...of content External Analysis: 2 Macro environment: 2 Meso environment: 5 Internal Analysis 7 SWOT Analysis Pepsi case: 9 Objectives 10 Marketing Strategy 10 Marketing Plan 12 Product 12 Place 14 Price 14 Budget & Control 15 External Analysis: Macro environment: The environment is constantly changing and therefore also influencing PepsiCo’s operations. Environmental changes which are not directly involved with the company but do influence it can be put in six categories: economic, technological, political, cultural, natural and international changes. These changes and their influence on PepsiCo Canada are described per category. Management R. L. Draft, M. Kendrick, N. Vershinina, the general environment page 85-91. Economic In March 2012 Canada’s economy was ranked 11th of the world with a GDP of $1,759 billion. Canada is a wealthy nation with a very high standard of living and is also one of the world’s top trading nations. Since the 2008 world financial crisis Canada has emerged as one of the strongest developed economies in the world. The GDP growth of Canada in 2010 was more than 3% even though most of the World’s Western countries were in an economic recession. The stability of the Canadian economy even during a World financial crisis makes Canada a great country to operate in for a multinational like PepsiCo. http://www.rediff.com/business/slide-show/slide-show-1-worlds-20-economic-superpowers/20120312.htm http://www.economywatch.com/world_economy/canada/...
Words: 3700 - Pages: 15
...Running head: COCA-COLA AND PEPSICO Coca-Cola and PepsiCo: Similarities and Differences Lamar Smith Michel Brown Annette Pete May Valencia Cardinal Stritch University MGT 426 August 18, 2011 Submitted to the faculty of Cardinal Stritch University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Management. Introduction Two of the largest and most profitable corporations in the United States are the Atlanta, Georgia based Coca-Cola Company and the New York based Pepsi Cola Company. While both are called "colas" they both attempt to address the same target tastes but from different approaches. Coke was the first on market with what is still a "secret" formula and Pepsi followed with a similar (not exact) taste. Since taste is very much a factor of your personal likes, either or neither may appeal to you or seem sweeter (Inforefuge.com. 2011). This paper will discuss the similarities and differences in the processes used by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo for place, price, and promotion. Place and Price The marketing exposure of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola is everywhere ranging from commercials, billboards, and mail advertisements all over the world. Although they target the same markets, they both use different approaches to their marketing strategies. This is evident when comparing the two companies’ websites. When browsing the Coca-Cola website you will experience a more conservative style; there is...
Words: 720 - Pages: 3
...External Analysis: Macro environment: The environment is constantly changing and therefore also influencing PepsiCo’s operations. Environmental changes which are not directly involved with the company but do influence it can be put in six categories: economic, technological, political, cultural, natural and international changes. These changes and their influence on PepsiCo Canada are described per category. Management R. L. Draft, M. Kendrick, N. Vershinina, the general environment page 85-91. Economic In March 2012 Canada’s economy was ranked 11th of the world with a GDP of $1,759 billion. Canada is a wealthy nation with a very high standard of living and is also one of the world’s top trading nations. Since the 2008 world financial crisis Canada has emerged as one of the strongest developed economies in the world. The GDP growth of Canada in 2010 was more than 3% even though most of the World’s Western countries were in an economic recession. The stability of the Canadian economy even during a World financial crisis makes Canada a great country to operate in for a multinational like PepsiCo. http://www.rediff.com/business/slide-show/slide-show-1-worlds-20-economic-superpowers/20120312.htm http://www.economywatch.com/world_economy/canada/?page=full Technological The last decade many technological advancements and new innovations have been implemented in people’s life. This is also greatly affecting businesses. Internet, mobile phones and interactive TV...
Words: 3660 - Pages: 15
...« Previous Post - Next Post » Coke vs. Pepsi The Dilemma: You’re at a restaurant. You’ve specifically asked for a Coke when you get handed a Pepsi, or vice versa. You tell the waiter what you requested, and he gives you the “What’s the difference?” shrug. Perhaps it’s time you laid it on him. People You Can Impress: “Impressed” probably doesn’t accurately reflect the aforementioned waiter’s likely response. The Quick Trick: If you drink them side by side, Pepsi is the sweeter of the two (which is why people tend to prefer Pepsi in the Pepsi Challenge). The Explanation: Although the fantastic ad campaigns run by both companies would have you think otherwise, the soft drinks’ similarities are pretty striking. For starters, Pepsi and Coke were both the brainchildren of Southern pharmacists. Coca-Cola was invented by Atlantan Dr. John Pemberton in 1886. And yes, there was originally a concentration of cocaine in the soda, but it was reduced to a tiny amount (1/400th of a grain per ounce) by 1902 and removed altogether by 1930. Th e Coca-Cola Company changed hands a few times, and after Prohibition Coca-Cola was sold to the Woodruff family for $25 million. Pepsi, on the other hand, was born a few years after Coke. In 1893, pharmacist Caleb Bradham began experimenting withvarious drink mixtures in New Bern, N.C. His 1898 concoction, then known by the creative name “Brad’s Drink,” became an overnight success, and “Doc” Bradham began selling his “Exhilarating, Invigorating...
