...Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) and Malcolm X were two fortunate African American leaders who fought for the freedom of Black America. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of a kind just like his “I Have a Dream “speech which explained the injustice and violation of freedom towards African Americans even after slavery had ended it also explains how he wants both African Americans and whites to unite as one. As to Malcolm X, his most famous speech was “God’s Judgement” which also explained the injustice towards the African American race but leans more towards the violent path rather than the peaceful way. Both characters have similarities and differences between their speeches like the imagery they each portray, the tone/mood they present, and the type of character that they each show throughout the speech. The imagery that both speeches portrayed was in a way much different. For Example, MLK’ s “I Have a Dream” speech was intended to portray a world where both African Americans and whites were united and together without judgment and...
Words: 543 - Pages: 3
...judged by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character.” This was famous and inspirational quote spoken by activist and pastor, Martin Luther King Jr. He played a major role in black history and fighting for equality for all races. When thinking of Martin Luther King Jr., another person with very similar qualities comes into mind, Former President, Barack Obama. Barack Obama was the 44th president of the United States who had many similar views and qualities to King’s. These two men have played a substantial role in shaping America into what it is today. Martin Luther King Jr. and Barack Obama both grew up in similar conditions and circumstances. They both raised in good conditions and grew up in households with their parents. Both men also came from middle class backgrounds. These two also graduated from some of the best universities in the Boston Area. Obama attended Harvard Law School in 1988 and graduated with great distinction in 1991. M.L.K. Jr. attended Boston University and was awarded his Ph.D. in 1955 when he was only 25 years old....
Words: 817 - Pages: 4
...The actions of what a person does determines whether or not they are a leader. Martin Luther King Jr. was an excellent impactful leader during the civil rights movement. Odysseus is a Greek hero who also leads as discussed in The Odyssey. However, in The Odyssey, Homer has Odysseus leading people into disaster with his selfishness. While Odysseus and Martin Luther King Jr possess similar leadership skills to lead people, Martin Luther King Jr was an iconic civil rights leader because he proclaimed his thoughts with peace and loyalty, rather than letting his hubris side affect him like Odysseus did when he was on his journey. Odysseus had power from being the king of Ithaca and the ability to lead a large group to follow him, Martin Luther King Jr also had capability to lead people to change and turn their way of thinking. In The Odyssey, Odysseus and his men were trapped with the...
Words: 835 - Pages: 4
...Civil disobedience is the act of refusal against laws, taxes, or demands by a government usually staying peaceful in nature. Martin Luther King Jr. and Antigone implement civil disobedience to defy unjust law; however, both approaches used to go against the wrong laws are different. Martin Luther King Jr. became the leader for the civil rights movement to put an end to segregation through civil disobedience by stressing the importance of peacefully protesting; while Antigone purposely went against the law, knowing the consequences, to follow God’s law instead of man-made law in a holy effort to bury her late brother Polyneices. Martin Luther King Jr. goes against unjust laws through civil disobedience by initiating peaceful protests. He believed that using nonviolent tactics are better at showing the immorality the unjust laws’ and calls for black people to fight the long battle against segregation. In Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter From Birmingham Jail”, he reveals the unjust treatment going on in Birmingham and why it is important for him to be there helping, “Actually, we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already...
Words: 1102 - Pages: 5
...Antigone vs Martin Luther King Jr in rhetoric Should we truly be punished for breaking laws that break moral code? According to Antigone and Martin Luther King Jr the answer appears to be no. They both defend their actions that break the rules yet favor different rhetorical devices. Throughout Antigone’s speech she seems to favor pathos to convey her reason to break a law. When explaining her actions she evokes the emotion in her audience by explaining what would have happened if she had follow the laws she would have allowed her “own mothers son to not”, then explains how it would “have been agony”, the perspective draws an emotional response that she hopes to use as empathy. When threatened death as a punishment she expresses that if she “is to die before her time” that she would “consider that a gain”. She again uses pathos to draw motion from the king by explaining that death would be worth her action. This adds a more dramatic moment which in turn causes more emotion. Unlike Antigone Martin Luther King Jr uses logic through logos to make his argument after being called an “extremist” he explains this is not always a bad thing....
Words: 440 - Pages: 2
...There has been many prominent figures in the American Civil Rights Movement. Some prominent figures include Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X. They both have their own viewpoints of social justice and how to achieve their goal. Martin Luther King, Jr. is more on the nonviolent side, while Malcolm X supports the use of violent if necessary. Malcolm X’s method of achieving social justice is more dominant than Martin Luther King, Jr.’s because Malcolm X’s method teaches people to use their available resources, to fight for what they believe in, and lastly use violence if it is necessary. Malcolm X’s method of achieving social justice teaches people to use available resources. He believes that people should do whatever they could to achieve what they want. Malcolm X indicates the term revolution meaning “a complete overturn-a complete change” (X). He is often called a revolutionist and agrees with the term because he wants change in the society. Malcolm X wants people to destroy the old system and replace it with a new system by all means. He says that “the Negro’s so-called “revolt” is merely an asking to be accepted into the existing system!” (X). Malcolm X, for the most part, is aiming for justice and equality just...
Words: 674 - Pages: 3
...Martin Luther King Jr. once said “Nonviolence means avoiding not only external physical violence but also internal violence of spirit. You not only refuse to shoot a man, but you refuse to hate him. To have hatred embedded in the heart and to act with violence was something that Martin Luther King didn’t believe in. He believed in love and peaceful protest was the way to go for change to happen.While on the other side, Malcolm X violence and non peaceful protests were the way to go to get your point across more efficiently. During the 1950s and 1960s, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X took two different approaches in an attempt to change the way society acted towards African Americans. Malcolm X chose a more aggressive yet passionate route for change. He believed that we shouldn’t just let Caucasian people treat African American the way they do. We should stand up for what and protect each other. King thought the exact opposite, he believed that violence solves problems temporarily and non violence has lasting results. Using violence to fight oppression isn’t ideal because it portrays the cause in a negative light, creates fear and anxiety within a community, and it doesn’t have lasting results....
