...attend the quiz date this week, and you want to make it up, please see me immediately after your section meets on Tuesday/Wednesday. I will give you an alternate quiz. You should not take the early quiz if you do not need to. The 10 minute quiz will consist of a comprehension question about Machiavelli and a passage identification question or two that will refer to one of the five required texts by Al-Farabi, Said, Montaigne, Poe, or Shakespeare. Note: You were only required to read some sections from Al-Farabi (On the organization of the human mind and body: ch. 10 §1, 3 and ch. 14 § 1, 2, and 6. On the organization of human society: ch. 15 § 3, p. 259, ch. 17 § 1, 2, 4-6, and ch. 18 § 1-4.). And you are only required to read “On the Cannibals” of the three Montaigne essays. Shakespeare (reading for Feb 17-18): To give you some context for the Shakespeare play, it is about an aristocratic Scottish couple (identified as Macbeth and Lady Macbeth). Three witches tell Macbeth and his friend Banquo what their futures will be: Macbeth will extend his territory to include the Cawdor region of Scotland and later become king, and Banquo will have a son who becomes king. Right after the prediction, Macbeth receives the title Thane of Cawdor. He tells his wife about both predictions in a letter, and that he is now Thane of Cawdor, and she devises a murder plot with the hope of making him king. Try to spend at least 30 minutes with the Shakespeare passage. The writing style is very difficult...
Words: 327 - Pages: 2
...Of Cannibals Michel de Montaigne [Victorian Web Home —> Nonfiction] hen King Pyrrhus invaded Italy, having viewed and considered the order of the army the Romans sent out to meet him; "I know not," said he, "what kind of barbarians" (for so the Greeks called all other nations) "these may be; but the disposition of this army that I see has nothing of barbarism in it." — [Plutarch,Life of Pyrrhus, c. 8.] — As much said the Greeks of that which Flaminius brought into their country; and Philip, beholding from an eminence the order and distribution of the Roman camp formed in his kingdom by Publius Sulpicius Galba, spake to the same effect. By which it appears how cautious men ought to be of taking things upon trust from vulgar opinion, and that we are to judge by the eye of reason, and not from common report. I long had a man in my house that lived ten or twelve years in the New World, discovered in these latter days, and in that part of it where Villegaignon landed, — [At Brazil, in 1557.] — which he called Antarctic France. This discovery of so vast a country seems to be of very great consideration. I cannot be sure, that hereafter there may not be another, so many wiser men than we having been deceived in this. I am afraid our eyes are bigger than our bellies, and that we have more curiosity than capacity; for we grasp at all, but catch nothing but wind. Plato brings in Solon, — [In Timaeus.] — telling a story that he had heard from the priests of Sais in Egypt, that...
Words: 6102 - Pages: 25
...Hiba Jiryis Dr. Esther Schupak Academic Writing 1 January 6, 2016 Between the Past and the Present “Women belong in the kitchen. Men belong in the kitchen. Everybody belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food”. This is the best quote so far for the reason that the concept of “women belong in kitchen” is a disrespectful notion. “Trifles” deals with women status and treatment in society. Susan Glaspell shows the readers how men underestimate women’s interests and thoughts, especially since the whole play is set in a kitchen. Minnie had a miserable life ever since she married John Wrights who’s known as a hard man. She was a happy and full of energy who used to sing. She had nothing cheerful left but a bird, but unfortunately Mr. Wright choked it. She couldn’t help herself but to burst with anger, seize the opportunity and kill him. He took everything she loved: her voice, her body, her beauty and now all there was left: her bird. Sadly, Minnie represents many women all over the world today who are treated as neglected and worthless creatures who are suffering from physical and psychological assault. Technological development and world’s advancement isn’t necessarily related to the development of how people think. “Trifles” was written about a hundred years ago, and still its impact can be seen nowadays. Malala is a pakistani activist for female education and youngest Nobel Prize winner; who Taliban threatened then decided to kill her, and eventually they attempted...
