...NAFTA was a trade agreement between the North American nations .it was signed with the objective of NAFTA was facilitating trade in North America as well as the expansion of opportunities for capital invests so that countries such as Mexico could improve economically. In this section, we will look into the impacts of NAFTA on the lives of Mexicans with focus on the economic lives. We also determine the attainment of the objectives of NAFTA NAFTA did not bear any resemblance to the forecasts and the expectations of the agreement. The agreement was not a solution to the unemployment challenges in mexico.it was not helpful in raise the average wages of the Mexicans or reducing the flow of Mexican immigrants to the US. It was however useful in...
Words: 887 - Pages: 4
...Why did the US, Mexico, and Canada sign the North American Free Trade Agreement? Which sectors would you expect to gain most from this agreement? NAFTA allowed for the free flow of goods and services between the three parties, US, Mexico and Canada by immediate or phased elimination of tariffs on numerous goods. This free trade would in turn lead to comparative advantage i.e. each country could specialize in producing goods/ services in which they are relatively more productive than their trading partners, increasing overall productivity and output. Hence, the parties to NAFTA signed the agreement so that companies can leverage aggregating and arbitration opportunities within the region leading to overall more trade, more jobs and higher GDP. On the side, the countries also hoped for some other interrelated non-economic benefits such as reduction in illegal immigrants from Mexico to US due to availability of more earning opportunities within Mexico. The sectors which were expected to gain most from this agreement were- automobiles (in Canada), textile and apparel (in Mexico), agriculture (in all countries, particularly US), financial and banking services (in US) and energy (especially in US and Canada). 2.!Has NAFTA been beneficial for the countries that signed it? There were numerous positive economic developments after the signing of NAFTA such as: •! Increase in international trade: Mexico’s trade as a % of GDP almost doubled after the NAFTA agreement, new...
Words: 1064 - Pages: 5
...How has the implementation of NAFTA affected Walmart’s success in Mexico? Walmart’s marketing campaign has been “everyday low prices”. This was not the case in Mexico prior to NAFTA. Walmart was paying higher tariffs to import American goods. Once NAFTA was implemented, Mexico became a free trade zone. This made it possible for Walmart to reduce its tariffs from 10% to 3% creating a level playing field with its competitors. With the signing of NAFTA, it also opened up the doors to foreign investment in Mexico. Walmart was also paying huge fees for goods to be shipped from Europe and Asia into Mexico. Once these companies knew that building manufacturing plants in Mexico they could keep the costs low by using Mexican labor, they facilitated it. This allowed Walmart to purchase these products without paying high import tariffs. “NAFTA resulted in better suppliers due to an increase in competition, competitiveness and efficiency among the companies in order to gain the trust of their clients. Better supplies also increased the variety of products available to consumer with wider price ranges, which allowed Walmart to offer customers better savings and thus increase their purchasing power. NAFTA also helped Mexico achieve greater economic growth at a lower rate of inflation, which also added to the purchasing power of consumers.”(Daniel & Radenbaugh, pg. 321) 2. How much of Walmart’s success is due to NAFTA, and how much is due to Walmart’s...
Words: 990 - Pages: 4
...NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and Its Advantages in Mexico Regional Integration is described as a process in which states enter into a regional agreement in order to enhance regional cooperation through regional institutions and rules. North American Free Trade Agreement was the removal of barriers between Mexico and the United States. It was the phasing out of virtually all restrictions on trade and investment flows. “The expanded trade resulting from NAFTA has raised the United States' gross domestic product very slightly. (The effect on Mexican GDP has also been positive and probably similar in magnitude. Because the Mexican economy is much smaller than the U.S. economy, however, that effect represents a much larger percentage increase for the Mexican economy.)” (The Effects of NAFTA on U.S. –Mexican Trade and GDP, May 2003). Over the years NAFTA has helped Mexico to improve on their exports and imports trading with the United States. NAFTA has had a positive effect dealing with the international investments. This is because some of the restrictions Mexico had on their foreign investment dealing with the ownership of capital. NAFTA also allowed Mexico to do away with tariffs and quotas. This allowed Mexico to become a profitable place to invest, in plants and assembling of products in the United States. NAFTA eliminating the tariffs in Mexico helped to reduce the different license requirements and restrictions on foreign investment. This meant that it would...
