Free Essay

Religion and Society

In:

Submitted By Tmcinerney
Words 2047
Pages 9
Though, when a society is thought about it’s usually about the government, population, schools, and the people who live there. Religion is not usually the first thing on a mind of a person looking at a society or how that society is affected by the religion the country worships. Studies have shown that a secular nation, or a nation with a higher population of atheists than religious peoples have resulted in being a more peaceful nation. However, it has been said that a religious nation has higher rates of murder, teen pregnancy, abortion, sexual promiscuity and war. The things just listed are things that religious nations try so hard to prove are sin. If a religious nation says these things are a sin, then why do they have higher numbers of the societal ills than a nation with a higher number of Atheists? Religion may play a role in peoples’ lives, but religion should not be a part of our growing modern society.
In 2009, the Global Peace Index did a study that compares our worlds countries by using six different sections concluding which countries are the most peaceful to the least peaceful. The sections of this study are: foreign war, internal conflicts, human rights, murders, prison population, and democracy. When the study came out, it was said that New Zealand was considered the most peaceful nation of our world. New Zealand is a mostly secular nation and the study shows that is why New Zealand is rated number one in the Global Peace Index’s study. While still talking about these ratings, the United States was rated eighty-third in this study (Cline 1).
The Global Peace Index’s study also shows that New Zealand is a mostly secular nation, which is why the study shows they are the most peaceful. This difference of populations is determined by an equation p=0.001 or less making the study face and not just chance. After the study’s results, the Global Peace Index cannot argue that secularism leads to peace and religion leads to turmoil. The Index’s study does not show that religion causes turmoil and secularism causes peace, the only thing being able to argue about is how religious countries do not have anything to prove the point that religion causes peace. All the Global Peace Index is showing how a secular nation can get along better with other countries along with the population of the country better than countries, like the United States, who are reliant on religion (Cline 1).
Looking at the divide between secular nations versus religious nations, you find that the murder rate is significantly different between the two. The study before with the Global Peace Index, learning that most religious nations have a higher murder rate; Louisiana has one of the highest church going populations of our nation but also has a murder rate twice the national average. However, going down the list of the murder rates relation to religion you see that the list goes Louisiana, The Bible Belt, United States, Britain, France, Australia, Sweden, and Japan ("Christanity and the Murder Rate" 1). If the list states that Louisiana has the largest murder rates, but also has the largest church going population, what does that say about religion, when the bible states, “Thou Shall Not Kill Thy Neighbor.”? If killing neighbors is wrong, according to the bible, then why do church going states or countries have some of the highest murder rates we have seen?
Religion says that the benefits it gives to people are life changing. However, another study done by a man named Gregory Paul tells that benefits religion is said to have are actually providing fuel for our societal ills His study compared people who were atheist and people who believe in God as our savoir. Many different studies proved that believing in God is not essential and can actually contribute to social problems in people. Gregory Paul took this study taking social indicators like murder rates; abortion, suicide and teen pregnancy to find that the United States had the high numbers, by comparing these numbers to less devout nations were not as dysfunctional. Paul stated that “Most Western states would become more religious if evolution was over turned and the presences of God was scientifically proven theory, majority support in the United States unless there was marked decline in religious belief.” He goes on to say, “I suspect that Europeans are increasingly repelled by the societal performance of the Christian states (Gledhill 1).” A paper published by the Journal of Religion and Society says: “Many Americans believe their church going nation is an exceptional God-blessed shining city on a hill that is and as impressive example for increasingly skeptical world. In general, high rates of belief in and worship a creator correlate with a high rate of homicide, juvenile and early adult mortality, STD infections rates, teen pregnancy, and abortion in the prosperous democracies’. The United States is almost always the most dysfunctional of the developing democracies, sometimes spectacularly so (Gledhill).”
Religion today is very different from the religion we had back when the bible was written and supposedly a man named Jesus was alive. Today, religion plays a large role in the way society is run, even though the separation between Church and State should be enforced. Religion may play a large role in our lives should not affect the way our government runs ("What Effect Has Religion Had on Society" 1).
Science is greatly affected by the way religion is run. Doctors’ everyday that preforms ‘sinful’ operations are exclusively pointed out and harassed by religious people for giving woman the choice of abortion. Stem cell research from these women’s aborted children is a large part of the religious debate about how this life-saving research is sinful. Since religion is so obstruction with medical science progression, approximately 18 people die every day from waiting for an organ transplant (Rowden 1); these people would not have died if the stem cell research from the women’s aborted children had been practiced to the full potential. Many people at the top of the waiting list still die from rejection or tissue issues after the transplant is over, being able to do this research could produce exact matches to the tissue of the person needing the transplant ("What Effect Has Religion Had on Society").
