...Case Study: Building a Coalition MGMT591 First of all, in order to successfully build a coalition for Woodson Foundation, we should be aware of the necessary stags of group development that we are going to go over: The first stage is Forming, which is bringing the new plan in development by creating an executive team with the assistance of Human Resources to select the correct candidates for the new occupations available. The second period is Storming, which brings conflict among the members of the group, principally because each representative of the groups has his or her particular interests. To go through this phase, they have to think as a team without all the doubtful behavior The third phase will be Norming. To succeed here, they should set their common goal up to begin the performance, feel more comfortable with the rest of the team, and work efficiently together. An important issue to take into account here is that there has to be someone who leads that work assuming the role of leader. The following stage is Performing. This stage will start when the team starts to perform together to achieve the objective set up by the association. Last but not least, the Adjourning stage starts when the team members feel a sense of loss and their enthusiasm decay because the team's task is approaching to the end. Because of this phase, it is imperative to distinguish the team members for their achievements and exult the team's overall accomplishment. In this case, since...
Words: 1650 - Pages: 7
...Case Study Week 3 Zhengyu Gui dragonfly8563@gmail.com MGMT591 Professor Bodero July 2014 Group Development When developing teams, a five-stage group-development model called the Tuckman Ladder is referenced most often. The model, first proposed by the educator Bruce Tuckman, is consisted of five distinct stages all teams go through: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Each stage is characterized as the following: * Forming: Characterized by a great deal of uncertainty about the group’s purpose, structure, and leadership. Not until these issues are sorted out members can think of themselves as part of the team and move on to the next stage. * Storming: Characterized by intragroup conflict. Members accept the existence of the group but resist the constraints it imposes on individuality. There is conflict over who will control the group. When this stage is complete, there will be a relatively clear hierarchy of leadership within the group. * Norming: Characterized by close relationships and cohesiveness. There is now a strong sense of group identity and camaraderie. This stage is complete when the group structure solidifies and the group has assimilated a common set of expectations of what defines correct member behavior. * Performing: Characterized by fully functional group. The group structure at this point is fully functional and accepted. Group energy has moved from getting to know and understand each other to performing the...
Words: 1417 - Pages: 6