Words: 767 - Pages: 4
...Cannibal Tours In "Cannibalizing, Commodifying , or Creating Culture? Power and Art in Sepik River Tourism," Silverman makes several critiques of O'Rourke's Cannibal Tours. Silverman argues that O’Rourke constructed a limited view of the New Guinea tribes. Silverman attributes the eroding ‘authenticity’ to the tourists’ pursuit for entertainment in exchange for money. For instance, O’Rourke’s interviews mostly covered reactions from tourists and how they gawked over the natives, arrogantly depicting their primitive lives. Silverman argues that the film “portrays tourism as a process that only disempowers local people and erodes from their lives all genuine, meaningful dimensions of their culture”(Silverman 1996). Tourism is much more than O’Rourke is presenting on the surface. In fact, Silverman suggests that its advantages go far deeper than monetary value, but attribute to growing, complex hybrid cultures. In Silverman’s opinion, “ Tourism is often a context in which local people exercise subtle forms of power and resistance, and artistically express novel hybrid concept of personal, ethnic, national, and transnational modern identities” (Silverman1996). Throughout O’Rourke’s film, the tourists, either through action or inaction, seem to be going against Silverman’s idea for tourism. For example, the local people are unable to exercise subtle forms of power; but instead, they experience disempowerment from the tourists’ unfair bargaining for already cheap, primitive...
Words: 699 - Pages: 3
...Montaigne in `Of Cannibals' disputes the conventional and the stereotypical notions that European adventurers had made of the cannibal society and he would as a matter of fact go a long way to give a different and logical meaning the story of the Mayan ballgame where the loser was sacrificed. In the novel, ‘Of Cannibals”, Montaigne not only seek to convince his readers that cannibal society were not as bad as the Europeans depicted them, but that they were self-sufficient societies who were at peace with one another, knew no inequality and they respected nature. Unlike the Europeans who believed that their culture was superior, cannibal societies were indeed in peace and harmony. In relation to the Mayan ball game in which the loser would be...
Words: 1063 - Pages: 5
...Throughout history there has always been social gaps. These are seen by rural and urban populations, and the upper and lower classes. In France in the nineteenth century, this was prevalent throughout the country’s provinces. The people spoke different dialects of French and they did not really identify together as a whole. The people were separated by both class and location through oppression and progress. Hautefaye was a small village in France that was filled with agrarian peasants. It also had some aristocrats who mingled amongst the population without worry. This was controversial because the urban bourgeoisie did not socialize with the urban poor. The nobility that lived in Hautefaye had owned their property for generations. The rural village, like most villages in France, liked to host fairs where the peasants gathered in economic and social activity. The fairs were supervised by government supplied gendarmes. Fairs were known for their violence. Men took part in fairs and they drank alcohol, which was the main festive beverage. For this reason, the alcohol sometimes got the best of the men and fights were common throughout the fairgrounds. Young boys got to follow their fathers around and learn the ways of a man. The economic activity that went on at fairs was stimulating to the community and helpful to those who took part. Propaganda became a key source in swaying the masses. The bourgeoisie used it to portray the nobility as bad and arrogant. Our textbook says...
Words: 1314 - Pages: 6
...WEB QUEST Value: 10% The purpose of this assignment is for you to explore the variety of online resources and sites that exist to support your work with families. Your findings are intended to broaden your knowledge and assist you in your course work (parent visit and major course assignment). The assignment is worth 34 marks and all students will begin with that mark. For each error or incomplete response, ½ mark is taken off. Submit as per your course faculty instructions. Answer each question clearly and concisely. 1. One of the best resources for teachers in finding support for families is the Canadian Child Care Federation. Go to the website: http://www.cccf-fcsge.ca and answer the following: (2 marks) What year was it established? It was established in 2012 What is its mission? Their mission is protecting, enhancing and prompting children safety and their healthy growth and development. As well as they committed to provide Canadian with the very best in early learning and child care knowledge and best practise. Google “Campaign 2000.” What is its purpose? What is the current status of this report? (Hint: Click on “What’s New” to see how it impacts families currently) (2 marks) The purpose of Campaign is seeking to eliminate poverty among Canadian children by the year 2000. Currently children and families in poverty left out of budget 2015, the federal budget misses its target by providing costly tax cuts to the wealthy at...
