Free Essay

Naturalism

In:

Submitted By leean3
Words 3214
Pages 13
NATURALISM

_______________________________________________

Research Essay

_______________________________________________

In partial fulfilment of the requirements in Introduction to Philosophy and Worldviews at Cornerstone Institute

_______________________________________________

by
Leeandri Smith 32156 28 April 2013

Contents

Describing Naturalism according to Naugle, Stone and Danto 1
Introduction 2
History of Naturalism 2
Ancient Greeks 2
The Enlightenment 3
Modern World on Naturalism 3
Naturalism in the 20th Century 4
The start of Naturalism 4
The Basic philosophical questions 5
Effects on society due to the naturalistic worldview 8
Dangers of naturalism to society 9
Conclusion 10
Bibliography 11

Describing Naturalism according to Naugle, Stone and Danto.
“Naturalism is an impression determined by the subjugation of the intellectual facts to the mechanical order of things” (Naugle 2002:96)
“This is a set of beliefs and attitudes that focus on this world on the negative side it involves the assertion that there seems to be no ontologically distinct and superior realm (such as God, soul or heaven) to ground, explain, or give meaning to this world. On the positive side it affirms that extension should be focused on the events and processes of this world to provide what degree of explanation and meaning are possible to this life” (Stone 2008:1)
“Religious naturalisms the type of naturalism which affirms asset of beliefs and attitudes that there are religious aspects of this world which can be appreciated within a naturalistic framework” (Stone 2008:1)
“Naturalism, in recent usage, is a species of philosophical monism according to which whatever exist or happens is natural in the sense of being susceptible to explanation through methods which, although paradigmatically exemplified in the natural science are continuous from domain of object and events. Naturalism is polemically defined as repudiating the view that there exists or could exist any entities or events which lie, in principle beyond the scope of scientific explanations.”(Danto 1976:448)

Introduction
In this essay I will be looking at the history of naturalism. Firstly I will be looking at the ancient Greeks, secondly the enlightenment and lastly the modern world. I will explain some naturalism in the 20th century as well as the start of naturalism. I will try to answer the basic philosophical questions to the best of my ability. I will try to describe the effects and dangers a society with a naturalistic worldview can have.
History of Naturalism
The history of naturalism is very interesting. Firstly we will be looking at the history of naturalism in the Ancient Greeks, secondly the Enlightenment, and lastly the Modern Era on naturalism.
The Ancient Greeks
Even in ancient Greece, naturalism designated several distinct positions. For the Cynics, naturalism consisted in severe condemnation of conventional values and artificial virtues. The virtuous man is one who lives naturally, but living naturally requires a rigorously ascetic practice in which all conventional and artificial goods are shunned. Naturalism also sought detachment from the conventional and the artificial, and agreed that the virtuous man is one who lives naturally, but its conception of nature was articulated in an elaborate cosmology. Human nature, for the Stoics, is part of cosmic nature, and virtue is identified with conformity to natural law. Both Cynicism and Stoicism take us a great distance from Aristotle (384–322 BCE), who resisted any attempt to abstract the virtuous life from the polis but who nonetheless looked with favour upon something called "naturalism." Man, according to Aristotle, is by nature political, and this conviction leaves no room for the contrasts Cynics and Stoics need to define their positions.

The Enlightenment
The Enlightenment is a way of thinking that is free from dogmas and based on reason and experience. The Age of Enlightenment marks the period when this way of thinking came about in the second half of the eighteenth century, although its roots go back much further, to the transition between the Middle Ages and Modernity. The end of the Age of Enlightenment has been demarcated to coincide with the end of the 18th century, although this did not mean the end of the ideas of the Enlightenment. Part of the enlightened mindset was to keep the secular separate from the religious and this was the norm among the practitioners of the objective sciences of Physics and Mathematics that dominated the era. Of all the philosophers of the Enlightenment who understood and accepted the separation between the secular and the religious even though he believed in God.
Modern World on Naturalism

