Premium Essay

Rhetorical Analysis Richard Lavoie

Submitted By
Words 574
Pages 3
This analysis is based on the F.A.T video presented by Richard D. Lavoie. In his video he talks how we can approach in different ways special education students, and how we need to have a new mindset of what is really Special Education and how we can help our students reach their potential.

Frustration, Anxiety and Attention
This video is a life changing experience, everything that Richard Lavoie talked is very challenging and it makes you think in the students that struggled every day with a learning disabilities. Richard Lavoie express in the video “I know how you feel” in a situation he had with a student, but do we really know how they feel? Do we really know what they are going through? We do not know, we actually don’t even understand what it means to struggle with a learning disability, because we don’t have one therefore is very difficult to share the difficulty of the problem or disability. …show more content…
We have very different types of needs in our classroom and we have to practice fairness everyday with our students. Fairness depends on what the student’s need (Richard D. Lavoie), fairness means everyone gets what they need. There are some students that need more help more attention than others; fairness is based on what specific need everyone has. Regular student cannot expect the same attention and accommodations like the special education students; we have to teach our regular students to be fair with

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Group Interaction Articles

...Colorado at Boulder Aamodt, M. G., & Kimbrough, W. W. (1982). Effects of group heterogeneity on quality of task solutions. Psychological Review, 50, 171-174. Abbey, D. S. (1982). Conflict in unstructured groups: An explanation from control-theory. Psychological Reports, 51, 177-178. Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768-776. Abele, A., Gendolla, G. H. E., & Petzold, P. (1998). Positive mood and in-group—out-group differentiation in a minimal group setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1343-1357. Aberson, C. L., Healy, M., & Romero, V. (2000). Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 157-173. Abougendia, M., Joyce, A. S., Piper, W. E., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2004). Alliance as a mediator of expectancy effects in short-term group psychotherapy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 3-12. Abraham, A. (1973a). Group tensions as measured by configurations of different self and transself aspects. Group Process, 5, 71-89. Abraham, A. (1973b). A model for exploring intra and interindividual processes in groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 23, 3-22. Abraham, A. (1974-1975). Processes in groups. Bulletin de Psychogie, 28, 746-758. Abraham, A., Geffroy, Y., & Ancelin-Schutzenberger, A. (1980). A method for analyzing group interaction: Development...

Words: 146784 - Pages: 588