...The Federal Government should provide health care for citizens who cannot afford it. Actually the Government should provide health care for all citizens and legal residents, whether they can afford it or not. Healthcare should be a right; everyone should be entitled to proper healthcare and not be subject to being medically treated or not, based on their financial status. Because of the economic downturn, there is a much higher percentage of citizens that cannot afford to pay for healthcare. Here in the United States the healthcare system is quite complicated; it is operated under a managed care system. There are many people today that are hard working honest citizens that cannot even afford to pay for the healthcare insurance even if it is offered at their job. There are quite a few countries in the world that provide healthcare for all citizens including the United Kingdom and Canada. Right here in the United States the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Healthcare reform is set up to provide healthcare for those who cannot afford, why can’t it be done nationwide. The new health Reform or ‘Obama care’ as it is becoming popularly known as, is designed to assist those who cannot afford proper healthcare. In my opinion, every citizen or non citizen of a country should be entitled to proper healthcare. Healthcare should be a right and not judged on how much income you have. There are people in this country that have not been treated properly because they do not have any health coverage...
Words: 1249 - Pages: 5
...People do not believe in free healthcare until they have an accident and could not pay for their treatment. Some people in the United States consider that healthcare should be the individual’s responsibility. They affirm that healthcare is not essential for the society, and using the government funds and support would diminish the accessibility, quantity, and quality of health care. Also, they think it would increase the government debt and deficit. Contrary to these arguments, most Americans sustain that universal healthcare will contribute to the country in many ways. The United States Government should provide free universal healthcare to American citizens, because it is a human right, improves public health and saves lives, benefits the...
Words: 1477 - Pages: 6
... from the Operating Room. She has seen many changes occur in healthcare during his career. This paper will discuss some of the values he finds most important for creating an equal healthcare system. In order to establish an equal healthcare system, coverage needs to be affordable, with equal opportunities for everyone, and American’s need to feel they have the freedom of choice for the type of coverage they want. Healthcare coverage first of all, needs to be affordable. Employers should pay all or most of the healthcare premiums to cover their employees. The coverage should be competitive and at the same time the employee should have the right to choose if they want to be covered or seek private insurance. Mandatory physical exams and blood work should be discussed in detail at employee forums and human resources should not just assume all employees know their coverage rights. Physician’s office staff should be well educated in insurance literacy to let their patients know what their coverage rights are. This will keep the patient from getting a surprisingly high statement in the mail. Those who are eligible for Medicare should not have deductibles. If they are on Medicare then they obviously fall below some standard and therefore do not have the money to pay for medical coverage. Carla states, “Medicare should not be eliminated unless the federal government is going to hand out free healthcare coverage to the elderly.” According to the Future of the Affordable...
Words: 874 - Pages: 4
...American Government Obligation to Health Access No, the American Government does not have an obligation to provide its citizens with health access. Reformers do not emphasize “individual responsibility “ instead the burden of the underinsured is to be shifted to others as their responsibility. When the American Government creates policies, sometimes it becomes the responsibility of the people (working class) by increasing taxes or raising the cost of living in some aspects to reconcile. Our country provides rights for the people but nowhere does it say “free”. It should be everyone responsibility to provide for themselves despite of circumstances. If there is a will, there is a way. I believe the only obligation of the government with health access is to create the environment for moral actions, to ensure that every citizen has the ability to get healthcare. Government Regulating Health Behavior The government’s role in regulating healthy and unhealthy behavior is making a moral decision for the people to be administered efficient health care. Some other approaches should be consumer protection policies, policies on insurance companies, and policies expanding public benefits. Government should not organize the healthcare system to demonstrate unethical behavior. The behavior demonstrated has not been for the people but against them in so many ways. Some of the ways are increasing the cost of healthcare cost as time progress. Due to the increase of healthcare it has cause...
Words: 540 - Pages: 3
...Business and Canadian Government Policy; Initiating a New Policy Name: Institution: Course title: Instructor: Date: Business and Canadian Government Policy; Initiating A New Policy Introduction This paper looks into a proposal on the introduction of a universal pharmaceutical policy or pharmacare in Canada. Canada is a country that has a global reputation of offering a successful healthcare to its populations. The Canadians enjoys free healthcare facilities because when they get sick they just need to visit the hospital or their doctors even when they do not have money. The government funds for the universal health policy by use of government revenues. The government gets the funds to pay the policies through taxation of Canadians who are well-off. Most Canadians especially the ordinary Canadians have benefited from the universal healthcare as it has increased their accessibility to health services (Fierlbeck, 2011). Although most Canadians and stakeholders consider the Canadian healthcare policy as universal, it is not comprehensive. A comprehensive healthcare policy should offer a complete healthcare package for citizens. The current healthcare policy in Canada does not substantially offer a comprehensive healthcare policy. This is because various core areas of healthcare are not covered with the current policy on healthcare. The core areas that have been left out by the policy include dental care, prescription drugs, and prescription glasses. The prescription drugs are more...
