. Full binding coverage is indicated by 100 without further decimals.
If some tariff lines are unbound but the result still rounds to
100 this is reflected by maintaining one decimal, i.e. 100.0.

Only duties and imports recorded under HS Chapters 01-97 are taken into account. Each applied tariff schedule is validated against the standard nomenclature at the HS six-digit subheading level of the HS version adopted by the country for the reference year. National tariff lines that do not follow this standard (i.e., the first six digits should be based on the standard subheading nomenclature of the HS version used by the country) are discarded and not taken into account. On the other hand, missing subheadings are added. Hence, all calculations are based on the complete standard nomenclature. All simple averages are based on pre-aggregated
HS six-digit averages. Pre-aggregation means that duties at the tariff line level are first averaged to HS six-digit subheadings. Subsequent calculations are based on these pre-aggregated averages. AG: Tariff quotas (in %)

Per cent of HS six-digit subheadings in the schedule of agricultural concession covered by tariff quotas. Partial coverage is taken into account on a pro rata basis.

AG: Special safeguards (in %)

Per cent of HS six-digit subheadings in the schedule of agricultural concessions with at least one tariff line subject to Special Safeguards (SSG). Partial coverage is taken into account on a pro rata basis.

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

II COUNTRY TABLES

Row titles

To the extent possible, non-ad valorem duties are converted into ad valorem equivalents. The methodology used for the conversion is in Technical Annex B of World Tariff Profiles 2006.

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 25

Part A.2
Tariffs and imports by product groups
Frequency distribution by duty ranges
The shares by duty ranges in the frequency distribution are based on the pro rata shares of tariff line level duties in the standard HS six-digit subheadings.
For example, if there are two tariff lines in one HS six-digit subheading, one with a duty of 10 and one with a duty of 20, then half of the HS six-digit subheading is allocated to the 5-10 range and the other half to the 15-25 range. The frequency distribution includes AVEs whenever those were calculated. The percentages by duty ranges add up to 100 per cent for MFN applied duties unless there are non-computable AVEs or missing tariff lines for which no separate category was allocated. For bound duties, the duty ranges add up to the percentage of the binding coverage unless there are non-computable AVEs or missing tariff lines. Please note that the use of different nomenclatures for bound and MFN applied duties affects the comparability of bound and MFN applied duty shares by frequency ranges.
When trade is available at the tariff line level, imports are allocated on a tariff line basis to the respective duty ranges. Otherwise, HS six-digit imports are allocated on a pro rata basis to duty ranges, e.g. if there are two tariff lines in one HS six-digit subheading, one with a duty of 10 and one with a duty of 20 then half of the HS six-digit imports are allocated to the 5-10 range and the other half to the 15-25 range.
Share of HS six-digit subheadings subject to non-ad valorem duties: when only part of the HS six-digit subheading is subject to non-ad valorem duties, the percentage share of these tariff lines is used. 26

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics Column heading

Description or method of calculation

AVG

Duty free

Max

Highest ad valorem duty or calculated
AVE within the product group
Share of HS six-digit subheadings containing at least one bound tariff line. Full binding coverage is indicated by 100 without further decimals. If some tariff lines are unbound but the result still rounds to 100 this is reflected by maintaining one decimal, i.e. 100.0.

AVG

Simple average of MFN applied duties.

Duty free

Share of duty-free HS six-digit subheadings in the total number of subheadings in the product group. Partially duty-free subheadings are taken into account on a pro rata basis.

Max

Highest ad valorem duty or calculated
AVE within the product group

Share in %

MFN applied duties

Share of duty-free HS six-digit subheadings in the total number of subheadings in the product group. Partially duty-free subheadings are taken into account on a pro rata basis.

Binding in %

Final bound duties

Simple average of final bound duties excluding unbound tariff lines

Share of imports falling under product group

Duty free in %

Share of MFN duty-free imports falling under product group in total imports in that product group. Partially duty-free subheadings are taken into account on a pro rata basis if tariff line imports are not available.

Imports

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Part B
Exports to major trading partners and duties faced
Column heading

Bilateral imports

Description or method of calculation

Total imports of major partner countries

HS 2 digit

Number of HS Chapters with trade flows after exclusion of
5 per cent of smallest bilateral tariff line trade flows.

