...CASE STUDY The foreman catches two men fighting on the shop-floor. The fight is between Ramu and Gopi. Ramu had been fooling Gopi for some small matter. Gopi lost his temper and gave Ramu a poke. Ramu hit back. Both of them have had clean records in the past. QUESTIONS 1. Give a suitable title to the case. 2. What is the core issue in this case? 3. What is the Peculiarity of this case? 4. What are the strategic mistakes did by both Ramu & Gopi? 5. Should both men receive equal punishment? Or Should Gopi be punished more severely for starting the fight or Ramu for provoking it? Why? 6. What is the nature of punishment you will recommend? 7. Will you go for a formal enquiry or settle informally? Why? 8. What are your strategies to prevent aggravation of further tension between RAMU and GOPI? 9. What are the leanings from the case? Date: 3 March 2015 CASE ANALYSIS BY THE FACULTY (D.Mavoothu,Ph.D.) (Strictly for SMS Classrooms Only) Title: ROLE MODELS-TURNED ROGUE MODELS What is the core issue in this case? There is a moral Vs. legal dilemma that whether RAMU and GOPI should equally be punished? Peculiarity of the case? Normally, in any in disciplinary incident, there will be a culprit and a victim. But in this case both RAMU and GOPI were turned out to be culprits. Strategic Mistake by RAMU? * RAMU should have kept himself as a victim by not hitting back GOPI. RAMU will be in a better position if he maintained his...
Words: 1634 - Pages: 7
...GUIDELINES FOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE - CONTENTS Chapter 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Item Discipline and Indiscipline Acts of Misconduct Report of Misconduct Flow-chart of Disciplinary Proceedings Preliminary Enquiry Principles of Natural Justice Charge-sheet Suspension Domestic Enquiry Penalties Appeal and Review Annexures Page No. 96 97 98 99 102 103 104 107 109 117 122 123-153 Policy Manual CHAPTER-1 DISCIPLINE AND INDISCIPLINE 1.1 Discipline means orderly behaviour - It means voluntary and willing compliance of rules and regulations and instructions and also development of right habits of conduct in work with others at the work-place. Why do we want Discipline? (a) Discipline is essential in any organisation for improving the employee morale as well as to increase the productivity which is the ultimate goal of any organisation. Discipline is of utmost importance for harmonious working with a view to achieve Company’s objectives. It is moral responsibility of the employer not to allow the minority of employees who are indisciplined to affect the life of majority. 1.2 (b) (c) 1.3 How does Indiscipline arise? In most of the cases, indiscipline of a worker is the expression of his reaction to his environment. Usually the causes of indiscipline are : (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Lack of awareness of Company’s rules and regulations; False promises made by superiors; Absence of any procedure to handle grievances; No action taken when required; Personal...
Words: 9341 - Pages: 38
...[pic] Unit Learning Guide School of Communication College of Arts Name of Unit – Fashion and Identity Unit Number: 100941 Teaching Period: SPRING 2010 Unit Weighting: 10 credit points Unit Level 200 Unit Co-ordinator: Juliana Swatko Teaching Staff: Juliana Swatko, Jordan Graham First Point of Contact: Name Juliana Swatko Phone 9852 5441 Email : j.swatko@uws.edu.au Student Consultation A time for face-to-face consultations can be arranged by email. Email enquiries will be answered at regular intervals during the week. Provide details of times that are available for student consultation, including face to face, answering email or phone enquiries. It is a condition of enrolment at UWS that students must use their UWS student email account when corresponding with UWS staff by email in relation to their studies. The UWS Policy relating to this requirement is accessible at the following address : http://policies.uws.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00019#maj3 Attendance Requirements Students are expected to attend at least 80% of face-to-face sessions, and should contact the unit coordinator and lecturer by email to explain any non-attendance in advance. Essential Equipment and/or Resources Equipment Students need to have access to a computer where the Internet can be used to logon to E-learning at UWS and the VUWS website for this unit. It would be useful to have Adobe Acrobat Reader. It can be downloaded from...
