PAD 500 WEEK 3 DQ CUSTOM ORDER
To purchase this visit following link: http://www.activitymode.com/product/pad-500-week-3-dq-custom-order/ Contact us at:
SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM
PAD 500 WEEK 3 DQ CUSTOM ORDER
Evaluate the importance of each major steps in policy analysis as it relates to political choice. Next, debate if one would conside any of these steps more important than another. Procvide a rationale to support your answer.
There are five steps that most Policy Analysts attempt to follow and these are:
• Definition of the problem
• Setting objectives and criteria
• Developing alternatives
• Analyzing various policies
• Ranking and choosing
Under the Definition of Problem
Policy analysts need to decide which of the problems facilng public organisations are most pressing. There are several questions that need answers, the analyst must seek a clear statement of the problem, information of the nature and range of solutions. These questions include but not limited to: who is affected? Why has the problem surfaced? How does this problem relate to similar problems? E.g. building homes for the disabled: The analyst should be informed about the time or money and the limitations. He/she can talk to those who did similar jobs.
Setting Objective and Criteria
In setting the objective and criteria, the analyst should be able to say what the project is worth for the agency to achieve result A instead of B, e.g. routing a highway, the factors to be considered are the cost of the project, how many people will use the high way, number of houses and other properties that might be displaced, impact of noise and pollution on adjacent neighborhoods. These should be ranked, the analyst be asked to seek the solution maximizes output and minimize cost. The different stakeholders should be considered when making that choice.
Developing Alternatives
After the consideration of the different stakeholders in mind, the analyst should make a complete range of alternatives. He/she should consider the relationship between the particular problem and the alternatives to similar issues. E.g. issues of healthcare, financial support for housing the disabled etc.
Analyzing Various Policies
After generating a number of realistic policy alternatives, the analyst must access the likely impact on each alternatives. Where there are limited information the analyst can only make intuitive judgments. He can gather specific data and analyze it by means of quantitative techniques.
Ranking and Choosing
The final step is to compare the impacts of associated with various alternatives, with the earlier established evaluation standards. These can be ranked in terms of their impacts especially when the criteria and impacts are straight forward, then choice can then be made.
PAD 500 WEEK 3 DQ CUSTOM ORDER
To purchase this visit following link: http://www.activitymode.com/product/pad-500-week-3-dq-custom-order/ Contact us at:
SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM
PAD 500 WEEK 3 DQ CUSTOM ORDER
Evaluate the importance of each major steps in policy analysis as it relates to political choice. Next, debate if one would conside any of these steps more important than another. Procvide a rationale to support your answer.
There are five steps that most Policy Analysts attempt to follow and these are:
• Definition of the problem
• Setting objectives and criteria
• Developing alternatives
• Analyzing various policies
• Ranking and choosing
Under the Definition of Problem
Policy analysts need to decide which of the problems facilng public organisations are most pressing. There are several questions that need answers, the analyst must seek a clear statement of the problem, information of the nature and range of solutions. These questions include but not limited to: who is affected? Why has the problem surfaced? How does this problem relate to similar problems? E.g. building homes for the disabled: The analyst should be informed about the time or money and the limitations. He/she can talk to those who did similar jobs.
Setting Objective and Criteria
In setting the objective and criteria, the analyst should be able to say what the project is worth for the agency to achieve result A instead of B, e.g. routing a highway, the factors to be considered are the cost of the project, how many people will use the high way, number of houses and other properties that might be displaced, impact of noise and pollution on adjacent neighborhoods. These should be ranked, the analyst be asked to seek the solution maximizes output and minimize cost. The different stakeholders should be considered when making that choice.
Developing Alternatives
After the consideration of the different stakeholders in mind, the analyst should make a complete range of alternatives. He/she should consider the relationship between the particular problem and the alternatives to similar issues. E.g. issues of healthcare, financial support for housing the disabled etc.
Analyzing Various Policies
After generating a number of realistic policy alternatives, the analyst must access the likely impact on each alternatives. Where there are limited information the analyst can only make intuitive judgments. He can gather specific data and analyze it by means of quantitative techniques.
Ranking and Choosing
The final step is to compare the impacts of associated with various alternatives, with the earlier established evaluation standards. These can be ranked in terms of their impacts especially when the criteria and impacts are straight forward, then choice can then be made.