...in 1898 Caleb Bradham created Pepsi Cola for the beneficial effects it claimed to have on upset stomachs and indigestion. The enmity between the two soda companies are known as the “Cola Wars”. The war began in the 1960’s when Coca-Cola’s supremacy ruled the market as the beverage of choice above Pepsi Cola. Due to the competition between the two rival cola companies actions became extreme and forced both companies to implement strategic methods in order to keep the competitive edge over the other. Coca Cola Wars Case Analysis I. Current Situation: Coca-Cola's and Pepsi Cola’s marketing strategies has been as impossible to tell apart as the products themselves, both companies rely on vibrant colors, catch phrases, attractive people, and famous entertainers to grab consumer’s attention and to entice them into purchasing their products. In 1941 Coca-Cola officially renamed their product to “Coke” as an official trademark with a series of advertisements informing consumers that “Coke” means Coca-Cola (Coca-Cola, 2011). Pepsi was first introduced as " Drink" in 1898 by Caleb Bradham its inventor who created Pepsi at his home, it was later that Bradham changed the name and officially named the beverage Pepsi Cola (Pepsico, 2011). The continual changing of Pepsi and Coca-Cola management assisted in facilitating the brands image according to what they envisioned as a gainful competitive approach, this style and approach is what makes Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola obviously unique...
Words: 3366 - Pages: 14
...segmentation of Pepsi Co are as follows:- a) The market positioning and segmentation strategy Pepsi Co has chosen in this case are the launching of new drink for target group where the target audience are belonging from age group of young men. The products also targeted the consumers who switched to bottled waters instead of diet related drinks. The new product will reach the new and whole audience according to the company because it itself has a unique taste. It will support the new and unique marketing technique for the American consumers. Pepsi produced the most successful brand with the help of strong positioning and segmentation. It has concentrated in the development of major brands with the delicious and healthful beverages and drinks. It had analysed the best market positioning to increase the awareness among the target group. It also provides the unique and different taste to the consumers. Thus it captures the important marketing strategies for the business and also it is available with different packages and geographies and is available worldwide. This way, it supported the important drink for everybody and it this way managed to develop the global brand. Thus it demanded and determined with the important elements of producing the proper taste and ingredients. Other promotional support and marketing discovered the market research with the help of promotional support. The important themes such as advertising budget and other important strategies were maintained...
Words: 1508 - Pages: 7
...over 200 countries. Pepsi co is really a leader when it comes to convenience foods and drinks but it always come second best. It always comes behind Coca- cola, which is the world leader in soft drink. In 2006 Pepsi co was the world leader in this market we will study what strategy they used to be able to determine what is the problem since 2006 . Analysis of the problem. Problem Analysis. On December 12, 2005, for the first time in the rivalry of over a century, PepsiCo (Pepsi) surpassed its biggest foe Coca-Cola (Coke) in market capitalization. It had much higher operating revenue than Coke. Acquiring many companies is a strategy that propelled Pepsi ahead of it longtime concurrent Coca-cola. (.ibscdc2006) The Quaker Oats acquisition at $13.9 billion brought Quaker’s most valuable asset Gatorade under PepsiCo. After the completion of Quaker Oats acquisition in August 2001, PepsiCo made a number of small, tuck-in acquisitions. The combination of acquisitions coupled with PepsiCo’s core snacks and beverage businesses allowed the revenues to increase from approximately $20 billion in 2000 to more than $35 billion in 2006. PepsiCo’s corporate strategy was diversification and a relatively new element of PepsiCo’s corporate strategy was product reformulations to make snack foods and beverages less unhealthy.( scrib 2006) Alternatives Solutions Alternative 1. Diversification Since it seems that by acquiring many small companies, it boosted Pepsi co revenue so high...
Words: 532 - Pages: 3
...Bus 478 Strategy MEMO To: Anthony Chan, Bus 478 Instructor From: Li Jiang, Bus 478 Student Date: January 11th, 2016 ------------------------------------------------- Subject: Cola War Continues: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 Coke and Pepsi have duopoly the soft drink market for decades. It is a mature market with low growth. For all the years, Coca-Cola and Pepsi have built significant brand identity. When people thinking about buying cola, they cannot tell a third brand’s name. Both of them have built mature distribution channels and their large sales volume archives them economic of scale already. Suppliers to Coke and Pepsi have weak power since there are many suppliers in market due to low entry level. Suppliers have to give Coke and Pepsi lowest price to keep their business with the giants or they will lose business to competitors. Coke and Pepsi corporate with many bottling companies. These regional companies are not capable for developing their own drink and advertising. The barrier of entry is also low so their profitability are restricted by Coke and Pepsi, and distribution channels. They have no power to raise price or competitors will take over their business. As concentrates businesses, Coca-Cola and Pepsi have strong power over bottling business. As long as these bottling companies want to corporate with Coca-Cola or Pepsi, they have to agree to refuse similar products from other new brands. However, Coke and Pepsi always have rights to change to another...