Words: 4725 - Pages: 19
...grievances; (d) No action taken when required; (e) Personal frustrations and misunderstandings. There could be many other different reasons for indiscipline depending upon individual differences. 1.4 Corrective and Punitive action Since any case of indiscipline is basically a behavioural problem, it is necessary that before taking any punitive action, all efforts should be made to improve the behaviour of the employee by correcting him through education, counselling, persuasion and coutioning. However, if all the efforts to improve the employee fail, the Supervisor/Man-ager should never hesitate to reprimand the employee and, if the misconduct is serious or has been repeated, to report the matter to the superiors for appropriate disciplinary action. GUIDELINES FOR DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE V OLUME -I 96 Policy Manual CHAPTER-2 ACTS OF MISCONDUCT...
Words: 9299 - Pages: 38
...Block 1 1 Introduction to the Professional Ethics Training Responsible Conduct of Research (PET-RCR) The University of Oklahoma Block 1 2 Professional Ethics Training – Responsible Conduct of Research Thank you for signing up for the Professional Ethics Training – Responsible Conduct of Research (PET-RCR) seminar. Certification: All training participants are expected to attend and actively participate on both days of training. A certificate of completion will be issued to trainees who complete the two-day training. Purpose: Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training is part of an effort by the University of Oklahoma to provide graduate students with superior educational opportunities for professional growth. This training has been developed to increase your awareness of ethical issues, to convey common problems in ethical decision-making, and to provide strategies for managing ethical dilemmas that may occur while conducting research. At the end of this training, you will have acquired tools that will help you in conducting research and managing ethical dilemmas. Contents of this Packet: This training packet contains materials that will introduce you to ethical decision-making in research and will be used throughout the training. Please bring your completed packet with all of the enclosed materials to each training session. This packet contains a number of items including: 1) Training Agenda & Packet Instructions 2) Ethical Guidelines for the Conduct of Research...
Words: 7845 - Pages: 32
...Subject: Policy No: Version: Effective Date: Contact: Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy PP-ACD-DB-10.4 V3 25 July 2012 Immediately Chair, Deans’ Committee This document is issued and controlled by the Policy and Document Control Officer. Approval for changes may only be given by the President or in his/her absence, an authorised member of Senior Administration. This is a controlled electronic document subject to update and must not be copied. 1.0 Purpose of Policy The purpose of this policy is to set out the University’s commitment to Academic Integrity, with particular reference to: the importance of acknowledgement practice; responding to plagiarism and other forms of academic misconduct in a consistent and equitable manner; and the roles and responsibilities of staff and students in upholding the values of Academic Integrity. 2.0 Definitions Word Academic Integrity Definition (with examples if required) Demonstrating the values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect and responsibility in all academic endeavours, including preparing and presenting work for assessment as part of coursework or research. The practice of acknowledging the ideas, designs, words or works of other people in one’s own work. An academic task which a student is required to complete to provide a basis for an official record of achievement or certification of competence in a subject, as stipulated in the Subject Outline. Using another person’s ideas, designs, words or works...
Words: 2274 - Pages: 10
...Part 1 Explore Freedom of Exploration and Ethical Responsibility Exploring the website http://www.chem.vt.edu/chem-ed/ethics/ I read several articles including Ethics in Science which was adapted from lectures given by Professor Henry Bauer in the Chemistry Department at Virginia Tech. This essay discusses scientific misconduct and a more dependable model than the scientific method. It opens with many examples of misconduct from major universities to Nobel Prize winners. It is eye-opening to see how prevalent scientific misconduct has become and makes one ponder just what are the pros and cons of such misconduct. Figure 1 | Bauer states that the key to understanding the reliability or lack thereof science is the realization that science is done by human beings. He believes that how these scientists interact with one another is crucial. He believes that scientific knowledge is accumulated through a “knowledge filter” as in figure 1. The top where it is most broad contains any all human traits. Rather competent or not, lazy or hard-working, careful or sloppy, everything is thrown in the original mix. Most of the nonsense gets filtered out through undergraduate and graduate studies in science.The next filter we must ask “What will others think?” There is always someone reviewing one’s work who will determine worthiness for publication, grants, graduation, promotions or employment. As the filtering process continues, most of the dishonesty is removed before reaching primary literature...