Words: 4500 - Pages: 18
...Joson, Gerard Gio R. EMG166-T Case analysis no. 11 – Pepsico’s Diversification Strategy In 2008 December 5, 2011 Overview Pepsico is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Purchase, New York, United States, with interests in the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of grain-based snack foods, beverages, and other products. PepsiCo is a world leader in convenient foods and beverages, with revenues of about $25 billion and over 142,000 employees. The company consists of the snack business of Frito-Lay North America and the beverage and food businesses of PepsiCo Beverages and Foods, which includes PepsiCo Beverages North America (Pepsi-Cola North America and Gatorade/Tropicana North America) and Quaker Foods North America. PepsiCo International includes the snack businesses of Frito-Lay International and beverage businesses of PepsiCo Beverages International. PepsiCo brands are available in nearly 200 countries and territories. Many of PepsiCo's brand names are over 100-years-old, but the corporation is relatively young. PepsiCo was founded in 1965 through the merger of Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay. Tropicana was acquired in 1998 and PepsiCo merged with The Quaker Oats Company, including Gatorade, in 2001. PepsiCo’s success is the result of superior products, high standards of performance, distinctive competitive strategies and the high integrity of our people. Our mission is to be the world's premier consumer products company focused on convenient...
Words: 3312 - Pages: 14
...PepsiCo Case Study Analysis Paper Michael Gillespie Organizational Policy and Strategy, OML-450, Cohort (835) Professor Vicky Sons-Eiden September 15, 2011 PepsiCo Case Study Analysis Paper A case study analysis on PepsiCo’s diversion strategy in 2008 will be addressed in this paper. The elements that will be discussed are the vision and mission of PepsiCo, the background and history of the company, the external and internal forces of PepsiCo’s business environment, PepsiCo’s strategic marketing plan, and a conclusion and recommendations on how the PepsiCo company can improve their business strategy to stay competitive in years to come. Vision and Mission The vision of PepsiCo is to be a responsible company that supports continuous improvement of all areas across the globe in which they operate. These areas include the environment, social, and economic conditions creating a better future then the present. The mission of PepsiCo is to be the best company in the industry that provides convenient foods and beverages to the consumer. The company has a goal to provide financial benefits and growth for its shareholders as the company provides growth for its employees, its business partners, and the communities in which they are established. In all aspect of the business, PepsiCo strives to be the leader in honesty, fairness, and integrity. (PepsiCo, 2011). Company History PepsiCo Inc. was formed in 1965 when Pepsi-Cola Bottling merged with salty snack icon Frito...
Words: 2714 - Pages: 11
...Pepsi nuts over new nut snack Chaitali Chakravarty, ET TEAM Nov 21, 2001, 10.02pm IST enthused by the profits that fritolay has generated, parent pepsi, is adding more to its snackfood subsidiary. the company is set to roll out a new nut-based snack, nutyumz, nationally. also, plans are afoot to eventually drop lehar from the lehar kurkure brand. sources said that lehar kurkure has been earning a substantial amount for fritolay (it accounts for more than one-third of its total turnover) and it is about time to market it under the kurkure brand alone. sources said that nutyumz will be launched in different flavours. the brand has been innovated for the indian market alone. besides india, mexico is the only other market where pepsi is selling nut-based snacks under a different brand name. in india, nutyumz will be manufactured in the company-owned plant in pune. the fritolay spokesperson confirmed the launch of new brand. sources said pepsi is gung-ho about fritolay as the subsidiary has been making some money, it ended the year 2000 with a rs 4 crore profit, up from rs 3.04 crore earned in the year ending 1999. pepsi's idea is to create new categories to suit indian tastes and pump up the profit figures by at least rs 2 crore by the end of 2002. sources said that after pepsi acquired uncle chipps, it got within its fold an entire constituency. lays and uncle chipps together earn the maximum (around 50 per cent) for fritolay, while cheetos and lehar namkeen are still on the...