A lot has happened in this new era. By the end of 1700 people began to read the Bible self, they didn’t have to sit in church and listen to the priests reading them the Bible. People were very independent and they were able to move around and it was possible to emigrate. There was a bad side of this change; God was being replaced by man. There were a lot of changes happening in society and this led to man challenging everything. Everything changes, from family to business values. They believed that they can do what they want, when they want to and with whom they want to. Because this happened there was a shift in our minds, we thought that we moved from sacred to a secular world. This helps with the problem that human beings moved the focus from God to themselves. Everything we live by is secular humanism, our law, education, media, science, technology and even our culture. This creates our post modern world.

Naturalism in the 20th century

Naturalism is spreading fast. Due to its empirical basis it is very popular with people. Scientific discoveries are one of the main emphases of life. Naturalism is being embraced by a lot of people from all over the world and is now a very strong competitor to theism in places that was previously dominated by the theism worldview.

When naturalism was founded - ethics was not given much thought. A Lot of naturalists held similar values to those of theists. They believed that Jesus Christ was a teacher of good ethics and they followed those ethics. As time passes more focus is placed on human beings. Naturalists no longer live according to Christian ethics. The gap between theism and naturalism is widening.

The Start of Naturalism

Naturalism came into being as a worldview in the 18th century and was seen as a believable worldview after 1859, once Charles Darwin made a plausible argument of a naturalistic creation hypothesis in his theory of natural selection.

The naturalistic worldview is so popular that it is still endorsed in the 20th century by many people. Naturalism seems to be true, backed up by science and legitimate. It is easily understood by most people; therefore a lot of people chose this as their worldview. There have been many worldviews since the start of naturalism, even some very strong ones, but yet naturalism has survived and the number of people that believe in it have not decreased, but increased. Naturalism is the foundation of most scientific study and is used in most secondary schools, tertiary education centres and colleges as the basis of their teaching.

Naturalism was derived from deism, which believes that God is the Creator and Sustainer of the universe, similar to theists believing in the creation by God. Unlike the theist belief of a personal God that is in each person’s heart and constantly altering nature and lives, deists believe that God does not influence daily lives and that He has no interest in human beings. They believe that nature is self-sustaining and that God does not influence or alter nature in any way. Deists have made the role of God so insignificant that it is hardly important. They further believe that the universe is all about nature, natural laws and that all things form part of nature and are of nature. Naturalism has similar beliefs as that of deism, but naturalists have completely forsaken the idea of God. They believe that nature has always been there and that life on earth is due to some big bang or a natural phenomenon that occurred. Naturalists believe that all natural elements and humans exist in a sphere or system that is closed and that there is nothing other than or outside of this sphere or system. Only those things that are within this sphere can influence anything in the sphere.

Naturalism Answers the basic philosophical questions

1. What is real for a naturalist?

Reality is that everything has always been and it will continue forever, but it will continue to change. Nature has always existed, not in the way that we know it now, but some unknown phenomenon caused changes to take place that lead to evolution and life as we know it. Naturalists believe that God is not real. They do not believe in miracles, as nothing exists outside the sphere of nature and can therefore not influence anything that is real. Everything that happens in nature is caused by something else in the closed system of nature. The only thing that is real for a naturalist is our material world. They do not believe there is a spiritual world. The only meaning our lives have is the meaning humans give to their live. (Copp D,2003:179-181). (Sire, James. 2004:54-55)

2. What does a naturalist believe the world is made up of?

Nature was not created. It has always been and needs nothing in order to exist for ever. All things in nature are formed from something like particles or units. These small particles are the same, but have different characteristics and functions. They are all natural, governed by change and effect and will continue in that way. The system is closed and it functions through cause and effect. Effects happen because some other change happened or was caused by an action and is a reaction thereof. People with this worldview belief that the world is made up out of space, time, molecules, and the basic elements. They also believe that evolution had a very big part in our world. People with this worldview only belief that the world is our resource nothing more and nothing less. (Sire, James. 2004:55-56)

