Premium Essay

Refutation

In:

Submitted By robinemilyallen
Words 845
Pages 4
Hunting For an Answer

In his article, “Hunting- It’s Bad For Animals, It’s Bad For America,” Kelly Overton argues that hunting is a useless act, hunting is based on “our country’s racist past”, and hunting glorifies gun violence. As an individual who has been an active hunter since age ten and a member of the Texas Trophy Hunters Association, I will invalidate each of these claims. Overton failed to research the positive results caused by the practice of hunting before he deemed hunting a useless act. Overton states that hunting deer is “neither useful nor necessary.” Overton also says that “The animals are not invading our territory,” and on that point, he is correct. The growing human population is invading the animal’s territory. As many rural areas become suburban neighborhoods, the number of deer’s natural predators are declining so rapidly that the population of deer is growing out of control. As humans continue to inhabit rural areas in order to build houses, people are choosing to hunt deer in order to account for the lack of natural predators, which as a result of human expansion, are forced to relocate to a less populated area. If these deer populations were not managed properly they would grow exponentially in individual numbers, and eventually die a slow, painful death due to starvation. Thankfully, hunting is an undeniably effective method for keeping deer population under control in ever expanding suburban neighborhoods.
Overton later argues that hunting is a tradition based on racism but in reality, the practice of hunting has been around for 1.5 million years for the singular purpose of feeding communities. Overton argues that “hunting is a stubborn holdover from our country’s racist past,” but in fact, evidence of hunting has been discovered in northern Tanzania, where scientist believe all human life originated from. ABC News recently

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Refutation Assignment

...Dr. Wilson English 111 (TuTr) Fall 2010 Refutation Assignment Assignment: In an essay of 2-3 pp., refute the editorial or essay of your choice. Method: If you choose a newspaper editorial, you can only use one of the following papers: The Boston Globe, The Chicago Tribune, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, or The Washington Post. You may also use news and current affairs periodicals, such as the National Review, The Nation, The New Republic, Mother Jones, Dissent, Commentary, The Economist, etc. If you are looking in newspapers, turn directly to the Editorials/Op-Ed section. Ignore letters to the editor. You may use the paper’s editorials, or any of their syndicated columnists. These pieces express opinion directly. You may disagree only in part, but you must be clear about what you disagree with and why. As always, you must give reasons, facts, examples, etc., to substantiate your argument. You must then try to persuade the reader (moi), that the editorialist is wrong and you are right. Avoid reportage and news stories. Biased though they may be, they do not openly express opinion. The exception would be advocacy journalism. You need not limit yourself to editorials. You may use essays you have come across in your research projects that you do not plan to use as one of your major arguments. Please attach a copy of the editorial or essay you are refuting to your...

Words: 253 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Confirmation/Refutation

...Two children with the same name, both born in the same city and raised by single mothers, have completely different lives just by the outcomes of the choices they make. In The Other Wes Moore, written by Wes Moore himself in 2010, the author Wes ends up as a decorated combat veteran and Rhodes Scholar, while the other Wes serves a life sentence in prison for murder. While Baltimore is the similar hometown for both Wes Moores, the outcomes each experienced in the end exemplify the importance of choice making. The institutions and interpersonal relationships one encounters, for better or for worse, have a very influential role in the choices they make. The author Wes Moore reluctantly goes to Valley Forge after being forced by his mother, Joy. While Wes ultimately did not make this choice himself, the Military Academy sets the beginning guidelines for a prestigious and disciplined life ahead. However, the choice to work hard and eventually become the most respected student at Valley Forge was an outcome of his own choice to succeed. When Wes went to the pizza parlor with Dalio and experienced the drunken kids that threw a bottle at Wes’s face, Wes’s decision to not react and fight back was a test of his maturity. Instead of reacting in a violent way, he looked out for his friend’s safety and led him back via another safer route. In contrast, the other Wes Moore makes the continuous decision to be a part of the drug game. After getting caught up in the game’s mishaps several...

