Free Essay

Silvia

In:

Submitted By silviamachado
Words 2494
Pages 10
1947 - Britain, as part of its pullout from the Indian subcontinent, divides it into secular (but mainly Hindu) India and Muslim Pakistan on August 15 and 14 respectively. The partition causes one of the largest human migrations ever seen, and sparks riots and violence across the region.
1947/48 - The first Indo-Pak war over Kashmir is fought, after armed tribesmen (lashkars) from Pakistan's North West Frontier Province (now called Khyber-Pakthunkhwa) invade the disputed territory in October 1947. The Maharaja, faced with an internal revolt as well an external invasion, requests the assistance of the Indian armed forces, in return for acceding to India. He hands over control of his defence, communications and foreign affairs to the Indian government.
Both sides agree that the instrument of accession signed by Maharaja Hari Singh be ratified by a referendum, to be held after hostilities have ceased. Historians on either side of the dispute remain undecided as to whether the Maharaja signed the document after Indian troops had entered Kashmir (i.e. under duress) or if he did so under no direct military pressure.
Fighting continues through the second half of 1948, with the regular Pakistani army called upon to protect Pakistan's borders.
The war officially ends on January 1, 1949, when the United Nations arranges a ceasefire, with an established ceasefire line, a UN peacekeeping force and a recommendation that the referendum on the accession of Kashmir to India be held as agreed earlier. That referendum has yet to be held.
Pakistan controls roughly one-third of the state, referring to it as Azad (free) Jammu and Kashmir. It is semi-autonomous. A larger area, including the former kingdoms of Hunza and Nagar, is controlled directly by the central Pakistani government.
The Indian (eastern) side of the ceasefire line is referred to as Jammu and Kashmir.
Both countries refer to the other side of the ceasefire line as "occupied" territory.
1954 - The accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India is ratified by the state's constituent assembly.
1957 - The Jammu and Kashmir constituent assembly approves a constitution. India, from the point of the 1954 ratification and 1957 constitution, begins to refer to Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of the Indian union.
1963 - Following the 1962 Sino-Indian war, the foreign ministers of India and Pakistan - Swaran Singh and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto - hold talks under the auspices of the British and Americans regarding the Kashmir dispute. The specific contents of those talks have not yet been declassified, but no agreement was reached. In the talks, "Pakistan signified willingness to consider approaches other than a plebiscite and India recognised that the status of Kashmir was in dispute and territorial adjustments might be necessary," according to a declassified US state department memo (dated January 27, 1964).
1964 - Following the failure of the 1963 talks, Pakistan refers the Kashmir case to the UN Security Council.
1965 - India and Pakistan fight their second war. The conflict begins after a clash between border patrols in April in the Rann of Kutch (in the Indian state of Gujarat), but escalates on August 5, when between 26,000 and 33,000 Pakistani soldiers cross the ceasefire line dressed as Kashmiri locals, crossing into Indian-administered Kashmir.
Infantry, armour and air force units are involved in the conflict while it remains localised to the Kashmir theatre, but as the war expands, Indian troops cross the international border at Lahore on September 6. The largest engagement of the war takes place in the Sialkot sector, where between 400 and 600 tanks square off in an inconclusive battle.
By September 22, both sides agree to a UN mandated ceasefire, ending the war that had by that point reached a stalemate, with both sides holding some of the other's territory.
1966 - On January 10, 1966, Indian Prime Minister Lal Bahdaur Shastri and Pakistani President Ayub Khan sign an agreement at Tashkent (now in Uzbekistan), agreeing to withdraw to pre-August lines and that economic and diplomatic relations would be restored.
1971 - India and Pakistan go to war a third time, this time over East Pakistan. The conflict begins when the central Pakistani government in West Pakistan, led by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, refuses to allow Awami League leader Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, a Bengali whose party won the majority of seats in the 1970 parliamentary elections, to assume the premiership.
A Pakistani military crackdown on Dhaka begins in March, but India becomes involved in the conflict in
December, after the Pakistani air force launches a pre-emptive strike on airfields in India's northwest.
India then launches a coordinated land, air and sea assault on East Pakistan. The Pakistani army surrenders at Dhaka, and its army of more than 90,000 become prisoners of war. Hostilities lasted 13 days, making this one of the shortest wars in modern history.

