...Assignment #5: Financial Management Coca-Cola Company vs. PepsiCo. Rodséy E. Smith Daniel Sersland BUS 508: The Business Enterprise December 9, 2010 Abstract In the late 1800’s two of today’s largest and most recognizable food and beverage companies, PepsiCo and Coca-Cola Company began their quest to dominate the industry. Even today after over a hundred and twenty years, PepsiCo and Coca-Cola Company continue their efforts to compete against each other in order to gain additional market share. The purpose of this paper is to explore the two competing companies from a financial perspective, rather than a product preference. The paper will draw from information given in the 2009 year-end financial report for each of the two companies. From this information, several financial ratios will be computed and an analysis will be given to determine which company is more financially profitable. After a financial analysis is made, the paper will conclude by presenting what non-financial criteria could be considered when choosing which company is the better investment options. Using the current ratio, discuss what conclusions can be made about each company’s ability to pay current liabilities. The current ratio is a popular financial calculating tool used by financial analysts to determine a company’s liquidity, also known as the company’s working capital position. The ratio is determined by deriving the proportion of current assets available to cover the current liabilities...
Words: 1733 - Pages: 7
...12 COLA WARS CASE Table of contents Introduction……………………………………………………………3 Question no. 1…………………………………………………………4 Question no. 2………………………...……………………………….4 Question no. 3………………………………………………………….7 Question no. 4………………………………………………………….9 Bibliography …………………………………………………………10 INTRODUCTION Over the years Coke and Pepsi managed their rivalry in the carbonated soft drinks (CSD) industry by following some of the tactics identified below. Both companies came up on the market with the same product coca-cola, two different recipes. Coca-Cola was discovered in 1886 in Atlanta Georgia, by pharmacist John Pemberton, while Pepsi-Cola was formulated 7 years later, in New Bern, North Carolina, by pharmacist Caleb Bradham. Since then the two giants, Coke and Pepsi are on a continuous “battle without blood” over the $74 billion CDS industry in the United States. One of the first tactics identified is that Coke first introduced its product in grocery stores and other channels through open-top coolers. Also, they developed automatic fountain dispensers and introduced vending machines. Pepsi had a rough start, but they were willing to achieve. In this way after bankruptcies in 1923 and again in 1932, they came back and the business started to pick up. Their first move was to price their 12-oz container to a nickel, same as Coke would charge for a 6.5-oz. After that Pepsi started focusing more on take-home sales to target family consumption. With an aggressive marketing campaign...
Words: 3025 - Pages: 13
...Coca-Cola VS PepsiCo Carmine Strayer Strayer University Intermediate Accounting III ACC305012VA016-1136-001 Professor Bob A. Wright August 25, 2013 This paper will discuss the financial health and similarities and differences between the two major producers of soft drinks in the United States as of 2013. In order to understand the financial health of the two companies we must first understand the markets, history and products produced by both companies. Both companies were founded in the late l800’s by pharmacists working on their own. Coca-Cola was the first of the companies and its main product Coca-Cola, was invented and introduced to the public in 1886. The beverage was named after two of its major ingredients, Cocaine and the Kola nut. (Bellis, 2013, p. 2) Its first year sales as a fountain drink at Dr. Pemberton’s pharmacy are believed to have amounted to about $50, with a production cost of around $70. (Bellis, 2013, p. 2) Coca-Colas, 2009 Operating Revenues amounted to $30,990 billion with about 74% of that revenue coming from its international operations. (Kieso, Weygandt, & Warfield, 2012, Comparative Analysis Case; Coca-Cola Vs. PepsiCo p. 148) Its core product was and continues to be the carbonated beverage Coca-Cola even though it has acquired a few other beverages companies along the way. Those companies include Sprite, PowerAde and the Minute Maid Juice Company. Pepsi-Cola, the original product of what is now known as one of the major products of...
Words: 1115 - Pages: 5
...Coca-Cola Company vs PepsiCo, Inc Professor Archie – ACC 305 Sara Griffith...