Words: 353 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Refutation Of Publicola Summary

...The Refutation of Publicola for the People of New York A few nights ago I was reading through the New-York Daily Gazette and I came across a concerning patch of questions raised by Publicola. The man raised many questions about the necessity of a National Bank and if it would be worth all the trouble. The questions Publicola raised were very important and understandable, so I am writing this article to set my fellow readers of the New-York Daily Gazette on the track to properly understanding the concept of our Nation’s bank. The first question raised was if a National Bank can be established with safety to the interests of the people of the United States, to which the answer must clearly be yes. The whole ideal of the National Bank is to do good for the people of our nation. Many have claimed that the bank is simply a way to resolve the debts of the north and put the pressure of repayment more heavily on the south, which is preposterous. One thing I believe the bank will do is bring the nation together and help eliminate the...

Words: 820 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Counter Argument

...Counter Argument & Refutation * What’s a Counter Argument? It is when you recognize the other side of the debate in order to strengthen your own argument. In other words, it’s the thesis making the OPPOSITE (aka: counter) point. * What’s a Refutation? Refute means to prove wrong. Refutations saying why the counter argument is wrong (or not as right as your thesis). Sample Counter Argument and Refutation ------------------------------------------------- Argument: Human Trafficking is a major problem in the world today. We can all help to end this problem by avoiding the purchase of products made by slaves. For example, I will challenge my audience to exclusively purchase fair-trade chocolate and boycott all chocolate producers that cannot guarantee their products are slave-free. ------------------------------------------------- Counter-argument: One person is not enough to make a difference. Changing my personal purchasing habits will not be enough to affect the profits of major companies. Thus, there is no reason for me to pay more for my chocolate since it won’t make a difference. ------------------------------------------------- Refutation: While it is true that one individual alone will only have a minor impact on the profits of major chocolate companies, we should never underestimate the power of an individual. Your purchases make only a small difference, but they still make a difference. Furthermore, we cannot forget the impact our actions...

Words: 486 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Summary Of Vliet's Argument

...My essay provides a clear and thorough refutation of Vliet’s arguments that follow the specific “defend the status quo” refutation strategy. Throughout my argument I used specific strategies that helped defend the current policy. I believe that my essay clearly refutes Vliet’s argument by providing counter examples from reliable sources to help counter her claims. Another strategy that I used in my essay was the identification of logical fallacies that Vliet stated in her argument. While searching for sources I searched for credible sources that provided reliable facts and evidence. I tried to locate sources that were void of any biases. Also, I did a thorough job explaining why the current policy needs to stay as is and not be changed, due...

Words: 351 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Examples Of Topos In Negotiation

...Whereas reputation is a property attributed to the worker, it is his works that constitute the proper object of refutation. Whereas the former denotes the appreciation of a person by others, the latter denotes the appreciation of a thesis or theory by reference to the world or to the facts. Whereas the one refers to the public image of someone, which may be produced by sheer advertising, the other is concerned with verifying whether such an image cones ponds to the truth. Reputation feeds on subjective impressions and gossip, whereas for refutation only the facts and solid arguments...

Words: 906 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Argumentative Researc

...h essay Argumentative Research Essay Introduction Description When you write an argumentative essay, you investigate a controversial issue (considering both sides), determine which side you favour, and argue using evidence and examples both to support your claims and to refute counter-arguments. A controversial (or contentious) issue is one that is debatable and has a logical counter-argument. An argumentative research essay formalizes the way you gather your supporting evidence. Purpose When you write an argumentative essay, you want to make your readers agree with your stance on an issue (i.e., to persuade them). You may also wish to make your readers act on the issue, in which case you will have to specify what they should do. Audience To reinforce for your readers your credibility (ethos), you will * employ a formal tone * include much evidence from outside sources to support your arguments * analyse these arguments in depth You should consider whether or not your audience is familiar with the issue. If not, you will have to provide more background information than you would for a knowing audience. You should gauge your readers’ stance on the issue. Are they * supportive? (i.e., do they agree with your stance?) * hostile? (i.e., do they disagree with your stance?) * wavering? (i.e., have they yet to take a stance on the issue?) Your readers’ stance will influence the amount and kinds of evidence you will need to support your arguments. Topic ...

