Free Essay

Prime Minister

In:

Submitted By siewmei93
Words 1518
Pages 7
TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN PUTRA AL-HAJ
Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj ibni Almarhum Sultan Abdul Hamid Halim Shah is Malaysia first Prime Minister after its Independence in 1957. He is well-known as Bapa Kemerdekaan (Father of Independence) or Bapa Malaysia (Father of Malaysia). Tunku who is the seventh prince and twentieth child of Sultan Abdul Hamid Halim Shah was born in Istana Pelamin , Alor Setar in Kedah on February 8, 1903. His mother was Che Manjalara who is the fourth wife of Sultan Abdul Hamid. In 1909, Abdul Rahman was sent to a Malay Primary School Jalan Baharu and was later transferred to study at the Government English School in Alor Star, which currently known as the Sultan Abdul Hamid College. Abdul Rahman was then sent to Debsirin School in Bangkok in 1911. Then, he returned to Malaya in 1915 and continued his studies at Penang Free School. He graduated from St. Catharine’s College in Cambridge University with a bachelor degree of Arts in law and history in 1925. In 1951 Abdul Rahman became the president of UMNO and in 1955,he became the first Chief Minister of Malaya.

As UMNO President, he has successfully solved many political issues in the Federation of Malaya, with various races cooperation. As a result, he succeeded in forming an alliance between the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), the Malayan Chinese Association (MCA) and the Malayan Indian Congress (MIC) and this was known as the Alliance, Party. Under Tunku Abdul Rahman, the country successfully transformed from colonialism to independence. Tunku had successfully brought the country to independent on 31 August 1957 without bloodshed instead through a spirit of nationalism.

Tunku made several visits to a few neighbouring countries such as Vietnam, Ceylon (Sri Lanka), Japan and Brunei after independence. The formation of the Association of South East Asia countries (ASA) is suggested by Tunku in January 1959 to develop regional cooperation in the economic and cultural fields. ASA was then established in 1961. Federation of Malaya would sign a memorandum of understanding with Britain, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak to form a new nation to be known as Malaysia was announced by Tunku in May 1961 and this intention was strongly opposed by the Philippines and Indonesia. However, the Federation of Malaysia was declared and established on 16th September, 1963, comprising of Federation of Malaya, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak. Nevertheless, in August 1965, Singapore was forced to secede from Malaysia, and therefore the Federation of Malaysia only consists of 13 states. Since the Malays in Kedah started opposing the establishment of the Malayan Union, Tunku has been involved in writing. Through Watan magazine, Tunku wrote several articles which succeeded in inculcating the spirit of nationalism among the Malays. Some of the articles that had been published were 'The Events of May 13', 'Looking Back', 'View Points', As a Matter of Interest', 'Lest We Forget', 'Challenging Times', 'Something to Remember', 'Political Awakening', 'Baling Talk', and 'Malaysia - The Road to Independence'. As an appreciation of his invaluable contributions, Tunku received numerous awards which includes 'The Outstanding Malaysian of the Year' in 1987, the 'Honorary Citizen of London', the 'International Sports Award' from the Sports Academy of United States in 1981, 'The Replica of Dhu'l Faqar' from Al-Malik Faisal in 1983, 'Honorary Doctorate in Law' from the University of Oxford and the 'Roman Magsaysay' award in 1980. Besides that, tunku has also been acknowledged as the 'Father of Independence' and the 'Father of Malaysia'. On 6th December, 1990, Tunku passed away at the Kuala Lumpur General Hospital and he was buried at the Langgar Royal Cemetery, Alor Setar on 7th December, 1990.
TUN ABDUL RAZAK

