Premium Essay

Negotiable Instument

In:

Submitted By nahid11
Words 3090
Pages 13
A negotiable instrument is a document guaranteeing the payment of a specific amount of money, either on demand, or at a set time, with the payer named on the document. More specifically, it is a document contemplated by or consisting of a contract, which promises the payment of money without condition, which may be paid either on demand or at a future date. The term can have different meanings, depending on what law is being applied and what country it is used in and what context it is used in.
Examples of negotiable instruments include promissory notes, bills of exchange, banknotes, and cheques.
Because money is promised to be paid, the instrument itself can be used by the holder in due course as a store of value. The instrument may be transferred to a third party; it is the holder of the instrument who will ultimately get paid by the payer on the instrument. Transfers can happen at less than the face value of the instrument and this is known as discounting; this may happen for example if there is doubt about the payer's ability to pay.
Common prototypes of bills of exchanges and promissory notes originated in China. There, in the 8th century during the reign of the Tang Dynasty they used special instruments called feitsyan for the safe transfer of money over long distances.[1]
Later such document for money transfer used by Arab merchants, who had used the prototypes of bills of exchange – suftadja and hawala in 10–13th centuries, then such prototypes had been used by Italian merchants in the 12th century. In Italy in the 13–15th centuries, bills of exchange and promissory notes obtain their main features, while further phases of their development have been associated with France (16–18th centuries, where the endorsement had appeared) and Germany (19th century, formalization of Exchange Law). In England (and later in the U.S.), exchange law was different from

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Act 1881

...Short essay on the negotiable instruments in business law The law relating to “negotiable instruments” is contained in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Act extends to the whole of India. The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, has been amended for more than a dozen times so far. The latest in the series are: (i) the Banking, Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 (effective from 1st April, 1989), and (ii) the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 (effective from 6th February, 2003). The provisions of all the Amendment Acts have been incorporated at relevant places in Part IV of this book. The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as amended up-to-date, deals with three kinds of negotiable instruments, i.e., Promissory Notes, Bills of Exchange and Cheques. Definition: The word negotiable means ‘transferable by delivery,’ and the word instrument means ‘a written document by which a right is created in favour of some person.’ Thus, the term “negotiable instrument” literally means ‘a written document transferable by delivery.’ According to Section 13 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, “a negotiable instrument means a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable either to order or to bearer.” “A negotiable instrument may be made payable to two or more payees jointly, or it may be made payable in the alternative to one of two, or one or some of several payees”...

Words: 1111 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Holder and Holder in Due Course

...person can sue on a negotiable instrument unless he is named therein as the payee or unless he becomes entitled to it as indorsee or becomes the bearer of an instrument payable to bearer. In the Full Bench case reported in Subba Narayana Vathiyar v. Ramaswami Aiyar,1 it has been held that in a suit on a negotiable instrument by the payee or indorsee, it is not open to the defendant to plead that the plaintiff is a mere benamidar not entitled to payment with a view to show that the note has been discharged by payment to real owner. Again in the Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court in Bacha Prasad v. Janaki,2 it has been held that a person who is not a holder of a negotiable instrument cannot maintain a suit for recovery of money due under it even though holder is admittedly the benamidar and is impleaded in the suit. In the said decision, it has also been held that "a beneficiary cannot be called a holder of the instrument and payment to him cannot discharge the maker thereof unless the case falls under section 82(c) of the Act". So also, it has been held in the decision reported in Subharaya v. Abiram,3 that a beneficiary does not become a holder of the instrument even upon getting a declaration that he is the beneficial owner and the payee is only a benamidar. In this connection it has to be noted that Allahabad and Rajasthan High Courts have taken a slightly different view and held that in certain cases a beneficiary may maintain a suit on a negotiable instrument "if holder...