People seem to think that churches are very selfless when actually they are the most effective way to exploit commoners to the people higher up as well as the cheapest way to control people. How can a religious country exploit and control the people who are following the religion? If the churches are supposedly selfless they should not be controlling their congregation for their own personal gain ("What Effect Has Religion Had on Society").
Religious figures often say they are tolerable with other people and the diverse ways of our society in the modern world along with the diverse ways of religion. Though according to an article called “What Effect Has Religion on Society, “ religion is often used for intolerance of diversity of other beliefs since the beginning of America this has caused prejudice that leads to war ("What Effect Has Religion Had on Society").
In our modern civilization, many current events are fueled by religion. September 11, 2001, a terrible day on American soil, can be directly linked to religion. The Muslim people hijacked American and United airplanes because the people involved were in the midst of a holy war. The strike of this Holy War against Americans succeeded, and now America is left with tons of dead, innocent people along with an ongoing war with the Middle East. The Taliban, or Muslim extremists, are people who take the holy book called the Koran to the absolute edge. In doing so, these Muslim people are murdering people left and right including themselves in their attempts to be accepted into the Holy Land of Mohammed.
For years religion has made it known how they feel about some of the modern health issues being dealt with in the twenty-first century. First off, Catholics not believing in birth control is outrageous. A woman has a right to protect and do what she wants with her body, and birth control has some good effects on a woman like helping with the stresses of a period, or even treating very heavy bleeding. Dealing with the non-belief in birth control, the pope, leader of the Catholic Church, went to Africa and told those people not to use condoms. Africa is one of the highest populated continents with HIV/AIDS and not teaching them about safer sex practices will kill the people of this continent. Religion, in this case, Catholicism are telling people who are less aware of safer sex that these practices are wrong against the word of God.
Scientology, a religion that does not have an exact way to run their church, believes that diseases are all in your head. Cancer, Diabetes, or any other physical disease is considered to be a part of your minds way of fooling you. Even though doctors know that is not true, Scientologists believe differently. Doctors treat the sick, but a religion that does not believe that medical attention is required for underlying medical conditions in order to embrace your spiritual self is a little out there. If people are sick, they go to a doctor, simple as that.
In school systems we have a moment of silence every morning in order to reflect on the day ahead, or for some religious peoples’ to pray before the day even starts. If Church and State are supposedly separate, then why do we have a moment of silence in public school systems? Public schools are a part of the state, and the constitution clearly states that these two things should never cross paths. So why do schools still have that moment of silence? Should we not take it out at the beginning of the day no matter the religion of the population going to the school? This beginning of the day ‘prayer’ can be done by the children who are religious, but those who are not should not have to be subjected to do the same as those children who are church going children.
Secular nations are fairly different from those who are religious. They’re said to be a more peaceful nation because they have nothing to fight over. These nations have nothing to fight over because they are not wasting their time on who is right and who is wrong. Secular nations seem to use more logic than religion to make executive decisions about how to run the country they are living in. It has been said in many different studies like in the Global Peace Index or Gregory Paul’s study that these nations are also not as dysfunctional. Secular nations do not have a ton of war crime since they have nothing to make a war over. These nations are better off without the wars being fought and should keep their peace with the division they had made.
From the crusades to the war in Afghanistan, we see that religion plays a huge role in the war we fight and how we fight it. ‘In God We Trust” is written on our currency, but if we are trusting in God why do we need to fight wars in order to make sure that we are right and everyone else is wrong? It seems like a cycle that will never be broken until we all decided that being secular nations will be the best for the population.
During the entire time humans have been here we have believed in religion. Now, in the twenty-first century we are now learning how to divide ourselves to see what is true to believe in and what we should put in the fiction box. Though this fight will never be won, we can always prove the facts that are there. Religion has its place, and it is not in the public schools or in the research of science and not even in the fight against HIV/AIDS. Religion may be the way to spiritual release, but it is not the way to grow a society.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Religion and Society