Tun Abdul Razak bin Hussein Al-Haj is country’s second prime minister who heads the country from 1970 to 1976. He is well-known as the father of development. Tun Abdul Razak is the only child to Dato' Hussein bin Mohd Taib and Hajah Teh Fatimah bt Daud was born in Pulau Keladi, Pekan, Pahang on March 11, 1922. Tun Razak received his early education at the Malay College Kuala Kangsar in 1934. He then continued his studies at Raffles College in Singapore in 1940 after joining the Malay Administrative Service in 1939. His studies at the college stopped with the onset of the Second World War. In 1947, Tun Razak left for Britain to study law and he received a Degree of an Utter Barrister from Lincoln's Inn in 1950.In the same year, he became the youth chief for United Malays National Organisation (UMNO).He worked as the Assistant State Secretary of Pahang and in February 1955 he became Pahang's Chief Minister. He was appointed as the Education Minister after winning country's first general elections in July 1955. On top of that, Tun Razak was one of the member of the February 1956 mission to London to seek the independence of Malaya from the British. After the 1959 general elections, Tun Razak became the Minister of Rural Development besides holding the portfolios of Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defence. Formulating the development policy known as the Red Book was one of Tun Razak’s achievement. Tun Razak then replaced Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra as the Prime Minister of Malaysia on September 1970.

In 1971, Tun Razak launched the New Economic Policy (NEP). He and the "second generation" of Malay politicians saw the need to tackle vigorously the economic and social inequality which fuelled racial antagonism. The NEP have two important goals that is to reduce and eventually eradicate poverty, as well as to reduce and eventually eradicate identification of economic function with race. In 1973, Tun Abdul Razak set up the Barisan Nasional to replace the ruling Alliance Party. He increased the membership of its parties in an effort to establish "Ketahanan Nasional" (National Strength) through political stability. For his contributions in the area of national and rural development, Tun Abdul Razak is known as the Father of Development. Abdul Razak died on January 14, 1976 while seeking medical treatment in London. He is laid to rest in Heroes Mausoleum near Masjid Negara, Kuala Lumpur.

TUN HUSSEIN ONN Tun Hussein bin Dato' Onn is country’s third prime minister who heads the country from 1976 to 1981. He is well-known as the father of unity. Tun Hussein Onn is the child to Dato Onn Jaafar and Datin Halimah Hussein who was born in Johor Bahru, Johor on February 12, 1922. Tun Hussein Onn received his early education in Singapore as well as at the English College in Johor Bahru. In 1940, he joined the Johor Military Forces as a cadet and was sent a year later to the Indian Military Academy in Dehra Dun, India for training and upon completion he was absorbed into the Indian Army and later served in the Middle East when the Second World War broke. British employed him as an instructor at the Malayan Police Recruiting and Training Centre in Rawalpindi after the war due to his vast experience.

In 1945, Tun Hussein returned to Malaysia and was appointed Commandant of the Johor Bahru Police Depot. The following year he joined the Malaya Civil Service as an assistant administrative officer in Segamat, Johor and later posted to the state of Selangor, becoming Kelang and Kuala Selangor’s district officer. In 1945, Tun Hussein became the first youth chief of UMNO (United Malays National Organization and in 1950, he was elected as the UMNO secretary general; however, he left UMNO in 1951 to join his father in forming the Independence of Malaya Party (IMP). Later on, Tun Hussein went to London to study law at Lincoln’s Inn, qualifying as a Barrister-at-Law; he came back as a certified lawyer and practiced in Kuala Lumpur. He returned to politics in the year 1968 after being persuade by Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak to rejoin UMNO. He was then appointed as the education minister after winning the 1969 general elections. On August 13, 1973, Tun Hussein succeeded the late Tun Dr Ismail as the Deputy Prime Minister and he was appointed as the prime minister on January 15, 1976 after the passing away of Tun Razak. Tun Hussein is renowned for stressing on the issue of unity through policies aimed at rectifying economic imbalances between the communities. For example, April 20, 1981, saw the National Unit Trust Scheme being launched. He also gave serious consideration to the concept of Rukun Tetangga and the fight against the drug menace. Tun Hussein Onn was being very sincere in his struggle for racial unity and had a reputation of being firm against anyone that tried to create racial problem in the country. Due to his efforts in promoting goodwill among the various communities, he was known as the Bapa Perpaduan or 'Father of Unity'. On July 17, 1981, he retired from active politics and resigned from his prime minister post due to health problem. Tun Hussein died on the May 29, 1990 in Seaton Medical Center, San Francisco, at the age of 68. He is buried in Makam Pahlawan (Heroes Mausoleum) near Masjid Negara, Kuala Lumpur.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Prime Ministers

