Free Essay

Praiside Lost

In:

Submitted By killerpanda2013
Words 1704
Pages 7
In Milton's epic poem, Paradise Lost, God's only two commandments to his newest creations, the humans Adam and Eve, contradict each other. This is because God incorporates the contradictory notions of both faith and reason into the law by which he says Adam and Eve must abide. God first commands Adam to not eat of the Tree of Knowledge; this commandment is governed by a required faith on Adam's part in God's righteousness alone. Secondly, God (through implication) commands Adam to live according to his capacity to reason rationally. It is made clear to Adam that the first commandment, having to do with faith, is the primary commandment, since it is the only one God articulates. But, when Adam passes the information on to Eve, he does not make this distinction as clear. He also further convolutes the distinction with other things he says. Thus the order of importance of the two contradictory commandments is lost when told to Eve. Then, In book 9, Satan takes advantage of Eve's lack of information by presenting Eve with a situation wherein the conclusion that rational reasoning would produce is at odds with the conclusion that a blind trust in faith would produce. Eve cannot abide simultaneously by both of God's commandments in this situation. By eating the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge (as Satan tells her to), Eve is guilty of losing faith, which initiates the "original, mortal sin" (9,1003-4). However, acting reasonably is what Adam tells her is otherwise valued by God and is generally the human connection to the divine. Therefore, while Eve is guilty of losing faith (which she understands as one of God's commandments), she is entirely following God's (and Adam's) commandment to be reasonable.
God's commandments are inherently self-contradicting. From Eve's perspective, the contradiction (of the commandments) is even more apparent, and confusing, since the law she is given is through Adam's words, which somewhat simplify God's single spoken commandment by vocalizing the second, implied commandment. Within the hierarchical system that God creates, Eve understands that "God is [Adam's] law" and Adam is her law (4,637). She must act according to what Adam says is the law in order to obey God. Adam says to Eve, theoretically passing on God's law to her, that "we [Adam and Eve] may not taste nor touch" the Tree of Knowledge, but otherwise "our Reason is our Law" (9,652-4). From Eve's perspective, this statement places the contradictory notions of faith and reason up against one another. The command not to touch the tree only barely takes precedence in this context because the two are spoken so close together. Similarly, Adam tells Eve that "Reason [God] made right" (9,352), and that "lesser faculties serve Reason as chief" (5,102). These statements further indicate that Adam is communicating to Eve the importance of reason, while he does not celebrate faith in the same way. In fact, the first time that he vehemently talks of the importance of faith is after the Fall, saying "let none henceforth seek needless cause to approve the faith they [own]" (9,1141). Naturally, Eve is going to internalize the virtue of reason above the virtue of faith, although technically Adam initially, verbally established that the opposite was the case. Adam does not make it clear to Eve that she should obey a blind faith in God's command not to eat the fruit from the Tree above his command to obey her ability to reason.
Adam's lack of clarity (in distinguishing the hierarchical order of the two commandments) is compounded by his final words to Eve before her Fall. When Adam and Eve are about to part each other's company to do their morning's work separately, Adam incoherently warns Eve. His warning is incoherent because its core meaning is simply to promote the value of reason, not of faith. He says "Reason / May meet / the foe [Satan] / and fall into deception" (9,360-2). The last words she hears from her beloved Adam, her "head" (8,574) is that she should not allow her reason to be deceived. It is possible that Adam was attempting to tell her to not follow her reason at all and stick to her faith, but the way that he says it makes it seem that he is telling her to follow her reason, and not allow deception to intercept its proper functioning. She does just that. She abandons the command to be blindly faithful and chooses to be completely reasonable and rational. Satan's argument when he is in serpent-form to convince Eve to eat the fruit of the Tree is totally reasonable. She knows that only humans are given the capacity to speak, seeing a beast with that capacity requires an explanation. The serpent's explanation makes sense, especially in light of the name of the Tree which is "Knowledge." The serpent increased its knowledge of the world by becoming a rational creature, for then it could evaluate the world. Eve would have had to question the reality of her sense-perception for the rationality of her eating the fruit to be undermined. Even Satan, when speaking truthfully to himself, mentions that he perceives God's commandment forbidding Adam and Eve to attain Knowledge as "reasonless" (4,516).