...Religion and Society Though, when a society is thought about it’s usually about the government, population, schools, and the people who live there. Religion is not usually the first thing on a mind of a person looking at a society or how that society is affected by the religion the country worships. Studies have shown that a secular nation, or a nation with a higher population of atheists than religious peoples have resulted in being a more peaceful nation. However, it has been said that a religious nation has higher rates of murder, teen pregnancy, abortion, sexual promiscuity and war. The things just listed are things that religious nations try so hard to prove are sin. If a religious nation says these things are a sin, then why do they have higher numbers of the societal ills than a nation with a higher number of Atheists? Religion may play a role in peoples’ lives, but religion should not be a part of our growing modern society. In 2009, the Global Peace Index did a study that compares our worlds countries by using six different sections concluding which countries are the most peaceful to the least peaceful. The sections of this study are: foreign war, internal conflicts, human rights, murders, prison population, and democracy. When the study came out, it was said that New Zealand was considered the most peaceful nation of our world. New Zealand is a mostly secular nation and the study shows that is why New Zealand is rated number one in the Global Peace Index’s study...

Words: 2130 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Religions Effect on Society

...Mr. T. Campbell Religions Effect on Society For as long as humans have had the ability to reason, they have attributed the natural phenomenon of the world around them to deities, spirits, and supernatural forces. Religion has played a huge role in the development of societies and civilizations throughout history. It has been a guide for morals and principal. It has been a foundation of law for many cultures. The positive aspects of religion are recognized and cherished among its followers, however there are other effects, some well-known, and others ignored, that are not so positive. Just some examples of these effects are: wars, discrimination, control, the retardation of science, the denial of healthcare, and death. This argument seeks to research and describe some of the negative effects religion has had on mankind, and thus the world. Certainly the most notable negative impact on society is religious wars. A religious war or holy war is a conflict primarily caused or justified by differences in religion. The account of the conquest of Canaan by the Israelites in the Book of Joshua; the Muslim conquests of the 7th and 8th centuries; the Christian Crusades, 11th to 13th centuries; Wars of Religion, 16th and 17th centuries. These are the classic examples, but a religious aspect has been a part of warfare as early as the battles of the Mesopotamian city-states in 700BC. Throughout recorded history, more wars have been waged in the name of religion than any other reason....

Words: 1167 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

World Religions: The Influence Of Religion On Society

...history without religion being a major influence on society. For centuries women, men, and nations all around the world would follow the guidance of a scared leader. As the classical era in time declined, religion stepped in to focus on emphasising life, spirit and divine help. The government suffered with the issue of secrecy and uncertainty. Since the world relied solely on the promises the government made to its people, followers began to quickly drift to different religions to seek a sense of security and trust. With the people questioning their government, Christianity, Buddhism, and Islam became known as the three world religions. Each making a major impact on society, religion sometimes impacted the government in different ways. Religion took the power from the government which allowed them to blossom successfully, therefore, causing world religions to have a major impact on society everywhere. Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam all began when people felt as though they had no more guidance or...

Words: 509 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Role of Religion in Medieval Society

...Contreras Civilizations II Second essay October 9, 2013 The Role of Religion and Church during Medieval and Renaissance Society The role of religion and church was very influential during The Middle Ages and Renaissance society. They possessed a great deal of power that couldn’t be taken away by any ruler. In fact, the church was a counter to kings who wanted absolute power. Any king who wished to rule must have the church on his side. Opposing the church would lead to excommunication. Today this doesn’t sound like much, but at the time, excommunication translated to the downfall of one’s kingdom. The Middle Ages were a time in which everything was controlled by oaths. So for a king to oppose to the church meant that he was breaking the oath of allegiance he had with God. This resulted on the pope excommunicating the king. Now, everyone from the king’s subjects to his enemies could be freed from those oaths, and all of the allegiance with that particular king could be cancelled. This means that anyone could rise up in revolt or invade, without fear of condemnation by the church. Also, any subjects of the king who opposed his views could switch sides without being accused of treason. The church also played an important role in government. Being allied with the king, church leaders such as bishops and archbishops sat on the king’s council and played influential roles in society. These important roles granted them power and wealth. But not anyone was appointed...