East Pakistan becomes the independent country of Bangladesh on December 6, 1971. | Click here for more on the Kashmir conflict | |
1972 - Pakistani Prime Minister Zulifiqar Ali Bhutto and Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi sign an agreement in the Indian town of Simla, in which both countries agree to "put an end to the conflict and confrontation that have hitherto marred their relations and work for the promotion of a friendly and harmonious relationship and the establishment of a durable peace in the subcontinent". Both sides agree to settle any disputes "by peaceful means".
The Simla Agreement designates the ceasefire line of December 17, 1971, as being the new "Line-of-Control (LoC)" between the two countries, which neither side is to seek to alter unilaterally, and which "shall be respected by both sides without prejudice to the recognised position of either side".
1974 - The Kashmiri state government affirms that the state "is a constituent unit of the Union of India". Pakistan rejects the accord with the Indian government.
On May 18, India detonates a nuclear device at Pokhran, in an operation codenamed "Smiling Buddha". India refers to the device as a "peaceful nuclear explosive".
1988 - The two countries sign an agreement that neither side will attack the other's nuclear installations or facilities. These include "nuclear power and research reactors, fuel fabrication, uranium enrichment, isotopes separation and reprocessing facilities as well as any other installations with fresh or irradiated nuclear fuel and materials in any form and establishments storing significant quantities of radio-active materials".
Both sides agree to share information on the latitudes and longitudes of all nuclear installations. This agreement is later ratified, and the two countries share information on January 1 each year since then.
1989 - Armed resistance to Indian rule in the Kashmir valley begins. Muslim political parties, after accusing the state government of rigging the 1987 state legislative elections, form militant wings.
Pakistan says that it gives its "moral and diplomatic" support to the movement, reiterating its call for the earlier UN-sponsored referendum.
India says that Pakistan is supporting the insurgency by providing weapons and training to fighters, terming attacks against it in Kashmir "cross-border terrorism". Pakistan denies this.
Militant groups taking part in the fight in Kashmir continue to emerge through the 1990s, in part fuelled by a large influx of "mujahideen" who took part in the Afghan war against the Soviets in the 1980s.
1991 - The two countries sign agreements on providing advance notification of military exercises, manoeuvres and troop movements, as well as on preventing airspace violations and establishing overflight rules.
1992 - A joint declaration prohibiting the use of chemical weapons is signed in New Delhi.
1996 - Following a series of clashes, military officers from both countries meet at the LoC in order to ease tensions.
1998 - India detonates five nuclear devices at Pokhran. Pakistan responds by detonating six nuclear devices of its own in the Chaghai Hills. The tests result in international sanctions being placed on both countries. In the same year, both countries carry out tests of long-range missiles.
1999 - Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee meets with Nawaz Sharif, his Pakistani counterpart, in Lahore. The two sign the Lahore Declaration, the first major agreement between the two countries since the 1972 Simla Accord. Both countries reaffirm their commitment to the Simla Accord, and agree to undertake a number of 'Confidence Building Measures' (CBMs).
Some of the diplomatic gains are eroded, however, after the Kargil conflict breaks out in May. Pakistani forces and Kashmiri fighters occupy strategic positions on the Indian side of the LoC, prompting an Indian counter offensive in which they are pushed back to the other side of the original LoC.
Kargil is the first armed conflict between the two neighbours since they officially conducted nuclear weapons tests.
In October 1999, General Pervez Musharraf, the Pakistani chief of army staff, leads a military coup, deposing Nawaz Sharif, the then prime minister, and installing himself as the head of the government.
2001 - Tensions along the Line of Control remain high, with 38 people killed in an attack on the Kashmiri assembly in Srinagar. Following that attack, Farooq Abdullah, the chief minister of Indian-administered Kashmir, calls on the Indian government to launch a full-scale military operation against alleged training camps in Pakistan.
In July, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf and Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee meet for a two-day summit in the Indian city of Agra. That summit collapses after two days, with both sides unable to reach agreement on the core issue of Kashmir.
On December 13, an armed attack on the Indian parliament in New Delhi leaves 14 people dead. India blames Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Muhammad for the attacks.