Words: 1002 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Augustine and Skepticism

...least some things are known.” St. Augustine fell into the second type and developed three refutations to total skepticism. The first of these refutations is what is called the principle of non-contradiction which basically means that two different statements. While this is a strong argument one has to ask the question can anything be proven to be absolute truth. Some things can be proven with science but as science continues to advance some of those proofs are actually disproved. The next refutation is that by being skeptical proves at least one instance that a person cannot be skeptical about. That is the facts that “they are” or else they would not be able to be skeptical. This theory relies heavily on the previous theory because a person cannot be skeptical about who they are if they accept the fact that they are able to be skeptical. So they have to acknowledge at least one proof. The final refutation is that of “sense perception ant that it itself lends to a basic kind of knowledge.” In other words what we see, feel, touch, and smell cannot be disputed by skepticism, the thing with this is that all the senses needs to be working correctly but also together. A good example of this is people that are color blind and even though they see a certain color they can be skeptical about the fact that the color that they are seeing is accurate. It is these refutations...

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Plan

...information can be categorised into two different sides of an argument. Make notes on these arguments. One side of the argument The other side of the argument Task 4: Decide on your stance From reading and categorising information about your essay topic, you should now be able to decide on your stance. You should state your stance in the introduction and then use it as your argument throughout the essay. Stance = Task 5: Arguments/Counter-arguments/Refutations Now you have your stance, you can organise your information into supporting arguments and counter-arguments. To make your essay more persuasive, and therefore stronger, you will also need to include refutations (information that makes the counter-arguments weak). In the spaces below, write down one supporting argument for your stance and one counter argument. Then think of a refutation that will weaken the counter-argument. Remember to include the sources you have used. Supporting argument: Counter-argument: Refutation: Task 6: Include support – Quoting, summarizing and paraphrasing Think about what you learnt in SS1 & SS2....

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Apa Farrell Case Study Answers

...1. I think Farrell did an average job supporting his thesis, and his whole writing is somewhat convincible. He gave many reasons on why his claim is correct, but it’s felt short. Farrell should include strong evidence of how overpopulation will have negative on the planet. The fact that he didn’t state how the growth of population will drain the Earth’s resources is a bad strategy. Farrell should exclude some information about the oil companies’ profit and their rejection of the idea of overpopulation. This part of the article doesn’t bring any relevance information to help make a case for his argument. 2. Farrell provided a lot of direct and indirect evidences, but it seems to be hollow in convincing the readers to agree with him. Yes, there...

Words: 352 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Toulmin's Argumentative Process

...Toulmin (1958, as cited in Connor, 1987) views the production of argumentative text as the cognitive-process of problem-solving. The goal of the writer is to convince and change the reader’s initial position to the final position that equals the position of the writer. The process of written argumentation typically consists of the following structural units: situation, problem, solution and evaluation. The situation introduces background material; the problem is a statement of undesirable condition of things, while the solution is a statement of the desirable condition and is often followed by an evaluation (Connor, According to Hatch (1992), a classical description of the structure of argumentative text consists...

Words: 417 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Universal Health Coverage Essay

...they become detrimental to a patient’s health. If illnesses are found soon enough they can be treated or prevented, saving the patients money, time and their lives. 3. Topic Sentence for Objection/Refutation Section: The tax increase, the lack of the government’s right to regulate states, and healthcare wait time objections for universal health coverage can be refuted. A. Support Example 1: 1. Objection: Universal health coverage will cause an increase of taxes for all citizens. 2. Refutation Although universal health coverage would cause a rise in taxes paid by citizens, it would also decrease or even eliminate the costly expense of insurance premiums, deductibles, and co-pays. B. Support Example 2: 1. Objection: The government lacks the right to regulate the states. Healthcare is not an enumerated power of the federal government. 2. Refutation When the tenth amendment was written in the 18th century, healthcare was not what it is today. Back in the 18th century healthcare was a simple as finding the town doctor and getting treated. Healthcare today is far more complex with a vast amount of medications and treatments that it needs to be regulated. C. Support Example 3*: 1. Objection: Universal health coverage will increase wait times at healthcare facilities. 2. Refutation Patients are still seen within a reasonable amount of time. Compared to countries that have universal healthcare, the United States currently have longer wait times to be seen by a healthcare provider...

