Outcome four includes revising, editing, and proofreading. In order to achieve this: there mustn't be errors that obstruct the comprehension of the work, the changes made must address critiques from instructor and peers and the writing must clear and intentional on multiple levels. This is paramount to a paper's overall efficacy as it creates a work that is understandable and clear to the reader. These types of requirements can be seen in almost any project that is adequate. Nearly all works must display fluency and responses to constructive criticism. For this, I chose SA 2.3. In this assignment one was required to annotate and cite three separate sources as well as describe a community, one of its problems and provide a possible solution. …show more content…
This revision was necessary for the comprehension of that sentence as it would have not made grammatical sense before the proofread. Another instance that included outcome four in SA 2.3 was in my revisions tailored to my peer’s comments in, ” "Water For All" is a mission statement of an MIT project that claims that clean water is paramount to a successful society and that there are consequences to inaction toward this problem.” A peer suggested, and I changed, the use of more sophisticated word choice in this sentence as it is a meaningful topic sentence. This was done to create a more profession topic sentence which I much more interesting with more complex synonyms. On the same hand, I used clear and intentional writing on multiple levels in, “The author of "Water" develops their claim by giving their argument, stating water-related challenges, arguing the right to water, setting goals, and lastly, explaining the importance of water to hygiene and sanitation.” This sentence was revised multiple times to achieve the most concise and purposeful sentence possible at both the word and sentence level in describing the goals of the subject