The attacks lead to a massing of India's and Pakistan's militaries along the LoC. The standoff only ends in October 2002, after international mediation.
2002 - President Musharraf pledges that Pakistan will combat extremism on its own soil, but affirms that the country has a right to Kashmir.
2003 - After Musharraf calls for a ceasefire along the LoC during a UN General Assembly meeting in September, the two countries reach an agreement to cool tensions and cease hostilities across the defacto border.
2004 - Vajpayee and Musharraf hold direct talks at the 12th SAARC summit in Islamabad in January, and the two countries' foreign secretaries meet later in the year. This year marks the beginning of the Composite Dialogue Process, in which bilateral meetings are held between officials at various levels of government (including foreign ministers, foreign secretaries, military officers, border security officials, anti-narcotics officials and nuclear experts). In November, on the eve of a visit to Jammu and Kashmir, the new Indian prime minister, Manmohan Singh, announces that India will be reducing its deployment of troops there.
2006 - India redeploys 5,000 troops from Jammu and Kashmir, citing an "improvement" in the situation there, but the two countries are unable to reach an agreement on withdrawing forces from the Siachen glacier.
In September, President Musharraf and Prime Minister Singh agree to put into place an Indo-Pak institutional anti-terrorism mechanism.
2007 - On February 18, the train service between India and Pakistan (the Samjhauta Express) is bombed near Panipat, north of New Delhi. Sixty-eight people are killed, and dozens injured.
The fifth round of talks regarding the review of nuclear and ballistic missile-related CBMs is held as part of the Composite Dialogue Process. The second round of the Joint Anti-Terrorism Mechanism (JATM) is also held.
2008 - India joins a framework agreement between Turkmenistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan on a $7.6bn gas pipeline project. A series of Kashmir-specific CBMs are also agreed to (including the approval of a triple-entry permit facility).
In July, India blames Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) directorate for a bomb attack on the Indian embassy in Kabul, which kills 58 and injures another 141.
In September, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari and Indian Prime Minister Singh formally announce the opening of several trade routes between the two countries.
In October, cross-LoC trade commences, though it is limited to 21 items and can take place on only two days a week.
On November 26, armed gunmen open fire on civilians at several sites in Mumbai, India. The attacks on the Taj Mahal Palace & Tower, the Oberoi Trident Hotel, the Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, Leopold Cafe, Cama Hospital, Nariman House Jewish community centre, Metro Cinema, St Xavier's College and in a lane near the Times of India office, prompt an almost three-day siege of the Taj, where gunmen remain holed up until all but one of them are killed in an Indian security forces operation. More than 160 people are killed in the attacks.
Ajmal Kasab, the only attacker captured alive, says the attackers were members of Lashkar-e-Taiba.
In the wake of the attacks, India breaks off talks with Pakistan.
2009 - The Pakistani government admits that the Mumbai attacks may have been partly planned on Pakistani soil, while vigorously denying allegations that the plotters were sanctioned or aided by Pakistan's intelligence agencies.
Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and Indian Prime Minister Singh meet on the sidelines of a Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, issuing a joint statement charting future talks. Singh rules out, however, the resumption of the Composite Dialogue Process at the present time.
The Indian government continues to take a stern line with Pakistan, however, with its coalition government saying that it is up to Pakistan to take the first step towards the resumption of substantive talks by cracking down on militant groups on its soil.
In August, India gives Pakistan a new dossier of evidence regarding the Mumbai attacks, asking it to prosecute Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, the head of Jamaat-ud-Dawa, an Islamic charity with ties to Lashkar-e-Taiba.
2010 - In January, Pakistani and Indian forces exchange fire across the LoC in Kashmir, the latest in a string of such incidents that have led to rising tension in the area.
In February, India and Pakistan's foreign secretaries meet in New Delhi for talks. This meeting is followed by the two countries' foreign ministers meeting in Islamabad in July.
In May, Ajmal Kasab is found guilty of murder, conspiracy and of waging war against India in the Mumbai attacks case. He is sentenced to death.
2011 - In January, Indian Home Secretary GK Pillai says India will share information with Pakistan regarding the 2001 Samjhauta Express bombing. The two countries' foreign secretaries meet in Thimpu, Nepal, in February, and agree to resume peace talks "on all issues".