Words: 1103 - Pages: 5
...In: English and Literature Of Cannibals, by Michael de Montaigne 3 August 2008 Research Summary: Of cannibals In Of cannibals, by Michael de Montaigne, Montaigne makes a subtle argument to try to show that the cannibals are not barbarians. He uses a rebuttal argument to make the claim that the cannibals are not terrible people because of one practice that they engage in. Another claim he makes is that the cannibals also exhibit many qualities and virtues that are well respected by Europeans. Montaigne gives his reason for the cannibals not being barbarous by stating that it is hypocritical for Europeans to judge them without even looking or acknowledge there own barbarous ways. He states that, “I am not sorry that we notice the barbarous horror of such acts, but I am heartily sorry that, judging their faults rightly, we should be so blind to our own” (155). Montaigne feels that the European nature of torture is more barbarous than the cannibals eating someone who is already dead, “I think there is more barbarity in eating a man alive than in eating him dead; and in tearing by tortures and the rack of a body still full of feeling, in roasting a man bit by bit, in having him bitten and mangled by dogs and swine, than roasting and eating him after he is dead (155). Montaigne defines the Europeans as being barbaric themselves and gives reasons for why the cannibals practice is not as bad as the accepted viewpoint. He states that it is a cultural practice that is...
Words: 362 - Pages: 2
...3 August 2008 Research Summary: Of cannibals In Of cannibals, by Michael de Montaigne, Montaigne makes a subtle argument to try to show that the cannibals are not barbarians. He uses a rebuttal argument to make the claim that the cannibals are not terrible people because of one practice that they engage in. Another claim he makes is that the cannibals also exhibit many qualities and virtues that are well respected by Europeans. Montaigne gives his reason for the cannibals not being barbarous by stating that it is hypocritical for Europeans to judge them without even looking or acknowledge there own barbarous ways. He states that, “I am not sorry that we notice the barbarous horror of such acts, but I am heartily sorry that, judging their faults rightly, we should be so blind to our own” (155). Montaigne feels that the European nature of torture is more barbarous than the cannibals eating someone who is already dead, “I think there is more barbarity in eating a man alive than in eating him dead; and in tearing by tortures and the rack of a body still full of feeling, in roasting a man bit by bit, in having him bitten and mangled by dogs and swine, than roasting and eating him after he is dead (155). Montaigne defines the Europeans as being barbaric themselves and gives reasons for why the cannibals practice is not as bad as the accepted viewpoint. He states that it is a cultural practice that is not for enjoyment and that everyone engages in the practice. They do not...
Words: 534 - Pages: 3
...Michel de Montaigne was a European author who wrote about the many unique things, such as the topic of the New World. While he had many essays, his paper titled “Of Cannibals” is certainly one of the most interesting. In this essay, he describes what he considered to be the “barbaric” nature that the people of the New World live. He goes on to compare these people to the more civilized people within Europe, and eventually comes to a conclusion that the New World might be less barbaric, even though they have more barbaric practices. This epiphany goes hand in hand with the Mayan Ball Game, in that the loser of this game would be sacrificed to the Gods. Montaigne would think that this game perfectly portrays how a civilized society is just as barbaric as the uncivilized, for they kill one another for their belief. Within Montaigne’s essay, he makes the statement “We may call these people barbarous…but in respect to ourselves, who in all sorts of barbarity exceed them” (Widger, 18). This is a powerful assertion, for he claims that his own society is much worse than that of a newly discovered one. The New World was full of different beliefs, one of which were active cannibals, yet here Montaigne still believes that the European civilization is just as bad if not worse. He justifies this by providing examples of different...
Words: 675 - Pages: 3
...Cannibalism is as alive and well today as it ever was in George Fitzhugh’s “Cannibals All!” In his book Fitzhugh writes at length about the benefits of being a slave vs being a free laborer. It was his view that as a slave there was incentive for the master to keep you alive and healthy, but to those who are free laborers could be easily disposed. “When the day's labor is ended, he is free, but is overburdened with the cares of family and household, which make his freedom an empty and delusive mockery (Cummings, 2015, p. 277).” In today’s free market society, it is still the “cannibals all” who live free at the expense of those who toil. “The free laborer must work or starve (Cummings, 2015, p. 279)” is Fitzhugh’s call to the cause of the free laborers. The free laborer must work and then spend those earnings to provide for the food and nourishment of his household. If he does not produce the family is left wanting. The story has not changed much in modern times. Amy Glasmeier, a professor of Economic Geography and Regional Planning at Massachusetts Institute of...
