...Chapter 11 Exercises For Exercises 1- 15, mark the answers true and false as follows: A. True B. False |1. |A text file stores binary data that is organized into groups of 8 or 16 bits that are interpreted as characters. | | |A | |2. |A program written in a high-level language is stored in a text file that is also called a source file. | | |A | |3. |The type of a file determines which kinds of operations can be performed on it. | | |A | |4. |The current file pointer indicates the end of a file. | | |B | |5. |Sequential access and direct access take about the same amount of time to retrieve data. | | |B | |6. |Some operating systems...
Words: 2267 - Pages: 10
...Loopback0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 172.16.1.17 255.255.255.240 duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address duplex auto speed auto shutdown ! interface Serial0/0/0 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.252 clock rate 64000 ! interface Serial0/0/1 ip address 192.168.10.5 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial0/1/0 no ip address clock rate 2000000 shutdown ! interface Vlan1 no ip address shutdown ! ip classless ! ip flow-export version 9 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! line con 0 password cisco login ! line aux 0 ! line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! ! ! end R1#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. R1(config)#router ospf 10 R1(config-router)#network 192.168.10.0\ ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. R1(config-router)#network 192.168.10.1 % Incomplete command. R1(config-router)#network 192.168.10.0.0.0.3 area 0 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. R1(config-router)#network 192.168.10.0.0.0.0.3 area 0 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. R1(config-router)#network 192.168.10 0.0.0.0.3 area...
Words: 2242 - Pages: 9
...Laborotory Work OSPF MULTI AREA CONFIGURATION In this laboratory work you will learn: * Use OSPF MultiArea protocol ; * Encrypted Ospf protocol; Note: The routers used CCNA labs are Cisco 2911 Cable the network as shown in the topology. Attach the devices as shown in the topology diagram, and cable as necessary. Configure PC hosts. Initialize and reload the routers and switches as necessary. Configure basic settings for each router. Configure routing. Configure OSPF on the routers in area 1 with process ID of 100, in area 0 with process ID of 110, in area 2 with 200. R6(config)#router ospf 100 R6(config-router)#network 8.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 1 R6(config-router)#network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 R6(config)#router ospf 100 R6(config-router)#network 8.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 1 R6(config-router)#network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 R2(config)#router ospf 110 R6(config-router)#network 8.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 1 R6(config-router)#network 9.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 1 R6(config-router)#network 30.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 R2(config)#router ospf 110 R6(config-router)#network 8.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 1 R6(config-router)#network 9.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 1 R6(config-router)#network 30.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 * On R1 use the following commands #show ip route R1#show ip route Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area ...
Words: 1093 - Pages: 5
...EIGRP vs OSPF EIGRP or OSPF, one is not necessarily better, but rather just different. Both are tools you can use to solve a problem they’re well suited to solve. Unfortunately, nothing on either protocol goes into too much detail on why we would use one or the other. EIGRP is known widely as a proprietary protocol. So is it just a matter of using EIGRP with Cisco equipment and OSPF without? OSPF is pretty cool because it allows us to decide the path through the network by being aware of all links in a given logical topology. OSPF gives us a bit more control, seeing as each router knows about every other link in an OSPF area, allowing us to get really granular path selection. OSPF does require more resources on the device than most other protocols, such as the relatively light DUAL algorithm that sits behind EIGRP. So use OSPF when you have beefy equipment and EIGRP when you don’t. From what I’ve read Cisco will be allowing EIGRP to be used on non-Cisco equipment. That will make it more available to use. So now EIGRP may be kind of open and newer equipment is less affected by the power of OSPF. So back and forth we go. One thing where OSPF holds an advantage is the ability to see your route. With EIGRP it’s considered routing by rumor. EIGRP is able to summarize on any interface running EIGRP, and OSPF is only able to do this at Area Border Routers, or routers at that join multiple areas together. There are a couple ways of looking at this, but I’d like to make one very clear...
Words: 376 - Pages: 2
... [pic] Objectives • Review EIGRP and OSPF configuration. • Summarize routes in EIGRP. • Summarize in OSPF at an ABR and an ASBR. • Redistribute into EIGRP. • Redistribute into OSPF. Background Two online booksellers, Example.com and Example.net, have merged and now need a short-term solution to inter-domain routing. Since these companies provide client services to Internet users, it is essential to have minimal downtime during the transition. Example.com is running EIGRP while Example.net is running a multi-area OSPF. Because it is imperative that the two booksellers continuously deliver Internet services, you should bridge these two routing domains without interfering with each router’s path through its own routing domain to the Internet. The CIO determines that it is preferable to keep the two protocol domains shown in the diagram during the transition period, because the network engineers on each side need to understand the other’s network before deploying a long-term solution. Redistribution will be a short-term solution. In this scenario, R1 and R2 are running EIGRP while R2 is the OSPF autonomous system border router (ASBR) consisting of areas 0, 10, and 20. You need to configure R2 to enable these two routing protocols to interact to allow full connectivity between all networks. In this lab, R1 is running EIGRP and R3 is running multi-area OSPF. Your task is to configure redistribution on R2 to enable...