3. What does a naturalist believe a human to be?

A Naturalist views a human as a complicated machine, made up of small particles that are the same as the particles making up the natural elements, but that have different characteristics and functions. As science revealed more intricate functions of humans, they still believe that humans are some form of machine, but that they are made up of processes yet to be understood. Naturalists hold that humans function under the same set of rules / laws that everything else in nature is governed by. Even hopes, dreams and imagination are particles of nature or are caused by nature or due to nature. Humans are valuable because of the ability to communicate with speech, because of their ability to think, their culture, etc. The uniqueness of humans is what makes them valuable. People with this worldview belief that human beings are part of evolution that took place and those human beings are the highest creation of evolution in our animal kingdom. They believe that we have instincts to survive the world around us. We have the power to reproduce and build our families and society, but God or a higher power has nothing to do with it. We are born with this instinct that evolution evoked. (Copp D,2003:182-189). (Sire, James. 2004:56-57)

4. How humans know explained in naturalistic terms. How a naturalist does explain terms to be true.

Naturalists are pro-science and base knowledge in all things that can be proven or that have a scientific explanation. Knowledge is reason. Humans know things by experiencing them or by solid reasoning that can be derived scientifically. They believe that something can be proven by sense and reasoning that can lead to reasoning through scientific explanations. Anything that cannot be proven by science or logic does not exist. This means they do not believe in God. They also believe that we live through our instincts and our logic to survive. They also believe we survive through our experience.

5. What will happen at death? Does a naturalist believe in heaven or hell? What is time to a naturalist?

The particles that humans are made up of will break apart, no longer be combined into a living human form after death. A deceased human will cease to exist and nothing further. There is nothing besides the particles that make up the body, mind and personality. There is no soul, there is no place the personality goes after death, because the personality is only present when the particles function together in human form. There is no heaven or hell. Time marks the passage of all things and history is what human beings interpret it to mean. (Glen’s notes p41). They believe that when we die we return to the elements that made us human. (Sire, James. 2004:58-59)

6. Is history important to a naturalist? Why do we have history? History is not a build up to anything and there is no ultimate plan for humanity. History is written and retold by humans to suit their needs. History is linear, nature has no starting point, only existence, then the unexplained phenomenon that created humans took place, humans form part of natural history from then on and events of human lives and society will be recorded until humans cease to exist. Nature will carry on. (Sire, James. 2004:59-61)

7. How does a naturalist distinguish right from wrong? How do a naturalist know what is wrong?

There are no uniform morals. Humans only choose to do certain things in certain ways; there are no ethical examples to be followed, only those that have been created since the existence of humanity. There is no God, therefore no commandments or rules. People follow a pattern set by natural laws or characteristics and they derive morals from a relationship between others and from nature. Things that are beneficial to nature and people around them are beneficial to them and this is the morals that they adopt. Humans also derive morals from community, family and the environment. A naturalist believes that pain is caused by natural causes and these natural causes’ results in pain. This pain is produced by pain sensors and the psychological and society construction of reality. Death can be the end of all biological life. (Sire, James. 2004:61-64)

8. What is beauty in a naturalistic worldview?

Beauty in n naturalistic worldview is experience in the world. Beauty is also what is created by human beings. Everything that humans made themselves have beauty in it, this can be the Eiffel tower of France. Another thing that is beautiful for a naturalist is our experience that we have. This can be life experience, work experience. Any experience that makes us better in anything we do.

9. What is to be done for naturalist?

Everything changes overtime. Societies good and bad, what’s wrong and what’s right. A naturalist believes that that whatever makes you feel good is right and you can do it. You can live for someone ells or yourself. Everything is according to you. Everything changes over time.

Effects on society due to the naturalistic worldview

Naturalists believe that everything happens within a set of very complicated rules, but that all things follow a certain design. They do not believe that anything from outside this natural sphere can influence anything within the sphere.