Words: 653 - Pages: 3
...Coca-Cola Company versus PepsiCo, Inc. Anderson Intermediate Accounting 305 February 24, 2013 Coca-Cola Company versus PepsiCo, Inc. Introduction The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo are both very large manufacturing corporations that operate worldwide. Over the years, each corporation has had a very longevity of business success. The expansion of business and brands through subsidiaries, partnerships and franchises in beverage and food products has been a consistent growth in retail sales for both corporations. With such growth, they employ thousands of employees worldwide and offer competitive benefits to include medical, life, and retirement. In 2006, both corporation adopted SFAS 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post retirement Plans – and a amendment of FASB Statement No 87, 88 , 106 and 132® (SFAS 158). For this particular paper, the goal will be to complete a comparative analysis of the pension plans that each corporation made available to their employees and retirees. Analysis A pension plan is an employer contributory or non contributory saving plan which can also be qualified and nonqualified that businesses offer to their employees to assist with their retirement. With contributory plans, The employer and the employee make contributions into the savings. Whereas, with noncontributory plans, only the employer is required to make the contributions while the employee’s participation is optional. Under a qualified plan...
Words: 396 - Pages: 2
... Int. Marketing Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. Case Study Hw#4 1. Q1. The key specific aspects of the political environment in India that have proven to play a critical role in the performance of both PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are ones that have portrayed India to be seen as unfriendly to foreign investors during years where imports were being banned from being sold in India. Coca-Cola chose to leave India in 1977 after a dispute with the government over its trade secrets and Coca-Colas refusal to cut its equity state to 40 percent. In 1991, a new government took office and introduced measure to stabilize the economy, which was appealing to foreign investors. 2. Q3. In terms of production policies, the two companies entered the market with products close to those already in the Indian market such as colas, fruit drinks, carbonated waters. They also entered the market introducing some new products such as sprite and their own brands of bottled water. Both companies have used promotional strategies to help their brand grow in India. PepsiCo gives away premium rice and candy with purchases of their product while Coca-Cola offers free passes, and special prizes like a vacation. PepsiCo and Coca-Cola have production plants and bottling centers in large cities around India for their wide range of distribution all over. Coca-Cola bought out Parle in 1993, and obtained its bottling...
Words: 531 - Pages: 3
...Stephanie Burke XACC/280 September 19, 2010 Sylvia White Shepherd The purpose for this analysis is to compare PepsiCo to Coca-Cola; this is done by providing a summary of financial accounting information. The information to compare a company to another comes from financial statements and then those numbers are broken down into analysis and ratios. Once the ratios are calculated then the investor can decipher is the company is worth investing in. The information gathered is from the attached financial statements of both companies for the year 2005. Below is a small description of the two companies before comparing them. PepsiCo manufactures or use contract manufacturers for their products. This company markets and sells a variety of salty, sweet and grain-based snacks, carbonated and non-carbonated beverages, and foods through North American and international business divisions (Navigator). Within PepsiCo one can find them merged with Frito-Lay, Tropicana, Quaker, and Gatorade. Coca-Cola manufactures carbonated and non-carbonated beverages. New beverages joined Coca-Cola’s line up, including Minute Maid, Powerade, and Dasani bottled water. Coca-Cola is throughout Northern American and international business divisions. Ratio analysis expresses the relationship among selected items of financial statement data. A ratio expresses the mathematical relationship between one quantity and another. The relationship is expressed in terms of a percentage, a rate, or a simple...
Words: 3232 - Pages: 13
...The purpose for this analysis is to compare PepsiCo to Coca-Cola; this is done by providing a summary of financial accounting information. The information to compare a company to another comes from financial statements and then those numbers are broken down into analysis and ratios. Once the ratios are calculated then the investor can decipher is the company is worth investing in. The information gathered is from the attached financial statements of both companies for the year 2005. Below is a small description of the two companies before comparing them. PepsiCo manufactures or use contract manufacturers for their products. This company markets and sells a variety of salty, sweet and grain-based snacks, carbonated and non-carbonated beverages, and foods through North American and international business divisions (Navigator). Within PepsiCo one can find them merged with Frito-Lay, Tropicana, Quaker, and Gatorade. Coca-Cola manufactures carbonated and non-carbonated beverages. New beverages joined Coca-Cola’s line up, including Minute Maid, Powerade, and Dasani bottled water. Coca-Cola is throughout Northern American and international business divisions. Ratio analysis expresses the relationship among selected items of financial statement data. A ratio expresses the mathematical relationship between one quantity and another. The relationship is expressed in terms of a percentage, a rate, or a simple proportion. To analyze the primary financial statements, an individual...