Words: 3338 - Pages: 14
...WHITE PAPER BIDIRECTIONAL FORWARDING DETECTION FOR OSPF Fast Failure Detection to Speed Network Convergence OVERVIEW In both Enterprise and Service Provider networks, the convergence of business-critical applications onto a common IP infrastructure is becoming more common. Given the criticality of the data, these networks are typically constructed with a high degree of redundancy. While such redundancy is desirable, its effectiveness is dependant upon the ability of individual network devices to quickly detect failures and reroute traffic to an alternate path. This detection is now typically accomplished via hardware detection mechanisms. However, the signals from these mechanisms are not always conveyed directly to the upper protocol layers. When the hardware mechanisms do not exist (eg: Ethernet) or when the signaling does not reach the upper protocol layers, the protocols must rely on their much slower strategies to detect failures. The detection times in existing protocols are typically greater than one second, and sometimes much longer. For some applications, this is too long to be useful. Bi-directional Forwarding Detection (BFD) provides rapid failure detection times between forwarding engines, while maintaining low overhead. It also provides a single, standardized method of link/device/protocol failure detection at any protocol layer and over any media. THE PROBLEM WITH CONVERGENCE The process of network convergence can be broken up into a set of discreet events*:...
Words: 6315 - Pages: 26
...EIGRP vs OSPF IP Networking NT2640 Travis McCaig 05/07/16 Mr. M. G. Durazo Ed. EIGRP vs OSPF In this paper we will explore and compare EIGRP and OSPF protocols to determine if one might be better suited to a particular network. First I’ll explore their positive or negative features individually. Then I’ll do a more side-by-side comparison to see if there are more noticeable differences. Finally, I’ll make an informed decision on which protocol to choose based on network’s size, topology and more. EIGRP Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol or (EIGRP) is a protocol that lets routers exchange a copy of its neighbors routing tables. These tables are updated each time a new router comes online and EIGRP can detect changes in routes. It can do this marvelous feat by periodically sending a “hello” packet, that essentially responds an active or inactive result. If a router isn’t available EIGRP changes the route as well as updates the other neighboring routers. Finally, this protocol can consider distance and determine if a path is loop-free thereby determining most efficient route. OSPF Open Shortest Path First also called OSPF is a protocol that like EIGRP can exchange routing tables with neighbors with an added bonus. The bonus is that it creates a complete map of all networks and this is dubbed an Autonomous System or AS. This complete picture of the AS is also copied and shared but the advantage lies in the ability to manually manipulate routes for traffic...
Words: 715 - Pages: 3
...EIGRP Vs OSPF EIGRP - Is an advanced distance-vector routing protocol, with optimizations to minimize both the unstable route incurred after topology changes, as well as the use of bandwidth and processing power in the router. Routers supporting EIGRP will automatically redistribute route information to IGRP neighbors by converting the 32 bit EIGRP metric to the 24 bit IGRP metric. Most of the routing optimizations are based on the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) work from SRI, which guarantees loop-free operation and provides a mechanism for fast convergence. IGRP is created by Cisco. OSPF - Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is a link-state routing protocol for IP networks. It uses a link state routing algorithm and falls into the group of interior routing protocols, operating within a single autonomous system (AS). OSPF is the most widely used interior gateway protocol (IGP) in large enterprise networks. OSPF is a trusted Cisco course-plotting method that creates managing big systems achievable. OSPF represents "Open Least Route 1st. inch this smallest journey would be the one particular with the cheapest. OSPF uses a metric to look for the volume of over head it'd price tag to be able to post info spanning a presented interface. This course-plotting criterion makes use of this specific metric to choose the most efficient journey in between resource and getaway. Determining your metric, or maybe price tag, yourself can be executed simply using a basic working out. ...