Words: 16119 - Pages: 65

Premium Essay

Negotiable Instrument

...Assignment on Negotiable Instrument Course Title: Legal Environment of International Business Prepared by: Farha Fatema Date of Submission: 28/04/2011 Executive Summary Negotiable instruments are written orders or unconditional promises to pay a fixed sum of money on demand or at a certain time. Promissory notes, bills of exchange, checks, drafts, and certificates of deposit are all examples of negotiable instruments. Negotiable instruments may be transferred from one person to another, who is known as a holder in due course. Upon transfer, also called negotiation of the instrument, the holder in due course obtains full legal title to the instrument. Negotiable instruments may be transferred by delivery or by endorsement and delivery. One type of negotiable instrument, called a promissory note, involves only two parties, the maker of the note and the payee, or the party to whom the note is payable. With a promissory note, the maker promises to pay a certain amount to the payee. Another type of negotiable instrument, called a bill of exchange, involves three parties. The party who drafts the bill of exchange is known as the drawer. The party who is called on to make payment is known as the drawee, and the party to whom payment is to be made is known as the payee. A check is an example of a bill of exchange, where the individual or business writing the check is the drawer, the bank is the drawee, and the person or business...

Words: 2594 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Ba 265

...November 11, 2013 Grantham University BA 265 Business Law II Week 6 Assignment Negotiable Instruments On the back of an envelope, Phoebe writes, “I promise to pay Quint or bearer $600 on demand. [Signed] Phoebe.” The type of instrument that is used in this scenario is a promissory note. When a promissory note is present, this is a written promise which involves two parties (Miller & Hollowell, 2011). The two parties that are present in a promissory note is the maker (payer) and the payee and the note may be made with a specific date mentioned or on demand-when the payee requests the money (Miller & Hollowell, 2011). In the scenario above, the maker is Phoebe and the payee is Quint and it the note is written to indicate that when Quint asks for the $600, Phoebe is to pay it at that time. In order for a note (or any other instrument) to be negotiable it must meet all six of the following requirements. These requirements are (Miller & Hollowell, 2011): 1. The instrument must be in writing-Phoebe wrote the promissory note on the back of an envelope. 2. It must be signed by the maker (payer) or the drawer-Phoebe signed the note 3. It must be an unconditional promise to pay-there were no conditions set by Phoebe that may hinder Quint from requesting payment (i.e.-I, Phoebe, will pay Quint the $600 if he calls me no later than noon on the day he requests payment) 4. The note must state a fixed amount of money-Phoebe’s promissory note listed...

Words: 572 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Law 2 Questions Week 3

...Ch25Q#1 Product liability; defect. There was no design defect. There was sufficient warning on the product. The fact that the landlord did not extend the warning to the tenants is not the responsibility of the product manufacturer. Hot water is hot - this simple fact does not allow recovery in this case. The landlord is liable for transferring any information of harm or danger to the tenants. The maker of the product manufacturer fully disclosed the information and did exactly what it is required to do. Ch26Q#11 Adequate assurances of performance. The court held that the seller had the right to stop work on one special production contract when the buyer had not paid on a contract for standard goods already delivered. The buyer had not paid in a substantial amount of time and the seller had the right to be concerned about payment for specially manufactured goods. Demanding assurances was justified even though the non-performance was on a different contract. Ch27Q#1 Statute of limitations. Firwood's resale may have taken three years, and the contract goods may have been sold as parts, but Firwood acted in good faith in trying to mitigate damages because there simply was no market for PCIs at the time of General Tire's breach. Firwood acted in good faith and pursued buyers diligently over that three-year period. While the time period may be less than optimal and the sale of the goods as parts not always desirable, Firwood did the best it could, given the market following...

Words: 572 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Negctiability

...things this is negotiable instrument called promissory note. Promissory note is a document passed from one person to another that is a written and signed unconditional promise to pay a specified sum of money on demand or at a definite time to order (to specific person or entity) or bearer. Promissory notes generally involve just two parties: the person signing the note who is promising to pay money (the “maker” of the note); and the person to whom the note specifies the money is to be paid (the “payee” of the note) (Promissory Note). Now just because you write on a piece of paper that you owe someone money and sign it doesn’t mean that you have created a negotiable instrument under the UCC. There are certain things that are require in order for it to be a negotiable instrument. These things include a signed document of promising payment of money and it must be unconditional, the amount of money must be a fixed amount (with or without interest charges), the instrument must be payable to bearer, the promise must be payable on demand or at a definite time, and the promise must not state any other instruction by the person promising or ordering payment to do any act in addition to the payment of money. Joelle note contain all of the above, which makes it a negotiable instrument called a promissory note. Joelle promissory note is negotiable but both parties need to agree with any new terms. Promissory notes are a formal written contract that may become negotiable if both parties...