Naturalism affects all facets of life. Naturalists have different morals to theists. Most legal systems originally stemmed from the theism worldview. As the world changes and freedom of religion is being advocated, no one specific religion is allowed to govern systems or laws in most countries and the empirical or natural worldview is then used. This brings about changes to existing laws, for example the law against abortion, which stemmed from a theistic worldview that believed God is the only one that can give or take a life. In that frame of reference abortion was against the law. The law changes to accommodate the new worldviews. In a lot of countries worldwide the law against abortion has been or is being lifted.

A view that was taken by Darwin is that the strongest will survive and should survive to keep the human race pure. Darwin conceived helping the poor as going against the nature of things and saw charity or helping the less fortunate as wrong. This is not necessarily the view of all naturalists, but it is inherent in the theory on which most of the naturalism worldview is based. This could affect the way people behave and therefore the way society functions.

Dangers of naturalism to society

Moral values are a big concern in contemporary society. Naturalists believe that your circumstances, make-up and memories cause your behaviour. They believe that human will is not the governing factor for what you do. Without free will, it can be assumed that you did not choose to do wrong, but because of who and what you are you did a specific thing in a specific set of circumstances. It is much easier to live with doing things that are conceived as wrong if you believe that you are not to blame. With less guilt, it becomes easier to do things that seem wrong. With no real consequences for wrong behaviour, this could cause people to become self-obsessed and only be concerned with their own survival. They may not to be interested in the welfare of others unless it is beneficial to them. If everyone conforms to this way of life, survival will be very difficult in the future and chances of a fairly peaceful society will be compromised.

Conclusion
This was a really hard assignment for me considering it is my second paper on naturalism. I can honestly say I understand naturalism now, but I do not agree with naturalism. I know it is a popular worldview, but my worldview is theism. I believe in God. I believe that God made the earth and everything on it, including animals, plants, water and our solar system. I believe that God made me in His image and He made me perfect. Humans are made or molecules, but God made these molecules. I also believe that beauty lies within. Every human being is beautiful just the way they are. We all are unique and this makes the universe we live in. I also believe that everybody has the right to believe what they want to and make up their own mind. This means I will not judge other people. There is only one person that can judge and that person is God.

Word Count: 2809 words

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Sire, James. 2004. The Universe next door: a basic worldview catalogue. USA: InterVarsity Press

2. Nash, Ronald H. 1992. Worldviews in Conflict: choosing Christianity in the world of

ideas.USA:Zondervan Publishing House

3. Stone,J,Arthur.2008.Religious naturalism today: the rebirth of a forgotten alternative

State university of New York press Albany

4. Glen’s Class Notes p 27-41

5. Copp D,2003. Why naturalism? Springer, volume 6:179-200 June

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Naturalism

...Thomas Dobson Professor Perez Literature 221 25 August 2013 Naturalism When must people think of naturalism they think of nature, and people who love the nature. That is not what naturalism is when it comes to literature. Naturalism is where the character in a story are caught in the forces of nature, and they have no control of their situation. Both Stephen Crane and Jack London did a great job with their short stories when portraying the writing style of naturalism. “The Open Boat” by Stephen Crane four men are on a boat when bad weather approaches them. They have to work together in order to survive this. In “To Build a Fire” by Jack London a man is at war with everything that the nature is putting in his path. He has no control at what is being thrown at him. The short story “To Build a Fire” by Jack London is about a man trying to escape death. The man is in Alaska, and decides to go on a walk with his dog. He is new to the area, and does not understand how bad the conditions really are. The man is supposed to meet up with a few friends at six o’clock. It starts getting colder, and the conditions are starting to worsen. The man falls down, and the snow gets him wet all the way up to his knees. So, he starts a fire to dry himself off, but the ice falls from a tree and kills the fire. He is not able to build another fire. By this point he is beginning to become frostbitten. He has a plan to kill his dog, and stuff his hands inside the dog to rebuild his circulation...