Words: 666 - Pages: 3
...each assessment task that you submit for marking. 1. ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS STUDENT NAME: | STUDENT ID NUMBER | COURSE | | UNIT OF COMPETENCY: | Assessment no: | TITLE OF ASSESSMENT: (e.g. Report) | DATE DUE: DATE SUBMITTED: | 2. COMPULSORY STUDENT DECLARATION Plagiarism means using another person’s intellectual output and presenting it (without appropriate acknowledgement of the author or source) as one’s own, constitutes academic misconduct. Where there are reasonable grounds for believing that this occurred, disciplinary procedures as outlined in the policies and procedures will be implemented. PLEASE SIGN BELOW (TYPE YOUR NAME) TO INDICATE THAT YOU HAVE SATISFIED THESE REQUIREMENTS- * I have read the policy on Plagiarism Policy and Procedure and the relevant referencing guides (or have had this explained to me by my Assessor) and understand the consequences of committing academic misconduct as outlined in the policy. * This assignment is my own work. * I have not participated in collusion, nor have I previously submitted this or a version of it for assessment in any other Unit of Study at the City Institute or any other institution without having obtained the approval of the trainer. * I have taken proper and reasonable care to prevent this work from being copied by another student. * I give this person permission to act according to City Institute’s policies and practice...
Words: 378 - Pages: 2
...Vol 435|9 June 2005 COMMENTARY Scientists behaving badly To protect the integrity of science, we must look beyond falsification, fabrication and plagiarism, to a wider range of questionable research practices, argue Brian C. Martinson, Melissa S. Anderson and Raymond de Vries. erious misbehaviour in research is important for many reasons, not least because it damages the reputation of, and Top ten behaviours All Mid-career Early-career undermines public support for, science. Historically, professionals and the public have 1. Falsifying or ‘cooking’ research data 0.3 0.2 0.5 focused on headline-grabbing cases of 2. Ignoring major aspects of human-subject requirements 0.3 0.3 0.4 scientific misconduct, but we believe that 3. Not properly disclosing involvement in firms whose products are 0.3 0.4 0.3 based on one‘s own research researchers can no longer afford to ignore a 4. Relationships with students, research subjects or clients that may be 1.4 1.3 1.4 wider range of questionable behaviour that interpreted as questionable threatens the integrity of science. 5. Using another’s ideas without obtaining permission or giving due 1.4 1.7 1.0 We surveyed several thousand early- and credit 6. Unauthorized use of confidential information in connection with one’s 1.7 2.4 0.8 *** mid-career scientists, who are based in the own research United States and funded by the National 7. Failing to present data that contradict one’s own previous...
Words: 1700 - Pages: 7
...Unethical Business Research Conduct The foundation of any research is trust. Professionals, organizations, and the public must be able to trust that research is being reported honestly, accurately, and free from bias. Questionable research misconduct can include poor data management, the failure to share data, questionable data selection methods, inadequate supervision of those conducting the research, and fiscal mismanagement ("Research Misconduct", 2012). Recently a large case of research fraud was brought against Dr. Kipak K. Das by the University of Connecticut. The allegations of research fraud involve 26 articles published in 11 different journals claiming the health benefits of drinking red wine. According to the article, “University Suspects Fraud by a Researcher Who Studied Red Wine”, the university received anonymous allegations in January 2009 about irregularities in Dr. Das’ research. An investigation into Das’ research articles revealed 145 instances of fabrication and falsification of data (Wade, 2012). Allegations received by the university reference lab members manipulating figures, often at the request of Dr. Das, and digitally manipulating the experiments (western-blot images) done in the studies. The fabrication and falsification of the research data will have a negative impact on Dr. Das’ reputation as a respectable doctor, could tarnish the name of the University of Connecticut, could harm those that rely upon this research data, and could also discredit...
