...Obama Care also known as the Affordable Care Act is a national health care plan aimed at reforming the American health care system. One of the main focuses of the system is to provide all Americans with affordable health insurance. In the process the government wants to improve the quality of health care, health insurance, regulate the insurance industry, and reduce the spending for health care. This plan will go into full affect by January 1st, 2014. It will force most American to have health insurance or pay a fee on their-end of the year taxes. This is just the start of tax implications that will be put into effect this upcoming year. Obama care gives benefits to many U.S. Citizens, but those benefits aren’t free. Different tax implications such as tax hikes, limits to deductions, tax credits, tax breaks, and other changes will be made to cover the cost of these benefits. One of the most controversial Obama care tax implications is the Medical Device Tax. The medical device tax is a tax for firms making medical equipment such as heart valves or pacemakers, and may other medical equipment. These firms’ wills see a tax of 2.3% on their profit of gross sales. This is a tax that will be enforced to pay even if companies don’t make a profit. According to the Congressional Budget Office this tax will generate 29 billion dollars in a decade. Many of these firms have fought back against this tax. These firms believe this tax will eliminate innovation and may cause many medical equipment...
Words: 1226 - Pages: 5
...document with huge costs. The plan will add a trillion dollars in health care spending. Obamacare calls for a $500 billion tax increase on citizens with an additional $500 billion is taken from Medicare, a plan that has benefited us for a long time. Obamcare will help people but at what cost? How can we afford to pay billions without going bankrupt? President Obama’s plan will cause the national deficit to steeply increase. Obamacare is a disaster for the national budget and for the American people. About half of the American public feels that President Obama is forcing them to buy healthcare. The public should feel this way about this kind of government takeover. How can you decide to use a plan when almost half the nation is against you? Those who won’t get healthcare will have to pay a fine, which most people feel is another tax. This plan takes away the people’s freedom to choose. President Obama should yield to the American people and stop the progression of Obamacare. Mitt Romney will allow states to design their own healthcare plan by issuing an executive order that provides all 50 states with a waiver for Obamacare. He will then work to create policies that enable the states to make their own healthcare plan. Obamcare will work but will not be entirely effective. Obamacare does not address the individual states and their most alarming ailments. Mitt Romney’s plan...
Words: 425 - Pages: 2
...violation of the Constitution, founding intent, and general constitutional principles. One debate surrounding the Affordable Healthcare is interpretation of the Commerce Clause juxtaposed against the individual mandate. Those who opposed the Affordable Healthcare act suggested the Commerce Clause gave the federal government no right to force a citizen to buy a product, be it health insurance or a toothbrush. In National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, Chief Roberts agreed, ““regulate commerce” did not allow the national government to force citizens to buy something like health insurance.” However, he continued, ““that the individual mandate must be construed as imposing a tax on those who do not have health insurance.” Thus, Obamcare was deemed a tax and thus Constitutional. Some viewed this interpretation as solid, Constitutional, and not an expansion of Government. While other viewed it as a gross expansion of government, and the interpretation a slap in the face of founding intentions. This argument over expansion of government echoes a Federalist versus Anti-Federalist debate. In hindsight, absolutizing the views of neither the Federalist nor Anti-Federalist views would prove beneficial. However, I assert the Anti-Federalist arguments throughout the Constitutional Convention were more in line with American Political theory. I agree with the Federalist that the government was far too weak under the Articles of Confederation. The government needed to be strengthened...
Words: 1285 - Pages: 6