HS 6 digit

Number of HS six-digit subheadings with trade flows after exclusion of 5 per cent of smallest bilateral tariff line trade flows

Simple

Simple average of MFN duties based only on tariff lines with imports

Weighted

Trade-weighted average MFN duty

Weighted

Trade-weighted average difference between the MFN duty and the most advantageous preferential duty. Tariff lines where either MFN or preferential duties cannot be expressed in ad valorem terms have been excluded.

TL in %

Duty-free tariff lines in per cent of all bilateral trade flows; includes dutyfree preferential treatment. Partially duty-free subheadings are taken into account on a pro rata basis if tariff line imports are not available.

Value in %

Share of duty-free trade in per cent of all bilateral trade flows; includes duty-free preferential treatment. Partially duty-free subheadings are taken into account on a pro rata basis if tariff line imports are not available.

Diversification:
95 % trade in no. of

II COUNTRY TABLES

in Mill US$

MFN Average of traded TL

Preference margin

Duty-free imports

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 27

Definition of groups used in part A.2
Product Group

1
MTN

Harmonized System nomenclature 2012

Agricultural products (Ag)
Animal products

17

Ch. 01, Ch. 02, 1601-02

Dairy products

21

0401-06

12

Ch. 07, Ch. 08, 1105-06, 2001-08

19

0601-03, 1211, Ch. 13, Ch. 14

13

0901-03, Ch. 18 (except 1802), 2101

x15

0407-10, 1101-04, 1107-09, Ch. 19, 2102-06, 2209

16

Ch. 10

Oilseeds, fats & oils

18

1201-08, Ch. 15 (except 150410, 150420), 2304-06, 3823

Sugars and confectionery 14

Ch. 17

20

2009, 2201-08

22

Ch. 24

x23

5201-5203

x15

0904-10

x23

Ch.05 (except 0508, 051191), 0604, 1209-10, 1212-14, 1802,
230110, 2302-03, 2307- 09, 290543-45, 3301, 3501-05, 380910,
382460, 4101-03, 4301, 5001- 03, 5101-03, 5301-02

Fruit, vegetables, plants Coffee, tea
Cereals and preparations Beverages and tobacco Cotton

Other agricultural products 1. 
Multilateral Trade Negotiations (MTN) categories were first defined in the Tokyo Round and adapted for the Harmonized System in the Uruguay Round.
The product group breakdown in this publication deviates slightly from the previous definition, which was based on the HS 1992 nomenclature.

28

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Product Group

1
MTN

Harmonized System nomenclature 2012

Non-agricultural products (Non-Ag)
Fish and fish products Ch. 03, 0508, 051191, 150410, 150420, 1603-05, 230120

4

2601-17, 2620, Ch. 72-76 (except 7321-22), Ch. 78-83 (except 8304-05)

9

Ch. 25, 2618-19, 2621, 2701-04, 2706- 08, 2711-15, Ch.31, 3403,
Ch. 68-71 (except 6807, 701911-19, 701940-59), 911310-20

97

2709-10

2
Chemicals

5

2705, Ch. 28-30 (except 290543-45, 300590), Ch. 32- 33 (except
3301, 330620) , Ch. 34 (except 3403, 3406), 3506-07, 3601-04,
Ch. 37-39 (except 380910, 3823, 382460, 392112-13, 392190)

Wood, paper, etc.

1

Ch.44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 9401-04 (except 940490, 961900)

Textiles

x2

300590, 330620, 392112-13, 392190, 420212, 420222, 420232,
420292, Ch. 50-60 (except 5001-03, 5101-03, 5201-03, 5301-02),
Ch. 63, 640520, 640610, 6501-05, 6601, 701911-19,
701940-59, 870821, 8804, 911390, 940490, 961210

Clothing

x2

Ch. 61-62

Leather, footwear, etc.

3

Ch. 40, Ch. 41 (except 4101-4103), 4201-05 (except 420212, 420222,
420232, 420292), 4302-04, Ch. 64 (except 640520, 640610), 9605

Non-electrical machinery 7

7321-22, Ch. 84 (except 846721-29), 850860, 852841, 852851,
852861, 8608, 8709

Electrical machinery

8

846721-29, Ch. 85 (except 850860, 852841, 852851,
852861, 8519-8523 but including 852352)

Transport equipment

6

Ch. 86 (except 8608), 8701-08 (except 870821),
8711-14, 8716, 8801-03, Ch. 89

Manufactures, not elsewhere specified

10

2716, 3406, 3605-06, 4206, Ch. 46, 6506-07, 6602-03, Ch. 67, 6807,
8304-05, 8519-23 (excluding 852352), 8710, 8715, 8805, Ch. 90‑93
(except 9113), 9405-06, Ch. 95-97 (except 9605, 961210 , 961900)

Minerals and metals

Petroleum

II COUNTRY TABLES

11

2. 
The part of HS subheading 330210 which relates to products originally classified as agricultural has not been taken into account in the Chemicals product group.

