I most definitely think that Oiler rights were violated. My opinion though really doesn’t matter if this behavior was discussed with Oiler at the start of him employment with Winn Dixie. Depending on the rules and regulation that were set forth by Winn Dixie and gone over with Oiler in orientation he very well may have been in violation of the company’s policy. I work for the state in the behavioral health department. Occasionally there are events that take place in the community, within legislature or people in charge of making very big decision. And as we all know the media is always looking for their next big story. Policy here stated that we are not to speak to any media, not be telephone, mail correspondence or in person. We have one specific person at the agency that covers all interviews. This is to make sure that the correct information is being given to the public. Employees here consider these to be strict guidelines and we make sure that we do as policy states. In Oiler’s case there may have been something in policy that stated that this type of behavior was not going to be accepted and that termination would result of it. This is why it is very important that everything given to a person be read prior to signing, especially if you know you partake in questionable activities. In Oilers case it is obvious this was not the case. It’s sad that society works this way but unless we own the business and work for ourselves we must abide by others rules.