Words: 354 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Imposter Rule

...Impostor Rule/Fictitious Payee The Impostor Rule is a rule stating that if an impostor endorses a negotiable instrument and receives payment in “good faith”, the drawer of the instrument is responsible for the loss. An example would be if an individual impersonates a person for whom a check has been cut or misrepresents himself as that person's agent. If the impostor receives the check, endorses it, and cashes it at the drawer's bank, the drawer is responsible for the loss, because the bank accepted the endorsement in good faith. The bank may be responsible for a percentage of the loss if it failed to exercise "ordinary care"; for example, if the bank did not check the impostor's identification. The imposter rule is based on the assumption that between the bank and the drawer, the drawer is in a better position to prevent the loss. The Fictitious Payee Rule is a principle of commercial law that if a drawer or maker issues commercial paper to a payee whom the drawer or maker does not actually intend to have any interest in the instrument, an ensuing forgery of the payee's name will be effective to pass good title to later transferees. Ordinarily, the drawer of a check is not liable on a forged endorsement. The "fictitious payee" rule is an exception to this principle, as it allocates the loss to the drawer if a person signing as or on behalf of a drawer intends the payee to have no interest in the instrument. The policy behind the fictitious payee rule is that it seeks to...

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Acc543 Mid Term/Final Study Guide

...ACC/543 Sample Questions for Midterm and Final Examinations The sample exam below is a representation of the Midterm and Final Examinations your students will take in Weeks Three and Six of this course. As in the sample exam below, the Midterm and Final Examinations will include questions that assess the course objectives. Although the sample exam contains one question per objective, the Midterm and Final Examinations will contain three questions per course objective. Refer to the questions in the sample exam below as a representation of the type of questions your students will be asked in the Midterm and Final Examinations. Refer your students to the weekly readings and content outlines for each week as study references for the final exam. The questions contained in the Sample Examination, Midterm and Final Examinations were selected from Operations Management for Competitive Advantage, Fundamental Financial & Managerial Accounting Concepts, and Business Law: Legal Environment, Online Commerce, Business Ethics, and International Issues. Week One: Managerial Accounting and Capital Budgeting Objective: Determine the present value of future cash flows from an investment. 1. Torvald's Hardware paid a contractor $45,000 to expand the store. The investment increased annual cash inflows by $8,000 per year six years. Torvald's has a desired rate of return of 10%. The net present value of this investment is which of the following? (round to the nearest dollar) A) ($10,160) ...

Words: 2448 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

N I Act

...B.S. Bodla NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 STRUCTURE 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Objectives Introduction Meaning of Negotiable Instruments Characteristics of a negotiable instrument Presumptions as to negotiable instrument Types of negotiable Instrument 1.5.1 Promissory notes 1.5.2 Bill of exchange 1.5.3 Cheques 1.5.4 Hundis 1.6 Parties to negotiable instruments 1.6.1 Parties to Bill of Exchange 1.6.2 Parties to a Promissory Note 1.6.3 Parties to a Cheque 1.7 1.8 Negotiation 1.7.1 Modes of negotiation Assignment 1.8.1 Negotiation and Assignment Distinguished 1.8.2 Importance of delivery in negotiation 1.9 Endorsement 1.10 Instruments without Consideration 1.11 Holder in Due Course 1.12 Dishonour of a Negotiable instrument 1.13 Noting and protesting 1.14 Summary 1.15 Keywords 1.16 Self Assessment Questions 1.17 References/Suggested readings 1.0 OBJECTIVES After reading this lesson, you should be able to• • • • Understand meaning, essential characteristics and types of negotiable instruments; Describe the meaning and marketing of cheques, crossing of cheques and cancellation of crossing of a cheque; Explain capacity and liability parties to a negotiable instruments; and Understand various provisions of negotiable instrument Act, 1881 regarding negotiation, assignment, endorsement, acceptance, etc. of negotiable instruments. 1.1 INTRODUCTION The Negotiable Instruments Act was enacted, in India, in 1881. Prior to its enactment, the provision of the English Negotiable Instrument Act...

