The feedback on the bottom of page 44, was the most effective. Why was it effective? Because it gives more important feedback or information. These ideas can be more helpful to make the writers paper better. By adding some of these ideas, it will make the writer’s paper more interesting to the readers. Also adding some credible sources is very important for the writer.
The first reviewer response was unclear to the writer. The reviewer needed to make the feedback stronger and better. But the feedback that the reviewer gave did not give any information on how to make the writers paper better.
The second reviewer was being nice and respectful to the writer. The reviewer said how nice and well thought out before writing the paper. The writer’s paper was well organized. The reviewer gave good feedback.
Reviewer three just said it was good liked the way it was written. Why? It gave what the reader liked. But it did not give any feedback. It also did not give any information to make the paper better.
Reviewer four response was not what the writer wanted to hear. The feedback gave no ideas on how to improve the paper. There were no comments about the examples or experience. The feedback just said “So true good job!” It did not tell what part was good.
The fifth reviewer gave a very good feedback. The feedback was also helpful to the writer. The reviewer gave ideas and very helpful information to the writer. All the information given, will help the writer to improve his or her paper a lot.
The sixth review gave a great and respectable review. The reviewer gave information where it was needed. The information like; credible sources, to use statistics sometimes, and staying on track.
The feedback for seven and eight was good feedback. The feedback for review seven was being straight forward. The paper needed lots more information and credible sources to improve the writing. The feedback for eight was a very good. It gave helpful ideas to improve the writer’s topic.
Peer reviewing helps the writer and reviewer see ideas, thoughts in different ways. The information in feedback will improve their writing skills, and be more organized. It helps in reminding the writer to use examples and specific details. Using credible sources helps the reader.
Other ways I can use peer-review, is by using it when I have to write presentations for work. It helps us communicate effectively. You can use peer-review at work or at home. If you want to write books or short stories, peer-review can be helpful. I believe peer-review can help in almost any situation. People ask for feedback on a lot of different things. My family and I use it to decide on what plans we should make. We make a detailed list and ask each other the feedback on what would be better.
Participation Requirements:
Review 4: This reviewing is lacking with the proper information. Even though that drug abuse is a problem. There is no information on how drug abuse causes positive or negative effects on a person. There is also the lack of information on the type of drugs. The different type of drugs can be over the counter, prescription, and illegal. Some people may not intentionally get addicted to prescription drugs. They may be more susceptible to the drugs because of health reasons. Do the facts of the drug abuse. I have one question, “How can people learn about the different ways to avoid drug abuse?”
Review 3: This review has no proper facts to correspond with the statements. There are no citations on where they received their information. It is well thought out, but lacks “proper truth” behind it. Teens can also learn these habits from parents and family members. Peer pressure is a key point in the review. Chemicals in the drugs harm the body and not just the brain. Chemicals can abuse health problems in the long run. The chemicals in the right dose can kill a person or cause problems such as; motor skills along with verbal communication.