Second, they want all boys feel they were treated equally, no matter they were more naughty or less. One thing we are sure is, we can not leave naughty boys like this and treat them really nice in order to make them happy but remain the problem; however, we can treat those less naughty boys harsher than they should receive in order to make them even better. To make the balance, to make students feel equal, teachers treat all boys the same, using the standard of the worse student.
One big point is, teachers develop two separate system for boys and girls, as the first reason said, “boys” are going to bear more when they grow older, that’s the reason why they bear more now. Teachers labeling “boys should bear more and be more brave” to boys.

Girls always get more rewards than boys, when they finish same almont of mission. When girls doing their homework, some of them do made mistakes. Compared with boys, if girls make mistakes on …show more content…
From my peer review article “School Suspension and Adolescent Friendship Networks”, the author argues the relationship between students’ suspension from school and mimic behavior of each other.
“A major strength of my dissertation has been on my measures of change in peer behavior and relationships in relation to suspension, but a more thorough test of the secondary deviance hypothesis is limited by my use of attitudinal changes as an indicator of label internalization.”
The difference in brain development between boys and girls has already begun to appear as early as the fetus period, and as the child grows, this natural gender difference will have an impact on the child's learning and will continue to strengthen. In turn, learning itself also changes the functional development of the brain. Because when the children play and learn, the corresponding brain cells will be more active and always updated, and those parts that are not frequently used will gradually degenerate and