WTO ITC UNCTAD
World Tariff Profiles 2013

Download the data: www.wto.org/statistics 29

Afghanistan
Afghanistan
Part A.1

Tariffs and imports: Summary and duty ranges

Summary

Total

Ag

Non-Ag

Non-WTO member
Binding coverage:

Simple average final bound
Simple average MFN applied

Total

5.9

7.1

5.7

Trade weighted average

2012
2011

8.3

7.2

8.6

Ag: Tariff quotas (in %)

Imports in billion US$

2011

4.0

0.9

3.1

Ag: Special safeguards (in % )

5

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Managers

...Managers who are clearly experienced and properly educated and want to be sophisticated need to have the following qualities as a manager: globalization, technology, innovation, diversity, and most importantly ethics. Managers would use globalization to expand their business globally, and to increase sales and representation of company’s existence. The use of technology is very important for a manger to know as an instinct. Technology is everywhere in today’s modern world. Managers who don’t know how to use the computer or know how to type, is really pretty much useless in reality. It is very important for managers to learn how to communicate efficiently with the use of modern technology such as chat and e-mail. Innovation is a key success point in a creative manager. Managers should always be looking for new innovative ways to do things. For example if a manger uses chat and e-mail to communicate, will a manger will be better off if they were to use social website to not only represent and market the company but communicate broadly to all employees at once. Therefore the use of social websites has 3 advantages oppose to just the use of e-mail and chat. Social websites advantages are free marketing, so the public can view what the company has wrote. Second broad communication to all employees at the same time, and third representation; making positive remarks about the business to consumers and these are few examples a manager can demonstrate innovation. Diversity is one...

Words: 418 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Manager Expectations

...My definition of a great manager is one who “gets things done through people”; if you want it right you don’t always have to do it yourself. In addition, there is a quote by the philosopher Lao Tzu that I absolutely feel sums up a great leader: “Go to the people. Live with them. Learn from them. Love them. Start with what they know. Build with what they have. But with the best leaders, when the work is done, the task accomplished, the people will say "We have done this ourselves". Leadership: * Be a servant manager – Take a humble approach with your direct reports (supervisors) and work for them, and not the other way around. Treat your direct reports and their employees with dignity, stay focused on the moment and do not multitask when speaking with employees, never interrupt them, listen to them intensely, smiling, saying please and thank you, acknowledge and welcome the contributions of your staff, quickly admit your mistakes, apologize as needed, never have to be the smartest person in the room, spend time on the front lines with your staff, and engage your customers. * Be a positive leader – You will set the tone for the entire staff in your department. If you are down and acting as if you are fighting against the world your staff will feel that same way. Your example is the personality reflected throughout the entire department. I expect you to be a positive leader. You are always setting an example for your staff to follow. Is it a good example, or a bad example...

Words: 1240 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Human Manager

...The Humane Manager: Role and Relevance in managing people in an organisation “Great management is about character and not technique “ Presenters - Anurag, Ashish, Abhishek, Sumanta, Suvrodip There are two categories of managers we come across in our daily life.One the Good Managers and the other Great Mangers. A good manager has all the technical proficiencies one expects a manger to have,what a b-school may instill in him/her,the stats,the data analysis,the curve-fittings,the collective bargaining and negotiation skills,the strategies.These are the subjects which can be taught.But we are still in the dark ages when it comes to teaching people how to behave like great managers- how to instill courage and integrity,how to stand up for human dignity and rights.These are things that cannot be taught.Managers are not responsible for other’s happiness we say,the workplace is not a nursery school we say, we have market shares and profits to bother,power is too useful to and entertaining to dribble away on relationships,we have go tour own nests to feather. But the only people who become great managers are the ones who believe in their guts that managing is not just a set of mechanical processes but a series of human interactions. We may love and work hard for the manager who knows little for a manager who knows little about pay roll management, marketing or computers ,but we almost invariably dislike and thwart managers who are mean-spirited...