Words: 64211 - Pages: 257

Premium Essay

Business

...Bangladesh Bank Order, 1972 (President’s Order No. 127 of 1972) Incorporating all amendments thereto upto March 10, 2003 -1- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC RELATIONS AND PUBLICATIONS BANGLADESH BANK, HEAD OFFICE, DHAKA [Published in the Bangladesh Gazette, Extraordinary, Part IIIA, dated the 3lst October, 1972] GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH MINISTRY OF LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (Law Division) NOTIFICATION No. 935-Pub. —31st October, 1972 —The following Order made by the President, on the advice of the Prime Minister of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh on the 31st October, 1972, is hereby published for general information: GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH MINISTRY OF LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (Law Division) President’s Order No. 127 of 1972 THE BANGLADESH BANK ORDER, 1972 [Whereas, it is necessary to establish a central bank in Bangladesh to manage the monetary and credit system of Bangladesh with a view to stabilising d omestic monetary value and maintaining a competitive external par value of the Bangladesh Taka towards fostering growth and development of country’s productive resources in the best national interest;]1 Now, THEREFORE, in pursuance of the proclamation of independence of Bangladesh, read with the Provisional Constitution of Bangladesh Order, 1972, and in exercise of all powers enabling him in that behalf, the President is pleased to make the following Order: CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. (1) This Order may be...

Words: 14234 - Pages: 57

Free Essay

Negotiable Instruments

...sovereigns of Delhi in the early part of the fourtheenth century. The word 'hundi', a generic term used to denote instruments of exchange in vernacular is derived from the Sanskrit root 'hund' meaning 'to collect' and well expresses the purpose to which instruments were utilised in their origin. With the advent of British rule in India commercial activities increased to a great extent. The growing demands for money could not be met be mere supply of coins; and the instrument of credit took the function of money which they represented. Before the enactment of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, the law of negotiable instruments as prevalent in England was applied by the Courts in India when any question relating to such instruments arose between Europeans. When then parties were Hindu or Mohammedans, their personal law was held to apply. Though neither the law books of Hindu nor those of Mohammedans contain any reference to negotiable instruments as such, the customs prevailing among the merchants of the respective community were recognised by the courts and applied to the transactions among them. During the course of time there had developed in the country a strong body of usage relating to “hundis”, which even the Legislature could not without hardship to Indian bankers and merchants ignore. In fact, the Legislature felt the strength of such local usages and though fit to exempt them from the operation of the Act with a proviso that such usage may be excluded altogether by appropriate...

Words: 8689 - Pages: 35

Premium Essay

Negotiable Law

...law LAW 504 PANCITO, Hazeleen Rose B. 3:30-5:30 PM Title I. - Negotiable Instruments in General Article I. - Form and Interpretation. SEC. 1. An instrument to be negotiable must conform to the following requirements: 1. It must be in writing and signed by the maker or drawer. 2. Must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in money. 3.Must be payable on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time. 4. Must be payable to the order or to bearer; and, 5. Where the instrument is addressed to a drawee,he must be named or otherwise indicated therein with reasonable certainty. Writing And Signature Writing and signature of maker or drawer are essentialto negotiability. Our natural conception of a negotiable instrument is that of a written paper. "Writing" includes print.12 The substance of the impression may be ink or lead.13 The former is of course preferable from the standpoint of sound and safe business practice. Signature. An instrument to be negotiable must be signed. "No person is liable on the instrument whose signature does not appear thereon, except as herein otherwise expressly provided. But one who signs in a trade or assumed name will be liable to the same extent as if he had signed in his own name." Example 8. Anotesigned "Western Novelty Co., Unincorporated" binds all who go under that trade name, assuming that the note is given under the authority of those sought to be held. Printed or lithographed signature is a legal...