Words: 800 - Pages: 4
...In 2012, Annie Dookhan, was a lab technician at the crime lab. Dookhan was arrested in Boston with charges of obstruction of justice and Perjury. It is said that Dookhan was responsible for testing substances brought in by police that appeared to be an illegal substance. It was noted that her work performance was above the norm by over 50% of her other coworkers. Dookhan was called Superwoman due to her testing over 500 samples in a month while the norm is 150 a month. This raised concern which started an internal investigation. During their investigation, it was determined that Dookhan had tested approximately 60,000 drug evidence samples during her employment in the lab. So far, over 1,400 samples were found to be tainted. After her arrest,...
Words: 409 - Pages: 2
...Business Research Ethics Bobbie Stolze RES/351 October 15th, 2012 James Malachowski Business Research Ethics Today there are many cases of unethical business research that usually result in entire firms as well as individuals that are convicted and fined in the court of law. Unethical business research comes in many forms some of these forms are inappropriate questionnaires, research fraud, failure to maintain participant’s privacy, and even skewing research results. The following information is regarding scientific research fraud involving William McBride. McBride was an obstetrician who was found guilty of 24 counts of scientific fraud that ended up costing between five and seven million dollars after all was said and done. In 1980 McBride had announced that thalidomide was dangerous to women who are pregnant. He claimed that the drug would cause deformities of the limbs in mother’s unborn children. Several years later McBride had claimed that he completed research on another drug called Debendox, which is a drug used for treating morning sickness for pregnant women. McBride published this research and claimed that he has tested the drug on eight rabbits, and three of the rabbits ended up developing deformities because of the drug Debendox. Shortly following McBride’s research, the manufacturer of Debendox was forced to take the drug off the market even though there were only a few supporters of his research claim. It was later discovered by Phil Vardy was a scientist...
Words: 820 - Pages: 4
...The Dookhan case is better explained as a “bad apple” because Dookhan showed the characteristics of a bad apple that Thompson, in his article, “Beyond Bad Apples”, explains as careless, incompetent, and malicious. Dookhan began to show her carelessness for the cases she forged signatures on the drug testing paperwork. This shows that Dookhan did not care to allow her superiors to peer review her findings and that she would try to find the easy way out of testing the drug samples. By forging the signatures, she would be able to continue on to the next cases rather than wait for someone to review her results since it would hold her back from moving on with her work. It also shows that she did not care enough to want to find the true results of...
Words: 377 - Pages: 2
...Today with the rapid development of scientific production, research misconduct has turned into a worldwide problem. Regardless of the slack of agreement about the definition of research misconduct, as a rule, it is characterized as creation, misrepresentation, or written falsification in every parts of proposing, conducting, reviewing, or reporting the research results ( Djalalinia, Owlia, Afzali, Ghanei, & Peykari, 2016). Ethical integrity in the conduct of healthcare research is essential for keeping up the general population trust and support of such activities. Without research, healthcare can't progress in a logical manner. Be that as it may, by definition, research that includes human subjects requires that a few parts of their care...
Words: 1131 - Pages: 5
...|Administration Officer | |Vacancy Reference: |QLD/202653/16 |Closing Date: |Friday, 29 January 2016 | |Designation: |Administration Officer |Classification: |AO3 | |Section: |Evidence Preparation - Supervisor, Telecommunications |Salary: |$55,812 - $62,235 per annum | | |Interception Unit (TIU) | | | |Branch: |Covert Specialist Operations Group |Contact Officer: |Detective Senior Sergeant Ash | | | | |Durre | | | | |(07) 3364 4487 | |Command: |Intelligence, Counter-Terrorism & Major Events Command | | | |Location: |Brisbane |Date of Review: |December 2015 | ...
Words: 1409 - Pages: 6
