...Many of today’s youth are fully immersed in an extremely competitive sporting environment where they push growing bodies almost daily to their max. A committee on sports medicine and fitness who knows firsthand these ill effects caused by such a schedule at The American Academy of Pediatric’s created an article titled, “Intense Training and Sports Specialization in Young Athletes.” It discusses many topics pertaining to children participating in sports training environments, a few of which include muscle, sexual, and social development as well as cardiac benefits. A coinciding factor across all these topics in the article point to the fact they agree if children play in sports, the children will reap great benefits, but only if they do so without specializing themselves to one particular sport until they reach a mature enough point in their life. This flow of concrete knowledge from respected experts in the medical field and the way they relay the information to the reader effectively proves the article’s key points and is a great use of Pathos, Ethos, and Logos. Without digging very deep into the article, one can find a great example of Pathos by the committee in this article. They intended to drive certain emotions to influence or persuade the reader’s thoughts and succeeded very well. This example is prevalent when the committee informs us, “Damage to the distal radial epiphysis with subsequent alterations in radial-ulnar growth has been described in highly competitive...
Words: 763 - Pages: 4
... Dr. Nancy Furlong A current question that has been frequently asked is whether eyewitness reports provided by children during a court case are reliable. Children's memory capacity, their susceptibility to suggestion, and the delay between a crime and providing an eyewitness statement are some factors that can influence the reliability of these reports. Eyewitness reports provided by children can be reliable if given within a reasonable time frame, and that the presented questions are not suggestive. Also, that the eyewitness reports are provided by older children (9 to 12 years old), their reports tend to be more reliable than those of younger children (5 to 8 years old). Taking these factors into account in future court cases with children as eyewitnesses will ensure the best possible reliability in children's statements. The number of children as eyewitnesses is ever-growing and therefore child eyewitnesses are more involved in the field of legal testimony (Flin, Boon, Knox, & Bull, 1992). Due to this greater involvement, it is frequently questioned whether children are able to serve as credible eyewitnesses during a court case, especially in cases where the sole eyewitnesses to an offense are children (Flin et al., 1992). There can be several factors that might influence the reliability of children's eyewitness reports. Firstly, children of all ages have the capability to give accurate reports...
Words: 2175 - Pages: 9
...The Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony SCI 110 Introduction to Physical Science Professor Pages 6 Abstract: Eyewitness testimony and its credibility has always been a staple of controversy in court cases. Let's take a minute to think back the last time you were in a local retail store. Now ask yourself, are you able to describe the person who was ahead of you in the line? How many details can you really remember about that person? Now how accurate do you think that your description was? Today we are going to investigate just how accurate people's observations are in everyday life. Objective: The purpose of this project today is to determine whether eyewitness account credible and reliable enough to be used as evidence in criminal investigations. We are going to do this by determining witness recollection, gender of suspect, distance away from suspect and date and time affect the accuracy of witness accounts. . Introduction: Eyewitness accounts are always under scrutiny whether in the courtroom, by police and even scientists. In most eyewitness identification the processes typically involve selecting an alleged perpetrator from a police lineup or sketches. After selecting a suspect a formal statement is using made confirming the identification of the subject. Usually the times in which you are asked to give a statement range anywhere from a day to a few days later. Within this time frame ,ask yourself how accurately are you able to recollect...
Words: 1173 - Pages: 5
...According to Flow Psychology, (2016), it states, that eyewitness testimonies can be used to “shed light into the sequence of the events that constitute the crime.” Most times eyewitness testimonies are the only source of information about the event. To clarify, if there is very little information known about a certain case, an eyewitness testimony can provide some information about what happened. An eyewitness testimony can also clarify how the crime was committed, where it happened and who was involved. Nevertheless, there is evidence provided by Kersten, Neufeld, Risinger, Sherrer, and Siegel that this is not always true because eyewitness could produce false memories, have memory loss, or lie to their advantage. Flow Psychology is a reliable source because they are an organization that provides different perspectives on topics dealing with psychology; they also provide articles and videos dealing with psychological...