...Chapter 2 – The Executive The Prime Minister What do you know about the roles and powers of prime ministers? • In Austria & Germany (Dr. Angela Merkel): chancellor • Prime minister: not only the chief executive of the state [In Europe], but also the head of one of the legislative parties. (usually the largest) ( Great power [in particular in single-party majority governments as Greece (Kostas Karamanlis), Britain (Gordon Brown)] ( The lack of any separation between legislature and executive. • In EU-style, the person who can muster a legislative majority ( Head of the executive • In such countries, the threat to the Prime minister comes from the governing party. Elements of power of the Prime minister: (1) Approved by the legislature (i.e. Parliament) as the political head of the government. (Most important task of the legislature after an election has been held.) - If the incumbent prime minister can collect the parliamentary votes to remain on office: he or she has “won” the election even if his party had large losses. - The politicians campaigning in Parliamentary elections are typically party leaders. - Electing/Approving a new prime minister is the central duty of a newly elected parliament. [Citizens vote for the party] - If citizens want to change their chief executive in a parliamentary government system, they do so by voting in legislative elections. (2) The modest role of head of state. Premier political...

Words: 853 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Us President Vs Prime Minister Essay

...When you ask the question “Who has more power the US president vs the Canadian Prime Minister the answer largely depends on what you mean by power. It’s undebatable that the US President has more international power then the Canadian Prime Minister but if you look at it at a local level, within their own respective countries it’s very different. Within their own respective countries the Canadian Prime Minster has more power than the US president. All we need to do is look at the separation of powers between the two powers in the two countries to see this to be true. Let’s first take a look at perhaps the most import decision making power a person could have first, the right to declare war. In the united states the president doesn’t get final...

Words: 487 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Time to Follow Rajdharma Mr. Prime Minister

...New ruler had and still continues to have an impeccable integrity, a no-nonsense approach towards public service, and a past as Chief minister which would make any politician jealous of him. The Indians had found a panacea in Narendra Modi, who we sincerely believed would take our country to glorious heights. There is no doubt that new sant of Sabarmati has been incessantly trying to deliver whatever he had promised and he has considerable achievements in his kitty from his 18 months rule. India has become the fastest growing nation overtaking china. India has become an important player in global politics, a more proactive and pragmatic foreign policy. The govt has been able to ensure high growth with low inflation (food inflation though has been high) and that too with low fiscal deficit. The Indian policies are now being implemented in mission mode, the prominent examples being PMJDY (Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana) and Toilets in schools. We find no example in recent history of Indian schemes completed on time. In social sector, Accidental and life insurance at Rs12 and Rs 330 have come as a huge relief to the poor and the marginalized sections of society. Moreover in all these 18 months he has never made a single statement which can be construed as even being remotely communal. He has truly upheld the dignity of the office of The Prime Minister. Modi deserves Kudos for all these achievements. This shining story has its other side also, which looks most unpleasant and ludicrous...

Words: 787 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Prime Minister Now Affectively a President

...Is the British Prime Minister now effectively a president? Nowadays the British prime minister is effectively a president, as the role has increasingly acquired presidential powers and been carried out in presidential style in order to become more dominant of government in general. Although the distinction between the legislature and executive in the UK is blurred and the prime minister is technically different to a president, the prime minister is now effectively the Chief of the Executive, Chief of State and Commander-in-Chief in Britain – these are typically considered presidential functions. This means that prime ministers in the UK are now more powerful and very similar to presidents – they govern in a similar way, and have similar prerogatives. Many argue that the British prime minister is unique and unlike a president because of the overlap between the executive and legislating branches of government. Whereas in the UK the prime minister’s party has a majority in the upper legislative chamber, and he can therefore harness parliamentary sovereignty, in America the legislature is independent of the president and can act as a barrier to his mandate. For example in 2012 Obama’s ‘Bring Jobs Home’ Bill, which would take tax breaks from companies that ‘outsource’ jobs abroad, and give them to ‘insourcing’ companies was blocked by Senate Republicans, 42 of whom voted against it. 17 other bills with similar widespread public appeal such as this one have been blocked by republicans...