Words: 854 - Pages: 4
...NAFTA Assignment Benefits of NAFTA NAFTA is a highly controversial free trade agreement between the countries of Canada, Mexico and the USA. I believe it has more benefits than drawbacks as it has quadrupled trade, lowered prices, increased economic growth and created jobs. Trade The trade between the three countries quadrupled, from $297 billion to $1.14 trillion (Advantages of NAFTA). Which in turn boosted economic growth, profits, and jobs. As well it lowered prices for consumers. A huge reason for the boost in trade between them is because with trade you do away with tariffs that you would usually encounter with other countries. With the cost of trade lowered it was a huge help to small businesses and business owners, now they had a better chance at expanding their businesses. Imports and Exports With lower tariffs the price of imports grew less and less. This is a huge factor for oil prices since instead of getting oil from the Middle East it could be imported from Mexico or the USA. Not only oil had a huge decrease in price and how much could be imported but fresh fruit, which is usually quite expensive, dropped in value and rose in imports. Natural Resources...
Words: 562 - Pages: 3
...In January 1994, the United States, Mexico, and Canada implemented the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), forming the largest free trade zone in the world. The goal of NAFTA is to create better trading conditions through tariff reduction, removal of investment barriers, and improvement of intellectual property protection. NAFTA continues to gradually reduce tariffs on set dates and aims to eliminate all tariffs by the year 2004. Before NAFTA was established, investing in Mexico was a difficult process. Investors needed the Mexican Government's approval and were also required to meet specific investment guidelines. These requirements necessitated investors to export a set level of goods and services, utilize domestic goods and services, and transfer technology to competitors. Under NAFTA, investors no longer need government approval to invest and are treated as domestic investors. NAFTA has also increased intellectual property rights and allowed companies to obtain patents in Mexico and Canada. In the past, companies were hesitant to export research and development intensive goods; with increased intellectual property protection, however, exports of these goods have shown a definite increase. As a result of better trading conditions, exports and imports of most other goods have increased along with the research and development intensive goods. In Mexico, the elimination of investment barriers has allowed investment to expand. Increased trading and investment has then...
Words: 1131 - Pages: 5
...geographic layout. There are many different countries that have made some type of an agreement with another country. In North America, regional integration among America, Canada, and Mexico has had both advantages and disadvantages. The NAFTA, which was first established in 1992 but did not become officially until 94, has become an important part of all three countries. Although all three countries have benefited from the NAFTA, this paper will cover the advantages and disadvantages it has had on Mexico. Advantages of the NAFTA It is safe to say that for the most part the NAFTA has been primarily a blessing for Mexico. A huge advantage for Mexico is the boost it has had on them economically. NAFTA decreased tariffs; essentially meaning that the exports and imports from Mexico increased due to the lower taxes. The NAFTA created many jobs for the people of Mexico. With the increase of jobs, came an increase in wages. The NAFTA is the largest free trade and creates more than $17 trillion in goods and services produced by these three countries. With this, Mexico has increased their economic output every year. The trade has also made it less expensive to transport the oil from Mexico into the United States, which ultimately helps both the nations. Another great attribute of the NAFTA is that the United States-Mexico industrial integration, especially in the automobile manufacturing area has increased dramatically....
Words: 802 - Pages: 4
...the nature of NAFTA and its effect on regional integration as well as state economies from several perspectives. In 1993, the United States, Canada and Mexico signed the North American Free Trade Agreement to achieve the higher level of regional integration. This NAFTA not only concerns the removal of trade barriers, but also aims to promote the movement of capital. Firstly, this essay will explain the evolution of NAFTA and its successful influence on economic integration. Furthermore, this chapter will provide the criticism on the influence of NAFTA. Secondly, this study will discuss the impact of NAFTA on regional integration, particularly economic integration. Then, this essay will propose the understandings on the effect of NAFTA on members’ economies and businesses from four perspectives, including trade, economic growth, employment and FDI. Main body The Evolution of NAFTA The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) issued in 1993 aims to removal trade barriers and liberalise economics and business among the United States, Canada and Mexico. Compared with similar FTA economic relationship, such as EU, NAFTA is described as the most implemented FTA (Orme, 1996). Like most FTAs, NAFTA not only effectively coordinates resource and improves competitiveness of countries and corporates, but also promotes the movement of products, services and investment, even financial integration. For instance, Krugman & Hanson (1993) stress that the implementation of NAFTA can facilitate...