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

“Religion Is Fundamentally a Positive Influence in Society.”

...Socialists define religion in four ways, first by identifying whether there is a belief in some kind of super natural power, second if there is an expression of belief through collective worship. Sociologists also define religion by identifying if there is a presence of a force which unifies society, and if there are a set of morals which guide behavior. There are also substantive definitions of religion, these define religion by suggesting there has to be a belief in the supernatural, a being with powers beyond humans and substantive definitions also suggest that in religions there is a belief in the sacred, where members in society worship selected people or things, and this may cause feelings of awe. The social constructionist definition of religion takes a more interpretivist approach to defining religion, they focus on how members of society define religion, for example scientologists see themselves as a religion; however many see it as a cult. In this essay I will focus on functionalist definitions of religion, and look at how religion contributes to society and how a religion can unite a society with moral codes. During the 19th century and in to the early 20th century Durkheim studied primitive societies, he noted that in Australian aboriginal tribes they all identified with spiritual totem. Totemism is a religious belief that is normally featured in shamanistic religious, the Totem is normally of an animal, or another naturalist figure that is representative of a person...

Words: 1175 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Pakistani Women: Religion, State and Society

...PAKISTANI WOMEN: RELIGION, STATE AND SOCIETY Much has been written in the international press in recent years concerning the difficulties facing Pakistani women today. Islam itself stresses that women have significant freedoms and rights and the Pakistani constitution guarantees equal treatment for all of its citizens. Pakistan has signed many United Nations treaties guaranteeing the equality and fair treatment of women. But the reality is very different. Most women in Pakistan face a hostile male-dominated environment where they have little or no choice in their lives and face the prospect of harsh violence directed against them. Some international journalists have written that Pakistan is one of the most dangerous places anywhere for women. The reason for this tragedy is that archaic tribal customs and attitudes remain a dominant force in many areas of the country. Pakistan was expressly created as an Islamic state, but many Pakistanis have not followed Islamic teachings concerning the treatment of women. The teachings of Islam provide full protection and security for women, but many Pakistani women are suppressed and victimized by their own family members. Although there are clear provisions both in Islam and in the 1973 Pakistani constitution to provide respect, safety and equal rights for women, Pakistan remains a male-dominated society where women still struggle to achieve their basic rights. Male officials in Pakistan can point to the nation’s constitution...

Words: 6868 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Religion and Ethics in Our Modern Society

...Notes for the Course: Religion and Ethics in our Modern Society, 2012 By Dr H Ndlovu Definition and Nature of Christian Ethics Ethics is derived from the Greek word “ethos” that is also comes from another word “ethika.” Ethika means norms, conventions, values, customs the society. Thus ethics is a discipline that examines one’s moral standards or the moral of a society. These are absorbed from family, church and friends. Why Study Ethics There are nine reasons why human beings have to study ethics. 1. Human beings are capable of reasoning from cause to effect with the understanding that everything done has effect. 2. Human beings are capable of making choices after comparing the alternatives, that is, internal and external. People have two cells namely: a. Real – what we have now b. Ideal – what we are aiming at 3. Human beings are self – conscious. This means we can study ourselves by being a subject and be the object at the same time. 4. Human beings are finite or limited not knowing what will happen from the next moment or next door. Thus, we must have principles to apply when situations comes. 5. Human life is an active dynamic phenomenon – We do something as if we do nothing. 6. People also can be taught to be good (Isaiah 1 :18) 7. Human beings are capable of filing an obligation 8. Human beings are also capable of understanding what moral terms like freedom, dignity and so on affects other people. 9. Finally, human beings need to survive. Human civilization...