2012 - In November, India execute Pakistani national Mohammad Ajmal Kasab, the lone survivor of a fighter squad that killed 166 people in a rampage through the financial capital Mumbai in 2008, hanging him just days before the fourth anniversary of the attack.

2013 - In January, India and Pakistan trade accusations of violating the cease-fire in Kashmir, with Islamabad accusing Indian troops of a cross-border raid that killed a soldier and India charging that Pakistani shelling destroyed a home on its side.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Remos and Romolous

...were the children of Rhea Silvia and Mars (or in some variations the demi-god hero Hercules). Romulus and Remus are best known for being the founders of the city of Rome. Their story is recorded by many authors including Virgil who claims their birth and adventures were fated in order for Rome to be founded. The Birth & Parentage of Romulus & Remus Romulus and Remus were the direct descendants of Aeneas, whose fate-driven adventures to discover Italy are described by Virgil in The Aeneid. Romulus and Remus were related to Aeneas through their mother's father, Numitor. Numitor was a king of Alba Longa, an ancient city of Latium in central Italy, and father to Rhea Silvia. Before Romulus' and Remus' conception, Numitor's reign was usurped by Nimitor's younger brother, Amulius. Amulius inherited control over Alba Longa's treasury with which he was able to dethrone Numitor and become king. Amulius, wishing to avoid any conflict of power, killed Nimitor's male heirs and forced Rhea Silvia to become a Vestal Virgin. Vestal Virgins were priestesses of Vesta, patron goddess of the hearth; they were charged with keeping a sacred fire that was never to be extinguished and to take vows of chastity. There is much debate and variation as to whom was the father of Romulus and Remus. Some myths claim that Mars appeared and lay with Rhea Silvia; other myths attest that the demi-god hero Hercules was her partner. However, the author Livy claims that Rhea Silvia was in fact raped by an unknown...

Words: 1822 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Legend of Romulus and Remus

...brother and claim the throne as his. Rhea Silvia who was the daughter of Nimitor, was also the mother of Romulus and Remus. Amulius wanted to avoid conflict of power of any sort, and so he killed all his elder brother’s male heirs, Also to prevent from any more being born, he made Rhea Silvia become a Vestal Virgin. A Vestal Virgin is a priestess of Vesta, the patron goddess of the hearth, and they are out in charge of a so called ‘sacred’ fire that cannot, under any circumstances, be extinguished, and live a life of celibacy. Rhea Silvia was found to be pregnant, and the father of Romulus and Remus is not known for a fact. In the many different versions of the legend comes with different ideas of the father of the twins. The possible fathers could be Mars, God of War, or Hercules, the half god, but most likely what happened is that she was raped by an unknown man. To cover that the fact she might have been raped or some other circumstance, and to protect her life and the life of the unborn child (child; singular because at this time they could not tell if a woman was to have a multiple pregnancy), Rhea Silvia claimed that her pregnancy was of divine nature. Normally when a woman broke the vows of celibacy of being a Vestal Virgin they had to suffer punishment, and the punishment is death by being buried alive. Amulius believed that a god (Mars or Hercules) to be the father, and did not want to be punished for killing Rhea Silvia and the unborn child. So Amulius waited to...

