The characterization of a threat can be described as a way to intimidate in order to accomplish fear, or a determination to inflict grievance. A threat ought to be instant in the company of a victim, in order for it to be considered an actual threat. The portrayal of a threat, in part, is the foundation of what creates a robbery, or the acting of stealing from another person. Robbery can be defined as “… someone taking another’s property by the use of intimidation or violent force” ( American Society of Criminology, 2008). The act of robbery can differ based on the level of violence and intimidation that is implicated. Several diverse levels of robbery consist of armed robbery, which includes the use of a weapon, aggravated robbery, which includes the use of or seemingly the use of a deadly weapon and highway robbery, which can take place outside in an opened area such as a road, recreational area or parking lot. Armed robbery is defined as “… someone taking another person’s property at gun point or with the use of intent of a weapon” (Haney, 2001). The current information provided is being shared in order to give a better understanding about the harshness of the criminal act of armed robbery and why there is a recommendation to change the current prison term policy. The complied information will give explanation for the preface of a bill that would double the highest prison term for armed robbery. With regards to the decision to support the bill, it is important to examine the current gaps as it relates to prison sentencing inside the judicial system. Prison sentencing within our justice system is broken down in gaps, as the verdict is a result of the crime presented. The variations of prison sentencing are portrayed if, for example, the offender is sentenced to five years for armed robbery, and another receives ten years for the same offense.