Words: 577 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Radical Feminist

...It is fashionable in some feminist circles to argue that the struggle for freedom from male oppression is, in part, a struggle for freedom from rationality and intellectuality. Julia Kristeva, for example, attacks women writers who value "science, philosophy, [and] professorships," calling them valorizers of "phallic dominance" (1974, in Marks and de Courtivron, 1980,166). For Kristeva, a truly revolutionary woman who wishes to succeed in exploding existing social codes must flee everything phallic, and this means that she must reject everything that is "finite, definite, structured, loaded with meaning." In the same vein, Helene Cixous, in her influential essay, "The Laugh of the Medussa" (Cixous, 1976, in Marks and de Courtivron, 1980,245-264), challenges women to forge for themselves, through writing, the "antilogos weapon." This weapon, supposedly the product of writing that "inscribes femininity," will be used to liberate women from the "phallocentric tradition," that is, the tradition of "male writing," which is the "effect" and "support" of the "history of reason." Views such as these are very much alive today. That there is at present tremendous interest in Cixous' writings, for example, is made evident by the listing of no fewer than 160 citations of them in the Arts and Humanities Citation Index for the years 1990-2. To what extent do these views deserve our support? It cannot be denied that some women are still oppressed today, treated unjustly and ...

Words: 2148 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Augustine and Skepticism

...of teaching rhetoric. His mother a Christian woman had encouraged her son to become baptized which led to Augustine’s service as a Bishop in Northern Africa. Augustine’s beliefs on Total Skepticism is refuted in three different ways and should be considered when analyzing his theories. The first refutation that Augustine refuted was the principle of noncontradiction. This principle basically stated that a both a contradiction as well as a proposition cannot be true; it must be only one or the other. I believe that the contradiction of the stick being straight and not straight shows how a direct contradiction can easily take place. Example, a person says “I’m on a strict diet of not eating meat”, yet the person stating this claim while inside of a steak house eating a steak. The second refutation is Augustine’s holding the act of doubting. The act of doubting shows a person’s existence as something which is very certain: “from the fact I am doubting, it follows automatically that I am (Descartes). When you begin to question whether or not what you are seeing is truly in fact something that you see, you are allowing the act of doubt to enter your mind. The third refutation in which St. Augustine refuted was sense perception. According to Augustine, Sense perception gives away a rudimentary sort of knowledge. He went on to explain how deception when it...

Words: 399 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

25 Entrepreneurship Lesson Learned

...Analysis of Argument Jeff Jacoby’s “Bring Back Flogging” Purpose, Method, and Persona • Purpose: – What is the author’s purpose? • His thesis: We should once again use flogging. – What is your purpose (for this exam)? • Dispute his argument – Jacoby’s argument is flawed. • Methods: – What are the author’s methods? • His arguments: examples, historical justifications, deductive reasoning, statistics, and so on. – What are your methods (for this exam)? • The weakness in his arguments: Find contradictions, inconsistencies, logical fallacies, false assumptions, and so on. – Statistics are misleading Purpose, Method, and Persona • Persona: – What is the author’s persona? • Is he comical, serious, academic, angry? – What is your persona (for this exam) • Formal and doubtful – Sarcasm – “Now, we offer a more enlightened, more humane way of disciplining wrongdoers: We should lock them up in cages” – is part of his persona here. Doubt the efficacy of this approach. He wants to make prisons sound less humane, but should humanity be a part of this argument? Has he left himself wide open for attack? Exam • You MUST bring a large blue book and a pen or pencil • You MAY bring – Your textbook – Your syllabus – An outline that doesn’t contain any complete sentences (except quoted material from the text) – A dictionary / thesaurus • You MAY NOT bring – A computer – A phone – A completed essay Sample Exam Question 1) Jeff Jacoby, an established...

Words: 858 - Pages: 4