Words: 1623 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Drilly: A Short Story

...Lilly dropped to the edge of the Aurium Pruritum. She shielded her eyes from the blinding green glow and the violent gusts within. Silvia and Paul both stared in, searching for those which the pit had claimed. Tickela’s screams of agony, those much louder than any of the others, echoed throughout the cyclone. “AAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!! NOOOOO!!!! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHSSSTTAAHAHAHAPP THIS AT ONCEEEEHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! I COMMAND YOU!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! SSSTTTAAHAHAHAHAHAHAPPP!!! PPPLLEEHEHEHEHAHAHAHAAASSEEEEE!!!” Tickela screamed. Her bellows ceased to be that of pain, quickly becoming that of the crippling ticklish assault against every nerve in her body. Her cries soon became one with the rest of those she committed to the...

Words: 2019 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Two Gentlemen of Verona

...Literary Criticism The Two Gentlemen of Verona The Two Gentlemen of Verona is a comedy about the adventures of two bosom buddies, Valentine and Proteus. When Proteus falls in love with his best friend's girlfriend, the guys find themselves torn between the bonds of male friendship and romance. (If you're thinking all this sounds like a modern day "bromantic comedy," you're right. Two Gentlemen of Verona is the great, great grandfather of buddy flicks like the 2009 comedy I Love You Man.) Written as early as 1590-91, Two Gentlemen appears to be William Shakespeare's first play. (As usual, some literary critics are divided over this issue, but we're going with the editors of The Norton Shakespeare and the editors of The Oxford Shakespeare on this one.) As Shakespeare's first theatrical effort, Two Gentlemenhas been referred to as a "limping forerunner" of Shakespeare's later works. Even famous literary scholar Harold Bloom says it's "the weakest of all Shakespeare's comedies." We, on the other hand, prefer to think of Two Gentlemen as Shakespeare's test kitchen, where a budding young playwright begins to work out the recipe for his "comedies" and begins to explore themes and conventions that he'll develop more fully in later works – particularly the themes of male friendship and heterosexual love, which come into conflict in plays like The Merchant of Veniceand also in Shakespeare's collection of Sonnets. Like all test kitchen creations, Two Gentlemen is far from perfect...

Words: 11043 - Pages: 45

Premium Essay

Poverty and Education

...in poverty because it helps them to understand the disadvantages of their poor life in comparison to the rich and shows that effective knowledge is the way to overcome poverty. Additionally, a proper education can inspire children to strive even harder for their success. In “The Lesson”, the author reveals to the reader the disadvantages of poverty in relationship to wealth through Ms. Moore's lesson. Ms. Moore chooses to take a group of children to the luxury FAO Schwarz toy store in order to show them the difference between rich and poor lives. She knows that the trip is only a chance to let children see another side of life in the same city and helps them realize the disadvantages of their poor life. Through the narration of Silvia, a leader of the group, a reader can imagine the low quality of the children’s lives. At the beginning of the trip Moore talks to the children about the value of money. She discusses the amount of money their parents make, and how much their lifestyle requires to spend: “So we heading down the street and she's boring us silly about what things cost and what our parents make and how much goes for rent.” (348). Moore points out the level of poverty in which the children live. It becomes more evident when the children describe their study areas at home. Just one of the children has a desk which can...

Words: 1624 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Transcultural Health Care Model Essay

...Talking with other parents that have access to certain family health care services that would be beneficial to their daughter would be a great help to them. They feel that they are not get a full care of family services and it's not only hurting their daughter's care but it is hurting the whole family dynamic. Finding out about different services offered to people who are a spanish speaking family and how to keep their family dynamic stable while caring for a child with needs that their daughter presents. They would also benefit from having a place to find work to accommodate the demands of their daughters schedule so that Juan's work hours aren't decreased. In addition , Juan and Silvia would benefit from their doctors speaking to them where they would be able to understand what is happening in regards to their daughter's treatment instead of speaking in medical jargon ; or having a translator in the room as they discuss her treatment and updates on the status of her health care. Without some type of family support the family structure and dynamic will fall apart. Leaving them struggling to take care of their daughter and themselves while continuing to live under the poverty...