Words: 951 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Has the Power of the Uk Prime Minister Increased?

...Has the power of the UK Prime Minister increased? It can be argued that the power of the British Prime Minister has increased power due to his multiple sources of authority and his dominance over the cabinet government. However due to the coalition formed in the 2010 general election the argument that the Prime Ministers power has not increased takes precedent because power has to be shared and they can still be removed from office by their party or parliament. The UK government is becoming more closely comparable to the American presidential system, as the Prime Minister holds more power, mainly due to his dominance over the cabinet. The party leader has the ability to choose who is appointed what position within the cabinet; David Cameron announced he would ‘re-shuffle’ the make-up of the cabinet after being elected in 2010. Thus allowing him to choose individuals to undertake certain roles which he can manipulate to his advantage. The Prime Minister can also dominate the decisions which should be made by the cabinet. For example Margaret Thatcher’s decision to ban trade unions at GCHQ in Cheltenham in 1984, was the result of a meeting between a small group which defied the convention of Cabinet collective decision making. Demonstrating how the power of the Prime Minister has increased as the cabinet government has adopted a more passive role. Similarly to their dominance of the cabinet, another valid reason in favour of the Prime Minister having increased powers is that...

Words: 391 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Explain the Factors a Prime Minister Considers When Appointing or Dismissing Ministers.

...source, a prime minister may choose to appoint those who have shown and proven that they can deliver in their departments. It says in the source that ‘the prime minister sees the second half of this parliament as the delivery phase’. This shows that a prime minister would want to put those in positions of power who have evidence showing that they are successful in the policies that they implement and can do this effectively. Therefore they would not want to promote, and would want to dismiss, those ministers that have not delivered and whose performance has been dissatisfactory. For example ‘Caroline Spelman’ is likely to be a victim of being sacked or demoted as she ‘has failed to recover from the fiasco of failed plans to sell off parts of the national forest’. Also suggested in the source is the fact that other influential politicians may have an effect on the prime ministers appointments or dismisses. It says ‘the appointment of Mitchell shows the influence of George Osborne, his close supporter’. Because George Osborne is the Chancellor of the Exchequer he would be an important MP, the fact that he supports another minister would encourage David Cameron to promote this minister. This influential minister may work particularly well, or agree on many policies with another politician. Equally if an important minister does not support another politician, or does not collaborate well with them, they are more likely to be dismissed. Another factor that the prime minister might...

Words: 386 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Is the Uk Prime Minister Now Effectively a President?

...Is the UK Prime Minister now effectively a President? (40 marks) The arguments that used to take place among political academics about 'prime ministerial government' have now largely disappeared. Few, if any, now doubt that the office of prime minister dominates the British political system. As long as the holder of that office is not faced by too many limiting factors, such as a small parliamentary majority or a divided party, the British system has moved away from the traditional 'cabinet government' model to a 'prime ministerial' model. But a somewhat different question has emerged concerning the role and importance of the prime minister. This asks whether the system has now become 'presidential'. The prime minister has come to be, effectively though not legally, the head of State, the leader of the nation, irrespective of party allegiance. It should be stressed that this is not the same as national 'popularity'. Rather, it means that in times of difficulty, emergency or crisis such as war or terrorist threats, the country can unite behind its head of government. Nothing new in that, and certainly it has always been true to a great extent. But it can be argued that there has been a long term drift towards seeing the prime minister of the day rather than the monarch as national leader, and thus creates a more presidential 'feel' to the prime minister. The prime minister now has an extensive network of personal advisers, think tanks, policy units and working groups...

