The peer that I viewed showed in many ways how on what the author is doing. In many ways his writing was focused on what might be motivating Sandy Hingston to write this. The peer puts effort in analyzing the text to find information that purpose. This varied from mine for I used more different approaches during the essay to reach the readers. The peer brought ideas on cultivating technology and motivation in to the writing to help show why text was made and for. I focused on the overall purpose from Hingston and what she tries to tell the readers. I also used different analysis and factors such as economic standpoint on the change from traditional bury to cremation to bring new ideas to help you think the ongoing change in the body disposal after death.

What I wished I noticed about the text was how was the author motivated into writing this. This gives you new thinking and new ideas of what’s going on and understand why this writing is significant. Another thing I wished I noticed, was the authors ways of making the readers think or feel. My peer mentions on how the author displays both sides in a argument and helps try to sway a reader to either side. An example would be swaying …show more content…
The question that came up so broadly was “What is Hingstons overall purpose in the writing”? This helped me get an underlined set of arrangement in my text. I wanted now is to order the paragraphs in a way to guide the readers appropriately in order to tell them what they need to know. I wanted to first show the readers how the authors strategies in her writing, in the body I show the and explain the purpose, and finally I wrap of thing and give final opinions reader should know. My introduction gave my intentional point in writing this and what to expect. I looked for many things from the author to get a better thought on what she did. I looked for tone and mainly the guidance to the