Both reason and faith are spoken of as positive, good attributes throughout the poem, but reason is praised more often by higher (in the divine hierarchy) characters. This perpetual praise of reason reinforces its position as one of God's commandments (although it is technically the lesser). Two angels, Raphael, and Satan (a fallen angel) praise reason as a divine virtue. Raphael advises Adam to "love / [the] attractive, human, rational," he also personifies and localizes good, "true Love" saying "Love / hath his seat in Reason" (8,587-91). Likewise, Satan (the fallen Angel Lucifer), in marveling over the goodness of God's latest creation, humanity, says to himself "Growth, Sense, Reason, all summ'd up in Man / what delight" (9,113). Adam too praises reason, in addition to the praise he gives it which is cited in the previous paragraph, he also attributes the experience of human happiness to reason. He tells Eve that "smiles from Reason flow" (9,239). He is saying that the happiness which humans are capable of feeling is a result of their ability to be reasonable, and derive reasonable enjoyment from that which is around them. Again, Adam's verbal valuing of reason is quite dangerous to Eve's correct understanding of how she should conduct herself if presented with a situation where reason and faith stand in contradiction. Moreover, speech, which is positive because it is the communication line between humans and God, and allows humans to worship God, is assumed to be the byproduct of rational, reasonable thought in the interaction between Satan in serpent form and Eve during the temptation (9,550-60). The narrator and author of Paradise Lost, Milton, who uses God as his muse, and in that way implicitly puts himself in a high position in the divine hierarchy, places "Reason" in the same category as the "Loyal, Just and Pure" (4,755). Milton also consistently capitalizes the word "Reason," which indicates that it is good, he doesn't capitalize words that represent bad things such as "envy" or "jealousy" (example: 4,503). He also capitalizes the word "Faith," but that word does not come up as often which indicates that he is not emphasizing it as much. Ironically, faith is verbally valued most by Eve prior to the Fall. She is its main defender. She says that her "firm Faith" cannot be "shak'n or seduc't" (9,286-7), and then she categorizes "Faith" with the good "Love" and "Virtue" (9,335). Eve reaffirms the commandment to be faithful in spite of the external reaffirmation of the other commandment: reason. In the end however, she chooses reason.
Like Eve, Beelzebub, one of Satan's comrades, another fallen angel, also must undergo a rational process in order to realize God's power. He is convinced that God is "Almighty" when he, as a part of Satan's army, loses his fight against God, since Beelzebub believes that "no less than such could have o'erpow'r'd such force" as Satan's army (1,144-5). He needed God's almighty power to be proven to him through questioning it reasonably with force. The 'guilt' of Beelzebub (and the others) though, is not dwelt on. They are simply turned out of God's realm (heaven) for trying to overthrow his power. Being in Hell is not so much about punishment as it is just the natural consequence of their actions. Eve succumbs to the same desire to be reasonable as Beelzebub and yet her 'guilt' is the focal point of the Fall. In blaming Eve for the Fall by calling her 'guilty,' one is falling into the trap that Adam and Eve fall into in the end of book 9 where in "mutual accusation they spent fruitless hours" (9,1186-7). Attributing blame for no reason other than self-justification is fruitless. In this way, Beelzebub and Satan are better than Adam and Eve for they don't spend time blaming each other for being expelled from heaven. Guilt is not an issue.
The irony of the results of eating the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge is that it ends up animalizing Adam and Eve rather than raising them up to the level of Gods. Eve's rational, reasonable choice to eat results in her losing part of her ability to be reasonable. After the Fall, a "sensual Appetite ["lust"] / usurp[ed] over sovran Reason" within Adam and Eve (9,1129-30). Eve is 'guilty' of losing her 'faith' in God by not following his seemingly irrational command to not eat from the Tree of Knowledge, and thus she is guilty of initiating the original, mortal sin, however, the word 'guilt' in this context is a label which endows her act with negative implications. Without the label of 'guilt,' Eve's act could be understood as her attempt to best serve her God through serving Adam. In addition, on our part, as modern humans, we are wasting "fruitless hours" by marking her with the label of 'guilt'.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Lost in Translation