Words: 365 - Pages: 2
...EIGRP Vs OSPF EIGRP - Is an advanced distance-vector routing protocol, with optimizations to minimize both the unstable route incurred after topology changes, as well as the use of bandwidth and processing power in the router. Routers supporting EIGRP will automatically redistribute route information to IGRP neighbors by converting the 32 bit EIGRP metric to the 24 bit IGRP metric. Most of the routing optimizations are based on the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) work from SRI, which guarantees loop-free operation and provides a mechanism for fast convergence. IGRP is created by Cisco. OSPF - Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is a link-state routing protocol for IP networks. It uses a link state routing algorithm and falls into the group of interior routing protocols, operating within a single autonomous system (AS). OSPF is the most widely used interior gateway protocol (IGP) in large enterprise networks. OSPF is a trusted Cisco course-plotting method that creates managing big systems achievable. OSPF represents "Open Least Route 1st. inch this smallest journey would be the one particular with the cheapest. OSPF uses a metric to look for the volume of over head it'd price tag to be able to post info spanning a presented interface. This course-plotting criterion makes use of this specific metric to choose the most efficient journey in between resource and getaway. Determining your metric, or maybe price tag, yourself can be executed simply using a basic working out...
Words: 361 - Pages: 2
...OSPF for Traffic Routing Robert Collazo Rasmussen College Author Note This research is being submitted on August 30, 2013, for Christine Stagnetto-Zweig’s N235/CET2629 Section 02 Cisco Networking Fundamentals and Routing course. OSPF for Traffic Routing The OSPF dynamic routing protocol is probably the most popular LAN routing protocol today. OSPF can scale to the largest LANs but can also start out small. With OSPF, every router has its own unique "picture" (topology map) of the network. Routers use "HELLO" packets to periodically check with routers to ensure they are still there. Every router in OSPF is identified with a "router ID". The router ID can be manually entered or OSPF will automatically choose the IP address with the highest number. To configure OSPF, Set the bandwidth on your interfaces using the bandwidth command Router (config-if)# bandwidth XX (where XX signifies the bandwidth of the WAN connection). Router (config)# router ospf {process-ID#} Next, instruct the router to advertise the networks that are directly linked to it by entering network statements with the area ID number for that network, Router (config-router)# network {X.X.X.X} {Y.Y.Y.Y} area {z} X.X.X.X = Network ID of Network Y.Y.Y.Y = the wildcard mask for the network (the wildcard mask is the inverse mask of the subnet mask). Z = the area ID number (For small networks, this can always be zero (0) but for larger networks, the area IDs need to be properly planned as all routing updates...
Words: 347 - Pages: 2
...OSPF for Traffic Routing Robert Collazo Rasmussen College Author Note This research is being submitted on August 30, 2013, for Christine Stagnetto-Zweig’s N235/CET2629 Section 02 Cisco Networking Fundamentals and Routing course. OSPF for Traffic Routing The OSPF dynamic routing protocol is probably the most popular LAN routing protocol today. OSPF can scale to the largest LANs but can also start out small. With OSPF, every router has its own unique "picture" (topology map) of the network. Routers use "HELLO" packets to periodically check with routers to ensure they are still there. Every router in OSPF is identified with a "router ID". The router ID can be manually entered or OSPF will automatically choose the IP address with the highest number. To configure OSPF, Set the bandwidth on your interfaces using the bandwidth command Router (config-if)# bandwidth XX (where XX signifies the bandwidth of the WAN connection). Router (config)# router ospf {process-ID#} Next, instruct the router to advertise the networks that are directly linked to it by entering network statements with the area ID number for that network, Router (config-router)# network {X.X.X.X} {Y.Y.Y.Y} area {z} X.X.X.X = Network ID of Network Y.Y.Y.Y = the wildcard mask for the network (the wildcard mask is the inverse mask of the subnet mask). Z = the area ID number (For small networks, this can always be zero (0) but for larger networks, the area IDs need to be properly planned as all routing updates...
Words: 374 - Pages: 2
...EIGRP (Distance Vector) and OSPF (Link-State) Routing Protocol Comparison Prepared By Part 01 Literature Review Date April 15 2016 * Executive Summary For routers to be able to effectively and efficiently distribute data across a network they need to be programmed with the network topology. One method in which the network is "mapped" can be done by using routing protocols. The two main types of routing protocol are Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) and Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP). * * Project plan The study will be compromised of setting up two different network topologies and implementing the different routing protocols on each so that we can observe and record the positive and negative aspects of each protocol. * Literature review http://packetlife.net/blog/2008/oct/2/distance-vector-versus-link-state/ “There are two major classes of routing protocol: distance vector and link-state. It's easy to remember which protocols belong to either class, but comprehending the differences between the two classes takes a bit more effort.” EIGRP (Distance Vector) and OSPF (Link-State) Routing Protocol Comparison * Summary EIGRP and OSPF are routing protocols used to advertise routes in a network. EIGRP was a cisco proprietary protocol, and OSPF is an open standard industry protocol, which means it can be implemented with non-Cisco devices. Protocols are set of rules and regulations, routing protocols...