Words: 18723 - Pages: 75
...SIZER COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES : PEPSICO VS. COCA-COLA AKIN DUNDAR 200068711 MBA/FINANCE 1/30/2013 Every company has a descripted or non-descripted competitive strategy if they have at least a competitor in the industry. To have the conversion rate of the investment, the company should have a desired and defensible position and power to defence this position. Sometimes, even a company has a really successful product it still tries to produce a new item or improve the one it has and this decision could be one of the biggest fail of marketing history. According to some marketing experts; the reason of the success of coke drink in the beverage industry is the advertisement competition and marketing war between PepsiCo and Coca-Cola since years ago. If there was not a PepsiCo in the industry, Coca-Cola could not make a billion bottles of daily sales. Both companies are in top of the list of most valuable brands list. They had many successes during their 120 years of rivalry but both of them also made high-cost mistakes during that time. The competition between the ‘Enemy Brothers’ is one of the good sample of rivalry which is based on a lot of interesting cases,different strategies and cultures. Differences between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo cultures and strategies was the main result announcer. In the middle of 1880’s, Coca-Cola was unrivaled in the industry. When the industrial war begun, was the time that PepsiCo showed up in the industry. There were...
Words: 1671 - Pages: 7
...Analysis PepsiCo Strengths * Branding - One of PepsiCo’s top brands is of course Pepsi, one of the most recognized brands of the world, ranked according to Interbrand. As of 2008 it ranked 26th amongst top 100 global brands. Pepsi generates more than $15,000 million of annual sales. The strength of the Pepsi brand is evident in Pepsi’s presence in over 200 countries. The company has the largest market share in the US beverage at 39. Such brand dominance insures loyalty and repetitive sales which contributes to over $15 million in annual sales for the company * Distribution - The company delivers its products directly from manufacturing plants and warehouses to customer warehouses and retail stores. This is part of a three pronged approach which also includes employees making direct store deliveries of snacks and beverages and the use of third party distribution services. Weaknesses * * Overdependence on US Markets - Despite its international presence, 52% of its revenues originate in the US. This concentration does leave PepsiCo somewhat vulnerable to the impact of changing economic conditions, and labor strikes. Large US customers could exploit PepsiCo’s lack of bargaining power and negatively impact its revenues. * Low Productivity - In 2008 PepsiCo had approximately 198,000 employees. Its revenue per employee was $219,439, which was lower that its competitors. This may indicate comparatively low productivity on the part of PepsiCo employees...
Words: 776 - Pages: 4
...PEPSICO a Solid Investment. By: Alexandra Fell For: Dr. Guendo0 Yorkville University July 2014 BUSI 1023 A pharmacist named Caleb Bradham invented Pepsi in 1893, it was originally named “Brad’s Drink”, before changing to it’s widely recognized name Pepsi-Cola, in 1898. Although Pepsi has faced many tough financial times historically, two bankruptcies and three offers to Coca-Cola to purchase the company between 1922-1933, the company has always managed to reinvent itself, and carve out its own market share, and today is not any different. In order for PepsiCo to see continued success they must be able to expand into different markets, increasing their consumer base and maximizing profits. PepsiCo is broken down into these four operating units: PepsiCo Americas Foods, which includes food and snack businesses in North America and Latin America. PepsiCo Americas Beverages, which includes all of their North American and Latin American beverage businesses. PepsiCo Europe. PepsiCo Asia, Middle East and Africa. PepsiCo’s main competitors in the non-alcoholic beverage industry are the Coca-Cola Company and Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc, their main competitor and long time rival is Coca-Cola. Coca-Cola has the larger market share of carbonated soda drinks, however; PepsiCo holds strong with its larger market share in liquid refreshment beverages like Gatorade and Tropicana. PepsiCo also has a leadership position in the snack industry world wide, against other food and...
Words: 1576 - Pages: 7
...Environmental Factors Paper University of Phoenix Christy Holley Environmental Factors for PepsiCo PepsiCo, one of the leading beverage and snack companies in the United States and abroad, is affected by both global and domestic environmental factors. These factors, along with changes in technology, all impact and shape the organization and affect marketing decisions. The article “PepsiCo Pops for China,” written by Ruthie Ackerman and published by Forbes.com, reviews Pepsi’s decision to invest billions into the Chinese market audience. This paper will review the article, identify environmental factors that shape the organization and impact marketing decisions, and discuss how technology plays a role in those decisions. Alternatives to Ackerman’s view of social responsibility to the company’s marketing decisions and activities will be analyzed, along with explanations of how ethical issues can make an impact. The accuracy of the article’s forecasts will be reviewed and further supportive references to conclusions made will be gathered, if necessary. Global and Domestic Factors Several macro-environmental factors shape the PepsiCo Corporation and impact marketing decisions. Demographics, economic climate, ecological and political issues, technology, and cultural concerns all affect where the company is headed desires and the decisions the company makes. Each issue affects the company differently, but when combined together, the environmental factors can wreak havoc...