Words: 280 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Manager Paper

...TTH 6 November 25, 2014 Manager Paper I interview Anthony Rodriguez the General manager of TGI Friday’s in Rancho Cucamonga. TGI Friday's is a franchise restaurant that serves a variety of food items (like burgers, pasta, wings, salads). The TGI Friday’s, in Rancho Cucamonga, has a large amount of traffic with weekly sales of 90 to 100 thousand and about 60 employees. Anthony has no college education but has read many manger books like the One Minute Manager and Good to Great. Before becoming a General manager of TGI Friday’s, he uses to be a server for a different Friday’s. The purpose of the interview was to determine how a manager plans their day-to-day operations and how they motivate employees. Planning is a very important for managers since it helps them understand their overall task with steps needed to accomplish such task. However there is not right way to plan so everyone has his or her own ideas of planning. For Anthony planning means creating a list of his entire task. At times he is asked to increase the use of customer loyalty program (a program offered at Friday’s that allows customers to earn points on purchase and allows them to receive free items). So he brainstormed and came up with idea of creating a game by offering top servers with the most sign up a gift card. Later he executed his plan, which end up being a success since it increased sign ups. Motivating employees to perform everyday task is an important task for a manager. TGI Friday’s offers employee’s...

Words: 511 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Manager Interview

...Case Manager Interview Case Manager: Merventine Scott Organization: Family and Youth Services Assessment and reassessment 1. When clients are referred to your organization, what process or procedure is followed to assess your client (such as psychological, social, medical, et cetera)? When clients are referred to Family and Youth Services an initial assessment is performed, which includes information on a clients demographics, residential status, income, insurance coverage, mental or medical history, and main reason for seeking service. The process also includes an overview of different areas of need such as shelter, food, safety, and health care. 2. What steps do you take to stay up to date on current services or changes in available services? Family and Youth Services management team sends program coordinators, qualified professionals, counselors, and other licensed staff out every month to meetings held for service providers. The staff comes back and we have conferences to review and discuss changes and make sure that everyone understands the new policies and procedures for these changes. We also make time for networking to research additional information on what services are available and share and use other information from neighboring agencies. 3. Can you describe the standards you use in writing up assessments, reports, and recommendations? All case managers should utilize the Standards of Practice for Case management. The case manager should complete all assessments...

Words: 1200 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Roles of a Financial Manager

...The role of the financial manager has in maximizing shareholders value is key to the achieving the goals of the shareholders. The financial manager performs double duty working toward achieving profits for the company and optimizing the shareholders value. The flexibility of having the ability to hear viewpoints from different angles to achieve the goals of both the shareholders and the company’s manager. Today’s financial manager must have the skills and strength to evaluate and assess risks to help their company maintain a competitive edge. The responsible of the financial manager in maximizing shareholders and use real-time financial information to take advantage of the latest opportunity to capitalize on an investment. According to the text the financial managers works to achieve the goals of shareholders because shareholders are the owners of the company that employs the financial manager. This can give rise to conflict when a manager makes decision because of the needed to make decisions based on shareholders approval and what is best for the company ongoing success. Sometimes the goals of shareholders can tempt the financial manager to make unethical decision in managers attempt to maximize the goals of the shareholder value. Other times companies will have a disregard of shareholders values and not only disregard reducing expenses but foster an environment where financial abuse takes place from renting luxury cars to doing business at the most expensive...

Words: 738 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

What Make a Good Manager?

...Governors University Course: TJP1 TASK 1 What Makes a Good Manager? The purpose for the presentation is to inform the audience about my perspective on a good manger; and also the skills that employers may want in a manger. The audience for the presentation is any individual or company that is interested in a subordinate’s views of a good manager. The significance of the chosen topic is to shown several key management skills, which managers should strive to have. Presentation Outline I. What Makes a Good Manager? A. Hi. I am a student at WGU. The topic that I will be discussing is “What Makes a Good Manager?” I have worked for several companies, while dealing with different types of managers. My experience with these managers has shown me that not everyone can be a good manger. I believe that there are different types of skills; a good manager should have in the workforce to develop the company and its employees. At the end of this presentation, you will not only know my perspective on a good manger, but also the skills that employers may want in a manager. II. The Seven Management Skills ☺ Delegate tasks wisely to the employees ☺ Establish goals for the employees ☺ Be adaptable in your communicative skills ☺ Make time for the CEO, clients, and employees ☺ Identify achievements of their employees ☺ Think about permanent solutions, not quick fixes ☺ Don’t take things too seriously III. Delegate Tasks Wisely ☺ A good manager must be able to delegate tasks wisely to the employees...