Words: 644 - Pages: 3
...Unit 5 Assignment 1: Cisco Networks EIGRP versus OSPF EIGRP: Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol Is another routing protocol just like RIP and OSPF. EIGRP converges very quickly and it takes about the same time or not less than OSPF takes to converge, but without the negatives of OSPF. EIGRP’s benefit requires much less processing time, memory and less design than say OSPF. The downside with EIGRP is that it is Cisco-proprietary, so if an internet work areas uses non-Cisco routers it cannot be used on those routers. EIGRP is neither distance-vector nor link-state. Sometimes Cisco refers to EIGRP as an enhanced distance vector protocol but in some cases calls it a balanced hybrid routing protocol. EIGRP has some similarities to routing protocols but the differences far outweigh them. OSPF: Open Shortest Path First Is a link-state routing protocol for Internet Protocol (IP) networks. It uses a link state routing algorithm and falls into the group of interior routing protocols, operating within a single autonomous system (AS). It is defined as OSPF Version 2 in RFC 2328for IPv4. The updates for IPv6 are specified as OSPF Version 3 in RFC 5340 . OSPF is perhaps the most widely used interior gateway protocol (IGP) in large enterprise networks. IS-IS, another link-state dynamic routing protocol, is more common in large service provider networks. The most widely used exterior gateway protocol is the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), the principal routing protocol between autonomous...
Words: 269 - Pages: 2
...Routing and OSPF (50 points) Fill in the blanks below with either the term defined or the definition for the terms listed. Each answer is worth 2 points each, 25 questions X 2 = 50 total points. Type answers in the appropriate cell; text will automatically wrap. Post your completed assignment to the dropbox. NAME | Jose Antonio Nunez | | Term | Definition | 1 | An OSPF network | Attaches to multiple areas, maintains separatelink-state databases for each area it is connectedto, and routes traffic destined for or arriving fromother areas | 2 | Autonomous System Boundary Router (ASBR) | Is an OSPF router located between OSPF autonomous system networks and non-OSPF networks. | 3 | Backup Designated Router (BDR) | Is a router that becomes the Designated Router if the DR fails. | 4 | Database Description (DBD) | Contains an abbreviated list of the sendingrouter’s link-state database and is used by receiving routers to check against the local link-state database | 5 | Designated Router (DR) | Is an OSPF router that controls the routes of LSA’s or LSU’s. It helps maintain link state updates to other routers in the network. | 6 | DRothers | Is neither a DR, nor a BDR. They are other routers in the OSPF network. | 7 | Flapping link | Is when an advertised route between two nodes alternates back and forth. This creates a link state that cycles between up and down. | 8 | The highest IP address of an active router interface. | Router ID for an OSPF router if...
Words: 655 - Pages: 3
...Protocols; Including RIP v2, EIGRP & OSPF Paul McDermott CCNA 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Abstract 3 2.0 Introduction 4 3.0 Protocol overview 5 3.1 RIP v2 Overview 5 3.2 EIGRP Overview 6 3.3 OSPF Overview 6 4.0 Protocol Comparison 10 4.1 Topology Overview 10 4.2 Protocol Types 10 4.3 Administration Distance 10 4.4 Protocol Tables 11 4.5 Algorithm 11 4.6 Metric 12 4.7 Periodic Updates 12 4.8 Hierarchical / Scalable 12 4.9 Load Balance 13 4.10 Comparison Table 14 5.0 Conclusion 15 6.0 References 16 Abstract The following report is a critical comparison of three routing protocols; RIPv2, EIGRP and OSPF, detailing the protocol features, as well as their similarities and differences. The report takes an in-depth look at the technical elements and algorithms used in these protocols, such as Bellman Ford, DUAL, and the Dijkstra Algorithm; and how these algorithms are used to calculate the routing metric. The report also discusses the fact that EIGRP is the most desirable protocol to use on Cisco based routers, while OSPF can be used across different router manufacturers. While looking at the technical considerations that are needed in choosing a routing protocol for a desired network the report will also look into the CPU/memory requirements, and how difficult the protocol is to install and maintain on the network; with RIPv2 being the simplest to run, and OSPF being the most complicated to...
Words: 4222 - Pages: 17