Premium Essay

Sepsis Workflow Analysis

Submitted By
Words 1394
Pages 6
Sepsis Workflow
The early recognition of sepsis is critical to the timely treatment and prevention of progression. According to Alsolamy et al. (2014), an electronic sepsis alert tool could help recognize early sepsis. Therefore, an understanding of the processes that surrounds the identification and management of sepsis can help electronic health record (EHR) designers, end-users, and quality auditors determine the most usable and efficient method. According to McGonigle and Mastrian (2015) workflow analysis involves the "observation and documentation to understand better what is happening in the current environment" (p. 266). This paper will examine the current early sepsis recognition process and determine if any opportunities for optimization …show more content…
The EHR alerts the nurse to the presence of two SIRS criteria. This step does require an element of critical thinking by the nurse. Nurses use the clinical assessment and the data from the EHR to help develop a clinical picture of the patient's condition. The application of expertise and intuition is driven by the nurses exposure to sepsis scenarios. Does the patient have assessment findings or any history element that leads the clinician to believe that the activation of the alert was related to early sepsis? Policies guide sepsis care and allow for autonomy of the nurse to order the screening panel if criteria are met. To execute this decision, the workflow involved includes knowledge related to sepsis, history and physical assessment details of the patient, and knowledge related to the alert …show more content…
There are many elements to the workflow that require a degree of clinical judgment. Sepsis can be difficult to detect early, and the physician's role is crucial. The bedside nurse is the one who receives the alert and is the identified person to make the decisions related to the actions associated with the sepsis alert. Physicians are not always logged into the EHR and therefore could not be the only one who receives the alert. However, should both parties receive the alert? Work done by Kurczewski, Sweet, NcKnight, and Halbritter (2015) found a reduction in time to treatment from 4.1 hours to 0.6 hours when an electronic sepsis alert was utilized and sent to both the nurse and physician. An improvement in workflow could include an engagement of the physicians receiving the alerts in addition to the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Cola

...SCHOOL OF PHARMACY REPORT WRITING UCS 1263 Assignment 1 Hospital Attachment Report Name : Thiban Ellumalay ID : 012011051056 Programme : BPH Lecturer Name : Dr. Jiyauddin Khan Submission Date : 30th September 2013 An attachment report based on the lesson learned, activity being carried out, experience gained, problem faced and suggestion at Hospital Tuanku Ampuan Rahimah, Klang in various pharmacy departments for period of 3 weeks Submitted to Dr. Jiyauddin Khan, PhD Report writing lecturer, School of Pharmacy Management & Science University Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia. Prepared by, Thiban Ellumalay, 012011051056 3rd year Bachelor of Pharmacy, Management & Science University Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia. 30th September 2013 Acknowledgement First and foremost I would like to thank the almighty lord for giving me wisdom to get my attachment done with successfully as well as with the preparation of the report. Without his blessings I wouldn’t have achieved this stage. Besides that, throughout my attachment accomplishment, many people have inspired me, influenced me and contributed their time, energy, ideas, and suggestions for improving my report. I will always be in debt to these people, too numerous to mention. I would...

Words: 7449 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Mr. Ng

...ANNUAL REPORT ON SENTINEL AND SERIOUS UNTOWARD EVENTS (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) ANNUAL REPORT ON SENTINEL AND SERIOUS UNTOWARD EVENTS 1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013 HOSPITAL AUTHORITY HONG KONG 1 ANNUAL REPORT ON SENTINEL AND SERIOUS UNTOWARD EVENTS (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This is the sixth Annual Report on Sentinel and Serious Untoward Events. By continuously learning from sentinel and serious untoward events and by building safe systems, processes and practices to mitigate the recurrence of such events, it demonstrates the Hospital Authority’s commitment to quality and patient safety. We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge all frontline staff, nurses, clinicians, risk managers and executives for their immense dedication and support in improving patient safety in recent years. Without their invaluable and incessant efforts in planning and executing various improvement initiatives to enhance patient safety through risk identification and mitigation, the publication of this annual report would not have been as meaningful. Patient Safety and Risk Management Department Quality and Safety Division 2 ANNUAL REPORT ON SENTINEL AND SERIOUS UNTOWARD EVENTS (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 CHAPTER 1 – Introduction 9 CHAPTER 2 – Sentinel and Serious Untoward Event Policy 11 CHAPTER 3 – Sentinel Events Reported from 1 October 2012 to 30 September 2013 13 CHAPTER 4...

Words: 11258 - Pages: 46

Premium Essay

Blood Work

...Essentials Ruth E. McCall, BS, MT (ASCP) Retired Program Director and Instructor Central New Mexico Community College Albuquerque, New Mexico President, NuHealth Educators, LLC Faculty, Emeritus Phoenix College Phoenix, Arizona Fifth Edition Cathee M. Tankersley, BS, MT (ASCP) Acquisitions Editor: Peter Sabatini Product Manager: Meredith L. Brittain Marketing Manager: Shauna Kelley Designer: Holly McLaughlin Production Services: Aptara, Inc. Fifth Edition Copyright © 2012, 2008 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business. Two Commerce Square 2001 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 351 West Camden Street Baltimore, MD 21201 Printed in China All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including as photocopies or scanned-in or other electronic copies, or utilized by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the copyright owner, except for brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Materials appearing in this book prepared by individuals as part of their official duties as U.S. government employees are not covered by the above-mentioned copyright. To request permission, please contact Lippincott Williams & Wilkins at Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, via email at permissions@lww.com, or via website at lww.com (products and services). 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress...

Words: 129902 - Pages: 520