Words: 450 - Pages: 2
...This report is based upon the information from the Harvard business case: “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century”. Both Coca Cola Company and PepsiCo are the largest players in the Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSD) industry. The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied, in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted in a ‘Nash Equilibrium’. Because of this, the report is described from the perspective of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The scope of this report covers not only on the increase of overall market share, but also finding new opportunities in unrevealed markets. The analysis is also based upon the eight key concept model. In addition the PEST-analysis and the five forces model of Porter is also utilized to gain insight into the ‘macro-environment’ and ‘meso-environment’ 1. Analysis The eight key concepts analysis is applied to identify the key issues with regard to both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The outcome of the analysis is utilized to establish the new strategy for both companies. The key issues for each concept are described in this paragraph. Direction The mission and vision of the two companies, described in the case, differ on one major issue. The Coca-Cola Company direction limits its market to a product portfolio of beverage brands, whereas PepsiCo does not only focus...
Words: 3313 - Pages: 14
...Communication Strategies of Pepsi Cola Table of Contents Executive Summery 3 Introduction 4 History 5 Effective Marketing and communication strategies of Pepsi 6 Media Commercials 6 Advantage of media commercials 6 Disadvantages of media commercials 7 Sponsorships 7 Advantages of Sponsorships 8 Disadvantages of Sponsorships 8 How to enhance the effectiveness of Sponsorship 8 Community Activities 8 Advantages of Community activities 9 Disadvantages of community activities 9 How to enhance the effectiveness of CSR projects 9 Product Diversification 10 Advantages of Product diversification 10 Disadvantages of product diversification 10 How to enhance the effectiveness of Product Diversification 11 Cross Comparison between the marketing strategies of Pepsi, Coca Cola, V and Red Bull 11 Conclusion 13 References 14 Executive Summery Pepsi is an aerated Soft drink that is produced by Pepsi Co. Inc. Pepsi Cola is using most of the modern communication and marketing methods to enhance their brand awareness among its consumers. Mainly they are advertising their brand on Television, Face book, Twitter and YouTube. In this report I have outlined the overview of the Pepsi Cola Corporation and its history, and the most effective communication strategies that are used by them to enhance their brand equity. These strategies include Advertisements, Sponsorships, Online promotions, Community activities and Product diversification of Pepsi Cola Corporation...
Words: 3206 - Pages: 13
...Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies Shemeika Goodwin Strayer University Professor Dr. Yemer February 15 2015 Abstract This research paper will analyze the business-level strategies for Coca-Cola to determine the business-level strategy that is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or not the decision was a good choice. It will also analyze the corporate-level strategies for Coca-Cola and determine the corporate-level strategy this is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or not the decision was a good choice. This paper will analyze the competitive environment to determine the corporation’s most significant competitor. Compare their strategies at each level and evaluate which company is most likely to be successful in the long term. It will also discuss the slow-cycle and fast-cycle markets. The Coca-Cola Company was founded in 1892 and was incorporated on September 5, 1919. The Company is currently worth over $168.7 billion. The Coca-Cola Company markets, distributes and sell more than 500 non-alcoholic beverage brands including carbonated beverages such as Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta and Sprite. The Coca-Cola Company also owns or licenses an array of still beverages that include bottled waters, sport drinks, juice drinks, coffees, ready-to-drink teas and energy drinks. Analyze the business-level strategies for the corporation you chose to determine the business-level strategy you think is most important...
Words: 1291 - Pages: 6
...CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS DR.MAGGIE SIZER COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES : PEPSICO VS. COCA-COLA AKIN DUNDAR 200068711 MBA/FINANCE 1/30/2013 Every company has a descripted or non-descripted competitive strategy if they have at least a competitor in the industry. To have the conversion rate of the investment, the company should have a desired and defensible position and power to defence this position. Sometimes, even a company has a really successful product it still tries to produce a new item or improve the one it has and this decision could be one of the biggest fail of marketing history. According to some marketing experts; the reason of the success of coke drink in the beverage industry is the advertisement competition and marketing war between PepsiCo and Coca-Cola since years ago. If there was not a PepsiCo in the industry, Coca-Cola could not make a billion bottles of daily sales. Both companies are in top of the list of most valuable brands list. They had many successes during their 120 years of rivalry but both of them also made high-cost mistakes during that time. The competition between the ‘Enemy Brothers’ is one of the good sample of rivalry which is based on a lot of interesting cases,different strategies and cultures. Differences between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo cultures and strategies was the main result announcer. In the middle of 1880’s, Coca-Cola was unrivaled in the industry. When the industrial war begun, was the time that PepsiCo...