Words: 975 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Naturalism

...During the late 1800s, a literacy movement called Naturalism occurred in America. Naturalist believed in the idea that peoples’ interactions with environments and other people are what shape them as humans. According to a naturalist named Becker, naturalistic writers approached literature with a “pessimistic materialistic determinism” creating novels and stories that are driven by the forces that rule human lives. To the naturalist, man always succumbs to nature, because he has no control over it. Naturalistic writers use their characters, plots, and settings to portray their worldview that man is controlled by natural forces that dictate his destiny and no matter how hard man tried to fight against it, nature is indifferent to man’s tribulation and will always win because man is weaker. Jack London wrote, “To Build a Fire” a literary work of naturalism. London’s main character is never named, but is referred to as ‘the man.’ The man is travelling in the Yukon alone with his husky dog on a day where the weather is 50 degrees below zero. The man was warned by an old timer at Sulpher Creek not to travel alone on a day like this because it is far too dangerous. Against the old timer’s advice, the man sets out for the freezing trail ahead without human company. Throughout the story, London reiterates that although the man is blind to his human weaknesses, his canine companion is in tune with his natural wolf instincts and understands that they are not able to travel against the...

Words: 1208 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Elements of Naturalism

...Elements of Naturalism In their stories Frank Norris and Stephen Crane use elements of naturalism to put you into the story and see what the characters are going through. The term naturalism describes a type of literature that attempts to apply scientific principles of objectivity and detachment to its study of human beings. Unlike realism, which focuses on literary technique, naturalism implies a philosophical position. Frank Norris and Stephen Crane are key authors that used this way of writing. In Frank Norris’s story Fantaisie Printanere(921-927) this story shows naturalism by highlighting characters’ actions that were based on environment and experiences, not their free will. In the story it talks about how McTeague and Ryder were both drove to start drinking because of the past where they had basically failed. The book says that “McTeague had once been a dentist, and had had “parlors” up at the respectable end of the street. But after a while the license office discovered that he had no diploma; in fact, had never attended a college of any sort, and had forbidden him to practice. So McTeague had taken to drink. Ryer, some years back, had been a son of small stock-dealers on the outskirts of Butchertown, and had done fairly well until the Health Board reported him to the Supervisors because he had fattened his hogs on poultices obtained from the City and County Hospital. The result was a lamentable scandal, which finally drove him out of business. So Ryer had taken to...

Words: 732 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Naturalism by Garland

...Naturalism by Garland Naturalism is a literary movement that encapsulates the struggles of the common population. Hamlin Garland presents an excellent example of Naturalist literature in his short story “Under the Lion’s Paw”, published in 1889. In this short story, many of Dr. Stephen doCarmo’s characteristics of Naturalism are visible. Dr. doCarmo describes three broad characteristics of Naturalism: individuals are subjected to larger uncontainable forces, political undertones are prevalent within the work, and the subject matter of the work appeals to the middle-class. “Under the Lion’s Paw” possesses all three of these characteristics and radiates naturalism. Dr. doCarmo’s first and most important characteristic of a naturalist work, as well as what he refers to as Naturalism’s central belief, is that “individual human beings are at the mercy of uncontrollable larger forces that originate both inside and outside them” (doCarmo). Mr. Haskins is subjected to a larger force in the environment, “He’s been eat up ’n’ drove out by grasshoppers” (Garland 755). This environmental catastrophe diminishes Mr. Haskins livelihood and leads to another uncontrollable force as described by doCarmo: “‘animal’ drives, such as the need for food, sex, shelter” (doCarmo). Garland also acknowledges these “animal” drives: “There is no despair so deep as the despair of a homeless man or woman. To roam the roads of the country or the streets of the city, to feel there is no rood of ground...