Words: 1460 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

To What Extent Have Uk Prime Ministers Become More Presidential

...of our prime ministers is the fact that they are not our head of state whereas presidents are heads of state. However our prime minister is or head of government. The head of state is responsible for attending political functions, exercising political powers and legitimising the state. They also have the power to call for early elections and are responsible for signing off all laws passed in parliamentary government. Whereas the head of government is the leader of the ruling party and is the chief of the executive branch. Their responsibilities are implementing laws and making all important decisions with the approval of the cabinet. In the presidential form of government the head of government and the head of state are the same individual whereas in our government the head of state is the Queen and the head of government is the prime minister. One way that the prime minister can be seen as becoming presidential is the greater concentration on the presentation of policy. The prime minister likes to be associated with the positive policies being enforced and passed through their government, guidance and leadership. So as to add to their public appeal. Famously Blair announced on Breakfast TV that the government was to make significant investments in the health service. Brown accused the prime minister of stealing his budget when in fact Brown was due to make the announcement the following day as part of his spending review. A second way in which the prime minister appears...

Words: 809 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Winston Churchill: A Career As Prime Minister

...Winston Churchill is well known for what he did as prime minister, but there is more information to know about him. Winston Churchill was born on November 30, 1874 and was born into an aristocratic family. His family, being aristocrats, were very wealthy which gave him a good education. He was related to many high up people. His father name was Lord Randolph Churchill, who was a British statesman and his mother’s name was Jeanette Jerome, who was a New York socialite. In Winston Churchill’s early life he got in trouble a lot and did not do well at his first two schools. In April 1888, he went to a boarding school where he enrolled in a military program. At first, he did not seem fit to go to on a military path. It took him three tries to pass the test for the British Royal Military school. Once he got in he did well though. During this time he wrote letters to his mother asking her to come and visit him, but she hardly ever came. His father died when he was 21 and didn’t really know him that well, aside from his work and what he did. Even though he never got to see his parents that often, he loved them both. While in the military, and at the Battle of Omdurman, he found himself writing reports on newspapers....

Words: 607 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Are British Prime Ministers as Powerful as Is Sometimes Claimed, [40]

...Are British Prime ministers as powerful as is sometimes claimed? [40] It is often argued that in this day and age, Prime ministers are almost untouchable within the British political system, due to the shear number of powers that the Prime minister holds, and the prerogatives that he utilises. However, due to a handful of checks and balances on the government, and the Prime minister not being separated from the political system, which means he or she is liable to these checks and limitations, the Prime minister may therefore not be perceived as all that powerful. As previously mentioned, the Prime minister enjoys a collection of powers within the UK political system. Firstly, the prime minister has this huge amount of power due to the fact that they are both part of the executive branch of government and the legislature, due to the fusion of powers within the British political system. This means that they are able to create law and then use their representation in the legislature to force through this law. For example, when Tony Blair won a landslide victory in 1997, winning 179 seats. As a result of this, he was not beaten in the commons until 2005, when they rejected his proposition on terror laws. Tony Blair can also be used as another example of how Prime ministers are as powerful as is sometimes claimed. Prime ministers have many prerogative powers that are granted to them by the Queen as head of state. For example, in 2003, when Tony Blair utilised these prerogatives...

Words: 1212 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Pierre Elliott Trudeau: The Most Controversial Prime Minister

...Pierre Elliott Trudeau was the fifteenth prime minister of Canada and held this position for sixteen years. He was the most controversial Prime Minster in Canadian history. He made some tough decisions for the unity of Canada. He was Prime Minster from 1968 to 1979 and 1980 to 1984. In 1972 Trudeau returned with a minority Liberal government. I came to Canada as an immigrant and arrived in Montréal at Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport. Later on, I came to know that he was the famous Prime Minster of Canada from Montreal. Trudeau had a vision of unified, bilingual and multicultural Canada. Trudeau used to drive sports cars, wore capes and floppy hats, and always had a red rose in his lapel. His charismatic, flamboyant and exciting...