Words: 719 - Pages: 3
...In the article, Jury hears eyewitness testimony in Lillooet murder trial it mentions slightly about the Lillooet murder trial that is taking place in Kamloops Supreme Court. the article just briefly mentioned that it was a case where a Lillooet man named Jeffery Harris is being charged with second degree murder of a 64-year-old named Gary Mandseth. The main focus of this specific article is that the jury was finally able to hear the eyewitnesses give their testimonies about what happened the day of the murder. As we learned in class eyewitness testimonies are considered to be the most compelling evidence in the court. In this particular case two eye witnesses gave their testimonies on April 3rd of this year, one was Jennifer Saelens who was living in the same house as the victim back in 2015, and the second eyewitness was Leonard Isaac who was one of the officers that was tasked with responding to a foot pursuit of Mr. Harris. Jennifer’s account of what happened was detailed and accounted what was happening at the time of the crime, while Officer Isaac’s account...
Words: 598 - Pages: 3
...Eyewitness testimony is a legal term, referring to a person’s interpretation of an event they have seen. Judges have a tendency to pay close attention to eyewitness testimony and find it a trustworthy source of information. Nevertheless, investigation into this area has found that eyewitness testimony can be affected by numerous psychological factor (Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C., 1974). Eyewitness testimony is not as reliable as it may seem at the first glance. It is commonly known that a person would react differently in a stressful situation to how he would react normally. Witnessing a crime is always stressful. The more serious the crime is, the more anxiety a person will feel. However, feeling a little stressed helps improving performance...
Words: 624 - Pages: 3
...death off of flawed testimonies by an eyewitness. In this I will attempt to show you my discussions of several statistics, convictions, exonerations, and key cases that will test the views of anyone when eyewitness testimonies are concerned. Within the past 30 years crimes were committed, and the people who witness these crimes made the cases have different outcomes. It used to be when a crime was committed, and someone came forward saying, “They have witnessed a crime”. History shows us when it comes to a traumatic experience dealing with crimes; the victims are different and as such react in many different ways. Most individuals panic, some are very calm, while others have no reaction whatsoever. The question has been raised about how reliable an eyewitness testimony truly is. Those who follow crime and courts trials know the stories are familiar and unnerving. Here is one case Cornelius Dupree spent 30 years Texas prison due to a 1979 rape and robbery he did not commit, because of one eyewitness. Cornelius was freed in 2011 through new DNA evidence. Derrick Williams imprison in Florida was freed through DNA evidence after spending 18 years in prison for a rape based on one eyewitness misidentification. Johnny Pinchback, a Texas inmate convicted of a 1984 rape based on one eyewitness misidentification he was freed...
Words: 1278 - Pages: 6
...This paper examines the causes of wrongful convictions and focuses on the DNA exoneration policy. Causes of Wrongful Convictions The first clinic to work on non-DNA exonerations was the Michigan Innocence Clinic. It revealed particular circumstances that people have always deemed as the wrongful conviction. The scenarios reveal that the criminal justice needs amendments and change how the Michigan Innocence clinic should deal with the system’s trends. The following are among the causes of wrongful convictions: Eyewitness Misidentification: sometimes the eyewitnesses could misidentify a person and cause wrongful conviction on the person. According to Loftus & Greene (1980), the human is not a recorder and as such, it is a reliable source of information. It is because eyewitnesses cannot remember everything exactly the way it happened. Similarly, Junk science is another cause of wrongful convictions. There has been numerous forensic methods for testing but have brought no or little scientific justification and with...