...Adrian Trejo Professor Crandall Monday-Thursday: 1:20-4:00PM 01/17/13 Essay#2- Lost in Translation Sophia Coppola’s, Lost In Translation presents a relationship, between two Americans who are married, but lack communication and inadequate attention from their spouses, while staying in Tokyo. Bob Harris is away from his family on a business trip, as he’s going through a mid-life crisis. Charlotte, a woman in her early twenties struggles to find a place in the world. She hoped a trip to Tokyo, with her husband would help conflicted feelings about her two-year-old marriage, her spirit, discovering a purpose and finding a career. These individuals meet and are instantly attracted to one another, because of parallel doubts about their life in contrasting perspectives. Magnetically drawn to one another, they inevitably communicate their problems in marriage, their fears, and insecurities of current circumstances. Bob and Charlotte are scapegoats staying in another country, as well as a foreign society. Their feelings of displacement, isolation and alienation during their stay in Japan, provide an exploration of complex human emotions, such as boredom and loneliness. Bob Harris is an aging movie star beyond his peak years, who is still famous enough to be recognized, but not to be asked to do any more movies. Now in his fifties, he traded his fast-paced Hollywood lifestyle for a wife and family. Harris thinks that he’ll only be in Tokyo for a few days, but his stay...

Words: 1454 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Learning Curve Theory

...considering transferring operations of the pizzeria to a family member. Mario has elected to supervise the business decisions made by the family member with regard to reductions in customer wait times and lost sales. Three scenarios are simulated: adjusting the number of tables allocated for two and four guests as well as adjustments to wait and kitchen staff, choosing to implement new technologies, and a choice between adding seating space or a takeout option. If Mario sees that the decisions made by the family member are sound, then he will hand over operations of the pizzeria at the end of two months. Because measurement in service industries is subjective (Pati & Reis, 2007), progress will be measured in lost sales, lost customers, and daily operating costs. Guests typically enter the restaurant in parties of two to four. The decision was made to set the number of tables designated for parties of two to 8, leaving the remaining 10 tables for parties of four. No change was made to the numbers of wait or kitchen staff. Increasing these numbers would have increased daily operating costs, making any possible losses more difficult to bear financially. Decreasing these numbers may have placed extra burden on the staff members, making efficiency difficult. While some sales were lost (see fig. 1), the losses were kept at a minimum. Based on the results indicated in the simulation, Mario was pleased with the numbers, and elected not to make any changes. Fig. 1: In the...

Words: 750 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Genre Analysis

...Nina Hagen Wrtg 1010-20 Using the Genre of a children’s story to articulate with monsters In Gordimers story “Once upon a time” uses the genre of a children’s story to articulate monsters in a suburban family by using the theme of a fairytale that clashes with the theme of a childrens story so he can use “monsters” in a suburban family. Gordimer uses phrases that kind of gives him the excuse to go in and articulate the monsters into the genre of a children’s story. Gordimer knew how to put everything in place to make it be called a “children’s story” Also, she the setting of the story in a good neighborhood, just people trying to be safe and you could kind of tell reading into the story a little disaster is coming, it is nothing brutal but it works for a children’s story type of theme. A fairy tale genre always ends up kind of automatically clashing with children’s stories. Gordimer is using a fairytale by saying in “For when they began to live happily ever after they where warned by that wise old witch, the husbands mother, not to take anyone of the street” This sentence right here is kind of what you get out of a fairytale genre and a children’s story genre. When they mention “happily ever after” You usually hear that phrase all the time in childrens stories or children type of things. For example: when you are watching a disney movie, which is a children’s...

Words: 733 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Just You

...Economist and watching "I love the 80s." I like tennis, Fazoli's breadsticks and writing assignments. I value honesty, commitment, scholarship and kindness. These are hard and true facts, but there is a lot I do not know about myself. I don't know how I feel about the death penalty, I have mixed feelings about religion, and I don't know what I think about a cashless society. I have no stock answer to offer about a life-changing experience or a moment of enlightenment, and it is hard for me to give a comprehensive proclamation of who I am, for my identity unfolds more every day as my experiences grow. Since I am only 17 years old, life has a lot of unfolding to do. I dislike saying "I am trying to find myself" because my identity is not lost, it just needs more uncovering. Luckily for me, what I love to do and want to be helps me uncover more about myself. I want to be a writer. I may not end up a professional writer but I will always write, even if I am the only one interested in my work, because writing is my self-reflection. When writing, I sometimes get worked up into such a fervor that I barely know what I am saying. I just let my fingers fly over the keyboard and the ideas pour from my head. When I go back through the jumble of unpunctuated ideas, I notice a theme running through the writing. I don't try to put a moral in the theme, but invariably it happens. Evaluating the theme and the rest of the writing helps me interpret my own character and decipher my at times...

