Premium Essay

Response To Nancy Mairs 'Disability'

Submitted By
Words 649
Pages 3
People with disabilities are not necessarily disabled. In the essay, “Disability”, by Nancy Mairs, the author demonstrates how people with disabilities are treated differently by the media. Some disabilities are more extreme than others and some people have the same type of disabilities but some are more severe for one person than it is for the next person. People with disabilities do not want sympathy from the public; they just want a fair chance in life. They have not done anything for people to snatch away their dreams and rights to a respectful and fulfilling life. The media treats people with disabilities like they are contagious, chronically ill, and unworthy.
To begin with, people with disabilities are treated like they are contagious. Many times people do not want to be around them. The media seems to have a fear that if they start letting one person with a disability on their show, more will want to share the spot light. Mairs stated, “Take it from me, physical disability looms pretty large in one’s life.” …show more content…
They treat people with disabilities like they are contagious, chronically ill, and unworthy of a fair chance to life and opportunities. First impressions do mean a lot but can also be misunderstood. The number of people on television with disabilities has never been enormous although it is steadily on the decline because of ratings. We need more people with disabilities portrayed on television because it gives others with disabilities a sense of normality. Nancy Mairs said, “So when I tell you I haven’t noticed any women like me on television, you can believe me.” Many people are faced with ableism, which is a discrimination action based on a person’s physical disability. Some people with more money can have some of their disabilities removed, but not all. What about the ones with no money, no fair chance at life and failed opportunities? What if it was your

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Santa Ana Winds

...Mr. Macomber English 3 AP Syllabus 1.5 English 3 AP Course Overview Students in this introductory college-level course read and carefully analyze a broad and challenging range of nonfiction prose selections, deepening their awareness of rhetoric and how language works. Through close reading and frequent writing, students develop their ability to work with language and texts in order to establish greater awareness of purpose and strategy, while strengthening their own composing abilities. C16 Students examine rhetoric in essays, images, movies, novels, and speeches. They frequently confer about their writing by conferencing in class. C 14 Feedback is given both before and after students revise their work to help them develop logical organization, enhanced by specific techniques to increase coherence. Rhetorical structures, graphic organizers, and work on repetition, transitions, and emphasis are addressed. I comment on individual drafts, and I write memos to the class in a blog about whole-class concerns such as specificity of quotations, parallelism, and transitions. C13 Simultaneously, students review the simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex sentence classifications. We examine word order, length, and surprising constructions. Loose and periodic sentences are introduced. We examine sample sentences and discuss how change affects tone, purpose, and credibility of the author/speaker. In addition, feedback on producing sentence structure variety...

Words: 2702 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Health Information System

...27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 AUPHA/HAP Editorial Board Sandra Potthoff, Ph.D., Chair University of Minnesota Simone Cummings, Ph.D. Washington University Sherril B. Gelmon, Dr.P.H., FACHE Portland State University Thomas E. Getzen, Ph.D. Temple University Barry Greene, Ph.D. University of Iowa Richard S. Kurz, Ph.D. Saint Louis University Sarah B. Laditka, Ph.D. University of South Carolina Tim McBride, Ph.D. St. Louis University Stephen S. Mick, Ph.D. Virginia Commonwealth University Michael A. Morrisey, Ph.D. University of Alabama—Birmingham Dawn Oetjen, Ph.D. University of Central Florida Peter C. Olden, Ph.D. University of Scranton Lydia M. Reed AUPHA Sharon B. Schweikhart, Ph.D. The Ohio State University Nancy H. Shanks, Ph.D. Metropolitan State College of Denver * [-2], (2 Lines: 2 59.41 ——— ——— Normal * PgEnds [-2], (2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [-3], (3) Lines: 115 to 168 * 487.0pt PgVar ——— ——— Normal Page * PgEnds: Eject [-3], (3) AUPHA Health Administration Press 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Your board, staff, or clients may also benefit from this book’s insight. For more information on quantity discounts, contact the Health...

Words: 123678 - Pages: 495