Words: 3751 - Pages: 16
...level of integration. The different levels of integration are dependent on a predefined criterion. The descriptions of levels are the advantages and disadvantages of regional integration and how the stage for economic development relates to a potential business opportunity. The Advantage NAFTA The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an economic, international trade treaty connecting three nations that inhabit the North American continent (Canada, Mexico, and the United States) that began in 1994. NAFTA is designed to remove various trade barriers between Canada, Mexico, and the United States as well as a reduction or elimination of numerous tariffs and nontariff barriers. NAFTA is exceptional in that it has created the foremost regional integration agreement linking two highly developed countries, the United States and Canada, and a developing country, Mexico. Export opportunities have grown under NAFTA because of the tariffs elimination in 2003. The main advantage of NAFTA is that it is the world's leading free trade area, connecting more 400 billion people and producing $11 trillion worth of goods and services. NAFTA has two-thirds of the United States exports entering Mexico duty-free and nearly all U.S. exports to Canada enter duty-free. Each day, just about $1.8 billion is trilateral trade between...
Words: 1101 - Pages: 5
...whole. The extent of which what the country shares and establishes in level of integration. The different levels of integration are dependent on a predefined criterion. The descriptions of levels are the advantages and disadvantages of regional integration and how the stage for economic development relates to a potential business opportunity. The main advantage of NAFTA is that it is the world's leading free trade area, connecting more 400 billion people and producing $11 trillion worth of goods and services. NAFTA has two-thirds of the United States exports entering Mexico duty-free and nearly all U.S. exports to Canada enter duty-free. Each day, just about $1.8 billion is trilateral trade between NAFTA countries. The United States manufactured exports to NAFTA partners increased 78% in the first six years. Massachusetts exports almost $1 billion more to Canada than to any other country in the world annually. Massachusetts exports nearly $3.5 billion in manufactured goods annually to Canada and Mexico (Massachusetts Export Center). The NAFTA partnership strengthens the supply chain to and from plants in Mexico, which pushes growers and producers to meet the needs of an increasingly sophisticated world and market. An example would be the partnership of Modelo’s Corona and Anheuser-Busch,...
Words: 798 - Pages: 4
...Abstract This paper examines the impact of NAFTA on trade as well as migration flows between Mexico, Canada, and the United States in the textile industry. Several questions are being investigated: Why did many textile jobs apparently migrate out of the United States in the years after the establishment of NAFTA? Who gained and lost from the process of readjustment in the textile industry after NAFTA? The act whether to protect or not to protect the textile industry when a free trade agreements? The findings show that the migration of many textile jobs out, mostly Mexico was mainly due to a cheaper and enhanced plants included with a flood of cheap labour compared to the United States. Certain quarters like the people of Mexico, people of the United States, apparel companies, and etc both benefits and lost at the same time. The impact on long-term trends were noticeable, while the short-run impact is more difficult to assess due to competing factors such as changes in business cycle patterns, immigration laws, economical climate, weather conditions, and exchange rate movements. Finally, there is the idea that protecting the textile industry from painful free trade agreement is not a perfect solution, bringing a solid and positive outcome to many with only a little much to sacrifice for the betterment of the countries’ wealth and dependency. Introduction The first major international trade agreement in the world was the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) formed in...
