Michael Newdow's Argument Against The Pledge Of Allegiance
Submitted By Words 1838 Pages 8
Francis Bellamy produced The Pledge of Allegiance In the year of August 1892 and President Eisenhower, got Congress to added the phrase under God into the Pledge of Allegiance. However, in 1954, in response to the Communist threat of the times, President Eisenhower encouraged Congress to add the words "under God," forming the 31-word pledge (Pintér, 2006). Still, are numerous of people who are against flag for they don't believe in the words God and are confused of t the meaning of the flag and heritage of 13 colonies. However, to have a good understand it patriotic stand for the flag and soldier who died protected this Great country. Therefore, the behavior of lawsuit against the pledge allegiance by Michael Newdow because his daughter was reciting pledge allegiance with…show more content… religion. In the year of 2000, Michael Newdow registered a complaint about using under God in Pledge Allegiance that it is unconstitutional. However, the debate, that student must listen even if the pupil decides not to participate in the words "under God" which Newdow claimed was a obstructs the establishment clause of the United States of America Constitution's First Amendment. Therefore on Mar. 8, 2000, Plaintiff Michael Newdow, one the behalf of himself and his daughter as law next friend. Therefore, next friend pertains to an individual like his daughter that is minor continuing to act in the name of another person. However, the Newdow v. United States Congress, Elk Grove Unified School District, disputing every single speech regarding the United States Pledge of Allegiance in public schools. Notwithstanding, the United States 9th Circuit Court of Appeals of California ordered on June 26, 2002, since the United States of America Pledge of Allegiance could establish a breach of the Establishment of Free Exercise Clauses of the