Words: 1148 - Pages: 5
...The Anatomy of a Skate Wheel: Hyper Cannibals VS Atom Poisons Flat track roller derby is a grass roots revolution. Leagues are popping up all across the world at a rapid pace. These leagues are formed with any resource founders can scrounge, and often times they have to compete with other local sports teams for playing space and practice time. While leagues do play under uniform rulesets, the skating surface they play on is variable. This surface can range from super slick polished concrete, to bumpy portable sport court tiles. In an attempt to maintain some consistency in their gameplay, skaters often switch out their wheel sets, depending on the surface they are getting set to play on. If you don't play derby, and you’re not a skater, you might think that there's not a lot involved in...
Words: 866 - Pages: 4
...Throughout “Of Cannibals” by Michel de Montaigne, Montaigne suggests that the cannibals of South America take part in acts that are considered barbaric, but he also explains that these cannibals practice similar activities as Europeans. Barbaric (adj) meaning cruel or extremely brutal and uncivilized or unsophisticated when compared to high developed citizens; may seem like the appropriate word to use when talking about “cannibals” however, I’d argue along with Montaigne that “we may then call these people barbarous, in respect to the rules of reason: but not in respect to ourselves, who in all sorts of barbarity exceed them.” Although these cannibals may commit acts that may qualify them as barbaric, the europeans commit acts that would qualify them as barbaric or even more barbaric as well. When living in a developed society, an undeveloped society may seem uncivilized. The Europeans live in a country with laws, businesses, cities, towns, schools and churches. While the cannibals live in the forest, off the land, hunting for their own food, teaching their children, building there homes. They provide for themselves, building what they need and using the resources from the land they live in. Perhaps not as sophisticated as the europeans, but no less civilized. “Their disputes are not for the conquest of new lands, for these they already possess are so fruitful by nature, as to supply them without labor or concern, with all things necessary, in such abundance that they have...
Words: 563 - Pages: 3
...In Of cannibals, by Michael de Montaigne, Montaigne makes a subtle argument to try to show that the cannibals are not barbarians. He uses a rebuttal argument to make the claim that the cannibals are not terrible people because of one practice that they engage in. Another claim he makes is that the cannibals also exhibit many qualities and virtues that are well respected by Europeans. Montaigne gives his reason for the cannibals not being barbarous by stating that it is hypocritical for Europeans to judge them without even looking or acknowledge there own barbarous ways. He states that, “I am not sorry that we notice the barbarous horror of such acts, but I am heartily sorry that, judging their faults rightly, we should be so blind to our own” (155). Montaigne feels that the European nature of torture is more barbarous than the cannibals eating someone who is already dead, “I think there is more barbarity in eating a man alive than in eating him dead; and in tearing by tortures and the rack of a body still full of feeling, in roasting a man bit by bit, in having him bitten and mangled by dogs and swine, than roasting and eating him after he is dead (155). Montaigne defines the Europeans as being barbaric themselves and gives reasons for why the cannibals practice is not as bad as the accepted viewpoint. He states that it is a cultural practice that is not for enjoyment and that everyone engages in the practice. They do not do it for pleasure or nourishment but rather as a way...
Words: 344 - Pages: 2
...A monster is defined as a person who intentionally goes against the code of ethics agreed upon by the community. Grendel broke a core human moral by killing other humans. As a result, he was quickly branded a monster. The fact that he appears as a monstrous person only added to the idea that he was a monster; however, that characteristic alone would not have been enough to brand Grendel as a monster. Another monster that fits a similar diagnosis is “The Thing”. “The Thing” is a monster that masquerades as other beings. This leads to a monster that is completely indistinguishable from a normal person. “The Thing” is quite clearly a monster judging by the fact that it kills most of the movie’s cast in under two hours. The ethical code broken...
Words: 333 - Pages: 2
