From the reading I gathered that claims that are testable are typically of a scientific nature. Yet, any claim, according to Popper would have to be testable to see if it is feasible or not. A claim that cannot be tested or falsifiable would be considered unscientific and lack credibility as an argument. The text gives an example of invisible unicorns in North Carolina that illustrates that if a claim cannot be proved false then it is unfalsifiable. Another thing to consider is even though we can test the claim or prove it falsifiable, the disconfirmation bias tells us we will lean towards the scientific data the supports our core beliefs.
A claim could be considered:

Kelly is sick.
Kelly coughed on me.
Now I will become sick.
If I use Popper’s strategy of disconfirmation, I would set out to prove that Kelly coughed on other people and they are not sick. I would also have to prove that Kelly being sick and coughing would be the cause of me getting sick. If I found people that she had coughed on and they were healthy, then that disconfirms my claim. If I found other people Kelly coughed on and they were sick, this would confirm my claim.
Both of these strategies would most likely work to support my claim. With Popper, if I could not locate healthy people that Kelly coughed on, this supports my claim, on the other hand if I did find people that she coughed on and they were healthy, then this disconfirms my claim. Both ways show the claim could be falsifiable.
Mosser, K. (2011). An introduction to logic. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Retrieved June 29, 2011 from https://content.ashford.edu

Logic and Ethics Mary is poor. She has not been able to find a job and has two children she needs to feed. Assume Mary is forced to let her children go hungry or steal some food from a local grocery store. Which should she do? Construct an argument that