Peer’s Critique Feedback

COMM/110

Peers Critique Feedback Peer review would refer to the many habits in which peers can share their creativity for constructive feedback then uses that feedback to revise and improve their work. The writing process, the modification is necessary as the draft of presenting, but peers often feel that they could not let go of their original words for introducing. Peers offer productive feedback, accept constructive criticism. Methods on critiques a presentation speech, to critique a speech or a presentation it's necessary to evaluate the presenters abilities in both speech and delivery. On determining whether the presenter is using facts and narratives to make a case. One method will be evaluating the content, by including word choices, references, and sketches should tailor to the audience that will be listening to the speech or presentation. Then it will follow the evaluation the speech or presentation clarity. The presenter should use correct grammar and easy to understanding language, making it pleasant to listen to the speech and follow what it is. Other would be on seeing if the statement is convincing and educational, in a well-written speech or presentation arguments are skillfully put forth to prove high points.
The implementation that I would plan on the suggestions that my teammates have mentioned and will be adding to my future presentations. The tone of voice was the critiques that my teammates comment on my tone of voice was low-slung. The steps that I will be conducting would overlook my tone from begging of the speech to middle down to the end and listen to myself, as well as pausing overlooking my sketches and more practicing in order not to break during presenting. The views that I have ignored and would implement on becoming successful from my classmate's presentations would be on eye contact to perform a more satisfactory performance eye contact will have to improve. Animation would have to decline well presenting; the choices of topics by having the right thing it will not have and distraction well presenting and have full contact well presenting.

Reference:

Lucey, B. (2013). Peer review: How to get it right – 10 tips. Retrieved June 27, 2016, from http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/sep/27/peer-review-10-tips-research-paper
Dlugen, A. (n.d.). Speech Analysis #2: The Art of Delivering Evaluations. Retrieved June 26, 2016, from http://sixminutes.dlugan.com/speech-evaluation-2-art-of-delivering-evaluations/