Words: 380 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Garce

...Economist and watching "I love the 80s." I like tennis, Fazoli's breadsticks and writing assignments. I value honesty, commitment, scholarship and kindness. These are hard and true facts, but there is a lot I do not know about myself. I don't know how I feel about the death penalty, I have mixed feelings about religion, and I don't know what I think about a cashless society. I have no stock answer to offer about a life-changing experience or a moment of enlightenment, and it is hard for me to give a comprehensive proclamation of who I am, for my identity unfolds more every day as my experiences grow. Since I am only 17 years old, life has a lot of unfolding to do. I dislike saying "I am trying to find myself" because my identity is not lost, it just needs more uncovering. Luckily for me, what I love to do and want to be helps me uncover more about myself. I want to be a writer. I may not end up a professional writer but I will always write, even if I am the only one interested in my work, because writing is my self-reflection. When writing, I sometimes get worked up into such a fervor that I barely know what I am saying. I just let my fingers fly over the keyboard and the ideas pour from my head. When I go back through the jumble of unpunctuated ideas, I notice a theme running through the writing. I don't try to put a moral in the theme, but invariably it happens. Evaluating the theme and the rest of the writing helps me interpret my own character and decipher my at times...

Words: 378 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Why Do People Survive In Lord Of The Flies

...tv-show LOST, the same ideal theme of civilianized survival is present. The events in LOST are more civilized as for the fact that all the characters are adults with responsibility. As for in Lord of the Flies, more foolish events take place due to the fact that all the characters are children. The death of the three characters demonstrated the necessities of civilians. Examining the meaning of murder, the deaths of Simon and Marshal Mars are not characterized by murder; on the other hand, the death of Piggy was clearly a murder. According to Document A, murder is intended slaughter. In the tv-show LOST, a U.S. Marshal, Edward Mars, was found with a large piece of shrapnel injected to his body after a...

Words: 759 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Loss Of Innocence In Lord Of The Flies

...but also because when Piggy died so did the innocence in his people. The concept of losing the innocence inside you is very true in the world. An example of this would be Jenn Jackson. Jackson was an average teenage girl who had a very unstable home. Back in 2015, Jackson was at her abusive father's home when he started acting out. She called her new friend who she really didn't know to come and pick her up even though he made it aware he had different intentions. Although aware of these intentions, she still went with him to his place. When there he raped her while his roommate was in the next room as if nothing was happening. After the rape occurred, she got dressed and he drove her to her dads, as if nothing happened. She mentions, “I lost myself in my thoughts. But, I said nothing. I barely moved. I didn't know what else to do”(Marie Claire). I cannot put into words what Jackson must have been feeling in that moment but I do know that when a certain someone is a virgin, they are seen as pure and innocent. For it to be taken, there are striping the innocence. Jackson, added this theme of loss of innocence to show the mental effect it leaves on the victim. When not adding the element of choice, it robs you of the one quality that is beneficial, innocence. ...

Words: 606 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Lost in Translation

...Lucy Parkhurst Dr. Thombre 11/5/13 Intercultural Movie Review When thinking of intercultural communication, the movie that comes to mind is Sophia Coppola’s “Lost in Translation”. Bob Harris, played by Bill Murray, is an American actor who visits Tokyo, Japan to film an ad for whiskey. Bob, away from his wife and his familiar western environment, experiences isolation, loneliness, and sleeplessness upon entering Tokyo. He is constantly frustrated, due largely in part to his understanding of what others, such as a film director, restaurant waiters, and prostitutes are trying to convey to him in Japanese. In the midst of all this, he meets Charlotte, an American woman who like him, is lonely because her husband is more interested in his photography work than her. Due to their shared loneliness and feelings of isolation and culture shock, Bob and Charlotte become friends, and begin a relationship through respect, trust, and self-disclosure. Bob and Charlotte become a mirror to each other, as both try to sort out their identities and how proceed from their own relational crossroads. While the audience may wonder throughout the movie if Bob and Charlotte’s relationship will ever become romantic, it is plain to see that they learn lots about themselves and each other as a result of being outsiders in this new and unfamiliar culture. The most evident intercultural concepts I noticed in the film is culture shock, language, and identity. The first concept, culture shock, is explained...