Words: 2183 - Pages: 9
...PepsiCo Business Analysis: Part I Management/MGT-521 Dr. Olivia Herriford PepsiCo Business Analysis: Part I PepsiCo is a world leader in convenient snacks, foods, and beverages with revenues of $65 billion and more than 285,000 employees. The company headquarters are in Purchase, New York. PepsiCo products can be found in nearly 200 countries around the globe. The company has 22 brands that each generates more than $1 billion each in annual retail sales. PepsiCo owns some of the world's most popular brands, including Pepsi-Cola, Mountain Dew, Diet Pepsi, Lay's, Doritos, Tropicana, Gatorade, and Quaker. Our brands are available worldwide through a variety of go-to-market systems, including direct store delivery (DSD), broker-warehouse, and food service and vending (PepsiCo, 2012). A SWOT analysis of a company is an important piece for an investor to determining if it is possible invests in a company and have a viable return of this inversion. This analysis will help to understand if the company is achieving its goals and objectives. Another important point would be identifying the company stakeholder and how the needs of those stakeholders are meet. SWOT Analysis Conducting a SWOT analysis of PepsiCo will determine the current status and strength for a potential investor. A SWOT analysis is a planning tool used to analyze an organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats ((Nickels, McHugh, & McHugh, 2010). Strengths PepsiCo has 22 brands that...
Words: 1675 - Pages: 7
...Income’ Analysis of ‘Cash Flow Adequacy Ratio’ Analysis of ‘Free Cash Flow / Operating Cash Flow’ Competition Marketing Campaign Innovation References Pepsi (PEP) Background PepsiCo, Inc. is a global food, snack and beverage company. The Company's brands include Quaker Oats, Tropicana, Gatorade, Lay's, Pepsi, Walkers, Gamesa and Sabritas. Pepsico Inc. is registered on NYSE using the ticker symbol of ‘PEP’. Using the available data from 1978 till now, the PEP ticker symbol has seen the stock price increase of approximate 4400% , which is comparable to its closest competitor Coca-Cola’s (Ticker : KO) growth of 4500% in the same time period. Pepsico’s current Market Cap is approximately 98.83B with a P/E ratio of 15.90. A high P/E ratio suggests investor's confidence in the future growth prospects of the company and Pepsico has the highest P/E ratio as compared to its major competitors in the sparkling soda industry including Coca-Cola and Dr. Pepper. Even though it can be interpreted that PEP has lagged behind Coca-Cola over the years in US market but it is very important to understand that the majority of PepsiCo's revenues do not come from carbonated soft drinks.In fact, beverages account for less than 50% of total revenue. Additionally, over 60% of PepsiCo's beverage sales come from its key non-carbonated brands like Gatorade and Tropicana. PepsiCo is also the largest snack and non-alcoholic drink producer in the United States, with 39% and 25% of the respective...
Words: 2806 - Pages: 12
...Cola Wars Case Study DMBA 630 Marketing and Strategy Management in the Global Markeplace Introduction Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSD) have been around for over a century and now accounts for a $60 Billion market with the average American consuming about 53 gallons a year. Coca-Cola was invented in 1886 by John Pemberton as a “potion for mental and physical disorders.” Asa Candler acquired the formula and began marketing it as Coca-Cola. The first bottling franchise was accorded in 1899 for a sum of one dollar. Pepsi-Cola was invented in 1893 by Caleb Bradham a pharmacist from North Carolina. Pepsi also franchised its bottling operations. Pepsi struggled over the years going bankrupt twice within a decade, first in 1923 and again in 1931. Pepsi competed aggressively against coke offering almost twice the amount of Pepsi for the same price in the 1930s. Coca –Cola or Coke on the other hand was the market leader through the early 20th century with numerous imitators popping up trying to clone Coke. Coke fought back in the courts to aggressively deter imitators and counterfeiters. During the 1920s and 1930s, Coke was marketed to multiple market segments making it available to anyone desiring the brand. Eventually Coke sued Pepsi for trademark infringement in 1938 and lost. Pepsi gained market share and became a titan competitor in the market for CSDs beating out all other brands except Coke. Thus began the “Cola Wars” in 1950 with Pepsi’s aggressive “beat Coke”...
Words: 3445 - Pages: 14
...involve in the alternative beverage arena is a daunting one. There are pressing internal and external environmental factors that present significant challenges in the gaining and maintaining of market share with in the industry. The obstacles faced by these organizations include global economic slow downs, dynamic distribution channels, negative press and fickle customer tastes. These companies, however, must remain focused and vigilant to attract customers to their brands. The case study presented by John E. Gamble, Competition in Energy drinks, Sport Drinks, and Vitamin-Enhanced Beverages, outlines the boons and challenges faced by the four leading distributers of alternative beverages around the world. The industry leaders (PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, Red Bull and Hansen Natural Company) in the alternative beverage market are what is know as a strategic group. “A strategic group is a cluster of industry rivals that employ similar competitive approaches, have product offerings that appeal to similar types of buyers, and thus occupy similar market positions.” (Thomas, 2012) The four industry leaders all have various strategies to remain competitive in the alternative beverage industry. These strategies span the spectrum of the five competitive strategies. Each has a different vantage point of the industry and has...
Words: 2393 - Pages: 10