Words: 1422 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

The Changing Role of the Relationship Manager

...The Changing Role of the Relationship Manager The relationship between wealth managers and their clients is not what it used to be. Public opinion of the financial sector, as a whole, has become sharply critical—people are outraged by the inability of the industry. Clients have become far less trusting and increasingly likely to jump to another wealth manager. But the relationship between RMs and their clients has actually changed well before the onset of crisis. Rise of the Product-Push Model before a Crisis At many wealth-management institutions, particularly the larger ones, the continuity of client relationships has— over time—been disrupted by organizational changes and the shuffling of client portfolios among RMs. In some cases, the goal was to bind the client more to the institution than to an individual advisor. In other cases, however, the institution itself simply could not maintain a consistent service model. At the same time, investors became more interested in diversifying their wealth across institutions. And as information about financial products became more accessible, some investors became self-directed. They tended to be less interested in holistic planning and more interested in specific types of support or investment recommendations. The role of the RM has also changed. Since the beginning of the decade, the RM has become less of a confidant and more of a salesperson. This shift was most apparent in the brokerage model, where RMs began providing targeted...

Words: 902 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Why Memo Is Disliked by Manager

...1. Many managers dislike memos because they are disorganized, wordy and pointless. The most effective manger should not be trapped in memos 2. With the development of computer technology, the numbers of memos are increasing. 3. The reasons of sending memos are managerial, psychological and political. 4. The memo is the most useful tool for communicating large amounts of detailed information. Might be dangerous if written inappropriately. Sued or fired 5. The memo is the managerial tool of choice when you want to put out word to lots of people. Have to be worded with exquisite care, particularly for announcing bad news-turn down in business, a firing, promotion over rivals. Recipient are likely to pore over these bullentins.(rewrite) 6. Announcing executive’s dismissal become more concise for the fear of annocing too many contributions may cause people think the firing was unjustified. Good that companies have stopped firing people by memo 7. Psychological reason: Memos are overused by mangers because they feel uncomfortable, too shy to communicate in person or over the phone. 8. Mangers send memos for political reasons. carry political power 9. Convey more subtle political messages. If changed from informal to formal, need to find out what has changed. 10. Clear motive, not wordy, easy to understand 11. Well-defined purpose in mind: who is your audience? What do you want them to do? What information they want? Pick a format-some companies establish standardized...

Words: 370 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Conflict of Interest Between Managers and Shareholders

...Corporate managers and shareholders can sometimes find themselves in a conflict of interest. The goal of being a good manager is being able to spot these potential conflicts and to remedy the situation before a serious problem arises. The biggest conflict between managers and shareholders is going to be money. Here is the most common scenario. A corporation is profitable. In fact, the corporation is more profitable than expected. Therefore, the corporation has a cash surplus, if you will. Managers would want this money as a financial bonus and the shareholders would want this money as a stock dividend. What to do? What to do? Mangers will argue that without their leadership and managerial ability, the corporation would not have been as profitable. The shareholders will argue that without their money, the corporation would not have been able to invest in its growth, and therefore, would not have reached that level of prosperity. Who should get the money? Another situation arises when the managers are also shareholders. This may lead a particular manager to push the opposite way of his/her position. For example, if a shareholder manager would get more money from a stock dividend than from a bonus, this shareholder manager might vote in favor of a stock dividend, not because he/she believes that stockholders should be rewarded for their investment, but because it will mean more money for that particular manager. What if only that one manger is a stock holder? Before...

Words: 406 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Product Manager

...A product manager investigates, selects, and develops products for an organization, performing the activities of product management. A product manager considers numerous factors such as intended demographic, the products offered by the competition, and how well the product fits with the company's business model. Generally, a product manager manages one or more tangible products. However, the term may be used to describe a person who manages intangible products, such as music, information, and services. A product manager's role in tangible goods industries is similar to a program director's role in service industries. Diverse interpretations regarding the role of the product manager are the norm. The product manager title is often used in many ways to describe drastically different duties and responsibilities. Even within the high-tech industry where product management is better defined, the product manager's job description varies widely among companies. This is due to tradition and intuitive interpretations by different individuals. In the financial services industry (banking, insurance etc.), product managers manage products (for example, credit card portfolios), their profit and loss, and also determine the business development strategy. In a Scrum environment, a Product Manager is also referred to as the Product Owner, and usually has the main role of representing the product to the customer.[1] Some of the responsibilities of the Product Owner include marketing of the...