Words: 2579 - Pages: 11
...The Needed Improvements in the Healthcare Reform Healthcare has gone down the wrong path in the past 10 years. Instead of making it better for Americans, it has become worse. Many Americans are not covered by insurance and do not receive any type of medical benefits. We hear about all the issues older Americans are having trying to receive Medicaid and Medicare. The decisions about coverage that will affect cost and payment and will also affect patient safety and tort reform. In order to reform healthcare, the government needs to work on the access, quality and cost of healthcare for not only today, but the future. The first major point is how the government is going to make the quality of healthcare better for Americans and fix the broken system from the past. Not only does the government need to fix our economy, but they need to fix America's broken healthcare system as well. Overwhelming healthcare costs have made it impossible to help our economy, with families and businesses all struggling to make it. Reforming healthcare means keeping the insurance each American has (if they are happy with it), seeing the doctor that they want, increasing the quality of care while decreasing costs and eliminating waste, helping small businesses stay competitive and in business, and reforming healthcare so Americans will never face losing your coverage. According to SEIU (2012), the average family of four is paying $29,000 a year for healthcare in taxes, lower wages and out of pocket...
Words: 1432 - Pages: 6
...Can healthcare be considered a basic human right? Over the past century, the term "health" has been redefined over and over to come to a more exact and appropriate meaning so that consensus can be reached. The World Health Organization came up with its first definition of health, as "a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity."(p. 26) However, many people criticized and questioned the words "complete", "mental", "social", "disease", "infirmity" and their meanings. Daniel Callahan eventually proposed a short yet solid statement on the definition of health, as "a state of physical well-being."(p.66). Why has so much effort been made to determine a proper definition of health? Because it is important to us. Health is an essential aspect of our lives and its significance cannot be minimized. Therefore, it is natural for humans to pursue good health. But consequentially, does that give humans the right to healthcare? According to the WHO Constitution, "the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being…" In order to attain that standard however, healthcare services are required. Services such as treatment, diagnosis, and prevention provided by medical practitioners play a vital role in people's well-being. One might say that it is their responsibility but on what grounds? In this paper, I argue that healthcare is not a basic human right because for one...
Words: 1530 - Pages: 7
...Healthcare systems have been debated for years in the United States, and have led us to fall behind the race for affordable high quality health insurance for all our citizens. To be able to comprehend how this can be achieved, we must examine various other systems and see how they are implemented. For over a decade the front runner in universal healthcare has been France. This country is truly a measuring stick for others who want to provide universal healthcare, and I believe for the United States in this particular situation should be the country that we want to imitate the most. Solely by imitating we cannot really achieve our main goal, we must put effective legislation into effect and provide our citizens with ample information to get them knowledge about this system. I truly believe by proposing a plan similar to French and examining the reasons through a consequentialism point of view we can understand why healthcare is a right that others should not interfere with. Having that kind of view brings on a heavy burden on trying to explain what is the morally correct right for healthcare, in answering the question in simple terms the moral right way to provide healthcare is through a comprehensive system that allows all resources to be available to those who need. This brings the very tough dilemma of how we can provide that many resources to our entire population. To answer that and the distribution of our new drug we will examine the French system of healthcare. To determine...
Words: 1049 - Pages: 5
...The goal of healthcare, above all, is to provide medical assistance to those who need it. A good healthcare system invests in a patient’s long-term health, provides necessary treatments for all patients, allows patients to have autonomy over who provides them with healthcare, and transparently conducts all monetary transactions. Currently, the US healthcare system hardly achieves any of these goals. We face a trilemma of healthcare: lack of universal coverage, high health care spending, and low-quality care. Additionally, the US healthcare system is too complicated for users to understand, severely lacks in terms of preventative care, and is overly influenced by big private investors and for-profit insurance providers who lobby in Congress....
Words: 1394 - Pages: 6
...E ROLE OF LAW IN THE U.S. HEALTHCARE SYSTEM USING THE LAW TO PROMOTE OUR POLICY GOALS AND ETHICAL PRINCIPLES The study of law is more than simply memorizing a list of activities that are illegal, such as Medicare fraud or price-fixing. It is more than memorizing the penalties for particular violations, such as the number of years in prison one can receive for a class B felony or the fine for driving 50 miles per hour in a 35 mile per hour zone. It is more than trying to remember the names of court cases or the citations to statutes and regulations. Instead, law is a policy discipline and a social science. Moreover, the law is not cast in stone, but is subject to change. For hundreds or perhaps thousands of years, people have reconsidered and changed the rules that govern their activities. In a democratic society, we have the power to make further changes in the laws by which we live. Therefore, as students and scholars of law, we not only study the current state of the law, but also what we think the law should be. In particular, we consider how we can use the law to accomplish our goals of public policy. We begin this type of analysis by identifying a practical problem. For example, we may want to focus on discrimination, violence, environmental pollution, or inadequate access to healthcare services. Then, we try to figure out how to use the law and the legal system to solve that particular problem by creating a new law or by changing an existing law. ...