Words: 517 - Pages: 3
...Martin Luther king Jr. and Fredrick Douglass both use their own skills in their speeches to prove how their freedom is nothing without equality. In Kings ” I Have a Dream” and Douglass’ “Address to Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society” they both use rhetorical and literary devices to express their thoughts of freedom and equality. Martin Luther king Jr. wanted not only blacks freedom, but to have equal rights like the rest of American citizens. A rhetorical device found in King's speech is an anaphora to make the listeners emphasis and remember what is being said. Martin Luther king states,” I have a dream “ about 8 times to demonstrate to the audience to get it through there head what his dream is, to have the world in the future to come...
Words: 535 - Pages: 3
...important than history. History allows us to relive the pass without being present at that time. There are many different historical figures that add value throughout time; however two of many that have made a significant impact to history are Dr. Martin Luther King and Malcom X. While both Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X were both prominent individuals to African American community and history, their choice of religion guided them to react to violence in a different way. Nevertheless, their names will forever be written in history for their actions that lead to change American as it is today. To begin, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was born in Atlanta, Georgia on January 15, 1929. King was the middle child two other siblings and also a Civil Rights Activist and Minister . Throughout his life, Dr. King studied and believed in Christianity. King attended college and studied in sociology. Later after graduating he studies in systematic theology for his doctoral degree. Although slavery was...
Words: 572 - Pages: 3
...pedestal as the primitive Caucasians were. Although we want to pursue the equality for the society, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Louis Menand show us how we must overcome the difficulties and publics’s resistance in order to finally achieve the goal of creating an equal and peaceful society. An individual can have a great impact on society by...
Words: 1008 - Pages: 5
...Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were very prominent African American individuals throughout the fight for equality in America. They fought for what they believed in but each in their own way. Their many different views and beliefs are easily a result of the environment they grew up in and the households they came from. MLK grew up in a middle class family and was well educated, while Malcolm X grew up in an underprivileged environment that was very hostile with poor education. Martin Luther King Jr. was always against violence throughout his entire struggle and he always stood his ground. Most importantly, even though he may have been physically attacked, he never reacted with violence. On the other hand, Malcolm X’s most famous line was “By any Means Necessary” he was willing to do whatever it took to fight against the oppressors, whether it is violent or non-violent. The more we learn about each of these men the more we...
Words: 831 - Pages: 4
...Martin Luther king Jr. and Malcolm X are both very important figures in the African American community. In fact, if asked to name one influential African American, undoubtedly one of these their names are going to come up. one In a time when changes were deemed now or never, these two leaders fought for what they believed in. While the political ideologies of leaders Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X were different towards their approach to government policies and violence, they were also similar in their apprehension for the immediate need for civil rights for African Americans. It is said that people are the product of their environment, and this holds true in regards to the upbringing of Martin Luther King and Malcom X. According to Baer Hans, “King grew up in a middle class family and was well educated. While Malcom X grew up in an underprivileged environment that was very hostile with barely any schooling” According to the documentary the Eyes on the prize-the time has come, Kings approach to civil rights and equality was throught “non violence”...
Words: 513 - Pages: 3
...Must we conform to our government’s view on everything? Martin Luther King Jr. and John Locke argue that we do not have to. Civil disobedience and rebellion is justified, particularly in the United States. Locke and King support their view with a variety of arguments. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, views any kind of rebellion as unacceptable. This essay will review the effectiveness of both positions, but in the end civil disobedience is justified in the United States. John Locke argues that resistance against one's government is acceptable under certain circumstances. Locke believes that we have God-given rights,which are: life, liberty, limb, health, and property. If at any point our government fails to protect those rights then we are allowed to step in in a non-violent way. It is up to the individual to enforce own executive power. Martin Luther King Jr.’s argument is very similar. He discusses multiple biblical figures. They fought for what they believed in an a non-violent, yet extreme way. King says: “... Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth and goodness, and thereby rose above his environment. Perhaps the South, the nation and the world are in dire need of creative...
Words: 611 - Pages: 3
...There were many leaders before and still there are many. Some important leaders you should know about are Martin Luther King Jr. and Rigoberta Menchu. They shared many similarities and differences between each other. Martin Luther King Jr. and Rigoberta Menchu were great leaders. They both were very hardworking by them both doing many strikes and speaking up for themselves. Martin and Rigoberta both won the Nobel Peace Prize. Martin Luther King Jr. and Rigoberta both spoke for themselves many times like when he wrote “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” in which he explained why he believed in nonviolence. Rigoberta Menchu also wrote a book about her struggle and the Mayan community’s problems called, “I, Rigoberta Menchu.” Rigoberta and Martin both wanted to end racism and freedom of speech....
Words: 417 - Pages: 2
...The battle between natural law and human law is very present , a described in, A Letter From Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr., and Antigone by Sophocles. In both tales, two minorities fight to overcome the great power of human law in order to do right by the almighty power of natural law. As well as the struggle to enforce natural law, the feat to restore universal humanity to society is an immense focus point throughout both, A Letter From Birmingham Jail, and Antigone. Both are tales that live on for ages due to the great virtue represented within each. “We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” (Martin Luther King Jr., Letter From Birmingham...
Words: 514 - Pages: 3