Words: 651 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ivan Light The Night Case Study

...Ivan was only three-years-old when his father, Rovy, died. Rovy was sailing the Atlantic Ocean when a massive hurricane destroyed his boat. Ivan’s mother, Silvia, had to get two jobs to support Ivan and Rolando, Ivan’s bother. Soon after, Silvia could not support and raise the two children. Both kids were dropped off at the Safe Haven Orphanage. Here, they were under fed regularly and were homeschooled until both reached high school. When Rolando was a Freshman, he was hired by a rich, old couple to be a servant. Rolando was well taken care of and eventually adopted by the couple. Ivan, on the other hand, was never adopted. After he graduated, Ivan was forced to get a job at a local law firm as the garbage man. Ivan eventually decided to he wanted to be a lawyer. The professional...

Words: 932 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Jfjsdhfjlsdfhlsdjf; S

...grieta entre los dos amigos. Una conexión que se hizo en la película estaba corrompiendo la inocencia. Aunque los chicos se hicieron amigos muy rápidamente, ambos contienen inocencia, que ciega de ver la verdad. Pedro está celoso de la riqueza de Gonzalo, pero descubre que los padres de Gonzalo vive en desarmonía. Gonzalo es envidioso de un espíritu de Pedro, pero es repelido por su pobreza. Además, el vecino de Pedro, Silvia, también causo su romper de la inocencia. Silvia es retratado como una preciosa adolescente que es autosuficiente y fieramente defensiva de su propia vulnerabilidad. Ella introduce a ambos muchachos en el arte de hacer hacia fuera y causa la grieta final en amistades del chicos y de Gonzalo conciliar en la autoconciencia de su protegido y privilegiado de la vida. Otro tema que se presenta en la película es política. La película establece dentro de la confusión política de Chile de 1973, donde el ejercito chileno derrocó el vacilante gobierno socialista democráticamente electo presidente Salvador Allendé. También hay protestas que Silvia, Gonzalo, y Pedro...

Words: 408 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Emily S. Robinson Exit Test

...necklace on and continues to pray that she will pass. She is not ready to die. As they arrive, Emily is holding back her tears. Emily’s mom tells her good luck and gives her a kiss on her forehead. Emily tells her mom that she loves her and exits the car with tears in her eyes. As her mom is pulling away, her mom is sobbing with fear but she did not want Emily to see her cry. When Emily walks inside the building, she sits down in a chair and begins talking to the person next to her , a girl named Silvia. Silvia had just moved to New York City this year so she doesn't know much about this exit test. Emily had told her all about what this exit test means and why she is here. Silvia says it's way different compared to where she used to live. She says she used to live in California but they had to move to New York City because of her dad's job. Silvia’s family did not know anything about the new run government and how they wanted to make a new society of only intelligent people. Silvia continues to say that she is not really nervous for this test because she's never received even a ‘B’ or lower on her report cards. Emily ponders over this, how could someone never get lower than a ‘B’ on their report card. Emily has had many of those, including C’s. It is now 9:30 a.m., the instructor walk into the exit testing room and tell them that they have two hours to complete this exit test which includes 200 questions! The instructor explains in a gruff voice, that everyone needs at...

Words: 1268 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Law Offices of Jeter, Jackson, Guidry, and Boyer

...day-to-day office personnel and operations. A hiring committee was form and within two months Mr. Brad Howser filled the position. Brad Howser was a longtime administrator from the insurance industry whose hopes were to bring structure and organization to The Law Offices of Jeter, Jackson, Guidry and Boyer. Brad Howser first six months were spent observing, meeting staff, and reviewing the law firms history. The months to follow Brad sent an entirely different message with a authoritative autocratic style. His first move Brad made was internal. With a flex schedule already in place Brad was now requiring all personal to report to work from 9:00 to 5:00 each day. This causes a great problem with Silvia, an administrative assistant who’s been with the firm for several years. Silvia relied on the flex schedule to allow...