Words: 778 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Sir John Alexander Macdonald: Canada's First Prime Minister

...Sir John Alexander MacDonald was Canada's first prime minister in 1857 that helped improve Canada. MacDonald accomplished many things during his two terms such as making British Columbia, Prince Edward Island, and North West Territories be apart of Canada and building the pacific railways. His legacy had many mistakes but made achievements, he was an alcoholic and was the father of the confederation, although some Canadians have said MacDonald did not know a lot about Canada when he was the prime minister. MacDonald was born on January 11, 1815 in Glasgow, Scotland and moved to Kingston, Ontario at the age of 5 and went to John Cruikshank school. At the age of 15 MacDonald started legal practice and was an apprentice for George Mackenzie who influenced him. By the time he got to age 20 he became a lawyer and opened his own office after he studied at Midland District Grammar school. When MacDonald was a child he always had interest in public affairs which led him to be a really known lawyer and a public spirited citizen that easily got elected to the Kingston Town Council as an alderman. After three year of service MacDonald ran Kingston as a conservative in 1844 but it didn't have any power at that time since he didn't...

Words: 656 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

To What Extent Does the Prime Minister Dominate the Political System in the Uk?

...dominant Prime Ministers; Thatcher and Blair for example. Although, in order to determine the extent that the Prime Minister dominates the political system, we have to look at changes in the role rather than looking at a couple of individuals. An argument that says the Prime Minister dominates the political system is the growth and use of an extensive advisory unit who work exclusively for the Prime Minister. This means the Prime Minister has access to information that his Ministers do not have, and it also means the Prime Minister can essentially overlook the advice of his/her Ministers thus allowing the Prime Minister to dominate cabinet. The Prime Minister, as the chief appointer of the Cabinet, can also effectively remove anyone who does not agree with his/her views. This results in a complete dominance of the executive, which inevitably results in dominance of the UK political system. However, this dominance is a short term consequence of the Prime Minister’s powers. There are only so many Ministers the Prime Minister can remove before his Cabinet loses complete faith in him/her; secondly, by completely dominating policy, Ministers lose any sense of ownership over policy which can cause party factions, or even a vote of no confidence. A Prime Minister’s power is said to be elastic, in that the further the Prime Minister tries to stretch their power, the harder his/her party pulls back. This is something we have seen with the UK’s most dominant post-war Prime Ministers, Blair...

Words: 902 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Who Is Margaret Stalin's First Female Prime Minister

...The Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher, nicknamed the Iron Lady, was Britain’s first female Prime Minister. Mrs. Thatcher challenged the image of females everywhere, while breaking the “glass ceiling” as the leader of the Conservative Party. This incredible Prime Minister managed to prove that a woman was capable of running an entire country during such a critical time in history. Margaret successfully remained in power for eleven years, from1979 to 1990. Even before serving as the first female Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher faced various challenges. While working as the Education Secretary, Thatcher was forced to make budget cuts, deeming herself one of the most hated politicians in Great Britain. Margaret’s political position left her feeling...

Words: 888 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

To What Extent Do Prime Ministers Control the Decisions Made by Their Government? by Alice Jones

...The prime minster has a lot of control about the decisions made by the government due to the powers they have over the cabinet. The prime minister chairs cabinet meetings, summing up decisions at the end of them and he also manages the agendas. This helps the prime minister to control meetings and direct the conversation in the course that he wants it to go in. The prime minister can also call when the meetings are and how long they are going to be showing that he determines the significant of a certain issue. People might say that the prime minister doesn’t have that much control over the government because they rely heavily on weather the cabinet and parliament have confidence in them or not. This is the ultimate limitation on there power. The prime minister cant don anything thing if the cabinet overrules them. Plus the policies that the prime minister makes are pointless if he cant get them passed, so he needs the approval of parliament and they must have the confidence in him. David Cameron is under the coalition and this could be problematic to him due to the fact that his cabinet is divided and he doesn’t have the majority of seats to get policies past without the liberal democrats. Being able to decide who the ministers are is a great way that the prime minister can control the decisions made by the government. The prime minister is allowed to select politicians who he will work most closest to- ministers in the cabinet. This means that the prime minister has...

Words: 549 - Pages: 3