Words: 1081 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Distant Dream

...difficult to execute phrase was Raja’s ultimate dream. From childhood he lived every moment in this thought, this wish and for this only purpose. One day his lady luck came up to him in the form of an old, learned palmist who in a glimpse said “You are god’s special child and will get everything you desire, just work vey hard for it.” Surprised and shocked by his luck Raja ran out of words and asked “WHAT”! What should I do? Here came the secret words “This iron stick will turn to gold as soon as it touches a precious magic stone ‘Pariiz’. Then you can use this stone to turn everything and anything to gold! Take it and follow your happiness, your desires, and your dreams! Amen”. From the moment he said Go, Raja started his search, completely lost in his dream, walking miles after miles; touching each stone, each pebble on his way, waiting for it to turn to gold. Days, months and then years passed, the mission still unaccomplished, but raja did not stop. Slowly the winds of time started to show up on Raja’s health, even with his deteriorating health and age, he went on and on. One day a small boy named “Vivek” saw him and pondered. Looking at the boy starring at him, Raja’s thoughts ran a flash back; his childhood, his family and everything he had forgone for his dream came in front of his eyes and tears rolled down and today his sole companion was his iron stick. He called upon Vivek and asked what was so amusing seeing him? Vivek instantly replied “Uncle what are you doing with...

Words: 407 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Media's View on Science

...Social Media’s Views on Science Naomi Acevedo SC250-Science for Everyday Life July 18, 2016 Social Media’s Views on Science The way the media depicts scientist has not been proven to be 100% true in regards to how they actually are in the real world. Although we know this, most people still see scientist in the same manner when asked to describe what a scientist looks like. Media usually depicts the scientist as geeky, nerdy, unattractive, crazy or mad, and even at times evil, but this does not rule out scientist being the hero. (Meredith, D.). When I hear the word scientist, the image that comes to mind is that of a male or female in a knee-length white lab coat, gloves and those clear experimental goggles we were all told to wear in grade school. This person might have a calculator and/or thermometer in their left breast pocket or even black plastic frame glasses as a finishing touch to give them that intelligent look that people associate the with smarter than average people. Some of the characters from television and films that comes to mind are the scientist Dr. Emmit Brown from the movie Back to the Future, Steve Urkel from a comedy television series called Family Matters and Temperance Brennan from the television series Bones. All three of these characters wore the white coat when in the essence of portraying a scientist. I’d like to think of the white coat as a sort of uniform for the job, just as a police officer and a firefighter have a certain uniform that...

Words: 1253 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Jack And Ralph In Lord Of The Flies

... In the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding, the two main characters, Jack and Ralph, have similarities and differences. Ralph is the first character introduced in the novel. He becomes a leader very quickly, and he has a more relaxed style of leadership. Jack is introduced later in the same chapter as leader of choir boys, but he is hungry for more power very early on. Ralph and Jack are characterized differently in Lord Of The Flies through the way they achieve leadership, morals, and their styles of government. While the most obvious leader was Jack, Ralph became the leader of the group when all of the kids voted him as the “chief”. Ralph was distinguished as their chief because “...there was a stillness about Ralph as he sat that marked him out: there was his size, and attractive appearance; and most obscurely, yet most powerfully, there was the conch.” (Golding 22). Ralph was almost unanimously voted as chief over Jack and he accepted this role. Jack was very unhappy with this solution and wanted to be in charge, so Ralph was intimidated into giving Jack some power. Because of this, Ralph decided, “ Jack’s in charge of the choir. They can be...hunters.” (22). Another difference between Ralph and Jack is their morals. For example, Ralph had a set of rules that everyone is supposed to follow, but people keep breaking the rules. Because of this, Ralph says, “All this I meant to say. Now I’ve said it. You voted me for chief. Now you do what I say.” (81). He enforces...