Words: 887 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

David Couto Family Interview Essay

...not remember himself having separation issues. His brother Daniel on the other hand, David vividly remembers crying and saying he did not want to leave all of his friends. Daniel was around the age of nine when they started their move to Angola. He did not understand that it was necessary to go there to have a better life because no kid at that age understands finances. Talking to Daniel briefly about his move to Angola put a new perspective on things because he remembered much more than David or Silvia did. He mostly spoke about the challenges he remembered having in school. Angola was behind in most subjects and their grades did not transfer right away. All three of the children were held back a grade until their report cards came and showed that they had been placed in the wrong grades. One thing David had stated one thing that he did remember was the fact that they were allowed to get an animal for the first time. Since he was the youngest, his brother Daniel and older sister Silvia got to pick out the family pet. With all the wild, crazy animals they could pick from they chose some sort of monkey. He remembered he got to pick the name, which was a big deal to him. David said that out of all the names everyone was telling him he chose “Mono”, which in translation means monkey. This monkey used to follow him to school even if he would lock him in the cage Mono would escape. Mono knew the way to and from school, and even the way to David’s mother's seamstress job. He said one...

Words: 1726 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Founding Myths Of Rome

...1: Discuss one of the two founding myths of Rome (You choose which), how did this affect the Roman attitude about themselves? In reference to Rome’s ancient mythology, the founding of Rome was based on two stories that empower their predecessor Romulus and Remus. Moreover, Romulus and Remus were the son of Rhea Silvia and Mars the God of war – which is a way to show that their blood came directly from a great leader. In other words, they were born to give orders and reign. Now, we came bring the implications of the myths; they had two myths which were related to the incident of their birth. Romulus and Remus’s mother Rhea Silvia was destined to be a priestess which requires her to be a virgin, due to the fact that she was no longer a virgin,...

Words: 338 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Similarities Between Fahrenheit 451 And Truman Burbank

...Guy Montag v.s. Truman Burbank So far in fahrenheit 451, the book tells the story of the protagonist, Guy Montag. Who, At first, takes pleasure in his profession as a fireman, burning illegally owned books and the homes of their owners. As he states at the beginning of the book,”It was a pleasure to burn.” He soon realizes that his “happy world” isn’t so happy when he meets Clarisse McClellan and she asks “Are you happy?” After viewing The Truman Show and reading a majority of Fahrenheit 451, many parallels can be drawn between the characters of Truman Burbank and Guy Montag. While some differences were noticeable, the similarities were very pronounced. Nobody actually cares. In Fahrenheit 451, all they care about is their "families" and/or...

Words: 391 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Turismo Racing Nissan History

...Nissan History,GTR,Silvia Nissan gran turismo racing’s have been around for the most part since 1957 and for most americans out of reach, because...

Words: 1293 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Test

...To: Jozko Mrkvicka MBA (jozef.mrkvicka@vratna-golf.eu) Subject: Recommendations – Spanish Business Etiquette Dear Mr. Mrkvicka, My name is Silvia Machanova and I work as assistant at PR Division in our company. I was asked by PR supervisor Mr. Novak to prepare the summary of Spanish business communication. Relationship and communication of Spanish people • Before making any decision and business negotiating Spaniards usually prefer to make relationship with business partner. As might be expected, the first meeting will be introductory to get to know each other. • In general, Spanish people prefer face-to-face contact rather than word form of communication. • Spain is hierarchical country and it is advisable to know and to have respect to the position of the person you are negotiating with. Probably, you will discuss with the people at the same level in the company like your own. However, the final decision is usually made by the top management of the company. • Verbal communication in Spain is quite loud, very emotional and theatrical with lots of gestures. This comes from the extrovert character of Spanish people; this way is showed their enthusiasm. Meeting Etiquette in Spain • Appointment should be made well in advance by mail, supported by telephone. Business meetings start on time and have formal language. Agenda is used but is not followed too strictly. • During introduction business partner usually shake their hands. • Printed material (including...

Words: 416 - Pages: 2