Words: 614 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Naturalism in Jack London's the Call of the Wild

...Naturalism in The Call of the Wild Jack London was born on January 12, 1876 to a working class family. He had to deal with a hard life from a very young age, but his constant struggling got him through most of the difficulties and by the age of 30, he was internationally famous for his books Call of the Wild (1903), The Sea Wolf (1904) and other successful literay works. Though he wrote passionately about the great questions of life and death and the struggle to survive with dignity and integrity, he also sought peace and quiet inspiration. He wished society to be reformed that he expressed through his writings. His stories of high adventure were based on his own experiences at sea, in the Yukon Territory, and in the fields and factories of California. Similar to a number of writers at that time, he died young, at the age of 40, impoverished (again), sick and suffering from alcoholism. To this day it is still unclear if he the cause of death was accidental morphine overdose or he commited suicide. He as well was a fairly controversial person, so that different authors look at him in various ways: ”The basic law of his thinking was logic. His literary style was the clear, obvious and unmistakable sentences of the beautiful English language. ’The Call of the Wild’ serves as the reference book of English stylistics on Sorbonne. He was the man of facts: not to be afraid of looking inside of the eyes of reality, a great view of life. But Jack London's inner debates did...

Words: 2444 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

How Did Jack London's Use Of Naturalism

...Well known for his stories such as A Call To The Wild and To Build A Fire, London took naturalism and made it into what is studied by so many students still to this day. Jack London’s fame as a writer came about largely through his ability to realistically interpret humanity’s struggle in a hostile environment. Early in his career, London became an interpreter of the things that are, rather than a creator of the things that might be. Due to this, he drew his plots, characters, themes, and settings from real-life experiences and encounters. London often is found describing the impact of nature in all of its raw power on both human beings and creatures such as dogs in his short stories. London incorporated passionate and shocking elemental dimensions...

Words: 272 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Under the Lions Paw

...Many debates have sparked due to the topic of naturalism vs. realism. Naturalism takes the power away from the actual person, it says that people exist entirely in the order of nature, and do not have a soul, or any mode of participating in a religious or spiritual world beyond nature. () Realism however, gives those human like characteristics back to the person. Literary realism has a concern with morality and ethics. It means that humans have a moral agency, they can make choices, take directions, and take responsibility for their actions. () Hamlin Garland’s “Under the Lions Paw” does a good job with strengthening that debate of Naturalism vs. Realism even more. The story incorporates both naturalism and realism making it difficult to decide actually what type of story it is. Even though “Under the Lions Paw” incorporates many realistic undertones, it is a story of literary naturalism. Naturalistic stories incorporate people being controlled by a force greater than them, usually nature. In “Under the Lion’s Paw”, the natural forces are grasshoppers. On page….in the book, Mr. Haskins says ... () Since the grasshoppers ruin their farm, they are forced to move out. They have no other choice and were defeated by nature, making this an obvious example of naturalism. Realist may argue that the story is a story of realism because of the ethical character Mr. Council. Many times throughout the story, Mr. Council makes many ethical decisions in order to help the Haskins family. For...

Words: 795 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Symbolism in the Red Badge of Courage

...great example of this is Stephen Crain’s novel The Red Badge of Courage. Written in 1895, the plot mainly takes place in the Civil War, more specifically in The Battle of Chancellorsville. It is said that this battle was one of the bloodiest battles in the Civil War (The New York Times). The story centers around a young man Henry Fleming, who is very much obsessed with fame and recognition. Part of this obsession makes him join the Union Army, as an attempt to die with honor and to be forever immortalized by fame. Crane makes use of Symbolism through his characters, such as Henry, and the environment in which these characters are placed in. Through the use of Symbolism, Crane is introducing and informing the readers about the concept of Naturalism in such a subtle yet effective manner. Crane’s novel is filled with symbolism, take the title for example. Back in that time period, Civil War solders used the term red badge to describe a blood stain or wound attained through battle (McDermott). It was a symbol of courage, which is part of the reason why Henry wanted a wound so badly; he wanted to be seen as valiant to other Union solders. Henry’s wish did eventually come true, but that is where the irony lies. As it turns out in later in chapter 12, Henry receives an accidental head wound from his own fellow Union Solder after fleeing from battle....