Words: 550 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

How Does Piggy Use Symbols In Lord Of The Flies

...The visual representation that I chose to create is Piggy’s glasses. As it is, glasses always come in pairs. The unbroken side symbolizes Piggy's logical reasoning, how he sees things and the usefulness of the glasses to the boys in its material aspect. The broken side pieces depict person, place and things that showed significance in the novel. The whole glasses itself projects as a very important tool for both parties, which is something that will easily help them produce a fire which to Jack’s group for cooking and for Ralph’s group a signal for rescue. The first image on the broken lens piece would be the conch, a thing that at first united all the boys. It is because of the conch that they chose a leader. The boys agreed that whoever is holding it have the right to speak to the group. But it is also the thing that created jealousy among them because Ralph, the voted leader of the group, whenever he is holding it projects authority. When it was shattered to pieces, it symbolized the end of Ralph’s authority. The Castle Rock is a significant place. It is a scenic place, surrounded by flat rocks that made it look like a castle. It joins both end of the island and a place where they can look over the sea and the water burst forth sprays from the sea. For Jack and the other boys thought it would make a good fort as it overlooks the sea and that end of the island, while Ralph showed no enthusiasm because he wanted to stay by the beach and hope for rescue. Castle Rock...

Words: 608 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Hurray-Personal Narrative

...“Leave it to Aidan Morag and Jack Clemmens to cast me as boy named Jack this week. Whether I want to or not, I have to take those two’s magic beans and plant them. As soon as that stupid beanstalk grows, I have to climb it all the way to a shooting range in the sky. Once I’m there I get to be target practice for a Polynesian giant and his Megalodon sized rifle. Hurray!” “So yeah, dropping the sarcasm and the cliche fairy tale, it is pretty easy to guess from my description above that I’m facing Vin Wesley this week. There is no shying away from the fact that is going to be a tough match for me. Vin is a big guy. In the past I have not faired so well against big guys. See my fights against Damion Darkside and Lord Raab as proof. Vin’s size is not what makes him dangerous though. He’s a very cerebral fighter that can easily calculate the exact amount of force he intends to use. A behemoth with brains. Fuck. Me.” “There is no beating around the bush when it comes to the only way I stand a realistic chance of beating Vin. I have to hit him so hard that his ancestors feel it all the way back in their war canoes. The only way I can do that is to get angry and luckily Vin’s actions against me in the past have given me sufficient fuel for the proverbial fire.” “You’ve recently become a champion Vin, congrats there is no better feeling than winning yourself a shiny prize made of leather and gold. There is no better feeling than getting to celebrate that achievement. Or so I’ve heard...

Words: 791 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Loss Of Innocence In Lord Of The Flies Research Paper

..."The mask was a thing on its own, behind which Jack hid, liberated from shame and self-consciousness" (Golding, 64) Loss of innocence is a strong topic in Lord of the Flies, the three topics that will be talked about in this essay includes, the boys acting without fear of punishment, they had to grow up and civilization helped them remain innocent and once they became savages they lost all remaining innocence. The loss of innocence is clearly shown in the boys because they are forced to grow up. They can’t play around any more but now they have to hunt and care for themselves. “We’ll make sure when we go hunting” (Golding, 35) This is when they realize they can't play around anymore or act like young boys but they have to grow up and start hunting and find resources so that they don’t die or get sick. Another time they lost...

Words: 792 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Piggy Lord Of The Flies Quote Analysis

...Piggy didn't lose his morals; he always kept his strong belief in order, civilization, and doing the right thing. Piggy gets angry when rules are broken. "'They've got our fire.' Rage shrilled his voice. 'They stole it!' 'That's them,' said Piggy. 'They blinded me. See? That's Jack Merridew. You call an assembly, Ralph, we got to decide what to do,'" (chapter 11). Piggy is very angry that Jack has done wrong by stealing his glasses. He wants things to be done correctly, he is very opposed to Jack’s way of doing things. Piggy strongly believes in the power of Ralph's position as chief. He believes in the order of calling an assembly to fix what has been done wrong. Piggy also strongly believes in doing things in the right way. Piggy states his plan to get back his stolen glasses from Jack. He says "I'm going to him with this conch in my hands. I’m going to hold it out. Look, I'm goin' to say, you're stronger than I am and you haven't got asthma. You can see, I'm goin' to say, and with both eyes. But I don't ask for my glasses back, not as a favor. I don't ask you to be a sport, I'll say, not because you're strong, but because what's right's right. Give me my glasses, I'm going to say - you got to!'" (chapter 11). Piggy wants his glasses from Jack. He says that it was wrong of a Jack. He doesn't want them back as a favor, he wants them back because it is the right thing to do. This shows that Piggy firmly believes in doing the right thing. Piggy questions the boys’ beliefs in Jack’s...

Words: 481 - Pages: 2