I am writing in response to your request that I analyze David Brook’s “The Talent Society” and make a recommendation for or against publication in The Shorthorn. I have considered the rhetorical appeals of Brook’s piece and determined it will give a shock to the readers of The Shorthorn. The readers are likely to find the piece interesting, as it addresses the topic of individualism, which is an important issue for married and singles alike. Brook’s central claim is that we are living in the middle of an amazing era of individualism where people try to be as independent as possible to maximize their talents. I agree with the author as we naturally become more independent as we move in our life. We move away from our parents, siblings and other …show more content…
He mentions several observations conducted by different people to know the changes and the causes that led to the new era of individualism. He also provides some statistics to show how individualism has increased rapidly within few generations. Finally, Brook appeals to the emotions of his Shorthorn readers in a way that helps her cause. He mentions that people with skills and social capital can really thrive in this tenuous, networked society. But people without those advantages would probably be left behind. This has made the life harder for poorer children. By mentioning these facts, the author successfully appeals the readers of The Shorthorn emotionally. The author’s evidence (logos) was strong and solid. He provides various statistics and studies conducted by recognized and well-known researchers and officials of educational administration. The author mentions some information about the counter views, which is important for the readers to understand the counter-argument. This is why I conclude that we should publish this article in The Shorthorn because the readers will find this article interesting and argumentative with its evidences and