Words: 1751 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

American Literature

...Katrina Bryant ENG/301 American literature is any written work of art that is created in the United States. American literature is like all literature, it has literary experiences and contextual history of America. It depicts how America has changed is still changing today. American literature has changed over time just like most canons of literary works. The uniqueness of American literature is that America from its beginning had a special philosophy of life and freedom. The special philosophy of life and freedom that made American literature so unique was reflected in its writings. Americans believed and had faith that God was and is the given of all our rights and freedom. We as Americans had faith in ourselves that we could succeed in anything that we try doing. The literature that we Americans wrote made life worth living because it was displayed for the world to read and understand that life was what we made it. Also by Americans having the ability to spring back from diversity made life worth living and George Washington was a perfect example of this. Literary canon is basically a suggested list of readings that belongs to a country or a certain period in time. Literary canon contains literary works that is mainly by authors who are accepted as an authority in their field and their writings constituting a serious body of literature in any given language. The works that are collected that is included in a literary canon is approved largely by cultural and...

Words: 710 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Naturalism

...Keisha Brown Naturalism, in literature, is an intensification of realism. Realism was a literary movement that occurred between 1870 and 1900. In realism, the author attempted to write about the way life was and not what it should or ought to be, however, naturalism, gave a more accurate depiction. It focused on ordinary people and their surroundings. In “Long Black Song”, Wright did an amazing job depicting how life was at this time. He incorporated race, gender, and the psychological drive of his characters in his writing so that the reader could get an accurate representation of life at that time. Gender plays a significant role in understanding what society was like when this story was written. In the first scene, you already can tell what the role of females and males were. A female was supposed to bear children and stay at home; they were seen as property, while the male was supposed to provide for the family. Sarah was at home with baby Ruth, while Silas was out of town selling cotton, so that he could make a living for the family. (pages 191-192) You also understand how a female was viewed as property. When Silas believed that Sarah had sex with another man, his words showed that he saw her in a certain way. On pages 195-196, Silas yells at Sarah and threatens to beat her for lying to him. In this day and age, it is frowned upon, for man, to raise his hand to a woman. However, in this time, it was just the way of life. Race had a very strong impact on society and...

Words: 772 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Magnus Derrick: the Governor

...Alex Hollingsworth Helen Driver Literature 221 November 20, 2014 Magnus Derrick: The Governor As the leader of the farmers’ defense league, Magnus Derrick has many troubles and hatred from many others within his league. His dialect is short of a redneck that we see today because of his short worded phrases and cut down words that only the people in his community can understand him. The governor has the features of an athlete even at his age, and his sons’ are two of the different kinds that he likes to describe them in many ways short of very descriptive. He tends to fit just right in to the community, the valley of farmers, with his sense of argument means to get what he wants no matter the consequences and in turn makes enemies like a leader of a gang or rebel group. Magnus is just like many other American’s during his time and beyond, the follow the rule of law. Almost sixty years old, Magnus Derrick, an all-American politician and leader that always commands his presence like a military officer, gambles his principles and way of living to his own ruin through the use of the enemy’s bad means for his good cause in the form of rebellion. One way that Magnus portrays as an all-American, is not just the fact he is a farmer but he knows how to talk and negotiate like an American. He tends to smile a lot and talks easily to strangers and shares personal stories like any other American would. Another attribute of The Governor is his ability to be polite to anyone by shaking...