Words: 2010 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Cpa Exam

...Ninth Edition CPA Preparatory Program Regulation Negotiable Instruments Sample Brian Hock, CMA, CIA with Dave Fairchild, CPA, CMA HOCK international, LLC P.O. Box 204 Oxford, Ohio 45056 (866) 807-HOCK or (866) 807-4625 (281) 652-5768 www.hockinternational.com cma@hockinternational.com Published August 2011 Acknowledgements Material from Uniform CPA Examination, Selected Questions and Unofficial Answers, Copyright © 1990-2011 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., is reprinted and/or adapted with permission. Acknowledgement is due to the Institute of Certified Management Accountants for permission to use questions and problems from past CMA Exams. The questions and unofficial answers are copyrighted by the Certified Institute of Management Accountants and have been used here with their permission. © 2011 HOCK international, LLC No part of this work may be used, transmitted, reproduced or sold in any form or by any means without prior written permission from HOCK international, LLC. Thanks The author would like to thank the following people for their assistance in the production of this material:     Kevin Hock for his work in the formatting and layout of the material, Lynn Roden, CMA for her assistance in the technical elements of the material, All of the staff of HOCK Training and HOCK international for their patience in the multiple revisions of the material, The students of HOCK Training in all of our classrooms and...

Words: 11083 - Pages: 45

Free Essay

Course Project

...The case at hand pertains to business ethics. Business ethics are the moral principles that steer businesses to act ethically while making sound decisions for the good of the business and making the right choices. This is the main reason why businesses have policies and rules that are followed in their day-to-day operations of the business and if there is a violation depending on the circumstances the individual(s) could be terminated as individuals or fined as a business. Furthermore, if you are working for a company and you are asked to do something that may be unethical weigh your options and make a sound decision accordingly to the benefit of the company and yourself morally. Parties The plaintiffs and defendants in this case are as follows: General Investment Corp. is a corporation based out of New Jersey (Plaintiff-Respondent), Anthony V. Angelini and Delores H. Angelini homeowners (Defendant-Appellants), Lustro Aluminum Products Inc. contracted to put siding on home (Defendant). The Supreme Court decided on June 7, 1971. Mr. Milton argued the case for the appellants, and Mr. Davis S. Baime argued the case for the respondent from Baime and Baime attorneys. Francis J. delivered the opinion of the court. Facts Anthony and Delores Angelini are homeowners that needed work done on their home. Lustro Aluminum Products is a contracting company that does home repair. The Angelini’s entered into a contract with Lustro for repair work on their home on December 10, 1966.” Lustro...

Words: 2126 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Court Case

...SUMMARY JUDGMENT The above case came before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment filed on August 1, 2006, in response to the debtor-plaintiff’s complaint alleging the creditor-defendant violated the automatic stay [i.e. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)] by cashing the plaintiff’s check after she filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The defendant avers it did not violate the automatic stay because of the exception provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(11). The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. The Court heard oral arguments on September 12, 2006 and directed the parties to file additional briefs dealing with whether the check at issue qualified as a negotiable instrument. For the reasons stated below, the 1 Case 06-40087-JJR Doc 31 Filed 10/26/06 Entered 10/26/06 08:56:27 Document Page 1 of 10 Desc Main Court finds the motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED. Background On April 15, 2006, the plaintiff received a “payday loan” for $500.00 from the defendant. In exchange for the $500.00 loan, the plaintiff gave the defendant a check for $587.50, which was intended to pay the principal of the loan plus interest and fees. The defendant agreed to hold the check until April 29, 2006. On May 9, 2006, the debtor-plaintiff filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy relief. For purposes of this summary...

Words: 3439 - Pages: 14