Words: 287 - Pages: 2
...Analysis Case The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, Inc. Both Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, Inc. used a comparative report format, that list the sections one above the other, on the same page, to present their balance sheets. For a measure of both a company’s efficiency and its short-term financial health, the working capital is calculated as: Working Capital = Current Assets – Current Liabilities. At the end of 2007, the Coca-Cola Company has a negative working capital of $1,120 million from the current assets of $12,105million and the current liabilities of $13,225 million. The Coca-Cola Company’s negative working capital might be impacted by the effects of transactions occurred in 2007. Trade accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses and other assets were increased to $730 million, $579 million and $637 million respectively. It was primarily due to 2007 acquisitions, including glaceau, 18 German bottling and distribution operations. Because of these acquisitions, accounts payable and accrued expenses were increased to $1,860 million. Additionally its loans and notes payable of $2,684 million were increased primarily due to net borrowings of commercial paper and short-term debt during 2007 to fund acquisitions. It seemed not that the Coca-Cola Company was unable to meet its short-term liabilities with its current assets but it seemed that the increases of current liabilities were much higher than that of current assets. On the other hand, PepsiCo, Inc. had a positive...
Words: 644 - Pages: 3
...The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo Pension Plans Intermediate Accounting III – ACC 305 Strayer University November 20, 2011 Abstract The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo are both very large manufacturing corporations that operate worldwide. Over the years, each corporation has had a very longevity of business success. The expansion of business and brands through subsidiaries, partnerships and franchises in beverage and food products has been a consistent growth in retail sales for both corporations. With such growth, they employ thousands of employees worldwide and offer competitive benefits to include medical, life, and retirement. In 2006, both corporations adopted SFAS 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) (SFAS 158). For this particular paper, the goal will be to complete a comparative analysis of the pension plans that each corporation make available to their employees and retirees. Analysis A pension plan is an employer contributory or noncontributory saving plan which can also be qualified and nonqualified that businesses offer to their employees to assist with their retirement. With contributory plans, the employer and the employee make contributions into the savings. Whereas, with noncontributory plans, only the employer is required to make the contributions while the employee’s participation is optional. Under a qualified plan, tax...
Words: 1000 - Pages: 4
...|[pic] |Syllabus | | |Axia College/School of Business | | |XACC/280 Version 2 | | |Financial Accounting Concepts and Principles | Copyright © 2010, 2009 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Course Description This course covers the fundamentals of financial accounting as well as the identification, measurement, and reporting of the financial effects of economic events on the enterprise. Financial information is examined from the perspective of effective management decision making with special emphasis on the planning and controlling responsibilities of practicing managers. Policies Faculty and students/learners will be held responsible for understanding and adhering to all policies contained within the following two documents: • University policies: You must be logged into the student website to view this document. • Instructor policies: This document is posted in the Course Materials forum. University policies are subject to change. Be sure to read the policies at the beginning...
Words: 2914 - Pages: 12
...Financial Management: PepsiCo and Coca-Cola 2009 Annual Reports BUS 500 Instructor: Gary Shelton December 7, 2010 Abstract In this paper I will use the information obtained from the PepsiCo and Coca-Cola 2009 annual reports to determine financial information about these companies. I will answer questions about the companies assets and liabilities, profits, and if they can satisfy stockholders. What conclusions can you make about each company’s ability to pay current liabilities? A company’s liabilities are their legal debts and obligations. Liabilities can come up during the company’s business operations and are settled over time. They are settled through by transferring money, goods or services. A list of a company’s liabilities can be found on the balance sheet for the company. Included in the liabilities are loans, accounts payable, mortgages, deferred revenues, and accrued expenses. A company’s ability to pay its liabilities can be determined by analyzing the amount of assets as opposed to the amount of liabilities. To do this you will need to find the current ratio for the company. The current ratio is used to determine if a company’s short-term or current assets are available to pay off its short-term or current liabilities. The liabilities of PepsiCo can be found on the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. PepsiCo’s total current liabilities equal 8.765 million dollars. Its total liabilities equal 22.406 million dollars. Its total current assets...