Words: 946 - Pages: 4
...such as those of Henry Morgenthau, the United States Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire during the genocide are considered to be part of the most prominent collection of official primary documents. Upon return to the United States, he published his book Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story containing accounts of his years in Turkey during 1918. Ambassador Morgenthau offers reliable eyewitness descriptions while asserting that “a campaign of race extermination was in the progress” . This statement corresponds directly to the definition of the term “genocide”, a label the Turks deeply refuse to use. The chapter about the Armenians, “Murder of a Nation”, describes the deportations and atrocities as “cold-blooded, calculating state policy” and mentions Morgenthau’s assertion that “the whole history of the human race contains no such horrible episode as this” . The purpose of the Ambassador’s book was to share detailed descriptions of the horrors that Turkey caused in the years leading up to and the year of the genocide. He shares valuable conversations held between him and Turkish officials in addition to memories of eyewitnesses along with his own. These verbatim conversations and meticulously described scenes of deportation and genocide offer insight into the unfortunate events of 1915. The assessments of these descriptions and conversations have created different opinions amongst revisionist historians regarding the question if this killing can be assigned with the term ‘genocide’. However...
Words: 1136 - Pages: 5
...Jessica Owens Life & Teachings January 27, 2013 Evidence for Jesus Unexplainable things and/or occurrences are usually dismissed because it is easier to deny them than to believe in the idea of a miraculous event. Most deny them out of fear and others deny them because they don’t understand, but whatever their reasons have been none have ever proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that Jesus Christ did not exist. Our history books are filled with facts that most people in this life time cannot confirm as fact or deny, but we believe in them and teach our children about them without hesitation. Rene Theophile Hyacinthe Laënnec invented the stethoscope in 1816, Edwin Beard Budding invented the lawn mower in 1830, Jacob Perkins invented the refrigerator in 1834, and a host of other inventions have occurred since the beginning of time. Who can actually prove that the data provided in relation to these inventions was accurately recorded? So why is it so hard to believe that Jesus Christ, the son of God existed? One explanation could be that people fear what they don’t understand? The acts performed by Jesus Christ were “divine” this concept is something that non-believers do not understand. Although Christianity is the only religion that is historically based, there are several forms of evidence that prove Jesus was indeed a real historical person (Hewer). Based on the Eyewitness Evidence, the documentary Evidence, the Corroborating Evidence, and the Circumstantial Evidence...
Words: 1515 - Pages: 7
...consideration when an eyewitness is identifying the culprit is witness confidence. Furthermore, the way lineups are conducted can influence who the eyewitness identifies. Improvements to the system variables will inevitably improve eyewitness accuracy because leading and suggestive comments and witness confidence can potentially hinder the accuracy of the eyewitness; the lineup method chosen can also impact eyewitness accuracy. Even with improvements to the system variables false identification can and most likely will still occur, this is why eyewitness identification should be just a piece of the puzzle wherever possible and not the only means to solve a crime. Investigators must work diligently to reduce bias when working with eyewitnesses as people of all ages, races, and backgrounds are susceptible to suggestion. Starting with the interview questions and comments made by the detectives; their words must be chosen carefully while the eyewitness is being interviewed and while he or she is attempting to make an identification. Even what the investigator says after the identification can factor into witness confidence. In the case of Ronald Cotton, an off-handed comment suggesting that Cotton was who the detective thought the culprit was after she made the identification through a photo lineup influenced Jennifer Thompson’s confidence that she had identified the correct suspect (Costanzo & Krauss, 2015, p. 133). Due in part to that comment, Thompson also identified...