Words: 1085 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Asl; Dkfjsad

...Naturalism was a philosophical movement during the late 1800s to mid 1900s, that marked a movement toward greater emphasis on nature, rather than materialistic society, and the natural world. The philosophy of naturalism teaches that nothing exists beyond the natural, that which can be discerned through science and natural observation. All humans are the product of certain circumstances; we are a caused species, not a self-causing. Naturalists [different word…claim] that there is no supernatural world, no God nor gods that affect our lives or give us Purpose. Instead, humans are made from the circumstances created by the universe, which is governed by natural laws. We have the free will to affect our circumstances in a way that would lead to a more beneficial conclusion for ourselves. Naturalism leads to the search for the cause of a problem, instead of the solution. Naturalism, like all philosophies, entered the literature of its time. This literature was marked less by what naturalism could offer society than by the power of nature. Literary naturalism was characterized by the power of nature over society, the fight of an individual to remain attached to civilization, and by the attempt to portray situations as clearly and as scientifically as possible. This blended with realism to stark descriptions, depictions of racism, pessimism, and some of the worst aspects of society. Zora Neale Hurston wrote Their Eyes Were Watching God in 1937, at the end of the movement. Their Eyes...

Words: 447 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

What

...Three forms of American literature during the 19th and 20th century are realism, naturalism, and local color. All three are very different styles of writing however, each one can have sub categories. Naturalism is another major literature movement of that occurred in America. Naturalism is a form of literature that attempts to apply scientific principles of objectivity and detachment to its study of human beings. Naturalist study human beings being governed by their passions as well as the easy the characters’ lives are governed by their environment. Some of the major themes of naturalism are survival in an amoral world, the struggle with the brute within, and futile attempts of man exercising free will. One of the many authors of the naturalist movement is Stephen Crane. Crane wrote the “Blue Hotel” in which he demonstrates the characters struggle with survival in an amoral society. The Easterner fighting the urge to tell everyone that he also knew Johnnie was cheating. This action eventually ends up getting the Swede killed. Local color authors sought to preserve the way of life that was often threatened by industrialization, immigration and reconstruction. Some of the key factors to local color is speech and manners while it also focuses on the dialect, and often focuses on regional characteristics. Some major themes of local color include escape, and constraints of society. One writer of local color was Kate Chopin who wrote “The Awakening.” In “The Awakening”...

Words: 362 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Stephen Crane's 'The Red Badge Of Courage'

...Many authors are notorious for their never ending use of cliff-hangers. Others, merely leave unanswered questions throughout their works. Stephen Crane is one of these writers. According to Julie Armstrong, “One of America's most influential realist writers, Stephen Crane… produced works that have been credited with establishing the foundations of modern American naturalism.” This conveys just what an amazing writer Stephen Crane truly was. Much of Stephen Crane's fame comes from his novel, The Red Badge of Courage. As said by Aaron Ezis, “Crane is less well known for his short stories, essays and poems, including An Experiment in Misery and In the Depths of a Coal Mine.” Along with this, critics often point out that Stephen Crane often asks...

Words: 803 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Advncement Keeping the Faith in an Evolutionary Age

...shifted from a higher creator to cosmic accident. The vast majority of history has shown humans to be theistic; the most recent dot on the string of time has been that of naturalism. Where Christianity has dominated western thinking for so long, it now finds itself in the minority voice of reason. Even Christians themselves have taken to blending their views to remain contemporary. L Russ Bush addresses this proliferation of naturalism in The Advancement. Brief Summary Bush produces an eight chapter discourse on the evolution, propagation and fallacy of a view that espouses inevitable naturalistic progress. One that believes biological life and humans in particular are evolving into a constant state of improvement. That believes science to be the replacement of God. Bush coins this worldview, “the Advancement”. Bush says that Christian stability has been replaced by naturalisms unstable relativity. Meaning no longer has meaning. Truth itself is subjective and new is always better. Bush begins by introducing a number of pre-modern and modern philosophers. Bush succinctly steps us through the evolution of this modern thinking and contrasts that against the Christian worldview. He outlines the ascension of scientific method and Darwinian dominance, noting the prevalent methodology to be based in naturalism. The consequences of science in the absence of God become a major theme. To avoid this consequence humans have revised the idea of God with the introduction of theological...

Words: 361 - Pages: 2