Words: 39235 - Pages: 157

Premium Essay

How Did Religion Influence Colonial Society

...Religion shaped the colonial society in many ways because one of the reasons to leave England was religious discrimination. Puritan Massachusetts Bay was one of the New England colonies that were very strict with their religion but like in Rhode Island, there is some toleration. The Chesapeake region was not very influenced by religion but Catholic Maryland was a strong religion practice in that area. Although the Chesapeake colonies were founded for economic reasons, the New England colonies had a society more based off of religion through family structure, government and schooling; hence the New England region was heavily influenced by religion. New England’s families were affected by Puritanism because they had many families that were raised...

Words: 659 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Synthesis Essay: Does Religion Affect Society?

...In this world, there are more than 4,000 religions. Approximately thirty-one percent of the world are christians. Twenty-three percent are muslims. Many more come behind them, but which ones affect society negatively? Which ones affect society positively? Religions are only as good as the people who practice it. Many people may state that a certain amount of religions affect society positively; however, others might state that they affect society negatively. Around the seventeenth century, Science arose and the scientific revolution came with it. The Law of Planetary Motion by Kepler, Galileo’s telescope observations, and all of the experiments with gases by Robert Boyle, are all scientific occurrences that have happened in the seventeenth...

Words: 1563 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Analysis on How Relevant Faith and Religion Is in a Modern Society

...Analysis on How Relevant Faith and Religion is in a Modern Society The author Revd. David Gifford is constantly presented with the same question of “how relevant is faith and religion in a modern society?” He states that times have certainly changed since the year of 1942 where the Council of Christians and Jews (CCJ) was first founded. The goal of this group was to stop the prejudice that the two faiths had for one another. In modern society Reverend David Gifford explains how backs are being turned on religion and it is worth is to still keep religion relevant. Religion has stirred up many conflicts in the world. Some of these issues end in blood shed for some people dude to the extreme amounts of prejudice and feuding of different types of beliefs. With so many muti-cultural and muti-faithful people in the world, there is usually no way of avoiding coming face to face with people of different beliefs. They are then faced with the reality of what religion really is. Some people take their experiences of learning about a different culture and begin to build opinions and maybe even suspicions or prejudices. Some are genuinely interested and understand and respect why people practice certain religions. The author states that a lot of work still has to be done for people to understand and be open minded about other religions. Since Revd. David Gifford is the CEO of the Council of Christians and Jews; he certainly stands for religious tolerance. The Archbishop of York and...

Words: 467 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Evaluate the Marxist Theory of Religion and Its Relevance to Todays Society.

...Evaluate the Marxist theory of religion and its relevance to society today. Marxists believe that the ruling class use instruments in society to control the working class – for example religion and education. They argue that religion is created and promoted by the Ruling Class in order to pass on their dominant ideology to the working class, using it as an “instrument”. Althusser argues that the ruling class do this through physical control such as the police and the justice system (Repressive State Apparatus), they also control the working class through the Ideological state Apparatus, which via religion, prevents the working class from becoming deviant and rebelling. A clear demonstration of this is in Christian teaching. They’re taught that Jesus himself had a day job as a carpenter – which is a manual labour, working class job. This idea of Jesus being like us civilians appeals to the working class as their attitude would be that if someone of such major influence can have that job, I can too because I will be repaid in the afterlife. Another supporting piece of evidence to the Marxist theory of religion is in the Jewish Torah (Old Testament – 34:12) God says “Six days thou shalt work, but on the seventh day thou shalt rest, in eanring time and in harvesting, thou shalt rest”. This also influences the working class not to question why we have to work for 6 days, because when we make our earnings we can rest on the seventh day, whilst the ruling class impose this religious...

Words: 1058 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Examine the View That Religion Has Positive Functions for Society

...Examine the view that religion has positive functions for society (18 marks) Functionalists demonstrate a positive view of religion, they see religion as a fundamental factor in the maintaining of consensual values. Without religion, Functionalists believe that society would break down. Durkheim suggests that religion is not a belief in Gods, spirits or supernatural but rather a factor that separates the sacred and the profane. Sacred things are believed to hold value and are treated with awe whereas profane objects, activities or people hold no significance and are considered ordinary and mundane. Durkheim concluded that sacred objects, for example the cross in Christianity, are only sacred because they represent or are symbolic of particular groups. Because such objects are given meaning based on the collective values of society, Durkheim ultimately believed that religion is society worshipping itself. Durkheim argued that religion serves two cognitive functions, firstly, religion helps maintain social solidarity where societies members can unite over common beliefs and values. The second function religion fulfills is the creation of ‘collective consciousness’ this is the idea that religion acts as a ‘glue’ that maintains social integration. These functions are seen to be positive as they suggest religion preserves society rather than disrupts it. Parsons offers another positive view of religion, he outlined three positive functions that religion successfully fulfills...