Words: 1671 - Pages: 7
...Competitive Strategies Coca Cola vs. Pepsi By Mohammed Hashim Professor Dr. Phyllis Parise Contemporary Business May 05, 2013 Coca Cola and Pepsi Company are two of the largest producers and distributors of beverage in the world. They manufacture, markets and sells variety of carbonated, non-alcohol beverages. They continued to lead the industry with their commitment to healthier food and maintaining the high quality of their beverages. Pepsi and Coca Cola has been known to have history of competition to maintained share of world mark, where both companies need each other in order to remain competitive. Pepsi is known to offer culture that encourage their employee to be initiative, risk taking and free to pursue their goals. Senior management door are always open to question and ideas from junior employees. Diversity is a way of business to Pepsi, Pepsi President Walter Mack; in his diversification he hired Hennan Smith a black executive to lead an all-black sales team. While Coca Cola general culture is defined as leadership, passion, integrity, and diversity. To attain this Coca Cola Company create a worldwide tam that is full of diverse people, talent and ideas. If we discuss diversity Pepsi has proven to be ahead of Coca Cola, by recruiting people of color and give them early opportunity for advancement. Though Coca Cola has claim that, their workplace diversity program is design to attract, retain, and develop talent. This really did not provide a true count of what...
Words: 860 - Pages: 4
...Competitive Strategies La-Quisha L Hill | DANIEL R SERSLAND | Contemporary Business 11/03/13 Introduction This is a comparison of the two of the most popular carbonated beverages in the world Coke and Pepsi. Pepsi and Coke products are something I can’t live without. I will always have a Pepsi or a Cherry Coke. Pepsi and Coca Cola contrast each other on their taste, its associated colors and themes, and corporate culture. Coca-Cola and Pepsi differentiate in more ways than one. Coca-Cola has more of a coke flavor taste. It is fizzier than that of Pepsi. When you drink it doesn’t feel as hard on your teeth as Pepsi. Pepsi on the other hand has a sweeter taste than that of Coca Cola due to the addition of artificial sweeteners and leaves a mild chemical taste after you drink it. When drinking Pepsi compared to Coca Cola, Pepsi tends to have a more “fruity” taste to it. Pepsi-Cola was created in 1898 by Caleb Bradham, a North Carolina pharmacist who formulated the drink as a refreshing and energizing tonic. Today, it is one of the world’s most iconic and recognized consumer brands globally. Pepsi have a complementary food and beverage portfolio that enables us to provide more choices for our customers, and drives lower costs, productivity enhancements and new capabilities. The...
Words: 984 - Pages: 4
...The case study prepared by Archie B. Carroll entitled, “Coke and Pepsi in India: Issues, Ethics, and Crisis Management”, describes issues two major, well known multinational corporations (MNCs) have been facing in India over the past several years, since 2003. Coke and Pepsi are known competitors in the world of soft drinks, but have become allies given the situations they are facing in India. There are allegations of highly contaminated soft drinks, which claim to cause cancer and birth defects. An interest group in India, Center for Science and Environment (CSE) made the allegations and stated tests can verify the products contain high levels of pesticide residue (Carroll & Buchholtz, 2012, p. 649). Another special interest group, India Resource Center (IRC) raised concerns of an issue Coke experienced which is the claim of overconsumption and pollution of scarce water resources due to plant operations and production. This affected many cities and regions of the country, especially in the communities of Kerala and Mehdiganj (Carroll & Buchholtz, 2012, p. 649). In addition to the scarcity of water, there were also complaints of the water around the soft drink giant’s plants tasting and smelling bad. Donated waste to farmers for fertilizer tested positive for cadmium and lead creating toxic waste (Carroll & Buchholtz, 2012, p. 649). The allegations made by these groups were taken very seriously and believed valid because of the support of a very powerful and influential...
Words: 2047 - Pages: 9
...environments for detecting early signs of opportunities and threats that may influence current and future plans. In strategic planning, an environmental scan can help an organization increase understanding of the internal and external environmental factors that will require reaching the long term goals of the company. Pepsi and Coca-Cola serve as prime examples of major competitors in the beverage industry and strive to be different although each company produces a similar product. With the popularity of these corporations at the zenith of existence, each needs to develop and maintain a competitive advantage that will yield results to their favor. For the purpose of gaining a competitive advantage measurement guidelines will need to be implemented to cultivate effective strategic planning and measure the effectiveness of each plan. The intention of this paper is to research and describe the internal and external to reach a company in order to describe the internal and external environments of each and develop an understanding of how each company uses environmental scanning. Furthermore, a discovery of competitive advantages will be uncovered by examining strategies, such as creation of value and sustain, measurement guidelines, and the effectiveness of the measurement guidelines used by each company Internal and External Environments The whole process can be seeing as beneficial knowledge for managers wishing to increase the long term efficiency and develop strategic...
