However, how is that the above process really describes the “very nearly perfect” (emphasis mine) parallelism? How about we continue to analyze it through two kinds of natural selection—microevolution and macroevolution. In such case, Kuhn's estimation of 'almost perfect' parallelism is far from almost perfect. That is, there are discrepancies in his analogous. For instance, microevolution, an evolution within a species, it does not produce completely new different species but a modified (slightly changed) and in many ways similar to its parent just as in the case of the finches and bacteria (Francis). Microevolution thus is analogous to what happen within the normal science where scientist and scientific community refined, against a new