Words: 3117 - Pages: 13
...DRAFT The purpose of this research paper is to define NAFTA and the purpose of the Free Trade Agreements. It will also discuss some of the rules, customs procedures, how to settle disputes between the countries and how NAFTA works overall. NAFTA is a regulation implemented on Jan. 1, 1994, that reduced and eventually abolished tariffs to encourage economic activity between the United States, Canada and Mexico. NAFTA has been given credit with making it easier for Americans to purchase Canadian and Mexican goods, which stimulated a small increase in wages in all three countries, and increased manufacturing and other jobs for U.S. workers. The agreement also radically increased trade between the three nations, from $337 billion in 1993 to $1.182 trillion in 2011(Investopedia). The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) revolutionized trade and investment in North America, helping to unlock our region’s economic potential. Since it came into effect 15 years ago, North Americans have enjoyed an overall extended period of strong economic growth and rising prosperity. NAFTA has helped to stimulate economic growth and create higher-paying jobs across North America. It has also paved the way for greater market competition and enhanced choice and purchasing power for North American consumers, families, farmers, and businesses. Furthermore, NAFTA has provided North American businesses with better access to materials, technologies, investment capital, and talent available across...
Words: 1727 - Pages: 7
...The Northern America Free Trade Agreement or otherwise known as NAFTA is a trade agreement between the United States, Canada and Mexico implemented in the early 1990s. The goal of NAFTA was to eliminate tariff barriers between the three Northern American countries in hopes to promote free trade and a stimulation in economic growth. Based on the economy of each country before and after NAFTA, it is fair to conclude that NAFTA was an overall successful because of the changes economically and socially to each country. Opposition to NAFTA during the early 1990s when its approval was in debate, voiced many concerns on how NAFTA would ultimately create problems economically, socially, and environmentally. Before NAFTA the United States was closely...
Words: 1553 - Pages: 7
...after the inception of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), ratified in 1994 (Kubasek, Brennan, & Browne, 2015). Many prominent economists and U.S. government officials convinced the American people to support NAFTA by predicting an abundance of growing trade surpluses with Mexico, and the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs. Now, twenty years later, Americans view NAFTA as a symbol of job loss, and huge lingering trade deficits. Many proponents are touting this agreement between the United States, Mexico, and Canada as having resounding success. However, a significant number of NAFTA opponents interpret the results as being devastating to the U.S. economy. It is important for American citizens to understand the overall effects of this pact creating the world’s largest free trade area after its initiation twenty years ago. North American Free Trade Agreement and American Job Loss The goal of NAFTA is to eliminate trade barriers between the U.S., Canada, and, Mexico (Kubasek et al., 2015). Since the implementation of NAFTA in 1994 (Kubasek et al., 2015), these roadblocks have been either immediately removed or were eliminated over longer periods, ranging from five to fifteen years (International Economics). The volume of trade between the three countries has soared to $1.2 trillion as of 2012 (Office of the United States Trade Representative, USTR 2014). Nevertheless, the impact of NAFTA has been both positive and negative resulting in a deep chasm...
Words: 2639 - Pages: 11
...Case study 9, NAFTA and Mexican Trucking. 1. What are the potential economic benefits of the trucking provisions in the NAFTA treaty? Who benefits? Who might lose? 2. What do you think motivated the Teamsters to object to the trucking provisions in NAFTA? Are these objections fair? Why did Congress initially align itself with the Teamsters? * The Teamsters object the trucking provisions in NAFTA because the greater competition from Mexican trucking firms would lower the price of road transportation within NAFTA. * The Teamsters Union also argued that Mexican truck drivers had poor safety records and that Mexican trucks did not adhere to the strict safety and environmental standards of the United Sates. * The president of Teamsters, James Hoffa, says that Mexican trucks are older, dirtier, and more dangerous than American trucks. American trucks drivers are taken off the road if they commit a serious traffic violation in their personal vehicle. That’s not so in Mexico. Limits on the hours a driver can spend behind the wheel are ignored in Mexico. * The Congress initially align itself with the Teamsters during the Bush administration which approved a measure setting 22 new safety standards that Mexican trucks would have meet before entering the United States. 3. Did it make economic sense for the United States to bear the costs of punitive tariffs as allowed for under NAFTA, as opposed to letting Mexican trucks enter the United States? *...
Words: 1152 - Pages: 5
