Discussion questions: 1. At what point should limits be placed on what can be done to the human body or should there be limits at all? There are several scientists around the world who are quite open about their willingness to clone a human. Should technology be developed that allows this? Why or why not?
With our world’s technology growing at a substantial rate, there should be limitations placed on what can be done to the human body. I believe the technology to clone human beings is far too valuable to be overlooked. However, there should be laws and limitations to these types of technology due to how dangerous it could be if it got in the wrong hands. Our world’s history shows that mankind is capable of controlling and regulating such dangerous technologies for example nuclear weapons. 2. Should we continue to spend money on technology that exists to enhance our capabilities when so many ills of society still exist?
I believe technology is what helps the world really develop and improve. There will always be tradeoffs as to what we should spend our money on but technology is always a safe bet as it modernizes and simplifies previously difficult tasks.

3. Should technology progress to a point where you could replace body parts with "superior" hardware, should it be allowed? Consider this: if/when a means of providing perfect 20/20 sight to someone who is blind is available should a person with little or no sight limitation have the right to have the same technology to improve their sight to better to than perfect? What types of enhancements (if any) should be permitted to a healthy human?
I believe if technology were to progress to a point where body parts would be replaced with “superior” hardware that it should be made available to everyone at a reasonable price. However if only a small portion of humans were able to afford such hardware then