Words: 1413 - Pages: 6
...Clark International Business Policies and Strategies, Winter Quarter 2011 11/29/11 CASE 11: PepsiCo’s Diversification Strategy in 2008 Page 1 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Time Country(s) Involved Key Individuals & frame MileStones Titles 1965- Headquarters in Indra Krishnamurthy 2008 Purchase, New York, Nooyi, Chairman of USA. Operations the Board and CEO (2006-). global in scope. Steven Reinemund (CEO 2001-2006). Roger Enrico (CEO 1996-2001). Donald Kendall and Herman Lay, Founders. Company Type & Size PepsiCo is a publicly traded company, listed on the NYSE, NASDAQ, and as a component of the S&P 500. In 2010 it had 294,000 employees worldwide. As of November 2011, it had a market cap of $101.02 billion. 1965 Merger with Frito-Lay CEO of Pepsi Cola, and engineer of PEPSICO Merger, Donald Kendal Diversification outside snacks and beverages Acquisition of Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, KFC Acquisition of 7UP, Mug Root Beer, SunChips, Introduction of Aquafina - 1993 Portfolio Reconstruction Roger Enrico, CEO (1996-2001) Wayne Colloway, CEO (1986-1996) "Potato chips make you thirsty; Pepsi satisfies thirst." Donald Kendall on merger. 1970s 1980s ‘Balanced three leg stool’ describes Wayne Colloway, however, strategic fit problems occurs 1990s Bottled water business starts. 1997 Due to several strategic fit problems, restaurant businesses have been spun off to form Tricon, later Yum! Brands. FTC’s bans to jointly distribute Gatorade with Pepsi for ten years. 2001 Acquisition of Quaker...
Words: 4668 - Pages: 19
...Joson, Gerard Gio R. EMG166-T Case analysis no. 11 – Pepsico’s Diversification Strategy In 2008 December 5, 2011 Overview Pepsico is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Purchase, New York, United States, with interests in the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of grain-based snack foods, beverages, and other products. PepsiCo is a world leader in convenient foods and beverages, with revenues of about $25 billion and over 142,000 employees. The company consists of the snack business of Frito-Lay North America and the beverage and food businesses of PepsiCo Beverages and Foods, which includes PepsiCo Beverages North America (Pepsi-Cola North America and Gatorade/Tropicana North America) and Quaker Foods North America. PepsiCo International includes the snack businesses of Frito-Lay International and beverage businesses of PepsiCo Beverages International. PepsiCo brands are available in nearly 200 countries and territories. Many of PepsiCo's brand names are over 100-years-old, but the corporation is relatively young. PepsiCo was founded in 1965 through the merger of Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay. Tropicana was acquired in 1998 and PepsiCo merged with The Quaker Oats Company, including Gatorade, in 2001. PepsiCo’s success is the result of superior products, high standards of performance, distinctive competitive strategies and the high integrity of our people. Our mission is to be the world's premier consumer products company focused on convenient...
Words: 3312 - Pages: 14
...Coca-Cola and Pepsi are the two greatest competitors amongst the soft drink industry today. They are both legendary brands and have been battling each for many years. I would first like to provide a little history about both companies. Coca-Cola was invented by pharmacist John Stith Pemberton in Columbus, Georgia around 1886 (Coca-Cola Journey, n.d.). The creation of the beverage was in a pharmacy by mixing Coca-Cola with carbonated water. The drink is well-known in over 200 countries with more than 500 brands and serves over 1.7 billion servings each day (Coca-Cola Journey, n.d.). United States is origin for Coca-Cola but its reputation has made it truly universal. Pepsi was first introduced in 1893 by Caleb Bradham at his drugstore in New Bern, North Carolina (Sodamuseum.com, n.d.). Bradham’s later labeled the drink Pepsi-Cola on August 28, 1898 which was named after the digestive enzyme pepsin and kola nuts ingredients used in the formula. Upon completion of this paper, there will be a general idea about Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola. First, there will be a discussion on how each corporate culture differs from the other. Second, I will then analyze three ways that each unique culture has benefited by the other’s competition. Finally, I will hypothesize how each would continue to thrive if its current corporate culture would need to change in the near future. Determine how each corporate culture differs from the other: The people’s two favorite soft drinks have always been...
Words: 924 - Pages: 4