Words: 1802 - Pages: 8
...opportunity. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have been competing in the soft drink sector for over a century and both companies enjoy a high degree of brand consciousness globally. Coca-Cola has, until recently, outpaced its number two rival considerably, both in the U.S. and overseas. I will compare the two companies using the following criteria: (a) comparative statistics and relevant figures affecting probability, (b) key ratios, and (c) the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Comparative Statistics: Relevant Figures Affecting Profitability For the purpose of my report, all relevant financial data on both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo was derived from the reliable Yahoo Finance and Morningstar website and the accompanying 10-k reports. Coca-Cola is the largest manufacturer and distributor of non-alcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups in the world. Additionally, the company has ownership interests in numerous bottling and canning operations. Furthermore, Coca-Cola groups its products into eight business divisions including: Africa, Eurasia, European Union, Latin America, North America, Pacific, Bottling Investments, and Corporate. Finished beverage products are sold in more than 200 countries worldwide. Coca-Cola's major products are comprised of: Coca-Cola, Crush, Sprite, Fanta, Diet Coke, POWERade, Fruitopia, Minute Maid juices, Dasani water and various coffees and teas. The next important area reviewed is stock price and revenues. Please refer to Figure 1 as we examine Coca-Cola's...
Words: 2527 - Pages: 11
...The Coca-Cola Company July 24, 2011 CONTENTS Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………3 Coca-Cola: An Introduction.……………………………………………………………………....4 Financial Analysis………………..……………………………………………………………..…6 Competition Analysis: Pepsi………………………………………………………………………9 Recommendations………………………………………………………………………………..13 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….…15 References………………………………………………………………………………………..16 Abstract Many international corporations began as small domestic ventures. As businesses grew, corporations saw the many possibilities brought on by expanding operations. Companies began to expand by opening franchises in various cities, yet they knew there was more potential for success if they were to expand their operations even further. Thousands of companies, such as Coca-Cola, chose cities internationally to gain more revenue. The purpose of a corporation is to maximize profits for all shareholders involved. Opening firms abroad allowed Coca-Cola to gain worldwide recognition, which gave them a competitive advantage over other soft drink makers. Now, Cola-Cola is not only recognized, but it is one of the most consumed soft drinks both within the United States and in cities across the globe. Coca-Cola took a huge risk in expanding their operations. However, their success proves that multinational corporations need to choose the right market to venture into and choose marketing techniques that appeal to their consumers. Coca-Cola: An Introduction In 1866...
Words: 3706 - Pages: 15
...Running head: COCA-COLA AND PEPSICO Coca-Cola and PepsiCo: Similarities and Differences Lamar Smith Michel Brown Annette Pete May Valencia Cardinal Stritch University MGT 426 August 18, 2011 Submitted to the faculty of Cardinal Stritch University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Management. Introduction Two of the largest and most profitable corporations in the United States are the Atlanta, Georgia based Coca-Cola Company and the New York based Pepsi Cola Company. While both are called "colas" they both attempt to address the same target tastes but from different approaches. Coke was the first on market with what is still a "secret" formula and Pepsi followed with a similar (not exact) taste. Since taste is very much a factor of your personal likes, either or neither may appeal to you or seem sweeter (Inforefuge.com. 2011). This paper will discuss the similarities and differences in the processes used by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo for place, price, and promotion. Place and Price The marketing exposure of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola is everywhere ranging from commercials, billboards, and mail advertisements all over the world. Although they target the same markets, they both use different approaches to their marketing strategies. This is evident when comparing the two companies’ websites. When browsing the Coca-Cola website you will experience a more conservative style; there is...
Words: 720 - Pages: 3
