Negotiation Strategy Article Analysis
Introduction
The art of negotiation has evolved throughout the years with the development of theories and practices, which moves beyond competitive negotiations and towards real world problem solving (Cronin-Harris, ¶ 1). Interest based bargaining, known as problem solving, allows the interested parties to review their underlying interests versus an assertion of their positions and demands (Cronin-Harris, ¶ 1). In doing so, both parties will search for solutions which meets those underlying interests, while making concessions consistent with their respective needs and concerns (Cronin-Harris, ¶ 1). In this paper, I will review two negotiation situations that employ different strategies. I will describe the two negotiation processes used, comparing and contrasting them against one another. In addition, I will also discuss how these strategies might apply in the workplace setting.
Situations
In a situation described by Dr. Bob March (2009), most foreign companies fail in negotiating a business deal in China because they failed to do their research, being unprepared (¶ 1). Preparation requires the negotiator to do research. In doing research the negotiator will have a better understanding of the counter party, in this the Chinese, in hopes of identifying what they really want from the agreement. Additionally, research would allow them to better understand the Chinese culture, understanding the counterpart’s expectations, habits and basic fundamentals in which the Chinese culture conducts business. Lastly, research would have allowed the foreign negotiator to understand how important the Chinese weigh the development a trusting relationship, prior to entering into a business transaction. In another example, Michelle LeBaron (2003) that stated that U.S. approaches “to negotiation rely heavily upon individual values,