Premium Essay

NASW Code Of Ethics Comparison

Submitted By
Words 907
Pages 4
Profession Code of Ethics Comparison
As a social work student, we are provided with the foundational education necessary to succeed in our profession. The National Association of Social Work (NASW) Code of Ethics is the most significant publication because it “is intended to serve as a guide to the everyday professional conduct of social workers” (NASW Code of Ethics, 2017). For this assignment, we are charged with exploring other professional codes of ethics to gain a better understanding of how they may be similar or differ from one another. Therefore, I choose to explore the American Counseling Association (ACA) Code of Ethics with the intention of conducting a comparison analysis of both documents. First, the NASW Code of Ethics clearly …show more content…
However, when taking a closer look, both the NASW Code of Ethics and ACA Code of Ethics share have similarities and a few distinctive differences. Overall, the professional missions of both NASW and ACA are similar in because they both focus on enhancing human well-being and quality of life while empowering and promoting respect and dignity for all humans. However, slight differences are noted. The NASW mission focuses on all humans, but pays specific attention to those who are vulnerable, oppressed, and in poverty. Whereas, the ACA mission focuses on humans in general with no special emphasis on particular groups of people.
Core Values
While evaluating each professional code, I noticed each profession held their own set of core values. The NASW Code of Ethics lists the core values of social work are service, social justice, dignity and worth or the person, importance of human relationships, integrity, and competence. While the ACA Code of Ethics core values and fundamental principles are autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice, fidelity, and veracity. Yes, they technically have different values. But, similar in principle. …show more content…
According to NASW Code of Ethics 1.09.c Sexual Relationships, “Social workers should not engage in sexual activities or sexual contact with former clients because of the potential for harm to the client”. However, the ACA Code of Ethics A.5.c. Sexual and/or Romantic Relationships with Former Clients states “sexual and/or romantic counselor-client interactions or relationships with former clients, their romantic partners, or their family members are prohibited for a period of 5 years following the past professional contact”. This particular difference was used because it is one which I feel the NASW Code of Ethics places complete and proper attention to the welfare of the client regards such relationships. I believe the presence of having a relationship with a client, even 5 years after ending professional services, still poses a harm to the client. Personally, I view it as unprofessional because the meeting of the two parties occurred in a professional setting when one person sought services at a vulnerable time. To initiate a relationship with a previous client could be seen as exploiting the vulnerable or abuse of professional

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Summative Evaluation Model Paper

...& Hall, Jr., 2015, p. 348). By using a summative evaluation model it will determine if the program effectively reduces the amount of adolescents that use drug and increases the number of days the adolescents attend school increases after the services are provided. Overall the summative evaluation model will allow individuals to gain an understanding of the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the program by determining if the programs outcomes are achieved. There are several evaluation approaches that are used to evaluate programs including quantitative methods, qualitative methods, one-group post-test design, pretest/post-test designs, client satisfaction surveys, goal attainment scaling, target problem scaling, case studies, group comparisons, and quality assurance reviews (Kirst-Ashman & Hall, Jr., 2015). For this particular program the quantitative method will be used to evaluate the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the program. “Quantitative methods use objectives (numerical) criteria (such as scores on a test, number of arrests, or frequency of temper tantrums) to learn whether change has taken place following an intervention” (Kirst-Ashman & Hall, Jr., 2015, p. 349). The number of adolescence involved in drug use prior to the intervention and after the intervention will allow the program to be evaluated. If the baseline shows that 40 adolescence reported using drugs prior to the intervention then after the intervention 10 adolescence report using drugs the program has...

Words: 1507 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Generalist Social Work

...Generalist Practice Concept Paper Why did I choose social work as my profession? I ask myself that question often these days. I love working with families and seeing them succeed, but social work is a hard job, and the decisions we make can change people lives forever. So let’s start the paper by talking about what is a generalist social worker. A generalist social worker is an individual who is skilled to work with individuals, families, and their communities on many different levels. Generalist social worker can work in areas like substance abuse, aging, child welfare, work with families, health care or mental health (Raymond, Teare, & Atherton, 1996). Generalist social workers are able to make decisions on the micro, mezzo, and macro levels. Generalist social worker uses a person-in-environment perspective to help their clients. Meaning that a generalist social worker knows and fully understands how their client’s environment impacts their lives, and makes the best decisions in order the serve their clients accurately. They incorporate diversity into their practice and are expected to advocate for human rights and social justice (Hepworth, Rooney, Rooney, Strom- Gottfried, Larsen, 2010). I currently work at Dougherty County Department of Family and Children Services, in the social services department as an investigator. I’ve worked with DFCS for past four years. I have worked as an investigator for the past 7 months. So I can totally relate and understand completely...

Words: 812 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Supervision in Social Work

...Social Work Examination Supervision in Social Work Table of Contents SUPERVISION IN SOCIAL WORK Table of Contents Table of Contents I. Introduction and Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Individual Supervision and Group Supervision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 III. Supervision Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 IV. Administrative Supervision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 V. Educational Supervision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 VI. Supportive Supervision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 VII. Evaluation/Performance Appraisal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 VIII. Miscellaneous Supervision Topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Chapter Review Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Answers and Rationale for Chapter Review Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

Words: 16728 - Pages: 67

Premium Essay

Poverty Report

...BAY AREA SOCIAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM Understanding Poverty From Multiple Social Science Perspectives A Learning Resource for Staff Development In Social Service Agencies Michael J. Austin, PhD, Editor BASSC Staff Director Mack Professor of Nonprofit Management School of Social Welfare University of California, Berkeley 510-642-7066 mjaustin@berkeley.edu August 2006 1 Table of Contents Introduction – Michael J. Austin, Guest Editor Part I Multiple Social Science Perspectives of Poverty Theories of Poverty: Findings from Textbooks on Human Behavior and the Social Environment Amanda J. Lehning, Catherine M. Vu, & Indira Pintak Economic Theories of Poverty Sun Young Jung & Richard Smith Sociological Theories of Poverty in Urban America Jennifer Price Wolf Psychological Theories of Poverty Kelly Turner & Amanda Lehning An Anthropological View of Poverty Kristine Frerer & Catherine Vu Political Science Perspectives on Poverty Amanda Lehning Theories of Global Poverty in the Developed and Developing World Jennifer Morazes & Indira Pintak Part II Theory Integration and Practitioner Perspectives Social Capital and Neighborhood Poverty: Toward an Ecologically-Grounded Model of Neighborhood Effects Kathy Lemon Osterling Social Work Students’ Perceptions of Poverty Sherrill Clark The Explosive Nature of the Culture of Poverty: A Teaching Case Based on An Agency-based Training Program Catherine Vu & Michael J. Austin 2 ...

Words: 65096 - Pages: 261