Words: 15289 - Pages: 62
...Healthcare for all Thirty-three million people in the United States (10.4% of the US population) did not have health insurance in 2014 according to the US Census Bureau. Healthcare is a medical insurance for people to keep them healthy and it is a basic thing for most people to have. 71% of americans live off of $10 everyday and it should be considered as a basic human right to ensure that everyone is covered by equal healthcare, no matter what age, gender, or their income. America has a strict, specific rule on healthcare and many people have discussed this as a popular argument in this time period. Even though it is seen as an effective healthcare system, the question is why can’t all americans have the right to be entitled to have healthcare?...
Words: 867 - Pages: 4
...centralized primary care facilities. The purpose of this paper is to look at forces that have influenced the development of the clinic, a mission statement, key performance indicators to measure effectiveness, decisions regarding clinic expansion, the role of the clinic in the community, and influences of public healthcare policy on outpatient clinics. Discuss the key political, economic, and social forces that may have influenced the development of the clinic. Politics can hamper development of private healthcare organizations by compromising quality, limiting accessibility or feasibility, or increasing the cost of healthcare through laws, regulations, policies, requirements of private practice, and monitoring of services (Griffith & White, 2007). The primary care clinic must balance the requirements and regulations of private practice while creating a market for quality healthcare in the community marketplace. The clinic model has advantages over other models in that it allows practitioners a level of economy in sharing their medical facilities, equipment and staff with others, minimizing overhead and allowing them to keep the rising cost of healthcare lower by sharing equity. Improved patient quality is also provided by medical specialists involved in primary care in a single cohesive environment, and patient satisfaction can be increased through a well-managed plan of diagnostic, treatment and billing services. Primary care clinics offer an outlet for a variety...
Words: 1590 - Pages: 7
...Healthcare a Right or a Privilege Cheryl Alcala Intro to Ethics and Social Responsibility Noel Sauer September 17th 2012 Should healthcare be a right or a privilege? In today's society it is becoming more of a privilege than a right. I believe that this is not the way things should be. Our government did not originally intend for it to be this way. I believe that our fore fathers wanted everyone to have the same rights. Was healthcare in the constitution? No, but I do believe that if our forefathers were alive today things would be much different. The issue at hand is healthcare and should it be a right or a privilege. The problem that this presents is this. Do we allow healthcare for everyone or do we chose who has the right to healthcare? Healthcare should be allowed for everyone in the united states. I feel that everyone has the right to be healthy. Other countries have implemented free healthcare and I feel the pros out weigh the cons. With free healthcare you are promoting a healthier society not to mention possibly increasing ones life expectancy. In retrospect your allowing people the chance to live longer healthier lives. Our government it is my belief wants to control who gets healthcare and who doesn't. I feel that this is their way of controlling our population, and continuing to remain in control of our lives. Why is it fair for a wealthy person to receive full medical and dental benefits yet a person of low income status cannot? Do you...
Words: 931 - Pages: 4
...Healthcare in India follows universal healthcare system run by the constituent states and territories if India. Every state in India promotes health and wellness by raising the level of nutrition and standard of living of its people and improves public health. Government hospitals, some of which are among the best hospitals in India, provide treatment at taxpayer expense where drugs are offered free of charge in these hospitals. Government hospitals provide treatment either free or at minimal charges. For example, according to Wikipedia, For example, an outpatient card at AIIMS (one of the best hospitals in India) costs a one-time fee of rupees 10 (around 20 cents US) and thereafter outpatient medical advice is free. In-hospital treatment costs depend on financial condition of the patient and facilities utilized by him but are usually much less than the private sector. For instance, a patient is waived treatment costs if he is below poverty line. Another patient may seek for an air-conditioned room if he is willing to pay extra for it. The charges for basic in-hospital treatment and investigations are much less compared to the private sector. The cost for these subsidies comes from annual allocations from the central and state governments. In the greater India, the hospitals are run by government, charitable trusts and by private organizations. The government hospitals in rural areas are called the (PHC) primary health center. Major hospitals are located in district head quarters...
Words: 1705 - Pages: 7
...Canadian Healthy Policy vs. United States Health Policy AHS 330 Health Care Systems: 7Q April 2, 2014 Healthcare in the United States is extremely different from the rest of the world. Over the years government and political analysts have compared and contrasted the health care systems of the United States to that of Canada’s. Despite being located on the same continent both countries have different ways of delivering health care to its citizens. Canada has a single-payer system that is publicly funded, while the United States has a multi-payer system that relies heavily on privately owned healthcare. This could be due to the differences in how many patients are cared for compared to those in America or it could be just a matter of who developed the better healthcare. However, due to the close proximity of the countries it is possible that the United States can adopt the Canadian healthcare system. According to Health Canada, Canada's publicly funded health care system is best described as an interlocking set of ten provincial and three territorial health insurance plans. Known to Canadians as "Medicare", the system provides access to universal, coverage for hospital and physician services. With this being said it is safe to assume that health care services are provided on the basis of need, rather than the ability to pay. “The Canadian Health Act contains a single national plan that is composed of thirteen provincial and territorial health insurance plans that all share...
Words: 1987 - Pages: 8