Words: 1565 - Pages: 7
...Eyewitnesses and the Weapon Focus Effect in children Adults and the Elderly Maria Urtado Florida International University ABSTRACT The “weapon focus effect” (WFE), states that a witness of a crime remembers fewer details about the perpetrator’s appearance when the perpetrator has a gun. To date, there are no studies of older adults and the WFE. The present study measures the WFE in older adults (60-70) compared to young adults (20-40) and children (8-12). The study consisted of 180 participants, randomly selected to watch one of three videos. The three videos were the same, with the exception of an object being manipulated. Conclusions were based on how much detail participants were able to recall about the target. Older adults remembered fewer details about the target’s appearance than children and young adults. The results suggest that older adults would take longer focusing on an object that is out of context, therefore, not focusing on the perpetrator, resulting in fewer details remembered. Eyewitness and the Weapon Focus Effect in children compared to the elderly Many people have been convicted of crimes that they did not commit. Eyewitness testimony is one of the major causes for these wrong convictions. At least 75% of wrongful convictions are the result of inaccurate eyewitness identification (Innocent Project, 2009). Before the public became aware of the large amount of wrongful convictions, psychology researchers...
Words: 5169 - Pages: 21
...in turn hurts the overall credibility of testimonies like these in court. Based on these articles, the credibility of eyewitness testimonies should be taken with a “grain of salt.” As some witnesses may have bias against a defendant and that can lead to the misleading of information. And the lawyer’s ability to ask leading questions can change the memory of the eyewitness. During trials, both jurors and judges should be very aware of lawyer’s asking potentially leading questions, and should understand that the questions being asked may change the response in favor of the opposition side of the court. So, yes eyewitness testimonies can be reliable and crucial to the conviction of a legitimate guilty defendant. But it important to keep in mind that an entire case should never be built entirely off an eyewitness testimony because eyewitnesses are only human, and can be manipulated to give answers that can hurt the defendant who may have been completely innocent. An example of the effectiveness of leading questions is shown in the second summarized article, which states: “Over 75% of children altered at least one aspect of their evidence and several completely retracted their allegations.” (Valentine, T., & Maras, K., 2011). As previously stated, children are much more susceptible to these questions and this drastically hurts the credibility of eyewitness testimonies. So again, take these testimonies in court with a “grain of salt” and focus more on hard evidence rather than the...
Words: 533 - Pages: 3
...However, what eyewitness expert witness cannot do (1) eyewitness expert witnesses rarely testify for the prosecution, (2) all expert witness cannot “speak to the ultimate issue” and (3) eyewitness expert witnesses do not test or interview eyewitnesses to determine whether they are reliable witness. Although in addition to the expert witnesses the author indicates several of factors which examines expert of witness such as eyewitness expert pre-trial consultation, eyewitness expert trial testimony, the scientific foundation for expert testimony on eyewitness memory and identification. In conclusion, eyewitness testimony is the sole source of evidence used to convict innocent people who were later cleared based on forensic DNA and having a high rate of eyewitness testimony misidentifications. Although in some innovations that might be improve the efficiency of eyewitness expert, it would be helpful to eyewitness experts to testify at the beginning of a trial rather than towards the end of the trial during...
Words: 508 - Pages: 3
...The reliability and authenticity of the Bible The Bible claims to be the inspired word of God (2 Tim. 3:16, TEV). Yet much controversy and criticism exists over this book. If we are to accept and base our lives on the Bible as the word of God, then we need to have confidence in the reliability and the authenticity of the Bible. That is, we need to have confidence that the Bible is dependable and trustworthy and that what was written did happen. This essay outlines some convincing evidence to prove that this is the case. I will summarize and discuss bibliographical, external and internal evidence which confirms the reliability and authenticity of the bible. One of the first pieces of evidence lies in the uniformity of the message of the Bible. It is a collection of sixty-six books written over a period of approximately fifteen hundred years in three languages on three continents by forty authors. Kings, peasants, educated men, a doctor, a prime minister, a tax collector a rabbi, a fisherman are among the authors (McDowell, 1973). While it discusses numerous issues, and each book has different purposes, the overall themes of creation, the fall of man and redemption are clear throughout (Williams, 2002). Military historian Chauncy Sanders mentions three criteria scholars use in historiography (Williams, 2002). When applied to test whether the scriptures we have are the same as the original documents, that is to test their accuracy, these are manuscript evidence (textual)...
Words: 2327 - Pages: 10