Words: 279 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Hotel Manager

...Job profiles Hotel manager If you can manage staff, and you want to get into the hospitality industry, this job could be ideal for you. Hotel managers oversee all aspects of running a hotel, from housekeeping and general maintenance to budget management and marketing. In this job will need strong business skills. You will need to communicate well, with a sensitive and diplomatic approach. You will also need to think on your feet to solve problems quickly. To get into this job you could enter at a junior position and work your way up to management. Or you could do a higher education qualification in a subject like hospitality management and go straight in as a manager. An Apprenticeship in hospitality and catering can also be a route in. The work Large hotels may have a manager for each department, reporting to the general manager. In smaller hotels, the manager is more involved in the day-to-day running of the hotel, often dealing directly with guests. As a hotel manager, your tasks would typically include: * setting annual budgets * analysing financial information and statistics * setting business targets and marketing strategies * managing staff * organising building maintenance * making sure security is effective * dealing with customer complaints and comments * making sure the hotel follows regulations such as licensing laws * securing corporate bookings for entertainment and conference facilities. In larger hotels you will...

Words: 646 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Football Manager Interview

...Football Manager is an enormously complex simulation. On a global level, the game tracks thousands of careers, ambitions and relationships, and on any given match day, weather, morale, skills and individual personal issues can contribute to moments of brilliance or abject failure. Talking to Sports Interactive’s director Miles Jacobson, I found that the simulation model is even more elaborate in some areas than I’d expected. Read on to find out about the game’s expanding narrative engine, how climate change is forcing the team to update the code that generates weather patterns, why the ugliest aspects of football have no place in FM and how a non-contract player’s family situation might prevent him from playing for your club. RPS: You’ve mentioned in previous interviews that you have a database of thousands of features to implement eventually. But do you have an overall vision of where the game is going to be in two or three years? Is there a shape that it’s taking? Jacobson: I tend to work two versions ahead. It used to be three but it’s two now because we’re managing to fit in a lot more each year, so there’s always an overall vision for the game. Whether that’s a year of revolution or of evolution – I think, certainly, the revolution years are going to be less and less because there’s so much in the game already that we’d rather look at evolving certain large chunks of the game each year. When you’re working on an annually iterative sports title that’s based on real life...

Words: 2911 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Top Qualities of a Project Manager

...Top 10 Qualities of a Project Manager What qualities are most important for a project leader to be effective? Over the past few years, the people at ESI International, world leaders in Project Management Training, have looked in to what makes an effective project leader. With the unique opportunity to ask some of the most talented project leaders in the world on their Project Leadership courses ESI have managed to collect a running tally on their responses. Below are the top 10 in rank order according to frequency listed. Inspires a Shared Vision An effective project leader is often described as having a vision of where to go and the ability to articulate it. Visionaries thrive on change and being able to draw new boundaries. It was once said that a leader is someone who "lifts us up, gives us a reason for being and gives the vision and spirit to change." Visionary leaders enable people to feel they have a real stake in the project. They empower people to experience the vision on their own. According to Bennis "They offer people opportunities to create their own vision, to explore what the vision will mean to their jobs and lives, and to envision their future as part of the vision for the organisation." (Bennis, 1997) Good Communicator The ability to communicate with people at all levels is almost always named as the second most important skill by project managers and team members. Project leadership calls for clear communication about goals, responsibility, performance...

Words: 1250 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Banana Republic General Manager Duties

...Banana Republic General Manager Duties 1. General Manager of Banana Republic Factory Store in Hershey, PA “This position leads BRFS Stores. The store produces an annual volume ranging from $2-20 million. In a standard location the GM is responsible for attracting, hiring, training and developing all levels of associates. They lead an average of 4 exempt and non-exempt positions. The GM is responsible for implementing the individual store strategy in a manner consistent with Gap Inc.'s Purpose, Values and Behaviors. The GM leads their team to meet net contribution goals, sales goals, customer service targets, and Operating and Human Resources objectives through motivation, inspiration and accountability. The GM is accountable for professional representation of our brands within their locale, understanding our competitors and their operations as well as driving excellent tenant and community relationships. Leadership and Employee Results (25%) • Holds Store team and self accountable to all Gap Inc. standards of performance and behavior. • Effectively sources, recruits, selects and on-boards all management and non-exempt store personnel. • Maintains optimal staffing levels to ensure business needs are obtained while promoting associate retention. • Promotes a high-quality store associate experience from on boarding through the associate life cycle. • Promotes maximum team and individual performance through consistent coaching and feedback. Drives in-store performance...

Words: 890 - Pages: 4