Words: 612 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Assess the Feminist Views on the Role of Religion in Society Today

...on the role of religion in society today (18 marks: AO1: 6, AO2: 12) This question is asking you to examine the strengths/limitations of feminism in comparison to other social theories. You will need to critically analyse and evaluate the following claims in your essay. * Feminist theorists argue that religion is a: Instrument of domination A product of patriarchy Serves the interest of men * Women are always unequal to men in terms of: Institutions – leadership and hierarchy Representation – culture, in scriptures. Attitudes and beliefs - socialisation Item A Sociologists disagree about the role of religion in society. Functionalists, for example, see religion mainly as a positive force. However, Marxists see religion as a tool of capitalism. They argue that it acts to justify inequality, helping to keep the poor satisfied by giving them hope of better times to come and preventing social unrest and revolution. Feminists see religion as a force for subordination and patriarchal oppression. This view is supported by evidence such as the differential treatment of women in religious congregations. Other sociologists argue that such evidence is out of date and that women are no longer the victims of religious oppression. Introduction Briefly explain the feminist view of religion– negative – patriarchy – conservative force. Briefly compare to the Marxist view as it is similar. Feminists show us the negative elements of religion but fail to see...

Words: 1559 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Evaluate Feminist Views on the Role of Religion in Society Today

...Evaluate Feminist views on the role of religion in society today The feminist school of thought is not just an ideology nor paradigm that can be accepted; but has been (and may always will be) a growing political movement for the equality of women, fair treatment of females all over the globe and annihilation of the oppression of patriarchy and misogyny. Feminist pioneers include Oakley and Woodhead who are usually the face of modern feminist ideology. There are many different types of feminists in the world today: Liberal, Marxist, Radical and Black feminists all play a part in the fight for female equality with men and many of their fights have been going on for very long times (one such example is the Suffragettes’ fight for the right to vote). The feminist school of thought is a structuralist theory and a macro-theory, focusing on the entire population rather than mere individuals. However feminists do take on board some ideas from micro-theory schools of thought such as their research methods – an example of this is when Ann Oakley conducted (unstructured) interviews with pregnant women for over 9 hours. On the basis of religion, the feminist school of thought (based on its ontological assumptions) would see religion’s role as a patriarchal and misogynistic apparatus of society. It’s possible to go far into history and look at the misogyny of biblical times to support the feminist’s point of patriarchy in society. Christ Jesus had 12 male disciples. King Solomon, nearing...

Words: 1086 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Assess the View That Religion Inevitably Acts as a Conservative Force in Society

...Religion is often seen as conservative in the sense of being ‘traditional’, defending traditional customs, institutions, moral views and roles. Religion upholds traditional beliefs about how society should be organised. Religion is also seen as conservative because it functions to conserve or preserve things as they are. It stabilises society and maintains the status quo. The view of religion is held by functionalists, Marxists, and feminists. Although each of these perspectives see the role of religion differently, all of them argue that it contributes to social stability. Functionalists see religion as a conservative force because it functions to maintain social stability and prevent society from disintegrating. For example, as Parson stated; it promotes social solidarity by creating value consensus, thus reducing the likelihood of society collapsing through individuals perusing their own selfish interests at the expense of other. It also helps individuals to deal with stresses that would otherwise disrupt the life of society. Durkheim, another sociologist shares his view that the sacred symbols represent society’s collective conscience, which is the shared norms, values beliefs and knowledge that make social life and cooperation between individuals possible- without these society would disintegrate. For Durkheim, regular shared religion rituals reinforce the collective conscience and maintain social integration. Participating in shared rituals binds individuals together...

Words: 421 - Pages: 2